Relieving Sore Throat Formula Exerts a Therapeutic Effect on Pharyngitis through Immunoregulation and NF-κB Pathway.

Relieving Sore Throat Formula (RSTF) is a formula approved by the China Food and Drug Administration and has been used for the treatment of pharyngitis in clinic for many years. However, the potential pharmacological mechanism still remains unknown. We combined multiple methods including bioinformatics data digging, network pharmacology analysis, and pathway analysis to predict the potential target of RSTF. We verified our in silico prediction results with an in vivo/vitro antibacterial effect test, mouse phagocytic index test, proliferation, transformation, and migration of mouse spleen lymphocytes. Alteration of NF-κB pathway was determined by Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and PCR. The in vivo experiments demonstrated that the RSTF could significantly relieve the symptoms of pharyngitis. A rat saliva secretion test showed that RSTF can effectively relieve the xerostomia symptom. A phenol red excretion test showed that RSTF has an eliminating phlegm effect. A hot plate method and granuloma experiment proved that RSTF also have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In silico prediction demonstrates that 70 active compounds of RSTF were filtered out through ADME screening and 84 putative targets correlated with different diseases. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that the candidate targets were mostly related to the response to bacteria and immunity signalling pathways, which are known contributors to pharyngitis. Experimental results confirmed that RSTF exerted therapeutic effects on pharyngitis mainly by antibacterial effect and downregulation of NF-κB activities. It is demonstrated both in silico and in vivo/vitro that RSTF exerted therapeutic effects on pharyngitis mainly through an antibiotic effect and downregulation of NF-κB signalling pathway.

What do Clinicians Perceive as a Successful "Trial of Fluids"?: A Secondary Assessment of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore physician perceptions of the amount of fluid that demonstrates a successful "trial of fluids" (adequate fluid intake) in the emergency department in children who have had insufficient fluid intake at home. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of viscous lidocaine versus placebo in children aged 6 months to 8 years with acute infectious ulcerative mouth conditions (gingivostomatitis, ulcerative pharyngitis, or hand foot and mouth disease) and poor oral fluid intake. We measured the amount of fluid ingested in 60 minutes after administration of the intervention and related physician perception of adequate intake to measured intake. Given that there was little difference in oral intake between the treatment groups, the 2 arms were pooled for this analysis. RESULTS: One hundred participants were recruited (50 per treatment group), all of whom completed the 60-minute trial period. At baseline, 72% were mildly dehydrated, 21% were not dehydrated, and 5% were moderately dehydrated. The participants drank a median of 8.6 mL/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7-14). Clinicians perceived 58% of the participants to have an adequate intake within the first hour after intervention. The median consumption of those whose oral intake was deemed as adequate was 12.6 mL/kg (IQR, 9.4-18.4); for those whose oral intake was not deemed adequate, the median consumption was 2.7 mL/kg (IQR, 0.7-5.3) (rank sum, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In children undergoing trial of fluids, we found that most clinicians perceived a fluid intake greater than 9 mL/kg as adequate and lower than 5 mL/kg as inadequate.

Grisel's syndrome, a rare cause of anomalous head posture in children: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous head posture (AHP) or torticollis is a relatively common condition in children. Torticollis is not a diagnosis, but it is a sign of underlying disease. Grisel's syndrome (GS) is a rare condition of uncertain etiology characterized by a nontraumatic atlanto-axial subluxation (AAS), secondary to an infection in the head and neck region. It has not been considered, in ophthalmological papers, as a possible cause of AHP. CASE PRESENTATION: A case of AAS secondary to an otitis media is studied. The children showed neck pain, head tilt, and reduction in neck mobility. The patient had complete remission with antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapy and muscle relaxants. Signs of GS should always be taken into account during ophthalmological examination (recent history of upper airway infections and/or head and neck surgeries associated to a new onset of sudden, painful AHP with normal ocular exam). In such cases it is necessary to require quick execution of radiological examinations (computer tomography and/or nuclear magnetic resonance), which are essential to confirm the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: GS is a multidisciplinary disease. We underline the importance of an accurate orthoptic and ophthalmological examination. Indeed, early detection and diagnosis are fundamental to achieve proper management, avoid neurological complications and lead to a good prognosis.

