Spanlastics nanovesicular ocular insert as a novel ocular delivery of travoprost: optimization using Box-Behnken design and in vivo evaluation.

Currently, travoprost is a synthetic prostaglandin F2α analogue used in the treatment of glaucoma, it is delivered by eye drop solution. Due to its very low bioavailability and patient non-compliance, the objective of the current study was to enhance its bioavailability, and prolong its release Spanlastic nano-vesicles gels were designed and optimized using Box-Behnken design. The optimized spanlastic nano-vesicles gel exhibited the lowest particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI) and the highest zeta potential (ZP), encapsulation efficiency (EE) and mucoadhesive strength was fabricated into spanlastic nano-vesicles ocular insert by solvent casting. In vivo studies showed enhanced bioavailability of travoprost spanlastic nano-vesicles gel and ocular insert compared to the marketed eye drops (travoswix®), as proven by their higher Cmax and AUC0-∞, in addition to being nonirritant to ocular surfaces. However, spanlastic nano-vesicles ocular insert showed more prolonged effect than spanlastic nano-vesicles gel. According to our study, it can be suggested that travoprost spanlastic nano-vesicles ocular insert is a novel ocular delivery system for glaucoma treatment.

Comparison of BAK-preserved latanoprost and polyquad-preserved travoprost on ocular surface parameters in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of two different prostaglandin analogues (Travatan® vs. Xalatan®) on ocular surface parameters. METHODS: This study includes 44 eyes of 44 patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Patients were randomly divided into two groups and treated with either benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost and polyquad-preserved travoprost. Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) levels and ocular surface parameters including ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear breakup time (TBUT), ocular surface staining scores, and Schirmer test scores of patients were performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment and compared. RESULTS: The age, sex ratio, visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and cup/disc ratio were similar between the groups. A decrease in IOP levels (23.3 ± 2.5 to 15.5 ± 2.3), TBUT (5.5 ± 2.3 to 4.1 ± 1.7 s), Schirmer test values (11.3 ± 5.9 to 8.6 ± 4.7 s), and a worsening in OSDI scores (44.6 ± 15.2 to 55.1 ± 13.1) and staining scores (1.7 ± 1.6 to 2.3 ± 1.8) were observed in all patients in the first month of treatment (p < 0.05, for all). No further worsening was detected during the 1-year follow-up. There was no difference between the groups in terms of alterations in IOP levels and ocular surface parameters. CONCLUSION: Travatan® and Xalatan® have a similar effect on IOP levels and ocular surface parameters in patients with POAG and OHT.

Implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents and topical travoprost in open-angle glaucoma not controlled on two preoperative medications: 18-month follow-up.

IMPORTANCE: Additional data are sought regarding treatment options for glaucoma, a major cause of global blindness. BACKGROUND: The study assessed outcomes following standalone implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents and postoperative topical prostaglandin in eyes with open-angle glaucoma not controlled on two preoperative medications. DESIGN: The study design is a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label study at a tertiary-care ophthalmology centre. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects had open-angle glaucoma with preoperative intraocular pressure of 18-30 mmHg on two medications, a medication washout phase, and post-washout intraocular pressure of 22-38 mmHg. All subjects (N = 53) have been followed for 18 months. METHODS: One day following implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents, subjects started topical travoprost. Medication washout was repeated at month 12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with intraocular pressure reduction ≥ 20% versus medicated baseline intraocular pressure with reduction of one medication at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, 91% of eyes achieved intraocular pressure reduction ≥ 20% with reduction of one medication. All eyes had intraocular pressure ≤ 18 mmHg with reduction of one medication, and 87% had intraocular pressure ≤ 15 mmHg. Mean intraocular pressure on one medication was ≤ 13.0 mmHg (≥ 34% reduction) through 18 months. Mean post-washout intraocular pressure at month 13 was 33% lower than preoperative unmedicated intraocular pressure. No adverse events occurred through 18 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In open-angle glaucoma eyes on two preoperative medications, treatment with two second-generation trabecular stents and one postoperative prostaglandin resulted in mean intraocular pressure ≤ 13 mmHg with reduction of one medication, with favourable safety. These findings show the utility of second-generation trabecular bypass with postoperative prostaglandin in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Comparison of the ocular surface changes following the use of two different prostaglandin F2α analogues containing benzalkonium chloride or polyquad in rabbit eyes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of prostaglandin analogues preserved with either 0.015% or 0.001% benzalkoium chloride (BAK); or 0.001% polyquad (PQ) on the ocular surface of rabbit eyes. METHODS: Forty white rabbits were randomized to receive four-times daily instillation of either 0.0015% tafluprost (TF) preserved with 0.001% BAK (TF-BAK); 0.004% travoprost (TR) with 0.015% BAK (TR-BAK) or 0.001% PQ (TR-PQ); or preservative-free artificial tears in one eye for a 4-week period. Tear samples collected from the 40 rabbits were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to identify the presence of inflammatory cytokines: interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-6 on day 14. Subsequently, harvested cornea and bulbar conjunctiva were evaluated using light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: IL-6 was significantly increased in TF-BAK and TR-BAK groups compared to controls and TR-PQ group (p = 0.005); however, IL-1ß level was not significantly different among four groups (p = 0.360). Rabbits treated with TR-BAK showed decreased goblet cell density of bulbar conjunctiva and increased pyknotic change and vacuolization of corneal epithelial cells on light microscopy; similar change occurred but was less severe in TF-BAK group. The TR-PQ group showed similar results as the controls. The destruction of the microvillar architecture of bulbar conjunctiva and cornea was most prominent in the TR-BAK group. CONCLUSIONS: Preservatives included in the anti-glaucoma eye-drops showed different ocular surface changes according to the concentration and type in the rabbits. Prostaglandin analogues preserved with higher level of BAK may cause more harmful effects on the ocular surface than PQ-preserved medications.

