Timing of Primary Surgery for Cleft Palate.

BACKGROUND: Among infants with isolated cleft palate, whether primary surgery at 6 months of age is more beneficial than surgery at 12 months of age with respect to speech outcomes, hearing outcomes, dentofacial development, and safety is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned infants with nonsyndromic isolated cleft palate, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo standardized primary surgery at 6 months of age (6-month group) or at 12 months of age (12-month group) for closure of the cleft. Standardized assessments of quality-checked video and audio recordings at 1, 3, and 5 years of age were performed independently by speech and language therapists who were unaware of the trial-group assignments. The primary outcome was velopharyngeal insufficiency at 5 years of age, defined as a velopharyngeal composite summary score of at least 4 (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater severity). Secondary outcomes included speech development, postoperative complications, hearing sensitivity, dentofacial development, and growth. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 558 infants at 23 centers across Europe and South America to undergo surgery at 6 months of age (281 infants) or at 12 months of age (277 infants). Speech recordings from 235 infants (83.6%) in the 6-month group and 226 (81.6%) in the 12-month group were analyzable. Insufficient velopharyngeal function at 5 years of age was observed in 21 of 235 infants (8.9%) in the 6-month group as compared with 34 of 226 (15.0%) in the 12-month group (risk ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.99; P = 0.04). Postoperative complications were infrequent and similar in the 6-month and 12-month groups. Four serious adverse events were reported (three in the 6-month group and one in the 12-month group) and had resolved at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Medically fit infants who underwent primary surgery for isolated cleft palate in adequately resourced settings at 6 months of age were less likely to have velopharyngeal insufficiency at the age of 5 years than those who had surgery at 12 months of age. (Funded by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; TOPS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00993551.).

Impact of a Palatal Fistula After Cleft Palate Repair on Velopharyngeal Closure.

PURPOSE: A palatal fistula is an adverse outcome of cleft palate repair. It is unknown if a palatal fistula will influence velopharyngeal closure, even after repair of the fistula. This study determines the effect of a soft palate fistula on the risk of developing velopharyngeal insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 2000 and 2015, with complete records at 4 years of age. Fistulae involving the secondary palate following primary palatoplasty were classified as the soft or hard palate. A forced-entry multivariate logistic regression model was built to detect predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction. RESULTS: Records of 329 patients were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. A palatal fistula was identified in 89/329 patients (27%) and 29/329 patients (9%) underwent an independent fistula repair. Of the patients with fistula, 44% were located in the hard palate only and 56% had soft palate involvement. Compared to patients without a fistula, rates of velopharyngeal dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with a fistula involving the soft palate (OR 3.875, CI: 1.964-7.648, P < .001) but not in patients with a hard palate fistula (OR 1.140, CI: 0.497-2.613, P = .757). Veau class, age at primary repair, and syndromic status were not significant predictors of VPI (0.128≤P ≤ .975). CONCLUSIONS: A palatal fistula involving the soft palate is a significant predictor for development of velopharyngeal dysfunction after primary palatoplasty. Surgical intervention, at the time of fistula repair, to add vascularized tissue may be indicated to prophylactically decrease the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Uvular Dermoid Cyst: More Than Just a Lump in the Throat-Management of Resultant Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

To seal the passage between the nasal and oral cavities during speech and swallowing, velopharyngeal closure is required. However, in velopharyngeal dysfunction, uncoupling of the nasal and oral cavities can be impaired, resulting in hypernasality, nasal air emission, and decreased vocal intensity. Velopharyngeal dysfunction can develop following velopharyngeal mislearning, oral surgery, or a congenital palatal malformation. Rare dermoid cysts of the palate may interrupt normal palatal development, resulting in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). While speech therapy is the standard treatment, some cases may necessitate surgical correction of structural insufficiencies. In this report, we present the case of a 7-year-old female with a past surgical history of a uvular dermoid cyst removal at 14 months of age with VPI that was treated with Furlow Z-palatoplasty. To the author's knowledge, this is one of but a few cases of a uvular dermoid cyst with VPI.

A custom nasal obturator for velopharyngeal dysfunction: A dental technique.