ED triage pain protocol reduces time to receiving analgesics in patients with painful conditions.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that collaborative nursing protocols initiated in triage improve emergency department (ED) throughput and decrease time to treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to determine if an ED triage pain protocol improves time to provision of analgesics. METHODS: Retrospective data abstracted via electronic medical record of patients at a safety net facility with 67 000 annual adult visits. Patients older than 18 years who presented to the ED between March 1, 2011, and May 31, 2013, with 1 of 6 conditions were included: back pain, dental pain, extremity trauma, sore throat, ear pain, or pain from an abscess. A 3-month orientation to an ED nurse-initiated pain protocol began on March 1, 2012. Nurses administered oral analgesics per protocol, beginning with acetaminophen or ibuprofen and progressing to oxycodone. Preimplementation and postimplementation analyses examined differences in time to analgesics. Multivariable analysis modeled time to analgesics as a function of patient factors. RESULTS: Over a 27-month period, 23 409 patients were included: 13 112 received pain medications and 10 297 did not. A total of 12 240 (52%) were male, 12 578 (54%) were African American, and 7953 (34%) were white, with a mean (SD) age of 39 years (13 years). The pain protocol was used in 1002 patients. There was a significant change in mean time (minutes) to provision of analgesics between preimplementation (238) and postimplementation (168) (P < .0001). Linear regression showed the protocol-delivered medications to younger patients and of lower acuity in a reduced time. Variables not related to time to provision of medication included sex, payer, and race. CONCLUSION: Emergency department triage pain protocol decreased time to provision of pain medications and did so without respect to payer category, sex, or race.

Efficacy and tolerability of an ectoine mouth and throat spray compared with those of saline lozenges in the treatment of acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis: a prospective, controlled, observational clinical trial.

The aim of this observational trial was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a mouth and throat spray containing ectoine in the treatment of acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis. The outcome was compared with control treatment using saline lozenges. This study was designed as a prospective, controlled, non-randomized, observational multicenter clinical trial and was conducted in Germany. The study population consisted of 95 patients. The decision for treatment with either spray or lozenges was based on the patients' preference for pharyngeal or oral application. Investigators assessed symptoms specific to acute pharyngitis/laryngitis and determined the pharyngitis symptom score. Both patients and investigators evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of the treatment applied. Treatment with the spray showed higher efficacy, 1.95 ± 0.81 versus 1.68 ± 0.67 (investigators) and 1.97 ± 0.88 versus 1.57 ± 0.69 (patients, p < 0.05). Treatment with the spray resulted in significantly greater reduction of cervical lymph node swelling (p < 0.05), ∆ spray = 0.44 ± 0.62, ∆ lozenges = 0.21 ± 0.62. The lozenges showed some advantage in relieving cough, ∆ lozenges = 0.62 ± 0.94 versus ∆ spray = 0.44 ± 0.85. Both patients and investigators rated the tolerability of both medical devices as "good" to "very good". Adverse events of mild to moderate severity were either possibly related or not related to the medical devices used. No serious adverse events occurred. Taken together, while the tolerability was consistent in both treatment groups, the ectoine-based spray showed superior efficacy in treating acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis.

Efficacy of disintegrating aspirin in two different models for acute mild-to-moderate pain: sore throat pain and dental pain.

A recently developed fast-release aspirin tablet formulation has been evaluated in two different pain models. The dental impaction pain model and the sore throat pain model are widely used for assessing analgesia, including acute mild-to-moderate pain. Both studies were double-blind, randomized, parallel group and compared a single dose of 1000 mg aspirin with 1000 mg paracetamol and with placebo and investigated the onset and overall time course of pain relief. Speed of onset was measured by the double-stopwatch method for time to meaningful pain relief and time to first perceptible pain relief. Pain intensity and pain relief were rated subjectively over a 6-h (dental pain) and 2-h (sore throat pain) time period. In both models fast-release aspirin and commercial paracetamol were statistically significantly different from placebo for onset of action, summed pain intensity differences and total pain relief. Meaningful pain relief was achieved within a median of 42.3 and 42.9 min for aspirin and paracetamol, respectively, in the dental pain model. The corresponding numbers in sore throat pain were 48.0 and 40.4 min. All treatments in both studies were safe and well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported and no subject was discontinued due to an adverse event. Overall the two studies clearly demonstrated efficacy over placebo in the two pain models and a comparable efficacy and safety profile between aspirin and an equivalent dose of paracetamol under the conditions of acute dental pain and acute sore throat pain. Trial registration These trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT01420094, registration date: July 27, 2011 and registration number: NCT01453400, registration date: October 13, 2011.

