Analgesic Effects and Adverse Reactions of Lidocaine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Patients Undergoing Open Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients who underwent open hepatectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. METHODS: A total of 281 patients who underwent open hepatectomy from July 2018 to December 2018 were included. All patients were assigned into two groups: the lidocaine group (PCIA consisted of lidocaine, sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron) and the control group (PCIA consisted of sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron). The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications (including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, numbness of the corners of the mouth, dizziness) between the groups were compared. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences between the characteristics, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and recovery of postoperative activity between the two groups. In the first 3 days after the operation, the postoperative VAS score of the lidocaine group was lower than that of the control group at resting state, while after activity, the postoperative VAS contrast results were completely opposite. In particularly, the resting state at 48 hours (h) (1.05 ± 1.25 vs 1.57 ± 1.54) after surgery and the activity state at 72 h (3.02 ± 1.51 vs 2.2 ± 1.66) after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidence of mouth numbness and dizziness were significantly increased in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of lidocaine in PCIA was not beneficial to improve the pain during activities and increased the incidence of perioral numbness and dizziness.

The orange-III study: the use of preoperative laxatives prior to liver surgery in an enhanced recovery programme, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the effect of preoperative macrogol on gastrointestinal recovery and functional recovery after liver surgery combined with an enhanced recovery programme in a randomized controlled setting. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either 1 sachet of macrogol a day, one week prior to surgery versus no preoperative laxatives. Postoperative management for all patients was within an enhanced recovery programme. The primary outcome was recovery of gastrointestinal function, defined as Time to First Defecation. Secondary outcomes included Time to Functional Recovery. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and September 2016, 82 patients planned for liver resection were included in the study, 39 in the intervention group and 43 in the control group. Median Time to First Defecation was 4.0 days in the intervention group (IQR 2.8-5.0) and 4.0 days in the control group (IQR 2.9-5.0), P = 0.487. Median Time to Functional Recovery was day 6 (IQR 4.0-8.0) in the intervention group and day 5 (IQR 4.0-7.5) in the control group, P = 0.752. No significant differences were seen in complication rate, reinterventions or mortality. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial showed no advantages of 1 sachet of macrogol preoperatively combined with an enhanced recovery programme, for patients undergoing liver surgery.

Effects of preoperative dental examination and oral hygiene instruction on surgical site infection after hepatectomy: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study retrospectively investigated relationships among risk factors and post-hepatectomy surgical site infection (SSI) and other complications in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We included 334 patients who underwent hepatectomies for liver cancers between January 2011 and December 2015 in this study. We evaluated risk factors for SSI and other post-hepatectomy complication, including demographic factors, preoperative factors, and preoperative intervention including oral management, perioperative factors, and length of hospital stay, with univariate and multivariate analyses. The oral management intervention included self-care instructions, extraction of infected teeth, removal of dental plaques and calculus (scaling), professional mechanical teeth cleaning, removal of tongue coating, and cleaning of dentures. SSI was defined in accordance with the guideline issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; it included purulent discharge from any incision or organ space within 30 days postoperatively, with or without microbiological evidence. Complications of grade II or greater, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were regarded as postoperative complications. RESULTS: We found bacterial infection of ascites (Odds ratio (OR) = 13.72), lack of preoperative oral management intervention (OR = 10.17), and severe liver fibrosis (OR = 2.76) to be associated with SSI and severe liver fibrosis (OR = 2.28), hypoalbuminemia (OR = 2.02), blood transfusion (OR = 1.86), and longer operation time (OR = 1.80) to be associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative oral management may reduce the risk of SSI in patients with HCC who undergo hepatectomy.

