RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of using 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with thin-strut biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in daily clinical practice remain uncertain. METHODSâANDâRESULTS: The REIWA region-wide registry is a prospective study conducted in 1 PCI center and 9 local hospitals in northern Japan. A total of 1,202 patients who successfully underwent final PCI using BP-DES (Synergy: n=400; Ultimaster: n=401; Orsiro: n=401), were enrolled in the registry, and received 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12inhibitor (prasugrel 3.75 mg/day or clopidogrel 75 mg/day) monotherapy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events at 12 months, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding. Based on the results of a previous study, we set the performance goal at 5.0%. Over the 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 3.08% of patients, which was lower than the predefined performance goal (Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). Notably, definite ST occurred in only 1 patient (0.08%) within 1 year (at 258 days). No differences were observed in the primary endpoint between stent types. CONCLUSIONS: The REIWA region-wide registry suggests that 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy is safe and feasible for Japanese patients with BP-DES.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Clopidogrel , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Japón , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Polímeros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a major global health concern. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has been endorsed as safe and effective in the management of culprit and non-culprit lesions of ACS. However, permanent metallic implants may have drawbacks, including the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the risk of long-term stent-related complications. An alternative approach using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is gaining growing interest, having the potential of delivering therapy directly to vulnerable plaques, avoiding the need for permanent metallic implants, and potentially allowing for better long-term medical treatment. Despite limited evidence, DCB is being explored in several patients' subgroups. This review aims to discuss the existing evidence regarding DCB in ACS management. RECENT FINDINGS: DCB appears to be a promising strategy in the management of ACS, showing comparable angiographic and clinical results as compared to new-generation DES in relatively small clinical trials or large prospective registries. The advantage of avoiding permanent implants is particularly appealing in this setting, where DCB has the potential of delivering anti-atherogenic local therapy directly to vulnerable plaques still amenable to atherogenic regression. This review seeks to underline the theoretical background of DCB use and reports the available evidence in its support in the specific setting of ACS. In the context of ACS, the use of DCB is highly attractive, offering a dedicated anti-atherogenic local therapy, capable of addressing a broad range of vulnerable plaques and patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with coronary artery disease treated with permanent polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (DES), the persistent presence of a less biocompatible polymer might delay arterial healing. Thin strut polymer-free DES have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The purpose of this first-in-human study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel polymer-free DES in patients with de novo coronary lesions. The TIGERevolutioN® stent (CG Bio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) consists of a cobalt chromium platform with a strut thickness of 70 µm and a surface treated with titanium dioxide onto which everolimus-eluting stent (EES) is applied abluminally (6 µg/mm of stent length) without utilization of a polymer. METHODS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled, with de novo coronary lesions (stable or unstable angina) and > 50% diameter stenosis in a vessel 2.25 to 4.00 mm in diameter and ≤ 40 mm in length for angiographic, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and clinical assessment at 8 months. All patients received DAPT after stent implantation. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 8 months. RESULTS: Twenty patients with 20 lesions were treated with TIGERevolutioN®. At 8 months, in-stent LLL was 0.7 ± 0.4 mm. On OCT, percent area stenosis was 29.2 ± 9.4% and stent strut coverage was complete in all lesions. No adverse cardiovascular event occurred at 8 months. CONCLUSION: The new polymer-free EES was safe and effective with low LLL and excellent strut coverage at 8 months of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005699.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus , Titanio , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Titanio/química , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Polímeros/química , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with thromboembolic problems, prosthetic valves, or coagulation issues are commonly prescribed anticoagulants and antiplatelets. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication might constitute a challenge for dentists and dental hygienists since possible prolonged bleeding might interfere with dental procedures. The aim of the present study was to examine the bleeding durations associated with various anticoagulants and antiplatelets during professional dental hygiene sessions, utilizing a modified Ivy test adapted for the oral context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing professional oral hygiene were recruited. Debridement during oral hygiene was performed using ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation, and bleeding sites were assessed and treated with gentle pressure using sterile gauzes. The time for bleeding cessation was recorded. Patients were categorized into six groups based on their drug intake, Control: no anticoagulants or antiplatelets DTI: direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) AntiXa: directa factor Xa inhibitors (endoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban) VKA: vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, acenocoumarol) SAPT: single anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel) DAPT: dual anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel). Bleeding time was measured in seconds and mean values were assessed among the different groups. Differences between groups were investigated with Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc correction for multiple comparisons or two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post-hoc; RESULTS: Control patients presented the lowest bleeding time 50 s, followed by AntiXa (98), SAPT (105), DTI (120), DAPT (190) and VKA (203). A statistically significant difference was present among control and DTI (p = 0.004), VKA (p < 0.001), DAPT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present outcomes, an increased risk of prolonged bleeding emerged in patients taking VKA and DAPT. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: bleeding did not interfere with the oral hygiene session The optimal period for dental treatment of these patients should be 2-3 h before the next dose, without the need to temporarily suspend the medication.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Sangría , Hemorragia Bucal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Bucal/etiología , Anciano , Adulto , Higiene Bucal , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited. METHODS: In an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. RESULTS: A total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polímeros , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Trombosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Método Simple Ciego , Sirolimus/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone significant advancements as a result of the combination of device-based and drug-based therapies. These iterations have led to the development of polymer-free drug-eluting stents. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding their clinical performance. Furthermore, while various risk scores have been proposed to determine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), none of them have undergone prospective validation within the context of randomized trials. DESIGN: The PARTHENOPE trial is a phase IV, prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated, assessor-blind study being conducted at 14 centers in Italy (NCT04135989). It includes 2,107 all-comers patients with minimal exclusion criteria, randomly assigned in a 2-by-2 design to receive either the Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent or the SYNERGY everolimus-eluting stent, along with either a personalized or standard duration of DAPT. Personalized DAPT duration is determined by the DAPT score, which accounts for both bleeding and ischemic risks. Patients with a DAPT score <2 (indicating higher bleeding than ischemic risk) receive DAPT for 3 or 6 months for chronic or acute coronary syndrome, respectively, while patients with a DAPT score ≥2 (indicating higher ischemic than bleeding risk) receive DAPT for 24 months. Patients in the standard DAPT group receive DAPT for 12 months. The trial aims to establish the noninferiority between stents with respect to a device-oriented composite end point of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization at 12 months after PCI. Additionally, the trial aims to demonstrate the superiority of personalized DAPT compared to a standard approach with respect to a net clinical composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or type 2 to 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria at 24-months after PCI. SUMMARY: The PARTHENOPE trial is the largest randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of a polymer-free DES with a reservoir technology for drug-release and the first trial evaluating a personalized duration of DAPT based on the DAPT score. The study results will provide novel insights into the optimizing the use of drug-eluting stents and DAPT in patients undergoing PCI.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Polímeros , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) provides additional risk reduction of ischemic events compared to aspirin monotherapy, at cost of higher bleeding risk. There are few data comparing new techniques for reducing bleeding after dental extractions in these patients. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effectiveness of the HemCon Dental Dressing (HDD) compared to oxidized cellulose gauze. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized study included 60 patients on DAPT who required at least two dental extractions (120 procedures). Each surgical site was randomized to HDD or oxidized regenerated cellulose gauze as the local hemostatic method. Intra-oral bleeding time was measured immediately after the dental extraction and represents our main endpoint for comparison of both hemostatic agents. Prolonged bleeding, platelet reactivity measured by Multiplate Analyser (ADPtest and ASPItest) and tissue healing comparison after 7 days were also investigated. RESULTS: Intra-oral bleeding time was lower in HDD compared with control (2 [2-5] vs. 5 [2-8] minutes, P=0.001). Prolonged postoperative bleeding was observed in 7 cases (11.6%), all of them successfully managed with local sterile gauze pressure. More HDD treated sites presented better healing when compared with control sites [21 (36.8%) vs. 5 (8.8%), P=0.03]. There was poor correlation between platelet reactivity and intra-oral bleeding time. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on DAPT, HDD resulted in a lower intra-oral bleeding time compared to oxidized cellulose gauze after dental extractions. Moreover, HDD also seems to improve healing conditions.