Correlation between aerosol therapy in early childhood and Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation.

AIM: To evaluate the correlation between the use of aerosol therapy in early childhood and the presence of Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH). STUDY DESIGN: a retrospective case-control study in which a group (cases) consisted of children from 6 to 13 years with MIH visited at the unit of Pediatric Dentistry of the Policlinico Tor Vergata (Rome, Italy), and a group (controls) consisted of an equal number of children of the same age without MIH. Data about the aerosol therapy and the presence of MIH were obtained respectively by medical history and intraoral clinical examination. Collected data underwent statistical analysis using mainly non-parametric tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: In the study were included 182 patients, of which 91 (46 males, 51%) were children with MIH (cases), and 91 (46 males, 51%) were children without MIH (controls). In the group of patients with MIH, in the early childhood, 12 (13.1%) never had aerosol therapy, 6 (6.6%) underwent aerosol therapy less than 7 days per year, 22 (24.2%) from 8 to 15 days per year, 22 (24.2%) from 16 to 45 days a year, and 29 (31.9%) more than 45 days per year. In the control group, in the early childhood, 9 (9.9%) never had aerosol therapy, 29 (31.9%) underwent aerosol therapy less than 7 days per year, 26 (28.6%) from 8 to 15 days per year, 20 (22.0%) from 16 to 45 days a year and 7 (7.6%) more than 45 days per year. STATISTICS: the risk of developing MIH in children undergoing intensive use of aerosol therapy with respect to those receiving a less intensive use resulted in an odds ratio of 3.19 (p <0.001) in the general population, 4.83 (p < 0.001) in males and was not statistically significant in females (p = 0.132). The Spearman correlation between aerosol therapy and MIH was 0.278 (p < 0.001) in the general population, 0.372 (p < 0.001) in male, and it was not statistically significant (p = 0.08) in female subjects. CONCLUSION: Aerosol therapy carried out in early childhood appears to be a risk factor for the development of MIH, particularly in male subjects.

Benzydamine hydrochloride on postoperative sore throat: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Sore throat is a common postoperative complaint. The etiology of postoperative sore throat (POST) is considered the result of damage to airway mucosa after insertion of a laryngeal mask airway device or endotracheal tube. This paper proposes benzydamine hydrochloride (BH), a topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with additional analgesic and local anesthetic properties, for POST prevention. SOURCE: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE™, Cochrane, and other relevant databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the outcome of topical application of BH vs non-application in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Using a random effects model, meta-analyses were conducted to assess the relative risks of the incidence of POST within 24 hr following the surgical procedure. The secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting, dry mouth, coughing, and local irritation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We reviewed five trials that included 824 patients in total. Our results indicated that the incidence of POST was significantly reduced in the BH group, with risk ratios (RRs) of 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20 to 0.68) at zero to one hour, 0.39 (95% CI: 0.27 to 0.57) at one to two hours, 0.42 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.81) at four to six hours, 0.29 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.88) at six to 12 hr, and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.56) at 12 to 24 hr, compared with the control groups. Patients reported local irritation, but no major BH-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the incidence of POST can be significantly reduced by prophylactic BH topical application to the oral cavity or airway devices. Further RCTs are required to overcome the limitations of heterogeneity and to determine the optimal dosage and application of BH for managing POST.

[Effects of dezocine on postoperative sore throat after maxillofacial procedures: a comparison with flurbiprofen axetil].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between dezocine and flurbiprofen axetil on postoperative sore throat (POST) after maxillofacial procedures. METHODS: In the study, 90 adult patients with maxillofacial diseases were divided randomly into control group (group C), flurbiprofen group (group F) and dezocine group (group D). Physiological saline, flurbiprofen axetil (1 mg/kg) and dezocine (0.1 mg/kg) were administered intravenously for each group 30 minutes before the end of the operation. We recorded visual analogue scale (VAS) and Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) at the time points of 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h after extubation. RESULTS: The incidence of POST in group D decreased significantly (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the incidences of groups F and C. The VAS of group F was lower than that of group C (P < 0.01) just at the time points of 0.5 h and 1 h after extubation, from then on, there was no difference between the 2 groups. The VAS of group D was lower than that of group F, and the BCS was higher than that of group F significantly. CONCLUSION: Dezocine has notable analgesia effect for postoperative sore throat, so it is a better choice to carry out postoperative analgesia after maxillofacial procedures.