Removable nasal obturators provide a treatment option for a range of patients presenting with velopharyngeal dysfunction without eliminating the possibility for future surgery, speech therapy, or the provision of other devices. The presented technique describes the fabrication of a 1-piece silicone nasal obturator to reduce hypernasality and nasal airflow errors without causing significant hyponasality. The obturator has minimal visibility and minimal risk of inhalation.

Videofluoroscopic Findings as Predictors of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Midface retrusion is a common problem in patients with cleft lip and palate owing to the lack of adequate growth of the maxilla. Midface advancement surgery is a definite treatment for midface retrusion; however, the subsequent oropharyngeal airway changes might result in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in affected patients. Determining the predictors of VPI beforehand and modifying the surgical procedure would be beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 42 patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent orthognathic surgery from 2013 to 2014 was performed. A total of 25 patients met the inclusion criteria and had undergone complete pre- and postsurgery videofluoroscopy, nasopharyngoscopy (NPS), and speech assessment. We compared 2 groups of patients, those who showed NPS finding changes of more than 0.1 (8 patients) and those without changes (17 patients), by measuring the distances of the contact point to the tip of the velum, gap size at maximum closure (MC) and rest, contact area length, lateral wall closure rate, closure velocity, and 2 angles (from the velum to the hard palate and genu) at MC and rest. The amount of maxillary advancement was also recorded. RESULTS: Among the 8 patients with NPS finding changes, 3 underwent Furlow palatoplasty for VPI. No significant difference was found in the amount of maxillary advancement between the groups (5.8 vs 5.7 mm). Significant differences were found in the preoperative gap size at MC and angle at the genu at MC (P = 0.035 and .012). These could be considered as the predictors before surgery. After surgery, a significant difference was found in the contact area, lateral wall closure rate, and gap size at MC (P = 0.005, 0.018, and 0.01). CONCLUSION: Videofluoroscopy is a relatively applicable method of determining dynamic changes in the velum function. By performing videofluoroscopy before midface advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate, we may predict the risk of VPI and consider alternative surgical strategies.

An Alternative Internal Le Fort I Distractor: Early Results With a New Trans-Nasal Device.

PURPOSE: To report the early experience using a new internal trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate. METHODS: Patients with cleft lip and palate and severe maxillary deficiency, who were treated with the trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor, were retrospectively reviewed. Cephalometric images were evaluated preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Speech outcomes were measured before and at least 6 months after surgery. Patient experience with the device was documented and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Five male patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (ages 11-19) underwent the maximum advancement allowed by the device (25 mm). Follow-up averaged 2 years. Average SNA changed from 75.5°preoperatively to 84.6°postoperatively. Average ANB angle changed from -2.8° to 7.4°, or a tendency to Class 2 overcorrection. There was an overall increase in upper anterior facial height by 7.5 mm. All patients achieved acceptable postoperative occlusions. Two patients with borderline velopharyngeal function preoperatively developed velopharyngeal insufficiency postoperatively that did not resolve 6 months postoperatively, necessitating further surgery. Families reported ease of turning with minimal discomfort reported by patients. All patients maintained normal mouth opening during and after the distraction phase. Two of the patients developed localized pin site infections after the distraction phase that were treated successfully with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor can be an effective device to advance the deficient maxilla and is well tolerated by patients.

Identifying Predictors of Acquired Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Lip and Palate Following Maxillary Osteotomy Using Multiple Regression Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary osteotomy is typically undertaken to correct abnormal facial growth in cleft lip and palate. The surgery can cause velopharyngeal insufficiency resulting in hypernasality. This study aims to identify valid predictors of acquired velopharyngeal insufficiency following maxillary osteotomy by using a range of perceptual and instrumental speech investigations and multiple regression. METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken consisting of a consecutive series of patients with cleft lip and palate (N = 20) undergoing maxillary osteotomy by a single surgeon. Participants were seen at: 0 to 3 months pre-surgery (T1), 3-months (T2), and 12-months (T3) post-surgery. Hypernasality was rated using the cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented (CAPS-A) and visual analog scales, and nasalance was measured on the Nasometer II 6400. For lateral videofluorosopic and nasendoscopic images, visual perceptual ratings and quantitative ratiometric measurements were undertaken. Multiple regression analyses were undertaken to identify predictors. RESULTS: T3 models with hypernasality as the dependent variable were found to be a good fit and significant (eg, CAPS-A: R2 = 0.920, F(11,7) = 7.303, P = 0.007). Closure ratio (a quantitative ratiometric measurement) and proportion of palate contacting the posterior pharyngeal wall (a visual perceptual rating) were identified as significant predictors for the CAPS-A model (P = 0.030, P = 0.002).