Asunto(s)
Celulosa Oxidada , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Celulosa Oxidada/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Persona Soltera , Método Simple Ciego , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Extracción DentalRESUMEN
Newer generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES) and biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES) have similar efficacy with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration of > 6 months. However, this difference in outcomes have not been well studied in shorter DAPT regime. This study compares the safety and efficacy profiles of DP-DES and BP-DES based on short-term (1-3 months), intermediate-term (4-6 months) and standard DAPT (6-12 months) durations. A search was conducted on Embase and Medline for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing stent types, and DAPT durations. Primary endpoints include cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major bleeding. Network analysis was conducted to summarize the evidence. A total of 15 RCTs involving 43,875 patients were included. DP-DES was associated with significantly lower major bleeding rates compared to BP-DES (RR 0.44, Crl 0.22-0.83) in short-term DAPT. Among DP-DES patients, short-term DAPT was associated with lower major bleeding risk compared to standard DAPT (RR 0.47, CrI 0.32-0.69). This favorable bleeding profile with short DAPT was not found in BP-DES patients. Cardiac death, MI, definite stent thrombosis, stroke and TVR rates were similar across the various DAPT durations and stent types. Our preliminary findings demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety outcomes between BP-DES and newer generation BP-DES across various DAPT durations. In patients requiring short DAPT, DP-DES had more favourable major bleeding profile compared to BP-DES, without compromising anti-thrombotic efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombosis , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Muerte , Hemorragia , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polímeros , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate long-term adverse events in HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation. METHODS: We analyzed stratified data from 4 all-comers postapproval registries. Patients with at least 1 of the following criteria were categorized as HBR: age ≥75 years, history of major bleeding (MB), history of stroke, chronic oral anticoagulant use, chronic kidney disease, anemia, or thrombocytopenia. Additionally, in a separate analysis, patients were categorized according to the recently published Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Coronary thrombotic events (CTE) included myocardial infarction or definite/probable stent thrombosis. MB was defined according to the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) or GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) scales. Impact of CTE and MB on subsequent risk of mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with MB and CTE included as time-updated covariates. RESULTS: Of the total 10 502 patients included, 3507 (33%) were identified as HBR. Compared with non-HBR patients, those at HBR had more comorbidities, higher lesion complexity, and a higher risk of 4-year mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.38 [95% CI, 3.76-5.11]). Results were qualitatively similar when using Academic Research Consortium criteria to define HBR. Risk of mortality was increased after CTE (HR 5.02 [95% CI, 3.93-6.41]), as well as after MB (HR 4.92 [95% CI, 3.82-6.35]). Of note, this effect was consistent across the spectrum of bleeding risk (P-interaction test 0.97 and 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the non-HBR population, HBR patients experienced worse 4-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Both CTE and MB had a significant impact on subsequent risk of mortality irrespective of bleeding risk.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Cromo , Cobalto , Comorbilidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Trombosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Trastornos Hemorrágicos/epidemiología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polímeros , Prevalencia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fumar/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The MITIGATE study aims to evaluate the real-world clinical effectiveness of pre-treatment with icosapent ethyl (IPE), compared with usual care, on laboratory-confirmed viral upper respiratory infection (URI)-related morbidity and mortality in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). BACKGROUND: IPE is a highly purified and stable omega-3 fatty acid prescription medication that is approved for cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk adults on statin therapy with elevated triglycerides. Preclinical data and clinical observations suggest that IPE may have pleiotropic effects including antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties that may prevent or reduce the downstream sequelae and cardiopulmonary consequences