The preservative polyquaternium-1 increases cytoxicity and NF-kappaB linked inflammation in human corneal epithelial cells.

PURPOSE: In numerous clinical and experimental studies, preservatives present in eye drops have had detrimental effects on ocular epithelial cells. The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxic and inflammatory effects of the preservative polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1) containing Travatan (travoprost 0.004%) and Systane Ultra eye drops with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) alone or BAK-preserved Xalatan (0.005% latanoprost) eye drops in HCE-2 human corneal epithelial cell culture. METHODS: HCE-2 cells were exposed to the commercial eye drops Travatan, Systane Ultra, Xalatan, and the preservative BAK. Cell viability was determined using colorimetric MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyldiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and by release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Induction of apoptosis was measured with a using a colorimetric caspase-3 assay kit. DNA binding of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) transcription factor, and productions of the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukins IL-6 and IL-8, were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. RESULTS: Cell viability, as measured by the MTT assay, declined by up to 50% after exposure to Travatan or Systane Ultra solutions which contain 0.001% PQ-1. BAK at 0.02% rather than at 0.001% concentration evoked total cell death signs on HCE-2 cells. In addition, cell membrane permeability, as measured by LDH release, was elevated by sixfold with Travatan and by a maximum threefold with Systane Ultra. Interestingly, Travatan and Systane Ultra activated NF-κB and elevated the secretion of inflammation markers IL-6 by 3 to eightfold and IL-8 by 1.5 to 3.5 fold, respectively, as analyzed with ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: Eye drops containing PQ-1 evoke cytotoxicity and enhance the NF-κB driven inflammation reaction in cultured HCE-2 cells. Our results indicate that these harmful effects of ocular solutions preserved with PQ-1 should be further evaluated in vitro and in vivo.

Reduced in vivo ocular surface toxicity with polyquad-preserved travoprost versus benzalkonium-preserved travoprost or latanoprost ophthalmic solutions.