Transient Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Calcified Stylohyoid Ligament Resection.

Elongation of the stylohyoid process or calcification of the stylohyoid ligament is known as the Eagle syndrome. Mostly, it is seen incidentally on imaging or with extreme suspicion and usually patients are asymptomatic.Surgery is the preferred method in symptomatic patients. Transcervical or transoral methods may be preferred as surgical route.A 28-year-old female patient who had formerly underwent tonsillectomy presented with throat and ear pain. A neck computed tomography was performed, and the patient was diagnosed as Eagle Syndrome. Surgery was recommended.Patient developed transient velopharyngeal insufficiency on postoperative day 4. Ventilation exercise and follow-up was recommended. Complaints of the patient decreased on the 15th day.It should be kept in mind that stylohyoid ligament may be calcified in young age group and middle age group patients with dysphagia or odynophagia, and differential diagnosis should be performed. Another issue is the condition of velofaringeal insufficiency which may occur due to the damage of the pharynx muscles by deep dissection during surgery.

Three-dimensional analysis of the velopharyngeal region in patients with cleft palate and healthy individuals.

PURPOSE: This study aims to attain metric data of the velopharyngeal dimensions of healthy subjects as well as patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency using the example of cleft and lip palate (CLP) in order to determine possible differences in the volumes of both groups. METHODS: Volumes and distances of velopharyngeal areas were analyzed retrospectively using cone beam computed tomography data sets (n = 60). Group 1 included healthy patients receiving dental implants (n = 31). Group 2 was represented by patients with surgically closed cleft lip and palate (n = 29). RESULTS: Biggest differences among mean values of both groups were found for: minimum axial area (p = 0.000), airway area caudal (p = 0.000), distance between posterior nasal spine and posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) (p = 0.014), mean distance between velum and PPW (p = 0.000), length of PPW (p = 0.000) and length of anterior pharyngeal wall (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Differences in the shape and geometry of the velopharyngeal area in subjects with a regular velopharyngeal structure and function and patients with cleft palate do exist. The significant differences found here can be categorized into two groups: one reflects distances between the anterior and posterior pharynx, presenting longer distances for patients with CLP. The second significant difference regards values of length in cranio-caudal direction, which is longer in healthy subjects. With regards to these values, one could conclude, that even though total volumes of both groups did not differ in size, group 1 shows three-dimensional velopharyngeal shapes that are longer and narrower, whereas shapes of patients of group 2 tend to be wider and shorter in general.

Speech Outcomes After LeFort I Advancement Among Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) results from incomplete closure of the velopharyngeal (VP) sphincter with oral pressure consonants during speech. Maxillary hypoplasia is common among cleft children and often requires LeFort I advancement. This results in anterior movement of the soft palate with the bony maxillary segment. Consequently, the size of the VP sphincter is increased and may result postoperative VPI or worsening of prior VPI. To better counsel our patients and their families of the risk of VPI after LeFort I advancement, we chose to evaluate our own cohort. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved prospective review of all cleft children presenting to Texas Children's Hospital who underwent LeFort I advancement after previous palatoplasty between 2013 and 2016 in a three-surgeon, consecutive patient series. Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, cleft type, prior secondary speech surgery, presence of preoperative fistula, planned distance of advancement, orthognathic surgery performed, and any concurrent procedures performed. Primary outcomes measured included preoperative and postoperative VP function and hypernasality as measured by a certified speech pathologist. RESULTS: Velopharyngeal function was unchanged in 67% of our cohort after LeFort I advancement. Of those patients, 83% had evidence of VPI preoperatively, and 17% had normal speech preoperatively. Twenty-two percent of the patients displayed worsening VP function after surgery, and 6% displayed evidence of improvement. Velopharyngeal function was unable to be assessed in 6% of patients. Nasality ratings worsened in 39% of patients, were unchanged in 39%, and improved in 22%. Of the patients with incompetent VP function after surgery, 50% already received or are currently scheduled for secondary speech surgery, 25% declined secondary surgery, and 25% are pending scheduling. CONCLUSIONS: Although VP function remains unchanged in a majority of patients after LeFort I advancement, VPI should be carefully screened for after surgery. If detected, secondary operations to correct speech should be strongly considered.