Evaluation of adhesion barrier types in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after hepatectomy creates problems for repeat hepatectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a spray (AdSpray) and sheet adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent partial resection of the left lateral liver lobe. They were randomly assigned to control (n = 10), AdSpray (n = 10), and Seprafilm groups. Seven days after surgery, the animals were sacrificed, and adhesions at the hepatic resection surface were blindly evaluated. RESULTS: In the control group, adhesions were formed in all 10 animals (100%), with a 69% adhesion extent (mean). In the AdSpray group, the incidence of adhesions (40%) and the adhesion extent (mean, 10%) were significantly lower than in the control group (incidence; p = 0.0147, adhesion extent; p = 0.0007). In the Seprafilm group, the incidence of adhesions was 70%. The adhesion extent of Seprafilm (mean, 30%) was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.0492). No significant differences were observed between the AdSpray and Seprafilm groups. As for histopathological examination, animals in the AdSpray group showed a similar healing profile to that of the control group without delayed healing and regeneration of mesothelial cells. In contrast, the Seprafilm group showed ongoing foreign body reaction to Seprafilm, and regeneration of mesothelial cells was immature at 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Both the spray-type gel and sheet adhesion barriers significantly reduced adhesion formation after hepatectomy. The spray-type adhesion barrier caused no adverse events and induced favorable healing. These adhesion barriers may be effective in hepatectomy. Further animal studies and clinical trials are required to determine their benefits in clinical use.

Surgical Outcomes of Liver Resection Combined with Inferior Vena Cava Resection and Reconstruction with Artificial Vascular Graft.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and reconstruction with concomitant liver resection sometimes represent the only chance for patients with liver tumors involving the IVC to get cured. However, surgical outcomes of liver resection with IVC resection and reconstruction using an artificial vascular graft have not been well investigated. METHODS: Out of a total of 1,179 cases, only 12 involving liver resection between 1998 and 2016 at our institution included IVC resection and reconstruction using an artificial vascular graft. An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft was used for the IVC reconstruction in all 12 cases. We investigated the surgical outcomes of these combined surgeries. RESULTS: The median operative time was 650 min and the median blood loss was 2,600 mL. Postoperative complications (≥ grade III in the Clavien-Dindo classification) developed in 2 patients - 1 case of bleeding and one of bile leakage. There were no cases of operative mortality. No complications associated with the vascular graft were observed throughout the postoperative follow-up period, and the grafts remained patent in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate favorable surgical outcomes of liver resection combined with IVC resection and reconstruction.

Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid/Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Bioresorbable Membranes in Reducing Perihepatic Adhesion Formation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Perihepatic adhesions induced by hepatectomy make the subsequent repeat hepatectomy technically demanding. The aim of this study was to verify the effect of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethyl cellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (HA membrane) in preventing posthepatectomy adhesion formation by focusing on the ease of the adhesiolysis in subsequent hepatectomy for recurrent tumors. METHODS: A total of 201 patients who underwent hepatectomy using HA membrane were prospectively followed-up for 3 years. Thirty of the 201 patients underwent a repeat hepatectomy for recurrence. The operative data of 85 cases of repeat hepatectomy, the primary hepatectomy of which had been performed without the use of HA membrane, served as the historical control data. The primary endpoint was the time interval between the skin incision and the start of hepatic parenchymal transection (the preparation time) including adhesiolysis. Secondary endpoints were blood loss during the operation, incidence of postoperative complications, and the biochemical data. RESULTS: The median preparation time (183 vs. 228 min; p = 0.027) and total operation time (374 vs. 439 min; p = 0.041) were significantly shorter in the HA membrane group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Use of HA membranes during hepatectomy enabled significant shortening of the adhesiolysis time during the sequential hepatectomy performed for recurrent tumors.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes following Glue versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant prior to Right Hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes after portal vein embolization (PVE) and right hepatectomy in patients receiving embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue + central AMPLATZER Vascular Plug (AVP; glue group) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles ± coils (PVA group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2008 and August 2013, all patients having PVE with NBCA + AVP or PVA ± coils before right hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed; 85 patients underwent PVE with NBCA + AVP (n = 45) or PVA ± coils (n = 40). The groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests. RESULTS: Technical success of embolization was 100%. Degree of hypertrophy (16.2% ± 7.8 vs 12.3% ± 7.62, P = .009) and kinetic growth rate (3.5%/wk ± 2.0 vs 2.6%/wk ± 1.9, P = .016) were greater in the glue group versus the PVA group. Contrast volume (66.1 mL ± 44.8 vs 189.87 mL ± 62.6, P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (11.2 min ± 7.8 vs 23.49 min ± 11.7, P < .001) were significantly less during the PVE procedure in the glue group. Surgical outcomes were comparable between groups, including the number of patients unable to go onto surgery (P = 1.0), surgical complications (P = .30), length of hospital stay (P = .68), and intensive care unit admissions (P = .71). There was 1 major complication (hepatic abscess) in each group after PVE. CONCLUSIONS: PVE performed with NBCA + AVP compared with PVA ± coils resulted in greater degree of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, less fluoroscopic time and contrast volume, and similar complication rates.