The study used a validated acute in vivo model to compare a new formulation of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution(travoprost PQ), preserved with polyquaternium-1 (PQ), with commercially available formulations of benzalkonium-chloride(BAK)-preserved travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution(travoprost BAK) and BAK-preserved latanoprost 0.005%ophthalmic solution (latanoprost BAK). Adult male New Zealand albino rabbits (n = 36) were randomly divided into 6 groups. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.001% PQ, 0.015% BAK, travoprost PQ, travoprost BAK or latanoprost BAK were applied onto rabbit eyes as 1 drop, for 15 times at 5-min intervals.The ocular surface reactions were investigated at hour 4 and day 1 using slitlamp examination; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) for cornea, limbus and conjunctiva/conjunctiva-associated lymphoid tissue, conjunctival impression cytology and standard immunohistology in cryosections for detecting CD45+ infiltrating cells and MUC-5AC-labeled cells. PBS, PQ and travoprost PQ did not induce obvious irritation by clinical observation, changes in microstructures of the whole ocular surface as measured by IVCM analysis,inflammatory infiltration or cell damage as measured by impression cytology, altered levels of goblet cell counts or numerous CD45+ cells in the cornea. In contrast, all BAK-containing products induced diffuse conjunctival hyperemia and chemosis, abnormal changes in the ocular surface microstructure,significant total ocular surface toxicity scores,damaged epithelial cells, inflammatory cell infiltration and decreased goblet cell density. Travoprost PQ did not elicitocular surface toxicity when administered to rabbit eyes.These results suggest a greater safety advantage for the ocular surface of patients receiving chronic glaucoma treatment with PQ-preserved drugs.

Effects of benzalkonium chloride- or polyquad-preserved fixed combination glaucoma medications on human trabecular meshwork cells.

PURPOSE: We investigated the potential short and long-term effects in cultured human trabecular meshwork (TM) cells of various topical glaucoma formulations containing different preservatives. METHODS: We tested the fixed combination medications 0.004% travoprost plus 0.5% timolol preserved with either 0.015% benzalkonium chloride (BAK; DuoTrav®), or with 0.001% polyquad (PQ; DuoTrav(®) BAK-free); and 0.005% latanoprost plus 0.5% timolol preserved with 0.020% BAK (Xalacom(®)). Also tested was a range of BAK concentrations (0.001%-0.020%) in balanced salt solution (BSS). Cells were treated for 25 min at 37 °C with solutions diluted 1:10 and 1:100 to mimic the reduced penetration of topical preparations to the anterior chamber. The percentage of live cells was determined immediately after treatment through the uptake of the fluorescent vital dye calcein-AM. To determine any long-term effects, we assayed release of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and apoptosis 24 h after treatments. RESULTS: BAK demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in TM cell viability, ranging from 71±5% live cells at 0.001% BAK (diluted 1:10) to 33±3% live cells at 0.020% BAK (diluted 1:10). Travoprost (0.004%) plus 0.5% timolol preserved with 0.015% BAK had statistically fewer live TM cells (79±7%) than the same preparation preserved with 0.001% polyquad® (PQ; 93±1%; p<0.001). Latanoprost plus timolol preserved with 0.020% BAK (29±9% live cells) was similar to the 0.020% BAK (33±3%) treatment. However, travoprost plus timolol preserved in 0.015% BAK had significantly more live cells (83±12%) than the 1:10 dilution of 0.015% BAK (49±10%). We also found 0.020% BAK (diluted 1:100) resulted in elevated levels of extracellular MMP-9 at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the substitution of the preservative BAK from topical ophthalmic drugs results in greater in vitro viability of TM cells. Travoprost with timolol, but not latanoprost with timolol, countered some of the toxic BAK effects. BAK treatment appeared to cause elevated levels of MMP-9, a matrix metalloproteinase implicated in the pathogenesis of glaucoma.

Ocular Surface Disease with BAK preserved Travoprost and Polyquaternium 1(Polyquad) preserved Travoprost.

Introduction. The topical medications containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative is known to induce corneal toxicity and ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients. Newer preservatives like SofZia or polyquaternium-1 (Polyquad) have been developed to replace BAK in many medications. The present study aimed at comparing the OSD in glaucoma patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost versus travoprost with polyquad as preservative and controls not receiving any medications. Methods. This prospective, controlled, observational study was conducted on patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) on medications for more than 6 months. The first group comprised of 40 patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost, the second group included 40 patients receiving polyquad preserved travoprost and 30 of control group not receiving any medical treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire were assessed and compared in all subjects. Results. The mean OSDI score was 29.09 ± 13.45 in BAK group, 12.4 ± 5.085 in polyquad group and 10.93 ± 7.36 in controls. The mean difference in OSDI scores between BAK and polyquad group 16.63 (p < 0.05) and between the BAK and control group was 18.96 (p < 0.05). The mean difference in OSDI scores between the polyquad and control group was 1.53 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP in the BAK group was 19.2 ± 3.5 and in polyquad group was 20.1 ± 4.2. The IOP measured at 12 months of treatment was 13.2 ± 2.1 in BAK group and 12.8 ± 3.3 in polyquad group. The IOP measured at baseline and 12 months showed statistically significant difference in both the groups (p

