Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Sci Tech ; 34(3): 699-712, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044146

RESUMEN

An outbreak of foot and mouth disease occurred in Miyazaki, Japan, in April 2010, and nearly 290,000 animals were culled to control the disease. This study was conducted to demonstrate the causes and intensity of mental distress felt by the field veterinarians participating in the control programme. A focus group discussion was conducted with ten veterinarians to understand their distress during the outbreak, and a questionnaire to quantify the degree of distress experienced each week was administered to 16 veterinarians. A detailed questionnaire was separately administered to 70 veterinarians six months after the outbreak was controlled, to assess mental distress status and to identify the risk factors for serious mental illness (SMI) using the six-item Kessler scale (K6). Overall, mental distress (mean 3.1) was significantly greater than physical distress (mean 1.9, p < 0.001). The risk factors for mental distress were categorised into three groups: culling, communication with farmers, and gender; each category was qualitatively described. Only two respondents (2.9%) had high K6 scores suggesting SMI. In the final generalised linear models with quasi-Poisson errors, the riskfactorsfor SMI that remained were: disinfecting vehicles (p = 0.01), distress (p <0.001), and increased alcohol consumption (p = 0.057), and a protective factor: participation in culling (p = 0.07), which suggested healthy worker bias. Sensitive individuals had been allocated to non-culling activities during disease control. In conclusion, human resource management was adequate during the outbreak from a public-health perspective. However, monitoring delayed symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Fiebre Aftosa/epidemiología , Estrés Fisiológico , Estrés Psicológico , Veterinarios/psicología , Adulto , Animales , Eutanasia Animal , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descanso , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
2.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 261(12): 1838-1846, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37607680

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast the views of benefits and general work conditions of participants working in corporate hospitals compared to those working in privately owned hospitals. SAMPLE: Veterinary members of the Veterinary Information Network (VIN) working as associate veterinarians in corporate- or privately owned hospitals. METHODS: An electronic survey distributed via the VIN data collection portal. RESULTS: A total of 896 responses from associate veterinarians working full time were received, of which 286 (31.9%) reported working in private practice and 610 (68.1%) in corporate practice. Fifty-five percent of participants indicated a preference for working in private practice compared to 12% preferring corporate practice. Veterinarians working in corporate practice were more likely to report receiving insurance (health, dental, life, and short-term disability), mental wellness programs (eg, counseling), wellness mobile apps, VIN membership, and continuing education paid by their employer than those working in privately owned practices. However, participants in private practice reported higher satisfaction with feeling known as an individual by upper management, hospital culture, the ability to fire difficult or abusive clients, and mentorship. Those working in corporate practices reported feeling more pressure than those in private practice to generate revenue and see more clients per shift. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There are positives and negatives of corporate-owned hospitals when compared to privately owned practices. Corporate hospitals may be well positioned to make large organizational-level changes that can improve work culture and, as a result, the well-being and retention of small animal practitioners.


Asunto(s)
Veterinarios , Animales , Humanos , Veterinarios/psicología , Hospitales Veterinarios , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción Personal
3.
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd ; 136(1): 30-5, 2011 Jan 01.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21298898

RESUMEN

The treatment of dental problems in animals and humans requires a different approach. While a basic knowledge of medicine is sufficient for dentists, a degree in veterinary medicine is a prerequisite for performing dental procedures in animals. Concepts such as oral-health veterinarian and dental care technician will be part of animal dental care in the future. When deciding on the plan of treatment, veterinarians should pay attention to the symptomatology, oral examination, and pain response. A number of treatments that are self-evident in human dentistry are often not recommended in veterinary medicine. Dental treatments for companion animals should be characterized by minimal interventions with maximum results: effective, efficient, and most of all patient/client focused.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Odontología/veterinaria , Veterinarios/psicología , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Animales , Odontología/métodos , Odontología/normas , Diagnóstico Bucal , Humanos , Salud Bucal , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/veterinaria , Satisfacción del Paciente , Medicina Veterinaria/normas
4.
Prev Vet Med ; 179: 104988, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32339964