A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing EVARREST™ fibrin sealant patch to standard of care in controlling bleeding following elective hepatectomy: anatomic versus non-anatomic resection.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, randomized clinical trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of the EVARREST™ Fibrin Sealant Patch (FP) in treating parenchymal bleeding following anatomic and non-anatomic liver resections. METHODS: One hundred and two patients were stratified according to the type of hepatic resection (anatomic/non-anatomic), and randomized (1:1) after identification of an appropriate bleeding site, to FP vs Standard of Care (SoC, manual compression ± topical haemostat). The primary endpoint was haemostasis at 4 min from bleeding site identification with no re-bleeding requiring re-treatment. RESULTS: The FP was superior in achieving haemostasis at 4 min (96%, 48/50) to SoC (46%, 24/52; p < 0.001). Stratification for resection type showed treatment differences for primary endpoint for anatomic (24/25 FP vs 13/23 SoC; p = 0.001) and non-anatomic liver resections (24/25FP vs 11/29 SoC; p < 0.001). Adverse events related to the study procedure were reported in 40/50 patients (80%) in the FP group and 43/52 patients (83%) in the SoC group. One (2%) adverse event (infected intra-abdominal fluid collection) was possibly related to study treatment. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial confirms that the FP is safe and highly effective in controlling parenchymal bleeding following hepatectomy regardless of the type of resection. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01993888.

Variation on a Theme: Alternative to Plastic Bag in ALPPS Procedures: Feasibility and Clinical Safety of COVA+™ Membrane in ALPPS Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) got wide success among hepatic surgeons as an efficient way to shorten to 7 days from the 4 weeks interval of classic 2-staged hepatectomy. The main disadvantage of ALPPS is the onset of inflammatory adhesions, particularly on the hepatic pedicle region, previously dissected. The aim of the study is the evaluation of a resorbable collagen membrane (CM) indicated in the prevention of postoperative adhesions as an alternative to the use of a plastic bag (PB) during ALPPS procedure. METHODS: All patients undergoing ALPPS procedure in our department were prospectively included in a database. At the end of the first surgery, at least one resorbable CM (COVA+™, Biom'Up, France) was placed instead of a PB. Intraoperative adhesions during the second step and clinical short-term safety were assessed. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 57.5 years underwent a 2-staged hepatectomy through ALPPS approach. At the second stage, 90 % of the patients experienced either grade-0 (no adhesion) or grade-I adhesions (mild adhesions easily divided). None of the reported complications were related to the use of the CM. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study evaluating the use of an anti-adhesion resorbable CM as a safe and efficient alternative to PB in ALPPS procedures.