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Travoprost 0.004% Ophthalmic Solution Preserved with Polyquad in Pediatric Patients with Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the systemic pharmacokinetics (PKs) of travoprost 0.004% preserved with Polyquad® (TRAVATAN®) in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a phase 1, open-label, multicenter clinical study of patients aged ≥2 months to <18 years. Patients received daily administration of travoprost 0.004% preserved with Polyquad in both eyes for 7 days. Plasma samples were collected 30 min before the final dose and at 10, 20, 40, and 80 min postdose. The main outcome measure was maximum concentration of travoprost free acid in plasma (Cmax). RESULTS: Included in the PK analysis were 24 patients (average age 9.6 ± 4.9 years). At least 1 sample with quantifiable levels of travoprost free acid was collected for 11 patients. The mean Cmax was 0.0471 ± 0.0105 ng/mL for patients aged 2 months to <3 years; 0.0258 ± 0.0128 ng/mL for ages 3 to <12 years; and 0.0109 ± 0.0005 ng/mL for ages 12 to <18 years. Travoprost was undetectable in samples collected predose from pediatric patients. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hyperemia, eye pain, and eye pruritus (n = 1 each). There were no discontinuations or drug-related serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost free acid concentration in plasma was low in pediatric patients, detectable in only 11 of 24 patients. There was no accumulation of travoprost over the course of treatment. No clear relationship was observed between age/body surface area and Cmax. No increased risk was identified for the use of travoprost 0.004% preserved with Polyquad in patients <18 years of age.

From benzalkonium chloride-preserved Latanoprost to Polyquad-preserved Travoprost: a 6-month study on ocular surface safety and tolerability.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of Polyquad-preserved Travoprost (PQ-Travoprost) in patients previously treated with benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved Latanoprost. METHODS: Cohort 6-month study on open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients. Complete ophthalmic examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and ocular surface status (tear film break-up time [TF-BUT], corneal staining and ocular surface disease index [OSDI]) were evaluated at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline IOP was 18 (15.5 - 21) and 16 (14 - 17) mmHg (p < 0.0001) after 6 months. At baseline, 18 (40.9%) patients presented an IOP of < 18 mmHg, 11 (25%) < 16 mmHg, 2 (4.3%) < 14 mmHg and 1 (2.3%) < 12 mmHg; 6 months later the proportions were 36 (81.8%) (p < 0.0001), 21 (47.7%) (p = 0.00075), 8 (18.2%) (p = 0.0143) and 6 (13.6%) (p = 0.0253). Concerning safety, TF-BUT improved from 8 [IQR 6 - 10] to 10 [IQR 8 - 12] s (p < 0.0001). No eye developed corneal staining; punctate keratitis was absent in 13 (29.5%) patients at baseline and in 31 (70.4%) after 6 months (p < 0.001). OSDI changed from 16 (10 - 30) to 9 (2 - 20). CONCLUSIONS: No patient treated with PQ-Travoprost developed ocular surface disease after 6 months of monotherapy, whereas many patients reached a good IOP control with lower IOP values. Ocular surface status statistically improved when examined by TF-BUT and corneal staining.

Polyquaternium-1-Preserved Travoprost 0.003% or Benzalkonium Chloride-Preserved Travoprost 0.004% for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate equivalence of polyquaternium-1-preserved travoprost 0.003% with benzalkonium chloride-preserved travoprost 0.004% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, 2-treatment, equivalence clinical trial. METHODS: setting: Multicenter clinical trial conducted in 60 centers in the United States and Europe. PATIENT POPULATION: Adult patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. One eye per patient was analyzed. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive polyquaternium-1-preserved travoprost 0.003% (n = 442) or benzalkonium chloride-preserved travoprost 0.004% (n = 422) once daily for 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3. Supportive outcomes were mean and percent IOP change, percentage of patients achieving IOP <18 mm Hg or ≥30% IOP reduction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean IOP was similar between groups at all study visits (travoprost 0.003% range, 17.5-18.9 mm Hg; travoprost 0.004% range, 17.4-19.0 mm Hg). Mean change (least squares mean differences, -0.1 to 0.3 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 0.7 mm Hg) and percentage change (travoprost 0.003%, 28.4%-30.7%; travoprost 0.004%, 28.5%-31.0%) from baseline were comparable. The percentages of patients with IOP <18 mm Hg and ≥30% reduction of IOP were also similar. Hyperemia was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event with both formulations (travoprost 0.003%, 11.8%; travoprost 0.004%, 14.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, polyquaternium-1-preserved travoprost 0.003% solution provided equivalent IOP-lowering efficacy to that of benzalkonium chloride-preserved travoprost 0.004%.

Effects of polyquaternium- and benzalkonium-chloride-preserved travoprost on ocular surfaces: an impression cytology study.

PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity effect of polyquaternium (PQ) and benzalkonium chloride (BAK) preservation of travoprost on the ocular surface. METHODS: This prospective study included 44 eyes of 44 patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma. Twenty-two patients used PQ-preserved travoprost (PQ group) and 22 patients used BAK-preserved travoprost (BAK group). To investigate the effect on the ocular surface, conjunctival impression cytology (IC) was performed at baseline and the 1- and 6-month follow-up visits. Additionally, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, Schirmer I test, and tear break-up time (TBUT) measurement were administered at baseline, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits. RESULTS: While both groups showed statistically significant IC grade increases at 1 and 6 months when compared with baseline measurements, IC grades were significantly higher for patients using PQ-preserved travoprost compared with patients using BAK-preserved travoprost. The Schirmer I test and TBUT scores were not statistically significant between group 1 and BAK group at baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month visits (P>0.05). OSDI scores did not statistically differ at baseline and the 1-month measurements between the 2 groups (P>0.05), but the 3- and 6-month OSDI scores were significantly higher for BAK group (P=0.001). Differences in OSDI and Schirmer I test scores were statistically significant at 1, 3, and 6 months in both groups as compared with baseline values (P<0.05). Statistically significant differences in the TBUT scores were seen for both groups at 3 and 6 months, while BAK group, but not PQ group, had insignificant score differences at 1 month as compared with baseline values of PQ group (P=0.083). CONCLUSION: PQ-preserved travoprost was found to be safer and better-tolerated than BAK-preserved travoprost. PQ-preserved travoprost provided better ocular surface comfort, and therefore a better patient experience, which would likely result in higher treatment compliance.

Corneal epithelial cell viability following exposure to ophthalmic solutions containing preservatives and/or antihypertensive agents.

INTRODUCTION: This in-vitro study compared the toxicity of bimatoprost 0.01% containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) 0.02% with other commercial BAK-free or BAK-containing prostaglandin analogs. METHODS: Six test solutions were evaluated: travoprost 0.004% with polyquaternium-1 0.001% (PQ), PQ, bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK 0.02%, latanoprost 0.005% with BAK 0.02%, tafluprost 0.0015% preservative free (PF), and BAK 0.02%. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was the live control and 70% methanol was the dead control. Confluent human corneal epithelial cells were incubated with test solutions (diluted 1:5 or 1:10 with PBS) or control solutions for 10 or 25 min, after which cells were fluorescently labeled to distinguish live and dead cells. Data were expressed as a percentage of PBS live-cell fluorescence for automated readouts. Live and dead cells were manually counted for numeric analyses. RESULTS: For 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions using automated readout, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significant reductions in the live cell signal compared with PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone (all P < 0.001). They also demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than tafluprost PF for 1:5 dilutions (all P < 0.001) and 1:10 dilutions (P ≤ 0.02), except for 1:10-diluted bimatoprost with BAK (P = 0.41). For 1:5 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK demonstrated significant reductions in the percentage of live cells compared with PBS (P = 0.02). For 1:10 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than PBS, travoprost with PQ, PQ alone, and tafluprost PF (all P ≤ 0.03). No significant differences were observed among PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone under any test conditions (P ≤ 0.63). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that BAKcontaining solutions, including bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK, were toxic to human corneal epithelial cells, whereas BAK-free solutions showed little to no evidence of toxicity.

Comparison of a travoprost BAK-free formulation preserved with polyquaternium-1 with BAK-preserved travoprost in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of travoprost 0.004% preserved with polyquaternium-1 (travoprost benzalkonium chloride [BAK]-free) is non-inferior to that of travoprost 0.004% preserved with benzalkonium chloride (travoprost BAK) in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 371 patients randomly received travoprost BAK-free (n=185) or travoprost BAK (n=186) dosed once daily in the evening for 3 months. Patients were evaluated at 9 am, 11 AM, and 4 PM at baseline, weeks 2 and 6, and month 3. Intraocular pressure was also evaluated 36 and 60 hours after the month 3 visit. RESULTS: Travoprost BAK-free is non-inferior to travoprost BAK. The 95% upper confidence limits for the difference in mean IOP at month 3 (primary efficacy) were 0.5 mmHg, 0.6 mmHg, and 0.5 mmHg, at 9 AM, 11 AM, and 4 PM, respectively. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 7.6 to 8.7 mmHg in the travoprost BAK-free group and from 7.7 to 9.2 mmHg in the travoprost BAK group. At 36 and 60 hours after the last dose, mean IOP remained 6.8 mmHg and 5.7 mmHg below baseline in the travoprost BAK-free group, vs 7.3 mmHg and 6.0 mmHg in the travoprost BAK group, respectively. The safety profile of travoprost BAK-free was similar to that of travoprost BAK. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost BAK-free safely and effectively lowers IOP in eyes with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. This BAK-free formulation has comparable safety, efficacy, and duration of IOP-lowering effect to travoprost preserved with BAK. Travoprost BAK-free is an effective option for IOP reduction while avoiding BAK exposure.

Silicone punctal plugs as an adjunctive therapy for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Primary open-angle glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy that can cause an irreversible loss of vision. A reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) is beneficial in slowing or halting its progression. Once-per-day monotherapy glaucoma medications, such as prostaglandin analogues, are effective in lowering IOP while maintaining patients' adherence. Achieving the desired target IOP often requires multiple medications. The present study evaluates punctal occlusion of both the inferior and superior puncta as an adjunctive therapy to travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004% for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in order to reduce IOP. METHODS: Thirteen patients who were using travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension received silicone punctal plugs in the superior and inferior puncta of one eye. After one month, the IOP was remeasured. The percentage change of the IOP from the baseline was analysed by using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: The mean baseline IOP was 19.82 ± 1.19 mmHg in the test eyes and 18.32 ± 1.11 mmHg in the control eyes. The mean IOP at the one-month visit was 18.23 ± 1.17 mmHg in the test eyes and 18.45 ± 1.04 mmHg in the control eyes. The test eyes demonstrated a decrease in IOP of 1.59 (± 0.95) mmHg from the baseline, or a 6.82 per cent decrease in the IOP from the baseline. The control eyes had an increase in IOP of 0.14 ± 0.77 mmHg from the baseline, or a 1.91 per cent increase in the IOP. The relative difference in the IOP between the test eyes and the control eyes at the one-month visit was 1.73 mmHg, or 8.74 per cent. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, punctal occlusion offers a statistically and clinically significant decrease in IOP when it is used as an adjunctive therapy to travoprost 0.004% for patients who are suffering from open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

[In vitro evaluation for corneal damages by anti-glaucoma combination eye drops using human corneal epithelial cell (HCE-T)].

The combination of anti-glaucoma eye drops is frequently used in clinical treatment, and it is known that the combination can cause corneal damage. Recently, an anti-glaucoma combination eye drops is developed, and the treatment by the combination eye drops is expected to enhance quality of life. However, effects of the combination eye drops on corneal epithelial cell damage have not been clarified. In this study, we investigated the corneal epithelial cell damage of commercially available anti-glaucoma combination eye drops, such as Xalacom® (latanoprost/timolol maleate combination eye drops), Duotrav® (travoprost/timolol maleate combination eye drops) and Cosopt® (dorzolamide hydrochloride/timolol maleate combination eye drops) using the human corneal epithelial cell (HCE-T). The cytotoxicity in Xalacom® was higher than that in Xalatan® (eye drops containing latanoprost) and Timoptol® (eye drops containing timolol maleate), and the benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and timolol maleate were related to cytotoxicity in Xalacom®. The cytotoxicity in Duotrav® and Cosopt® was lower than that in Timoptol®. The Duotrav® is preserved with a non-BAC system (POLYQUAD, polidronium chloride). Therefore, it was suggested that the POLYQUAD related to the low cytotoxicity in Duotrav®. On the other hand, the D-mannitol reduced the cytotoxicity by BAC in this study. This result suggested that the cytotoxicity in Cosopt® was reduced by D-mannitol. The Duotrav® and Cosopt® may be less damaging to the ocular surface of glaucoma patients receiving long-term eye drop therapy in compared with the combination of anti-glaucoma eye drops.

Effects of glaucoma medications and preservatives on cultured human trabecular meshwork and non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cell lines.

AIMS: We investigated the potential cytotoxicity of various topical ophthalmic glaucoma formulations containing different preservatives in cultured human trabecular meshwork (TM) and non-pigmented ciliary epithelial (NPCE) cell lines. METHODS: We tested 0.004% travoprost preserved with either 0.015% benzalkonium chloride (BAK), sofZia or 0.001% Polyquad (PQ); and 0.005% latanoprost preserved with 0.020% BAK. We also tested a range of BAK concentrations in balanced salt solution (BSS). TM cells were treated for 10 min at 37°C with solutions diluted 1:10 to mimic the reduced penetration of topical preparations to the anterior chamber. Viability was determined by the uptake of the fluorescent vital dye calcein-AM (n = 6). RESULTS: BAK solutions (diluted 1:10) demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in cell viability in both cell types (TM and NPCE). With a 1:10 dilution of 0.020% BAK, there were significantly more living NPCE cells (89 ± 6%) than TM cells (57 ± 6%; p < 0.001). In TM cells, travoprost + BAK had statistically fewer live cells (83 ± 5%) than both travoprost + sofZia (97 ± 5%) and travoprost + PQ (97 ± 6%; p < 0.05). Compared with BSS-treated NPCE cells, travoprost had statistically fewer live cells (p < 0.05) when preserved with BAK (85 ± 16%), sofZia (91 ± 6%) or PQ (94 ± 2%). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that substitution of BAK from topical ophthalmic drugs results in greater viability of cultured TM cells, the cells involved in the conventional outflow pathway. Cultured NPCE, responsible for aqueous inflow, appear more resilient to BAK.

Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%-fixed combination with and without benzalkonium chloride: a prospective, randomized, doubled-masked comparison of safety and efficacy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost/timolol in a benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free fixed combination preserved with polyquaternium-1 (TRA/TIM BAK-free), with travoprost/timolol-fixed combination preserved with BAK (TRA/TIM), in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, subjects with IOP of at least 22 mm Hg in one or both eyes at 0900 h, and IOP of at least 21 mm Hg in one or both eyes at 1100 h and 1600 h at two eligibility visits were randomly assigned to receive either TRA/TIM BAK-free (n=195) or TRA/TIM (n=193), dosed once daily in the morning (0900 h) for 6 weeks. IOP was assessed at 0900 h, 1100 h, and 1600 h at each scheduled visit (baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after randomization). RESULTS: Mean IOP reduction across all visits and time points was 8.0 mm Hg in the TRA/TIM BAK-free group and 8.4 mm Hg in the TRA/TIM group (P=0.0943). The difference in mean IOP between groups ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 mm Hg across visits and time points, with a mean pooled difference of 0.4 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.8), demonstrating equivalence of the two formulations. The most common drug-related adverse event was hyperemia of the eye (ocular hyperemia and conjunctival hyperemia combined), occurring in 11.8% of the TRA/TIM BAK-free group and 13.0% of the TRA/TIM group. CONCLUSION: Travoprost/timolol BAK-free demonstrated equivalence to travoprost/timolol preserved with BAK in efficacy. No clinically relevant differences in the safety profiles of travoprost/timolol BAK-free and travoprost/timolol preserved with BAK were identified.

In vitro comparative toxicology of polyquad-preserved and benzalkonium chloride-preserved travoprost/timolol fixed combination and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination.