of viral URIs. METHODS: MITIGATE is a virtual, electronic health record-based, open-label, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial enrolling â¼16,500 participants within Kaiser Permanente Northern California - a fully integrated and learning health care delivery system with 21 hospitals and >255 ambulatory clinics serving â¼4.5 million members. Adults ≥50 years with established ASCVD and no prior history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will be prospectively identified and pre-randomized in a 1:10 allocation ratio (â¼ 1,500 IPE: â¼15,000 usual care) stratified by age and previous respiratory health status to the intervention (IPE 2 grams by mouth twice daily with meals) vs the control group (usual care) for a minimum follow-up duration of 6 months. The co-primary endpoints are moderate-to-severe laboratory-confirmed viral URI and worst clinical status due to a viral URI at any point in time. CONCLUSION: The MITIGATE study will inform clinical practice by providing evidence on the real-world clinical effectiveness of pretreatment with IPE to prevent and/or reduce the sequelae of laboratory-confirmed viral URIs in a high-risk cohort of patients with established ASCVD.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , COVID-19/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/análogos & derivados , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline and tocopherol for the management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws. METHODS: Twenty-five patients diagnosed with osteoradionecrosis of the jaws treated with pentoxifylline 400 mg + tocopherol 400 mg three times daily (tid) were evaluated. Clinical records and image tests were reviewed. All patients were previously submitted to head and neck radiation therapy and presented with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws. RESULTS: Following therapy with pentoxifylline and tocopherol, 76% (19/25) of the patients showed complete mucosal healing, in which 47.3% (9/19) did not undergo sequestrectomy. From this particular group, 77.7% (7/9) were in stage I and 33.3% (3/9) used the protocol for up to 3 months. Among those who underwent to sequestrectomy, complete mucosal healing was observed in 52.7% (10/19). Among these, 60% (6/10) were in stage I and 100% of the patients were using the protocol for more than 3 months. In all other patients, partial healing of the mucosa was observed since they presented advanced disease. These represented 24% of the sample (6/25), 66.6% (4/6) were in stage III, and 60% (4/6) used the protocol for over 6 months. CONCLUSION: Pentoxifylline and tocopherol may provide effective management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws, and the association with sequestrectomy may avoid major surgical procedures.
Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Maxilares/patología , Osteorradionecrosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteorradionecrosis/cirugía , Pentoxifilina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Tocoferoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteorradionecrosis/patología , Pentoxifilina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Tocoferoles/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of four different local hemostatics in patients taking oral antiplatelet therapy, after multiple dental extractions without discontinuing drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study sample included 102 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 17.4 years) in treatment with oral antiplatelet agents needing multiple dental extractions. After surgery, the sockets were randomly sealing with suture alone (control group), hemostatic plug (HEM), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF+), and leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Primary outcomes were post-operative bleeding, wound healing index, and possible complications. Secondary outcomes were correlation between primary outcomes and patient's comorbidities and voluptuous habits. Descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons, and logistic regression analysis were performed (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Both A-PRF+ and L-PRF showed a reduced bleeding risk when compared with suture alone (OR = 0.09, p = 0.001 for A-PRF+; OR = 0.09, p = 0.005 for L-PRF). Only L-PRF showed a reduced risk for incomplete wound healing when compared with the control site (OR = 0.43, p = 0.019). Patients affected by hypertension (OR 3.91, p = 0.015) and diabetes (OR 3.24, p = 0.026) had the highest bleeding risk. Smoking (OR 4.30, p = 0.016) and diabetes (OR 3.79, p = 0.007) interfered with healing process. CONCLUSION: L-PRF and A-PRF represent a valid alternative to the traditional hemostatics, reducing post-surgical bleeding and promoting wound healing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In patients taking antiplatelet drugs, different local hemostatics are useful to control potential post-operative bleeding and to favor wound healing. However, comorbidities and voluptuous habits may increase bleeding risk, interfering with healing process.
Asunto(s)
Hemostáticos , Fibrina Rica en Plaquetas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Extracción Dental , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety of 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) and compared P2Y12inhibitor with aspirin monotherapy 3 months after DAPT.MethodsâandâResults:Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using BP-SES were enrolled and followed for 1 year. Patients with a history of stent thrombosis were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), definite or probable stent thrombosis, and severe bleeding at 12 months. The BP-SES arm of the CENTURY II trial was used as a conventional DAPT group for comparison. After DAPT, patients were maintained on either aspirin (n=846) or a P2Y12inhibitor (n=674 patients).In all, 1,695 patients were enrolled in the study across 65 centers. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.3% of patients at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the incidence of the primary endpoint was not inferior in those receiving DAPT for 3 months compared with conventional DAPT (5.5%; Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). The incidence of the primary endpoint and severe bleeding did not differ between the aspirin and P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment, 3-month DAPT was not inferior to longer DAPT after BP-SES implantation in terms of net adverse clinical events. There was no difference in bleeding and thrombotic events between P2Y12inhibitor and aspirin monotherapy after 3 months DAPT.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Sirolimus , Implantes Absorbibles , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polímeros , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombosis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of infrainguinal revascularization for disabling intermittent claudication (IC) due to femoropopliteal occlusive disease using bypass graft (BPG) surgery with a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (HB-ePTFE) graft. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2016, we performed 1400 BPGs with HB-ePTFE interventions in patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease, of which IC was an indication in 485 (34.6%) patients. Early major end points were in-hospital mortality and major complications; late major end points were primary patency, freedom from redo bypass, freedom from progression to critical limb ischemia, and freedom from above-knee amputation or prosthetic graft infection. RESULTS: We performed 200 (41.2%) above-knee BPGs and 231 (47.6%) below-knee BPGs; 54 (11.1%) BPGs targeted a tibial artery. In-hospital death occurred in two (0.4%) patients. Overall, the major complication rate was 4.3%. The median duration of follow-up was 33 months (range, 1-150 months; interquartile range [IQR], 14-62.8 months); the cumulative follow-up index for survival was 0.75 ± 0.25. During the follow-up, 56 (11.6%) patients died. Estimated primary patency of the BPG was 86.1% ± 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.7-88.9) at 12 months, 68.4% ± 2.4% (95% CI, 63.5-72.9) at 36 months, and 57.7% ± 2.9% (95% CI, 52.0-63.2) at 60 months. On multivariate analysis, runoff status (no or one vessel), site of the distal anastomosis (below the knee), and postoperative medical treatment (oral anticoagulants) impaired primary patency. Estimated freedom from redo bypass was 96.1% ± 0.9% (95% CI, 93.9-97.5) at 12 months, 84.8% ± 1.9% (95% CI, 80.7-88.2) at 36 months, and 76.4% ± 2.6% (95% CI, 71.0-81.1) at 60 months. Both the runoff status (no or one vessel) and the diameter of the graft (6 mm) were significantly associated with the need for redo bypass. Freedom from progression to critical limb ischemia was 86.1% ± 2.2% (95% CI, 81.2-89.9) at 60 months. During the follow-up, there were 20 (4.1%) above-knee amputations, which occurred at a median of 33 months (range, 2-107 months; IQR, 14-63 months) after the indexed BPG intervention. Prosthetic graft infection occurred in seven (1.4%) patients, with a median delay from index procedure to presentation with graft infection of 33 months (range, 1-72 months; IQR, 14-62.5 months), resulting in a freedom from prosthetic graft infection rate of 98.2% ± 2% (95% CI, 95.8-99.2) at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suffering from lifestyle-disabling IC with long or complex occlusive lesions of the femoropopliteal segment, open BPG surgery with Hb-ePTFE graft had an acceptably low mortality rate. A poor runoff status was a significant predictor of loss of graft patency, especially after a below-knee anastomosis, as was the need for redo bypass. Dual antiplatelet therapy had significantly better results against follow-up thrombosis, and 8-mm grafts showed better freedom from redo bypass compared with 6-mm grafts.