Management of severe blunt liver injuries by applying the damage control strategies with packing-oriented surgery: experiences at a single institution in Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to investigate effective management strategies for patients with severe blunt liver injuries. METHODOLOGY: Treatment methods and outcomes of 77 patients with grade IV-V damage among patients with liver injury managed between 2009 and 2013 were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 32 were managed surgically. Packing was performed in 29 of these patients, while 26 also underwent liver surgery to maximize the hemostatic effect of packing. All 32 underwent temporary abdominal closure, and the mean amount of blood products used in the first 24 hours after admission included packed red blood cell, 13.3 units; fresh frozen plasma, 12.4 units; and platelets, 12.2 units, very close to 1:1:1. A total of 9 of 77 (11.7%) patients and 8 of 32 who underwent the operation died (operative mortality rate, 25%). Liver-related uncontrolled hemorrhage contributing to death occurred in four patients (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Although nonoperative management can first be pursued if the patient's condition allows for it, hemodynamic instability and evidence of peritonitis requires surgical management. Surgical management should abide by the damage control surgery principles that focus on packing to minimize surgical time, followed by aggressive critical care according to damage control resuscitation.

Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer endobiliary obliteration of hepatic segments in a patient with isolated bile leaks.

A 54-year-old woman with a symptomatic giant hepatic hemangioma underwent an extended left hepatic trisegmentectomy complicated by 250-350 mL/d postoperative bilious drainage. After 5 months of therapy, drainage was unabated, and the patient was no longer a surgical candidate. Sinography revealed three distinct isolated bile duct leaks involving segments 6, 7, and 8. Endobiliary segmentectomy was achieved by obliterating the isolated systems with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx; ev3, Plymouth, Minnesota) during three fluoroscopic procedures. Bilious leaks were successfully eliminated, and compensatory hypertrophy of noninvolved liver occurred. At 2 years from the last embolization procedure, the patient remained asymptomatic with no bilious leak.

Local venous thrombotic risk of an expanding haemostatic agent used during liver resection.

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing liver resection that leaves an empty intraparenchymal cavity, traditional topical agents might be inadequate to achieve additional hemostasis. A new hemostatic expanding topical foam (BioFoam(®)) has been designed to provide a mechanical seal. The objective of this study was to report our preliminary results regarding the safety and the efficacy using this foam. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, BioFoam(®) was used to fill a three-dimensional defect following liver resection in 14 patients. The operative results and postoperative course of these patients were compared to those of 14 matched controls who underwent liver resection but did not receive BioFoam(®). RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, indications for liver resection, type of surgical procedure, and type and duration of clamping. BioFoam(®) patients experienced significantly less operative blood loss (275 vs. 630 ml, p = 0.032) but similar operative transfusion rates (28.6 vs. 35.7 %, p = 0.686) compared to no-BioFoam(®) patients. The postoperative mortality was nil and no patient developed postoperative hemorrhage. While the two groups shared similar overall (64.3 vs. 57.1 %, p = 0.599) and major (28.6 vs. 14.3 %, p = 0.357) complications rates, BioFoam(®) patients experienced significantly higher major vascular thrombosis compared to no-BioFoam(®) patients (29 vs. 0 %, p = 0.04). In the BioFoam(®) group, major vascular thrombosis was associated with exposure of the vessel along the transection plane. CONCLUSION: While the clinical benefit of BioFoam(®) in high-risk liver resections leaving a deep parenchymal defect remains to be proven, the associated risk of vascular thrombosis should preclude its use in contact with major veins.

Comparing iodized oil with polyvinyl alcohol for portal vein embolization in promoting liver remnant increase before partial hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of iodized oil versus polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles in portal vein embolization (PVE) before partial hepatectomy. METHODS: From October 2016 to December 2021, 86 patients who planned to undergo hepatectomy after PVE were enrolled, including 61 patients post-PVE with PVA particles + coils and 25 patients post-PVE with iodized oil + coils. All patients underwent CT examination before and 2-3 weeks after PVE to evaluate the future liver remnant (FLR). The intercohort comparison included the degree of liver volume growth, changes in laboratory data, and adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the resection rate between the iodized oil group and the PVA particle group (68 % vs. 70 %, p = 0.822). In terms of the degree of hypertrophy (9.52 % ± 13.47 vs. 4.03 % ± 10.55, p = 0.047) and kinetic growth rate (4.07 % ± 5.4 vs. 1.55 % ± 4.63, p = 0.032), the iodized oil group was superior to the PVA group. The PVE operation time in the PVA particle group was shorter than that in the iodized oil group (121. 72 min ± 34.45 vs. 156. 2 min ± 71.58, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the degree of hypertrophy between the high bilirubin group and the control group (5.32 % ± 9.21 vs. 6.1 % ± 14.79, p = 0.764). Only 1 patient had a major complication. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PVA particles, iodized oil PVE can significantly increase liver volume and the degree of hypertrophy without any significant difference in safety.

Unresectable colorectal liver metastases: the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy using hepatic arterial infusion immunochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and polyethylene glycol-interferon α-2a.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) or systemic chemotherapy has been used to treat unresectable colorectal liver metastases. The prognosis of the disease in recent years has been improved because chemotherapy is performed before hepatectomy to reduce tumor size (conversion therapy). The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy following HAI immunochemotherapy. METHODS: Hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/polyethylene glycol (PEG)-IFNα-2a was performed in 21 patients. The primary endpoint was the safety of HAI and hepatectomy. The secondary endpoints were response rate, rate of conversion to hepatectomy, survival rate, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: With regard to side effects, drugs were discontinued temporarily in one patient because of a decrease in white blood cell count; however, other patients continued chemotherapy. The response rate with HAI was 61.9 %, and the conversion rate was 38.1 %. Hepatectomy was completed successfully without mortality. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months (with and without conversion, 16.7 and 4.8 months, respectively; p = 0.021). Median overall survival was 34.6 months (with and without conversion, 48.4 and 26.6 months, respectively; p = 0.003). Prognosis was poor when the number of metastatic tumors was ≥10 [PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 32.21, p = 0.003; overall survival (OS): HR 9.13, p = 0.07], but prognosis improved after hepatectomy (OS: HR 0.08, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arterial infusion immunochemotherapy with 5-FU/PEG-IFNα-2a was performed safely without major side effects. Prognosis is expected to improve after successful conversion to hepatectomy.

Incidence and Mechanism of Refractory Postoperative Cholangitis After Hepatectomy with Hepaticojejunostomy.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant tumors, such as hilar cholangiocarcinoma, have shown improved long-term outcomes, and measures to prevent late postoperative complications are important. Postoperative cholangitis after hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy (HHJ) may occur and can significantly decrease the quality of life. However, there are few reports on the incidence and pathogenesis of postoperative cholangitis after HHJ. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 71 cases post HHJ at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Cholangitis was diagnosed using the Tokyo Guideline 2018. Cases due to tumor recurrence around the hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) were excluded. Patients with three or more episodes of cholangitis were classified as the "refractory cholangitis group" (RC group). RC group patients were divided into a "stenosis group" and "non-stenosis group" according to intrahepatic bile duct dilatation at the onset of cholangitis. Their clinical characteristics and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Cholangitis occurred in 20 patients (28.1%), with 17 (23.9%) in the RC group. Most patients in the RC group developed their first episode within the first postoperative year. The stenosis group consisted of 6 patients, and their cholangitis was treated with repeated anastomotic dilatation and stent replacement. In the non-stenosis group, cholangitis was relatively mild and treated with antibiotics. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy for these cases showed bile congestion in the jejunum near the site of the hepaticojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: There are two types of postoperative cholangitis, each with different pathogenesis and treatment. It is essential to assess anastomotic stenosis early and provide the necessary treatment.