PURPOSE: To compare, in vitro, the cytotoxicity profile of a new formulation of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution preserved with polyquaternium-1 0.001% (travoprost/timolol PQ) instead of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) with (1) commercially available travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution (travoprost/timolol BAK), (2) commercially available latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution (latanoprost/timolol BAK), and (3) their associated BAK concentrations. METHODS: Compounds tested on Wong-Kilbourne-derived human conjunctival epithelial cells: (1) phosphate-buffered saline, (2) polyquaternium-1 0.001% (Polyquad(®), PQ), (3) travoprost/timolol PQ, (4) travoprost/timolol BAK with 0.015% BAK (DuoTrav(®)), (5) BAK 0.015%, (6) latanoprost/timolol BAK with 0.020% BAK (Xalacom(®)), and (7) BAK 0.020%. Toxicological assays were used to assess cell viability [neutral red (NR), Alamar blue (AB)], apoptosis (YO-PRO-1, Hoechst 33342), and oxidative stress (H(2)DCF-DA, hydroethidine). The apoptosis and oxidative stress assays were each reported according to cell viability as observed with NR and AB (totaling 10 analyses per treatment). RESULTS: The NR and AB assays demonstrated that cells incubated with travoprost/timolol PQ had significantly better viability than cells incubated with latanoprost/timolol BAK, travoprost/timolol BAK, BAK 0.015%, and BAK 0.020% (P<0.0001 for all). As assessed with YO-PRO-1 and Hoechst 33342 relative to cell viability determined with NR or AB, travoprost/timolol PQ produced significantly less apoptosis than travoprost/timolol BAK and latanoprost/timolol BAK and their respective BAK concentrations alone (P<0.0001 for all). Also, travoprost/timolol BAK induced less apoptosis than latanoprost/timolol BAK (P<0.0001). As assessed with H(2)DCF-DA as a ratio to NR or AB, all of the compounds without BAK (phosphate-buffered saline, PQ 0.001%, and travoprost/timolol PQ) and travoprost/timolol BAK produced significantly less reactive oxygen species than latanoprost/timolol BAK (P<0.0001 for all). As assessed with hydroethidine as a ratio to NR or AB, travoprost/timolol PQ produced significantly fewer superoxide anions than latanoprost/timolol BAK (P<0.0001). In contrast, release of superoxide anions (hydroethidine method) after incubation with travoprost/timolol BAK was not significantly different from incubation with latanoprost/timolol BAK or travoprost/timolol PQ. CONCLUSION: Travoprost/timolol PQ may be better for ocular surface health than either BAK preserved formulations of latanoprost/timolol or travoprost/timolol.

Comparative in vitro toxicology study of travoprost polyquad-preserved, travoprost BAK-preserved, and latanoprost BAK-preserved ophthalmic solutions on human conjunctival epithelial cells.

PURPOSE: To compare the toxicological profile of a new formulation of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution (travoprost PQ), containing the preservative polyquaternium-1(PQ, polyquad), with the commercially available formulation of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution (travoprost BAK) and BAK-preserved latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution (latanoprost BAK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human conjunctival epithelial cells were incubated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), BAK 0.015%, BAK 0.020%, PQ 0.001%, travoprost PQ preserved with PQ 0.001%, travoprost preserved with BAK 0.015%, or latanoprost preserved with BAK 0.020%. Six toxicological assays were used to assess: cell viability (neutral red, Alamar blue), apoptosis (YO-PRO-1, Hoechst 33342), and oxidative stress (H(2)DCF-DA, hydroethidine). Apoptosis and oxidative stress were each reported according to cell viability as observed with neutral red and Alamar blue for a total of 10 analyses per treatment depending on the cell viability test used to interpret apoptosis and oxidative stress responses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in toxicity between cells exposed to PBS and cells exposed to travoprost PQ (10/10 analyses) or PQ 0.001% (9/10 analyses). Ten out of 10 analyses revealed that travoprost PQ produced significantly less cytotoxicity than latanoprost BAK (p < 0.0001). Travoprost PQ produced significantly better cell viability and less apoptosis than travoprost BAK (6/6 analyses, p < 0.0001). Travoprost BAK was significantly less cytotoxic than latanoprost BAK in 7 of 10 analyses (p < 0.0001). All 10 of the analyses revealed that BAK 0.015%, BAK 0.020%, and latanoprost BAK produced significantly more cytotoxicity than PBS (p < 0.0001). Travoprost BAK was significantly less cytotoxic than its corresponding BAK 0.015% preservative solution in 9 of 10 analyses (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A panel of in vitro toxicity analyses supports the safety of travoprost PQ. Travoprost PQ may be better for ocular surface health than BAK-preserved formulations of latanoprost or travoprost but clinical studies are required to validate these comparisons.