RESUMEN

Hendra virus (HeV) is an emerging bat-borne virus endemic in Australia that can be transmitted from horses to humans and has a high fatality rate for horses and people. Controversy surrounding HeV risk mitigation measures have strained the veterinarian-horse owner relationship. This study aimed to characterise the veterinarian-horse owner relationship in general and also in the context of HeV by analysing data derived from the 'Horse Owners and Hendra Virus: A Longitudinal Study to Evaluate Risk' (HHALTER) study. Australian horse owners were recruited via emails, social media and word-of-mouth for a series of five surveys that were administered online at six-monthly intervals over a two-year period to capture baseline knowledge, attitudes and practices of horse owners regarding HeV and any changes over time. In the current study, descriptive analyses of information sources were performed to understand the use of veterinarians as a HeV information source (Surveys 1 and 5; n = 1195 and n = 617). Ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with the frequency of horse owner contact with a veterinarian (Survey 3; n = 636). This study found a relative increase over the study period in the proportion of horse owners who had used veterinarians as HeV information source in the last 12 months (from 51.9% to 88.3%). Owning more horses, being older, having a 'duty of care' for other people working with horses and deriving the main income from horse related business were factors associated with more frequent veterinary contact. Results suggest that traditional information sources such as workshops, information packs and risk training are likely to be used by horse owners. Smart phone applications should be considered for use in the future and require further investigation for horse health communication. The findings of this study may be helpful in optimising strategies for horse health information delivery.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Virus Hendra/fisiología , Infecciones por Henipavirus/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/psicología , Difusión de la Información , Propiedad , Veterinarios/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Australia , Femenino , Infecciones por Henipavirus/psicología , Caballos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
5.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0204581, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30682017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dental disease is one of the most common health problems in dogs. However, no studies have investigated the attitudes, opinions and practices of dog owners, veterinarians and veterinary nurses regarding dental health and preventative dental home care in dogs. The objective of this study was therefore to develop and validate questionnaires for this purpose, in accordance with survey methodology guidelines. METHODS: Questionnaire items were determined based on the authors' academic knowledge and clinical experience, and modified throughout the validation process. Several measures were taken to reduce sampling, coverage, measurement and non-response errors. Content validity was assessed by Subject-Matter Experts (SME) and cognitive interviews were conducted in accordance with the "think-aloud protocol". Non-response analysis was performed using several methods. RESULTS: Constructs were identified using exploratory factor analysis and two predefined constructs from the dog owner questionnaire were confirmed "Dog owners' attitudes towards brushing their dog's teeth" (Cronbach's α = 0.86) and "Dog owners' assessment of their dog's dental health" (α = 0.76). Additionally, exploratory factor analysis identified three potential constructs. In the veterinary health practitioner questionnaire, two constructs were identified: "Veterinary health practitioners' attitudes towards dental chews and dental feed" (α = 0.78) and "Veterinary health practitioners' attitudes and opinions on dental problems and dental cleaning" (α = 0.73). Non-response analysis showed a higher proportion of women in the sample of dog owners and veterinarians compared to the target populations. Veterinarians in the sample were also younger. In contrast, gender and age distributions in veterinary nurses did not differ between sample and target. CONCLUSION: The validation presented in this work showed that the developed questionnaires could be used as accurate and reliable tools for measuring attitudes and practices regarding dental home care in dogs among Swedish dog owners, veterinarians and veterinary nurses.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedades Dentales/prevención & control , Técnicos de Animales/psicología , Técnicos de Animales/estadística & datos numéricos , Animales , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Perros , Humanos , Salud Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Propiedad , Mascotas , Suecia , Enfermedades Dentales/veterinaria , Veterinarios/psicología , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd ; 133(24): 1042-5, 2008 Dec 15.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19170335

RESUMEN

The consequences of the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in 2001 in The Netherlands can still be noticed in the daily work of the veterinarians involved. In particular, the number off arm animals has decreased, regulations have changed, and cattle farmers have become more confrontational. While the psychosocial consequences to veterinarians of the outbreak have decreased compared with immediately after the outbreak, this decrease is not statistically significant. Moreover, 40% of the veterinarians involved still show signs of a traumatic stress reaction. Should another outbreak occur, it is important that local veterinarians are contacted, in order to improve communication with cattle farmers.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Aftosa/epidemiología , Fiebre Aftosa/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veterinarios/psicología , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/psicología , Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Eutanasia Animal , Humanos , Salud Mental , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Vet Rec ; 183(5): 161, 2018 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29907659