Fibrin sealant for prevention of resection surface-related complications after liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of fibrin sealant in reducing resection surface-related complications in liver surgery. BACKGROUND: Bile leakage, bleeding, and abscess formation are major resection surface-related complications after liver resection. It is unclear whether application of fibrin sealant to the resection surface is effective in reducing these complications. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized trial in 310 noncirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection, we compared prophylactic application of fibrin sealant to the resection surface (156 patients) with no application of fibrin sealant (154 patients). In addition to clinical assessments, patients underwent protocolized computerized tomography (CT) scan 1 week postoperatively. Primary endpoint was a composite of postoperative resection surface-related complications (bile leakage, bleeding, or abscess), as adjudicated by a clinical-events committee that was unaware of the study-group assignments. RESULTS: Overall rate of resection surface-related complications was not different between the 2 groups: 24% (38/156 patients) in the fibrin sealant group and 24% (37/154 patients) in the control group. Bile leakage was detected in 14% of patients in the fibrin sealant group and in 14% of controls. CT scans showed a fluid collection at the resection surface 100 mL or more in 28% of patients in the fibrin sealant group and in 26% of controls (P = 0.800). The rate of reinterventions for resection surface-related complications (12% vs 10%; P = 0.492) and severity of complications did also not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized multicenter trial shows that prophylactic application of fibrin sealant at the resection surface after liver resections does not lead to a reduction in the incidence or severity of postoperative bile leakage or other resection surface-related complications (Controlled trial number, ISRCTN85205641).

Does fibrin glue prevent biliary and pancreatic fistula after surgical resection?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efficacy of fibrin glue to prevent biliary or pancreas fistula at the resected edge of the liver or pancreas is controversial. We examined surgical results of fibrin glue use in patients who underwent hepatectomy or pancreatectomy to assess the efficacy of its use. METHODOLOGY: Subjects were divided into two groups; the fibrin glue group in hepatectomy (n=228) and in pancreatectomy (n=113), and the non-fibrin glue group in hepatectomy (n=94) and in pancreatectomy (n=24). In case of hepatectomy, the fibrin glue was sprayed on the cut-surface or anastomotic site of hepatico-jejunostomy. In case of pancreatectomy, the fibrin glue was sprayed on the anastomotic site of pancreato-jejunostomy or closed pancreatic stump. RESULTS: In the hepatectomy group, uncontrolled ascites were more frequent in the fibrin glue group (p<0.05). The use of fibrin glue for both groups has been less frequent in recent years. Prevalence of biliary fistula was not significantly different between groups. Hospital stay in the fibrin glue group was significantly longer than that in the non-fibrin glue group, and was not significantly different between hepatectomy or pancreatectomy groups. There was no significant difference of any complications including pancreatic fistula between groups. Prevalence of pancreatic fistula was not significantly different between the fibrin glue group and the non-fibrin glue group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of fibrin glue did not prevent biliary or pancreatic fistula in patients who underwent hepatectomy and pancreatectomy with or without enteric anastomosis.

Fibrin sealant with PGA felt for prevention of bile leakage after liver resection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fibrin sealing are used to prevent postoperative hemorrhage and biliary leakage. However, the use of fibrin sealant alone is insufficient, thus requiring a kind of supportive material. Polyglycolic acid (PGA) felt was developed as a synthetic material to cover tissue defects. We performed preliminary evaluation of fibrin sealing combined with PGA felt (PGA-FS) as hemostat and to prevent biliary leakage, in comparison with the conventional fibrin-coated collagen fleece (FC-CF), retrospectively. METHODOLOGY: Between 2007 and 2008, PGA-FS was used in 34 patients, while FC-CF in 39 patients. We compared the incidence of biliary leakage, postoperative hemorrhage, surgical site infection, volume of ascites and the duration of hospital stay between the groups. Biliary leakage was diagnosed when the drain fluid/serum bilirubin ratio was >5. RESULTS: There were no significant differences of the patients' characteristics between the groups except for the surgical procedure. None of the patients experienced postoperative hemorrhage. Biliary leakage was noted in 4 of 39 patients with FC-CF but in none of the PGA-FS group (p<0.05). Various other postoperative parameters were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the PGA-FS would be effective in preventing biliary leakage, compared with the FC-CF.