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Heparina/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/mortalidad , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Italia , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Politetrafluoroetileno , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is known to be associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Defining the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after DES implantation is still under debate. The objective of this subgroup analysis of the all-comers ISAR 2000 registry was to assess the safety and efficacy of a short DAPT (<6 month) versus a longer DAPT (>6 month) in patients with diabetes electively treated with the polymer-free sirolimus-coated ultrathin strut drug-eluting stent (PF-SES). METHODS: Patients who received the PF-SES were investigated in a multicenter all-comers observational study. The primary endpoint was the 9month target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the 9month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and procedural success rates. RESULTS: In all, 167 patients were treated with DAPT for ≤6 months (S-DAPT group) and 350 patients underwent DAPT treatment for 12 months (L-DAPT group). There was no significant difference in the overall MACE rate (4.6% vs. 3.1%, pâ¯= 0.441), the 9month accumulated stent thrombosis rates (0.8% vs. 0.3%, pâ¯= 0.51), or the accumulated rate of bleeding complications (5.3% vs. 3.4%, pâ¯= 0.341). CONCLUSION: PF-SES are safe and effective in daily clinical routine with low rates of TLR and MACE in patients with diabetes and stable disease. Our data suggest that extending the duration of DAPT beyond 6 months does not improve MACE or TLR at 9 months in patients with stable CAD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Sirolimus , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Fosfatos de Dinucleósidos , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polímeros , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Posterior oropharyngeal trauma commonly occurs in children and frequently presents to the emergency department (ED). Rarely, serious infectious and neurologic sequelae result. Emergency providers are tasked with the challenge of diagnosing the minority with life-threatening complications while maintaining thoughtful stewardship regarding radiation exposure. A previously healthy 2-year-old girl sustained trauma to her posterior oropharynx with a toothbrush that resulted in a left carotid dissection. This dissection was diagnosed in the ED via computed tomography angiogram, Otolaryngology and neurosurgery were consulted in the ED, and anticoagulation therapy was initiated with aspirin. The child did initially well and was without neurologic deficit and no brain ischemia on magnetic resonance imaging. She was discharged home on aspirin therapy. Four days after initial injury, the child returned to the ED after a seizure. Computed tomography scan of the head demonstrated infarction at the junction of the left parietal and temporal areas. Although neurologic complications are rare, posterior oropharyngeal trauma in children is not. There are many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in its management. This case is, to the authors' awareness, the first case report in the English literature of a known and treated carotid dissection in a child after posterior oropharyngeal trauma that resulted in stroke despite diagnosis and initiation of treatment. The diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of posterior oropharyngeal trauma in children are discussed in this article.
Asunto(s)
Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/etiología , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Orofaringe/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of patients under antiplatelet therapy (APT) continues to raise as current recommendations foster this practice. Although some recommendations to manage this treatment during oral surgery procedures exist, these have methodological shortcomings that preclude them from being conclusive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the best current evidence was carried out; The Cochrane Library, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) concerning patients undergoing oral surgery with APT, other relevant sources were searched manually. RESULTS: 5 RCTs met the Inclusion criteria. No clear tendency was observed (RR= 0.97 CI 95%: 0,41-2,34; p=0,09; I2= 51%), moreover, they weren't clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: According to these findings and as bleeding is a manageable complication it seems unreasonable to undermine the APT, putting the patient in danger of a thrombotic event and its high inherent morbidity, which isn't comparable in severity and manageability to the former."
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients at high risk for bleeding who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often receive bare-metal stents followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. We studied a polymer-free and carrier-free drug-coated stent that transfers umirolimus (also known as biolimus A9), a highly lipophilic sirolimus analogue, into the vessel wall over a period of 1 month. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared the drug-coated stent with a very similar bare-metal stent in patients with a high risk of bleeding who underwent PCI. All patients received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary safety end point, tested for both noninferiority and superiority, was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. The primary efficacy end point was clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. RESULTS: We enrolled 2466 patients. At 390 days, the primary safety end point had occurred in 112 patients (9.4%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 154 patients (12.9%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -3.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to -1.0; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.005 for superiority). During the same time period, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization was needed in 59 patients (5.1%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 113 patients (9.8%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.9 to -2.6; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.69; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for bleeding who underwent PCI, a polymer-free umirolimus-coated stent was superior to a bare-metal stent with respect to the primary safety and efficacy end points when used with a 1-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy. (Funded by Biosensors Europe; LEADERS FREE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01623180.).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polímeros , Diseño de Prótesis , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Stents/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term safety and efficacy data of a third generation drug eluting stent (DES) with biodegradable polymer in the complex patient population of diabetes mellitus after a follow-up period of 5 years. BACKGROUND: After percutaneous coronary intervention patients with diabetes mellitus are under higher risk of death, restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST) compared to non-diabetic patients. METHODS: In 126 centers worldwide 3067 patients were enrolled in the NOBORI 2 registry, 888 patients suffered from diabetes mellitus (DM), 213 of them (14%) being insulin dependent (IDDM). Five years follow-up has been completed in this study. RESULTS: At 5 years, 89.3% of the patients were available for follow-up. The reported target lesion failure (TLF) rates at 5 years were 12.39% in DM group and 7.34% in non-DM group; (p < 0.0001). In the DM group, the TLF rate in patients with IDDM was significantly higher than in the non-IDDM subgroup (17.84 vs. 10.67%; p < 0.01). The rate of ST at 5 years was not different among diabetic versus non-diabetic patients or IDDM versus NIDDM. Only 10 (<0.4%) very late stent thrombotic events beyond 12 months occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The Nobori DES performed well in patients with DM. As expected patients with DM, particularly those with IDDM, had worse outcomes. However, the very low rate of very late stent thrombosis in IDDM patients might have significant clinical value in the treatment of these patients. Clinical trial registration ISRCTN81649913; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/search.html?srch=81649913&sort=3&dir=desc&max=10.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Polímeros/química , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of prosthetic carotid bypass (PCB) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of restenosis after CEA or carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2014, 66 patients (57 men and 9 women; mean age, 71 years) presenting with recurrent carotid artery stenosis ≥70% (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] criteria) were enrolled in a prospective study in three centers. The study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. During the same period, a total of 4321 CEAs were completed in the three centers. In these 66 patients, the primary treatment of the initial carotid artery stenosis was CEA in 57 patients (86%) and CAS in nine patients (14%). The median delay between primary and redo revascularization was 32 months. Carotid restenosis was symptomatic in 38 patients (58%) with transient ischemic attack (n = 20) or stroke (n = 18). In this series, all patients received statins; 28 patients (42%) received dual antiplatelet therapy, and 38 patients (58%) received single antiplatelet therapy. All PCBs were performed under general anesthesia. No shunt was used in this series. Nasal intubation to improve distal control of the internal carotid artery was performed in 33 patients (50%), including those with intrastent restenosis. A PTFE graft of 6 or 7 mm in diameter was used in 6 and 60 patients, respectively. Distal anastomosis was end to end in 22 patients and end to side with a clip distal to the atherosclerotic lesions in 44 patients. Completion angiography was performed in all cases. The patients were discharged under statin and antiplatelet treatment. After discharge, all of the patients underwent clinical and Doppler ultrasound follow-up every 6 months. Median length of follow-up was 5 years. RESULTS: No patient died, sustained a stroke, or presented with a cervical hematoma during the postoperative period. One transient facial nerve palsy and two transient recurrent nerve palsies occurred. Two late strokes in relation to two PCB occlusions occurred at 2 years and 4 years; no other graft stenosis or infection was observed. At 5 years, overall actuarial survival was 81% ± 7%, and the actuarial stroke-free rate was 93% ± 2%. There were no fatal strokes. CONCLUSIONS: PCB with PTFE grafts is a safe and durable alternative to CEA in patients with carotid restenosis after CEA or CAS in situations in which CEA is deemed either hazardous or inadvisable.