Complications Following Orthognathic Surgery for Patients With Cleft Lip/Palate.

INTRODUCTION: Cleft lip/palate is a facial anomaly caused by an abnormal developmental process. It is also the most common congenital anomaly. Orthognathic surgery is required in 25% of patients with cleft lip and palate for the correction of dentofacial deformity. There are various complications that can occur after orthognathic surgery. Complications that can occur during surgery include bleeding, improper fracture, and injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve. Meanwhile, postoperative complications include hemorrhage, edema, pain, infection, and delayed union or nonunion. This study retrospectively examines the complications that occurred after the orthognathic surgery in cleft lip/palate patients at Pusan National University Dental Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1, 2008 to July 31, 2017, we selected 17 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for cleft lip/palate at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pusan National University Dental Hospital. The patients were treated at different hospitals for all operations related to cleft lip/palate. RESULT: Intraoperative complications include hemorrhage, inadequate fracture, injury to the IAN and lingual nerve, root damage, and fistula. The patients who were evaluated included 2 patients with inadequate fracture, 3 patients with injury to the IAN, and 1 patient with fistula. Postoperative complications (e.g., as damage of the inferior alveolar nerve and velopharyngeal insufficiency) may occur, and all patients recovered during the follow-up period of 6 months or more after the surgery. The relapse rates were A-N per 14.0%, Pog-N per 15.1%, SNA 24.4%, and SNB 4.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in relapse rate. CONCLUSION: Complications that may occur after the orthognathic surgery in the patients with cleft lip/palate are similar to those without cleft lip/palate.

Comparison of the Speech Results After Correction of Submucous Cleft Palate With Furlow Palatoplasty and Pharyngeal Flap Combined With Intravelar Veloplasty.

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a relatively rare variant of the common pathology of cleft palate with specific anatomic and clinical features. Even though there are many surgical options defined previously to correct the SMCP, correction of the velopharyngeal insufficiency and obtaining ideal speech results remains as a challenge. The aim of this article was to compare the speech benefits of Furlow double opposing Z plasty and posterior pharyngeal flap operation combined with intravelar veloplasty for the correction of SMCP using objective assessment tools. This study reviewed 29 patients who underwent either superiorly based posterior pharyngeal flap combined with intravelar veloplasty or Furlow palatoplasty for submucous cleft palate repair between years 2005 and 2011. The mean standard deviation age at palate repair was 123.6 ±â€Š65.8 months and the mean follow-up period was 31.2 ±â€Š15.9 months. The postoperative results demonstrated that in both groups significantly correction has been achieved in means of velopharygeal closure (P values for Furlow and pharyngeal flap groups are 0.012 and 0.001 respectively). The correction of the nasalance scores obtained depending on the surgical procedure for /sa/ and /ka/ syllables demonstrated significantly more benefit with pharyngeal flap combined with intravelar veloplasty than Furlow palatoplasty (P = 0.026 for each). In the treatment of submucous clefts, both Furlow palatoplasty and pharyngeal flap procedure combined with intravelar veloplasty appear to be effective whereas for the patients having significant signs of hypernasality, contribution of pharyngeal flap may be taken into consideration.

Two Methods of Cleft Palate Repair in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcome between 2 patient groups with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent different types of palatoplasty. METHODS: This is a cohort study between 2 groups of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were operated using different surgical techniques from 2008 to 2011. About 28 patients were operated using a primary lip nose repair with vomer flap for hard palate single-layer closure and delayed soft palate repair (modified Oslo protocol) and 32 patients were operated using our protocol in Lima. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of symptomatic oronasal fistulas, presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and evaluation of dental arch relationships (scored using the 5-year-olds' index). RESULTS: Our comparative study observed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the presence of oronasal fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency in favor of our palatoplasty technique. A statistically significant difference was not found in functional vestibular oronasal fistula development between the studied techniques for unilateral cleft palate repair. This comparative study did not observe significant differences in dental arch relationships between the studied techniques. CONCLUSION: In this study, better surgical outcome than modified Oslo protocol regarding oronasal fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency on patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate was observed. The results arising from this study do not provide evidence that one technique is enough to obtain better functional closure of the alveolar cleft and dental arch relationship at 5 years.

Patient With Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia Who Underwent Distraction Osteogenesis and Conservative Therapies to Postoperative Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

The authors performed distraction osteogenesis using The Maxillary Distractor System (SYNTHES) to maxillary hypoplasia patient with cleft lip palate, and consequently improved the aesthetic complexion of the patient. Velopharyngeal insufficiency developed after bone elongation; the authors improved the insufficiency with conservative therapies such as articulatory training using the bulb attached palatal lift prosthesis. The authors were successful and accepted postoperative speech outcome.

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Le Fort I Osteotomy in a Patient With Undiagnosed Occult Submucous Cleft Palate.

The authors present a 16-year-old patient with no known history of cleft palate who developed velopharyngeal insufficiency after a Le Fort I osteotomy performed for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia and a Class III malocclusion. Postoperative evaluation revealed the presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and subtle findings of an occult submucous cleft palate. She had a pharyngeal flap 6 months later with successful correction of the velopharyngeal insufficiency. This case illustrates the need to screen for submucous cleft palate prior to orthognathic surgery.

Morphology of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Adults With Repaired Cleft Palate.

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in levator veli palatini (levator) morphology between adults with repaired cleft palate and adults with noncleft anatomy. Fifteen adult participants (10 with noncleft anatomy, 5 with repaired cleft palate) underwent 3-dimensional (3D) static magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Image analyses included measures of total muscle volume and the circumference and diameter at 6 points along the length of the muscle. Differences between groups were analyzed using independent sample Mann-Whitney U tests (α < 0.05). Significant differences between groups were noted for measures of muscle volume, circumference at the origin and midline, anterior-posterior diameter at the origin and midline, and superior-inferior diameter at the point of insertion into the velum and midline. Differences in measures at other points along the levator muscle belly were not statistically significant. Limited sample size and gender differences may have impacted statistical findings. Overall, the levator muscle in adults with repaired cleft palate is significantly different than that of adults with noncleft anatomy. This study demonstrates the successful implementation of a method for 3D analysis of velopharyngeal (VP) musculature with potential clinical utility given continued technological advancements in MRI. Continued evaluation of pre- and postsurgical anatomy and short- and long-term outcomes may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of various types of palatoplasties on levator structure, which is important to VP function for speech.

Modified Superior-Based Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective in Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Regardless of the Preoperative Closure Pattern.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is certainly one of the most important problems confronted after cleft palate repairs. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative speaking results of patients who underwent modified superior-based pharyngeal flap. Sixty-six children who underwent modified superiorly based pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The study population was evaluated in 2 distinctive groups depending on their preoperative velopharyngeal closure pattern as: coronal closure pattern or noncoronal closure patterns (ie, circular, sagittal with or without the presence of a Passavant ridge). The speech outcome of the patients was evaluated using the objective assessment tools of nasopharyngoscopy and nasometer. Coronal closure pattern was determined in 24 patients (36.4%) and noncoronal closure pattern in 42 patients (63.6%). The mean follow-up period was 14.67 ±â€Š3.90 and 13.74 ±â€Š3.53 months in the coronal and noncoronal groups, respectively. The results demonstrated that the postoperative nasalance scores of all syllables except (m) and (n) were found to be significantly lower compared to those of the preoperative period (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative results was observed in means of closure pattern. The surgical approach of modified superior-based pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI appears to be effective regardless of the preoperatively determined closure pattern.

International Adoptees With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Lessons Learned From a Growing Population.