Comparison of adherence between twice- and thrice-daily regimens of oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few studies have analysed adherence with antibiotic treatment in patients with respiratory tract infections. The aim of this study was to compare the compliance of patients taking a pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid twice daily with that of patients taking the standard formulation thrice daily. METHODS: Patients with suspected bacterial lower respiratory tract infections, pharyngitis and dental infections were included. Adherence was assessed by electronic monitoring, which recorded every opening of the patient's bottle of pills. The outcome variables were compliance with taking the medication, taking the correct dose and with timing of the dose. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were enrolled (167 in the thrice-daily group and 73 in the twice-daily group). The percentage of doses taken was greater with the twice-daily regimen (84.5 ± 22.8%) than with the thrice-daily regimen (72.7 ± 20.1%; P < 0.001). Forty patients in the twice-daily group opened the container every 12 ± 6 h during at least 80% of the course (54.8%), while only 19.6% of the patients assigned to the thrice-daily formulation did so every 8 ± 4 h (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who opened the container a satisfactory number of times per day was significantly higher among those taking the twice-daily regimen on days three, four, five, six and seven. Moreover, the thrice-daily group more frequently forgot to take the afternoon dose. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of compliance with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid therapy was very low. However, compliance with the new formulation that is taken twice-daily was significantly better.

Benzydamine hydrochloride for the treatment of sore throat and irritative/inflammatory conditions of the oropharynx: a cross-national survey among pharmacists and general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Benzydamine for oromucosal use is indicated in the relief of pain and irritation of the mouth and throat. It is an indazole derivative, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, with combined local anesthetic and analgesic properties, and antiseptic activity, marketed under the brand name "Tantum Verde". The aim of this study was to explore knowledge and prescriptive/advising attitudes among general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists (PHs) with regard to the topical treatment of sore throat and other irritative/inflammatory conditions of the oropharynx, with a focus on benzydamine. These findings could be important to increase awareness on benzydamine efficacy in sore throat and stomatological conditions, and to reinforce knowledge on the characteristics of benzydamine and its mechanisms of action among healthcare professionals (pediatricians, otolaryngologists, oncologists, etc.). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire survey was performed among PHs and GPs in four European countries (Italy, Germany, Russia and Poland). RESULTS: Both GPs and PHs proved to have an excellent knowledge and mastery of the constituents effective against oral symptoms. Among all the principles, benzydamine hydrochloride is the most recognized as certainly suitable for the topical treatment of sore throat symptoms and various inflammatory/irritative conditions of the oral cavity. It is recommended by about 90% of PHs and prescribed by 80% of GPs, mainly to solve the ailments caused by sore throats and stomatitis, especially for its anti-inflammatory, analgesic and anesthetic characteristics. Also in the pediatric field, benzydamine hydrochloride is recommended: among GPs, a high percentage (about 40%) prescribes it like the remedies based on dichlorobenzyl alcohol-sodium benzoate, which are instead more often recommended by PHs (44% against 37%). CONCLUSION: Although the public has a lot of confidence in this treatment, GPs and PHs do not recommend/prescribe benzydamine as a first-line treatment of sore throat and other irritative/inflammatory conditions of the oropharynx. To increase the knowledge of benzydamine among these healthcare professionals, it would be important to emphasize its characteristics and the different irritative/inflammatory conditions of the oropharynx in which it can be used.

[Estimation of efficacy of Hexalyse used for the treatment of acute pharyngitis].

The objective of the present study was to elucidate the relationship between the activity of the interferon system at the local level and the frequency of the development of relapses of acute inflammation of pharyngeal mucosa. The secondary objective was to estimate the possibility, necessity, and efficacy of the correction of the abnormal local immune response with the use of immunomodulatory agents. A total of 45 patients presenting with acute pharyngitis were available for the examination. They were allocated to two groups comprised of 25 and 20 patients respectively. Those in group 1 were given Hexalyse, a composite preparation for the local application. The patients of group 2 were treated with Strepsils. The study included general and specialized otorhinological examination as well as the evaluation of interferon production at the local level by measuring (using immunoenzyme assay) the concentration of interferon-alpha in the saliva before and on days 3 and 5 after the initiation of therapy. It was shown that the adaptive mechanisms of pharyngeal mucosa in acute pharyngitis are realized through activation of the interferon system. Elimination of the inflammatory process was accompanied by normalization of interferon-alpha level in the saliva regardless of the therapeutic modality used. One third of the patients presenting with acute pharyngitis suffered insufficiency of interferon production. It is concluded that the inclusion of an immunomodulatory agent, such as Hexalyse, in the combined treatment of such patients activates biosynthesis of interferon-alpha and leads to the reduction in the frequency of relapses of the disease. The results of the study of the relationship between the concentration of interferon-alpha in the saliva, the duration of acute pharyngitis, and the frequency of its post-treatment relapses were used to develop the practical recommendations for the prescription of Hexalyse for the treatment of patients with this pathology.

Limosilactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 and DSM 17938 as adjuvants to improve evolution of pharyngitis/tonsillitis in children: randomised controlled trial.

Pharyngitis and tonsillitis are the most common acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children aged ≤5 years. The analysis of published data showed that some probiotics could decrease the frequency and number of days with ARIs. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 and DSM 17938 to reduce the duration and severity of ARI symptoms. This randomised controlled trial included children aged from 6 months to 5 years, with pharyngitis or tonsillitis, who were randomised to receive a probiotic product containing L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 and L. reuteri DSM 17938 or placebo, as drops, ingested orally for 10 days as adjuvants to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The main outcomes were the duration and severity of ARI symptoms. The secondary outcomes were changes in salivary immunoglobulin A and inflammatory biomarkers. There was no fever on day 2 and subsequent days in the L. reuteri group (37.3 ±0.5 °C vs 38.6±0.3 °C, P<0.05). Beginning on day 3, the severity of sore throat (5±0.9 vs 8±1.2, P<0.05) was lower in the L. reuteri group. Significant differences in the days with runny nose, nasal congestion, days of non-programmed visits to the medical office or emergency department, levels in tumoral necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and related costs of treatment were observed in the L. reuteri group. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the groups. Therefore, L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 combined with L. reuteri DSM 17938 is a safe and effective adjunct to reduce the symptoms of pharyngitis or tonsillitis in children.

Scintigraphy can be used to compare delivery of sore throat formulations.

AIMS: Sore throat (pharyngitis) is commonly treated with over-the-counter lozenges, tablets, sprays and gargles. While the efficacy of the active ingredients has been examined, less is known about the comparative efficacy of the different delivery formats. METHODS: A pilot study was initially performed, followed by an open-label, four-way crossover study in healthy volunteers to quantitatively assess the delivery efficacy of a lozenge, tablet, spray and gargle, using technetium-99m and scintigraphy as a marker of deposition and clearance of the active ingredients. RESULTS: Initial deposition in the mouth and throat combined was significantly greater for the solid dose forms (lozenge and tablet) than for the spray or gargle. Rates of clearance were initially similar for the tablet and lozenge with low levels of radioactivity present at up to 2 h. At 10 and 20 min, significantly more of the dose remained for the lozenge than for the tablet. The mouth appeared to act as a reservoir for continued clearance to the throat. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Scintigraphy is an effective means of quantifying the delivery efficiency, and hence availability, of sore throat medications. The results presented here suggest that both lozenges and tablets offer considerable advantages over sprays or gargles, both in terms of proportion of the dose delivered to the mouth and throat, combined, and clearance from these regions. These delivery formats provide fast, effective and prolonged delivery of active ingredients, highlighting their potential benefits for sore throat medication.

A case of pharyngitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Throat cultures from an adult pharyngitis patient yielded Streptococcus pneumoniae as a single organism, with a very high bacterial count. The isolate was found to be macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistant, and the same strain was cultured from the patient's denture washing solution. Ceftriaxone therapy, a gradual reduction in the bacterial count and progressive clinical improvement proceeded at the same pace, so we labelled this clinical case as a pneumococcal pharyngitis.

[A multicenter randomized controlled study on the treatment of acute and chronic pharyngitis with Binglianqingye Spray].

