Perioperative, short-, and long-term mortality related to fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a study on 79,557 patients in the -Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Background and purpose - There are reports on perioperative deaths in cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), and THA revisions are associated with increased mortality. We compared perioperative (intraoperatively or within 3 days of surgery), short-term and long-term mortality after all-cemented, all-uncemented, reverse hybrid (cemented cup and uncemented stem), and hybrid (uncemented cup and cemented stem) THAs.Patients and methods - We studied THA patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 to 2018, and performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses with time of death as end-point. Mortality was calculated for all patients, and in 3 defined risk groups: high-risk patients (age ≥ 75 years and ASA > 2), intermediate-risk patients (age ≥ 75 years or ASA > 2), low-risk patients (age < 75 years and ASA ≤ 2). We also calculated mortality in patients with THA due to a hip fracture, and in patients with commonly used, contemporary, well-documented THAs. Adjustement was made for age, sex, ASA class, indication, and year of surgery.Results - Among the 79,557 included primary THA patients, 11,693 (15%) died after 5.8 (0-14) years' follow-up. Perioperative deaths were rare (30/105) and found in all fixation groups. Perioperative mortality after THA was 4/105 in low-risk patients, 34/105 in intermediate-risk patients, and 190/105 in high-risk patients. High-risk patients had 9 (CI 1.3-58) times adjusted risk of perioperative death compared with low-risk patients. All 4 modes of fixation had similar adjusted 3-day, 30-day, 90-day, 3-30 day, 30-90 day, 90-day-10-year, and 10-year mortality risk.Interpretation - Perioperative, short-term, and long-term mortality after primary THA were similar, regardless of fixation type. Perioperative deaths were rare and associated with age and comorbidity, and not type of fixation.

High early failure rate after cementless hip replacement in the octogenarian.

BACKGROUND: Use of cementless hip replacements is increasing in many countries, but the best method for fixation for octogenarian patients remains unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We studied how fixation method (cemented, cementless, hybrid) affects the survival of primary hip replacements and mortality in patients 80 years or older. Specifically, we asked if fixation method affects (1) the risk of revision; (2) the reasons for revision; and (3) the mortality after contemporary primary hip replacement in octogenarian patients. METHODS: A total of 4777 primary total hip replacements were performed in 4509 octogenarian patients with primary osteoarthritis in Finland between 1998 and 2009 and were registered in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Comorbidity data were collected from a nationwide quality register. Survival of hip replacements, using any revision as the end point, and mortality were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis and Cox regression analysis. The average followup was 4 years (range, 1-13 years). RESULTS: Cementless hip replacements were associated with a higher rate of early (within 1 year) revision compared with cemented hip replacements (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-5.1), particularly in women. The difference was not explained by comorbidity or provider-related factors. Periprosthetic fracture was the leading mode of failure of cementless hip replacements. After 1 year, there were no differences in the survival rates although 10-year survival was slightly lower for cementless than cemented and hybrid hip replacements (93.9% [95% CI, 91.1%-96.7%] versus 97.4% [95% CI, 96.9%-98.0%] and 98.1% [95% CI, 96.9%-99.4%], respectively). Fixation method was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cementless fixation was associated with an increased risk of revision and did not provide any benefit in terms of lower mortality in octogenarian patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A 5-8 year retrospective follow-up of the C-stem AMT femoral component: patient reported outcomes and survivorship analysis.

We report midterm functional, radiographic and survivorship data for the cemented, triple taper C-stem AMT femoral component from a consecutive cohort of 415 hip arthroplasties in 386 patients at a non-developer centre. Follow-up ranges were from 60 to 99 months, with a mean of 76 months. 32 hips were lost to follow-up. The median OHS was 40, median SF-12 mental component score (MCS) was 50, and median SF-12 physical component score (PCS) was 39. At 99 months follow up, stem survivorship is 96.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.5-99.5), and construct survivorship is 96.0% (95% CI 84.2-99.0). Adverse events such as calcar fracture, greater trochanter fracture and dislocation were rare at <1%. There have been no revisions for aseptic loosening.

Mortality following hip arthroplasty--inappropriate use of National Joint Registry (NJR) data.

Mortality following hip arthroplasty is affected by a large number of confounding variables each of which must be considered to enable valid interpretation. Relevant variables available from the 2011 NJR data set were included in the Cox model. Mortality rates in hip arthroplasty patients were lower than in the age-matched population across all hip types. Age at surgery, ASA grade, diagnosis, gender, provider type, hip type and lead surgeon grade all had a significant effect on mortality. Schemper's statistic showed that only 18.98% of the variation in mortality was explained by the variables available in the NJR data set. It is inappropriate to use NJR data to study an outcome affected by a multitude of confounding variables when these cannot be adequately accounted for in the available data set.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: correlation between clinical and radiological assessment, metal ions and ultrasound findings.

PURPOSE: We report the clinical, radiological and wear analysis of 52 consecutive MoM hip resurfacings (performed on 49 younger patients) to a mean follow-up of 9.2 years. METHODS: Every patient underwent X-ray and clinical evaluation (HHS). Ultrasonography of the hip was performed in all patients in order to identify possible cystic or solid mass in periprosthetic tissue. In case of mass >20 mm, further MRI was performed to better analyse the characteristics of lesion. RESULTS: Five patients (five hips) had a revision. The overall survival rate was 90.38 %. The average HHS at follow-up examination was 95.5 points. No progressive radiolucent areas and no sclerosis or osteolysis around the implants were found. The US and RMI imaging showed a pseudotumour formation in two patients (correlated with high metal ion levels in blood and urine), both asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: A significant positive correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and serum metal ion levels was found (r = 0.64 and r = 0.62 for cobalt and chromium, respectively).

Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement. Results and survivorship in young patients.

Total hip replacement using an alumina head and socket and a titanium alloy stem is evaluated in a series of patients under 50 years of age. Between April 1977 and December 1986, 86 such replacements were performed in 75 patients, but mainly because patients had difficulty travelling from Africa, only 71 hips were followed up adequately; of these, 56 were primary procedures and 15 revisions. Survivorship analysis showed that 98% of the prostheses were retained for 10 years. On clinical and radiological examination 51 of the 71 hips were stable and acceptable, 15 had radiological changes on the acetabular side, and one on the femoral side; four other cases had clinical and radiological changes suggesting impending failure, possibly because fixation of the socket was inadequate. There were no differences between the results of the primary procedures and those of revisions. In these young patients, the results seem better with alumina-on-alumina hips than with other varieties, possibly because of their remarkably low wear.

Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: National Joint Registry. POPULATION: About 275,000 patient records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hip arthroplasty procedures were linked to the time to any subsequent mortality or revision (implant failure). Flexible parametric survival analysis methods were used to analyse time to mortality and also time to revision. Comparisons between procedure groups were adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and complexity. RESULTS: As there were large baseline differences in the characteristics of patients receiving cemented, uncemented, or resurfacing procedures, unadjusted comparisons are inappropriate. Multivariable survival analyses identified a higher mortality rate for patients undergoing cemented compared with uncemented total hip replacement (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.16); conversely, there was a lower revision rate with cemented procedures (0.53, 0.50 to 0.57). These translate to small predicted differences in population averaged absolute survival probability at all time points. For example, compared with the uncemented group, at eight years after surgery the predicted probability of death in the cemented group was 0.013 higher (0.007 to 0.019) and the predicted probability of revision was 0.015 lower (0.012 to 0.017). In multivariable analyses restricted to men, there was a higher mortality rate in the cemented group and the uncemented group compared with the Birmingham hip resurfacing group. In terms of revision, the Birmingham hip resurfacings had a similar revision rate to uncemented total hip replacements. Both uncemented total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacings had a higher revision rate than cemented total hip replacements. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small but significant increased risk of revision with uncemented rather than cemented total hip replacement, and a small but significant increased risk of death with cemented procedures. It is not known whether these are causal relations or caused by residual confounding. Compared with uncemented and cemented total hip replacements, Birmingham hip resurfacing has a significantly lower risk of death in men of all ages. Previously, only adjusted analyses of hip implant revision rates have been used to recommend and justify use of cheaper cemented total hip implants. Our investigations additionally consider mortality rates and suggest a potentially higher mortality rate with cemented total hip replacements, which merits further investigation.

The impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic hip OA: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: There is scarce data available on intra-articular hyaluronan's ability to modify the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective pilot study was to assess the impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip replacement (THR) in patients with symptomatic hip OA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The records of patients presenting with symptomatic hip OA and treated with hylan G-F 20 were analysed. Endpoints were the number of THRs performed and the survival time (in months) between commencement of treatment and THR, if performed. Endpoints were evaluated for the entire study population and for those sub-groups of patients which were, or were not, defined as candidates for THR prior to intra-articular treatment. Predictive factors of progression to THR were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 850 patients' records were evaluated and 224 patients' data were included in the study and evaluated. Eighty-four patients (37.5%) progressed to THR, 206 patients (92.0%) achieved 12 months survival, 170 patients (75.9%) achieved 24 months survival, and 69 patients (30.8%) achieved 5 years survival. Mean survival time was 36 months. Classification as a THR candidate, Lequesne score, ultrasound pattern and the presence of diabetes were predictive factors for progression to THR. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hylan G-F 20 could be included in the management of symptomatic hip OA before recommendation for THR, particularly in patients presenting with milder symptoms, or in patients where, due to comorbidities or personal choice, THR is not a feasible option. Limitations of this study include the retrospective study design and the lack of a control group to determine any placebo effect of hylan G-F 20. Further prospective studies are therefore needed to corroborate these results.

[Cemented bipolar prosthesis in multimorbidity patients with coxarthrosis. Short- and intermediate-term results]. / Zementierte bipolare Prothesen bei multimorbiden Koxarthrose-Patienten. Kurz- und mittelfristige Ergebnisse.

The treatment of coxarthrosis with the cemented Duopleet prosthesis represents an efficient alternative to total hip prosthesis in elderly and polymorbid patients. The early results show a tolerable rate of complications. The patients can be mobilized early. The mortality seems to be low. Medium-term results are satisfactory. The rate of protrusions is lower than in patients with common femoral head prosthesis. Paraarticular ossifications are seen frequently. In numerous patients we found pain with projection to the operated hip.

A prospective study of the migration of two acetabular components. PCA versus RM cups.

Fifty-nine PCA cups and 61 hydroxyapatite-coated RM cups were included in a prospective randomised study with a mean follow up of 5.2 years. Clinical evaluation revealed better results with the RM cup. Radiological criteria of loosening could be applied only with considerable restrictions as different parameters were assessed: progressively loosened beads in PCA cups and faded contour in RM cups. Migration was measured by a computer assisted method (EBRA). PCA cups showed significantly more longitudinal migration 2 years after operation and subsequently. High migration values correlated with a limp. Loosening as defined by migration was of clinical relevance, could be measured early and predicted the survival rate.