RESUMEN

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is of major concern in most countries including Europe, where no outbreaks have occurred since a decade. Indeed, the risk of FMD introduction from infected countries is not negligible and the awareness of field stakeholders (farmers, veterinarians) is essential to ensure an effective detection of the viral circulation. The French veterinary services launched in 2015 a survey to estimate the awareness of farmers and veterinarians and their knowledge about epidemiological and regulatory aspects of FMD. Official health visits were used to collect information from cattle farmers and veterinarians through two separate questionnaires. The results show that not all cattle farmers were aware of the risk of FMD reintroduction in France and of its routes of infection and speed of dissemination. As for the veterinarians, their promptness to report a suspicion was dependent on the occurrence of FMD cases in European countries. These results highlight key aspectsregarding FMD epidemiology which should be regularly reminded to the field stakeholders in FMD-free countries to increase their awareness and thus ensure an effective early detection in case of FMD introduction.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores/psicología , Fiebre Aftosa , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Veterinarios/psicología , Animales , Fiebre Aftosa/epidemiología , Fiebre Aftosa/prevención & control , Francia , Humanos
9.
Vet Rec ; 176(19): 493, 2015 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25783048

RESUMEN

Data from a survey conducted in 1996-1997 suggested a low level of perioperative analgesic administration to cats and dogs in the UK. In order to evaluate current practice and attitudes with regards to perioperative analgesic prescription, a cross-sectional survey of UK practising small animal veterinary surgeons was undertaken in spring 2013. Four thousand one hundred paper questionnaires were distributed and the survey was made available online. Seven hundred and twenty valid responses were received and analysed. All respondents had access to at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and one opioid within their practice. Respondents considered analgesic efficacy, and degree of intraoperative pain, the most important factors governing their selection of NSAID and opioid analgesics. Perioperative NSAIDs were administered by approximately 98 per cent of respondents to dogs and cats undergoing neutering. Multimodal (opioid+NSAID) analgesia was prescribed by the majority of respondents. Neutering was considered more painful in dogs than in cats, and lower rates of opioid and postdischarge NSAID prescription were reported for cats. Orthopaedic, abdominal and dental surgeries were considered equally painful in dogs and cats. Local analgesic techniques were not commonly used. Analgesic prescription has increased since previous surveys, which should translate to improved animal welfare.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/veterinaria , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/veterinaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Veterinarios/psicología , Animales , Gatos , Estudios Transversales , Perros , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Reino Unido , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 220(12): 1782-7, 2002 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12092950

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess perceptions of state public health officers and state veterinarians in the United States regarding the risks of bioterrorism and determine the degree of support provided for activities related to bioterrorism. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SAMPLE POPULATION: State public health officers and state veterinarians. PROCEDURE: A questionnaire was sent between April and June 2001 to the state public health officer and state veterinarian in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. RESULTS: Perceptions of the risk of bioterrorism attacks were similar for state public health officers and state veterinarians. Veterinarians perceived the risks associated with foot-and-mouth disease and Newcastle disease to be higher than did physicians. State veterinarians perceived the risks associated with an anthrax hoax, brucellosis, and ricin toxicosis to be lower than did state public health officers. Risk posed by agents that affected animals exclusively was perceived to be higher than risk posed by agents that affected humans exclusively and zoonotic agents. Number of full-time-equivalent positions devoted to bioterrorism surveillance and percentage of the budget devoted to bioterrorism activities were significantly lower for offices run by state veterinarians than for offices run by state public health officers. State veterinarians were significantly less likely to have knowledge of bioterrorism incidents within their state or district than were state public health officers. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Provision of additional resources to state veterinarians and explicit integration of their expertise and surveillance capabilities may be important to effectively mitigate the risk of bioterrorism.


Asunto(s)
Bioterrorismo , Enfermedades Transmisibles/veterinaria , Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Médicos/psicología , Salud Pública , Veterinarios/psicología , Animales , Carbunco/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Notificación de Enfermedades , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Conocimiento , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Medicina Veterinaria
11.
N Z Med J ; 110(1055): 410-2, 1997 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9418822

RESUMEN

AIMS: To measure changes in the attitudes of medical practitioners toward the move from a collegial to a more competitive orientation of the medical profession and, in particular, toward the role of advertising. METHOD: In the years 1985, 1988 and 1994, self-completion questionnaires were mailed to samples of medical practitioners. The questionnaires for each year were identical, containing forty Likert scales with questions relating to advertising, competition and commercial behaviour. Similar data were also gathered from members of the dental, veterinary, legal and accounting professions. RESULTS: Over the three studies there has been an undramatic but steady movement towards acceptance of a competitive orientation in general and towards acceptance of informative advertising in particular. There remains substantial reservation towards the use of persuasive advertising. Although patients are viewed as being more demanding than in past times, practitioners still expect their relationships with patients to be long lasting. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that acceptance of the move towards a more competitively oriented profession will continue. The results also suggest that in view of the kinds of advertising that are now used by medical practices, and of the change in attitudes that has occurred, control of advertising might cease to be a concern to the profession.