Objective:To further evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Binglianqingye Spray on acute and chronic pharyngitis by clinical observation. Method:A randomized, double-blind and multicenter clinical trial which served Jinsangzi Tablet and Jinhoujian Spray as the control groups was conducted to observe the effect of Binglianqingye Spray on 360 patients with acute and chronic pharyngitis. Result:Binglianqingye Spray could significantly improve the symptoms with the exact clinical efficacy of the acute pharyngitis or chronic pharyngitis, such as sore throat, pharyngeal mucosa and uvula, dry throat burning, headache, cough, pharynx posterior wall lymphoid follicles hyperemia swelling and mandibular angle lymph node swelling and so on, but it occasionally occurred urine abnormalities and urine sugar adverse reactions. At the same time, the taste satisfaction was 82.1%. Conclusion:The combined effects of Binglianqingye Spray on the treatment of acute pharyngitis or chronic pharyngitis are well, the adverse reaction is rare and the patient's compliance is high.

Predicting local drug availability of locally acting lozenges: From method design to a linear level A IVIVC.

Lozenges are commonly applied in the treatment of sore throat. They often contain drugs intended to exert their effect locally in the oral cavity and throat. In the recent past, an increasing interest in development of generic products for locally acting lozenges could be noted. However, it was not clear, if therapeutic equivalence of locally applied, locally acting lozenges can be predicted based on results from in vitro studies. The aim of the present study was to determine an in vitro model that enables the assessment of local availability and bioequivalence of locally acting lozenges. Two novel in vitro dissolution setups (prototypes I and II) developed for simulating parameters relevant to drug release in the oral cavity, were screened for their biopredictivity. In the first step of the respective study in vitro mass loss and drug release of two marketed flurbiprofen lozenge formulations was determined. Then, an in vivo sucking study was performed to determine in vivo mass loss of the lozenges in 12 healthy volunteers. In the final step in vivo mass loss was correlated with in vitro mass loss resulting in a point to point (level A) correlation both lozenge formulations when using in vitro data obtained in the prototype II-based in vitro setup indicating biopredictivity of this in vitro model.

Systematic review of factors contributing to penicillin treatment failure in Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis.

OBJECTIVE: Review the evidence for various explanations for microbiologic treatment failure following use of penicillin in group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis. DATA SOURCE: Systematic review of the literature based on Medline and EMBASE searches, and review of reference lists of included studies. RESULTS: The explanations for penicillin treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis include 1) carrier state, 2) lack of compliance, 3) recurrent exposure, 4) in vivo copathogenicity of beta-lactamase-producing normal pharyngeal flora, 5) in vivo bacterial coaggregation, 6) poor antibiotic penetration to tonsillopharyngeal tissue, 7) in vivo eradication of normal protective flora, 8) early initiation of antibiotic therapy resulting in suppression of an adequate host immune response, 9) intracellular localization of GAS, 10) GAS tolerance to penicillin, 11) contaminated toothbrushes or orthodontic appliances, and 12) transmission from the family pet. There is very little type I or II evidence to support any of the above-cited explanations for treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis; available studies are mostly observational (in patients) or laboratory-based without clinical confirmation. CONCLUSION: Multiple explanations have been offered by investigators to explain penicillin treatment failures in GAS tonsillopharyngitis, but the evidence base to support the proposed explanations is generally weak by current standards. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanism(s) of penicillin treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis.

Comparative study of salivary pH and volume in adults with chronic laryngopharyngitis by gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is the most prevalent digestive disease of the modern society and has been associated with abnormalities in the larynx and pharynx (LPR). Nonetheless, little is known about the mechanisms involved in this atypical form of the disease. Contradictory clinical data suggest a defense deficit at this segment. Saliva with its organic and inorganic components is responsible for the homeostasis of the oral mucosa and the digestive tract. Salivary pH and volume abnormalities have been linked to laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD and LPR. In a recent study we demonstrated significant salivary pH reduction in patients with LPR. Another study found correlation between reduced salivary pH and volume directly related to esophageal pH-metry results. AIM: To evaluate salivary pH and volume before and after clinical treatment of LPR. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty-three adults with LPR had total fasting saliva tested before and after a 12-week course of oral proton pump inhibitor. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in salivary pH before and after treatment with increase of pH values after control of the disease (p<0.001). Salivary volumes of treated patients were also significantly higher than in pre-treated patients (p=0.009). DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that salivary pH and volume are influenced by the presence of gastroesophageal contents and that salivary pH monitoring can potentially become a cost-effective method for diagnosing and controlling LPR.