BACKGROUND: International adoptees with cleft lip and palate (CLP) are a growing population in the United States. They represent a clinical challenge, presenting at various ages and stages of cleft repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen at the CLP Program at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) between 1998 and 2012 with a history of international adoption was performed. Demographics, surgical histories, and long-term speech outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-four female and 77 male patients were evaluated. Patients were adopted at an average age of 2.3 years (range, 0.4-8.6 years); 80.8% (n = 122) of patients were adopted from China. The rate of international cleft adoption increased by approximately 1.5 patients per year (r = 0.7739, P < 0.001); 13.2% (n = 19) of all subjects with cleft palates had oronasal fistulas (ONFs) that required repair. The ONF rates for primary palatoplasties at CHOP were significantly lower compared to both preadoption repairs (P = 0.002) and postadoption repairs at outside hospitals (P = 0.01); 14.8% (n = 21) of all patients had secondary surgeries for velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI). Rates of secondary surgery for VPI were also significantly lower for primary palatoplasties at CHOP compared to both preadoption repairs (P = 0.0018) and postadoption repairs at outside hospitals (P = 0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: International adoptees with CLP are a growing population and are clinically challenging with high ONF rates and high secondary surgery rates for VPI. We recommend expedited repair of unoperated cleft palates in adoptees older than 18 months. Adopted patients with CLP should be rigorously evaluated for the need for speech therapy and secondary surgeries to correct for VPI.

Effects of Cleft Width and Veau Type on Incidence of Palatal Fistula and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Cleft Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) are 2 important complications after cleft palate repair. The effects of preoperative cleft width on outcomes after cleft palate repair have been rarely studied. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary cleft palatoplasty by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2011 was performed. Primary outcomes were palatal fistula and VPI, defined as the need for corrective surgery after failing conservative speech-language therapy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients (84 men and 93 women) were identified. Median age at repair was 10 months with median follow-up of 3.80 years. Preoperative cleft width was 10 mm or less for 72 (41%) patients, 11 to 14 mm for 54 (30%) patients, and 15 mm or greater for 51 (29%) patients. Palatal fistula was observed in 8 (4.5%) patients, but required surgical repair in only 2 (1.1%). Fistula was overall associated with Veau IV classification (odds ratio, 8.13; P < 0.01) but not with cleft width. Velopharyngeal insufficiency needing surgical intervention occurred in 9 patients (7.38% of patients older than 4 years) and was associated with increasing cleft width (odds ratio, 1.29; P = 0.011). Outcomes were similar for patients undergoing surgery in the earlier and later halves of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review is one of the first from the United States to explore the associations between measured cleft width and outcomes after palatoplasty. Overall rates of palatal fistula and VPI were low, corroborating previous studies showing good outcomes with the 2-flap palatoplasty. After adjusting for multiple variables including Veau type, cleft width was associated with higher VPI rates but not with fistula formation. Cleft width is a unique preoperative factor that should be considered and studied as a potential predictor of outcomes.

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Rates After Delayed Cleft Palate Repair: Lessons Learned From Internationally Adopted Patients.

Most surgeons recommend cleft palate repair between 6 and 12 months of age. Internationally adopted patients often undergo delayed repair due to social circumstances. There are few outcomes studies on this population. We conducted a 13-year retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair at a single tertiary-care academic medical center between 1993 and 2006. The primary outcome was velopharyngeal insufficiency, defined as the recommendation for corrective surgery after multiple formal speech assessments. Two hundred one patients (102 males and 99 females) were identified. One hundred eighty-three repairs were performed before 18 months of age (standard repair group). Eighteen repairs were performed after 18 months of age (delayed repair group), with international adoption being a circumstance in 16 cases. The delayed and standard repair groups were similar with regard to sex, presence of craniofacial syndrome, Veau class, cleft size and laterality, type of repair, and operating surgeon. Mean follow-up was 9.3 years, with minimum follow-up of 5.0 years. Six (33%) of 18 patients in the delayed repair group developed velopharyngeal insufficiency compared to 23 (13%) of 183 in the standard repair group (P = 0.03 by Fisher exact test). These data demonstrate that internationally adopted patients undergoing delayed palate repair suffer especially poor speech outcomes. Physiologic differences in patients undergoing late repair, as well as social factors including adaptation to a new language and culture, may be factors. Early repair should be performed when possible.