Asunto(s)
Publicidad , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conducta Competitiva , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud , Médicos de Familia/psicología , Odontólogos/psicología , Competencia Económica , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Nueva Zelanda , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Veterinarios/psicología
12.
Vet Rec ; 175(17): 428, 2014 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25028465

RESUMEN

Veterinary surgeons in the UK were invited to complete an internet survey concerning their attitudes to chronic pain in dogs. UK veterinary surgeons numbering 215 completed surveys in full along with 48 worldwide specialists in anaesthesia and 37 worldwide specialists in oncology. Osteoarthritis, dental and aural disease, vertebral and spinal cord conditions, neoplasia and skin conditions were considered important causes of chronic pain in dogs. UK practitioners used significantly fewer classes of analgesic drugs regularly than either category of specialist. The major barriers to adequate treatment of chronic pain were reported as difficulties with pain assessment, expense of drugs, and difficulties with owner compliance. Illustrations of six common neoplastic conditions were used and scored for pain according to prior experience by practitioners. All six conditions were consistently described as involving some degree of pain with primary bone tumour and oral tumour, causing severe pain and moderate to severe pain, respectively. Years since graduation and specialist status affected the pain scores attributed to the conditions. There was a significant correlation between the pain score attributed to the illustrated condition, and the tendency to administer analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dolor Crónico/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Veterinarios/psicología , Analgesia/veterinaria , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/veterinaria , Reino Unido , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract ; 43(3): 471-487, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23643017

RESUMEN

Veterinary dentistry is an exacting science, in which decisions are made not only for an individual patient, but also for individual teeth, which may vary in severity of disease. Multiple therapeutic decisions and treatment plans may be necessary for a single patient. Veterinary dental patients must be anesthetized to receive thorough treatment, which results in additional decisions that may not be necessary for human dental patients. This article discusses considerations and approaches toward therapeutic decision making and treatment planning in veterinary dentistry and oral surgery.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Enfermedades de los Perros/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/veterinaria , Veterinarios/psicología , Medicina Veterinaria/normas , Animales , Gatos , Contraindicaciones , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/normas , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Simulación de Paciente , Medición de Riesgo
15.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 240(4): 427-36, 2012 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22309015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between veterinarian-client-patient interactions and client adherence to dental and surgery recommendations and to test the a priori hypotheses that appointment-specific client satisfaction and relationship-centered care are positively associated with client adherence. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SAMPLE: A subsample of 19 companion-animal veterinarians and 83 clients from a larger observational study consisting of 20 randomly recruited veterinarians and a convenience sample of 350 clients from eastern Ontario. PROCEDURES: Videotaped veterinarian-client-patient interactions containing a dentistry recommendation, surgery recommendation, or both were selected for inclusion from the larger sample of interactions coded with the Roter interaction analysis system. Client adherence was measured by evaluating each patient's medical record approximately 6 months after the videotaped interaction. The clarity of the recommendation, appointment-specific client-satisfaction score, and relationship-centered care score were compared between adhering and nonadhering clients. RESULTS: Among the 83 veterinarian-client-patient interactions, 25 (30%) clients adhered to a dentistry recommendation, surgery recommendation, or both. The odds for adherence were 7 times as great for clients who received a clear recommendation, compared with clients who received an ambiguous recommendation from their veterinarian. Moreover, adhering clients were significantly more satisfied as measured after the interview. Interactions resulting in client adherence also had higher scores for relationship-centered care than did interactions leading to nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Veterinarian use of a relationship-centered care approach, characterized as a collaborative partnership between a veterinarian and a client with provision of clear recommendations and effective communication of the rationale for the recommendations, has positive implications for client adherence.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Odontología/veterinaria , Relaciones Interpersonales , Cirugía Veterinaria/métodos , Veterinarios/psicología , Animales , Animales Domésticos , Estudios Transversales , Odontología/métodos , Odontología/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Participación del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Cirugía Veterinaria/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Grabación de Cinta de Video
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA