Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Prev Med ; 72: 83-8, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25575801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We assessed the prevalence of dental disease among U.S. children and adolescents aged 6-17 years, as well as the impact of unmet dental needs on school absenteeism because of illness/injury within the past 12 months. METHODS: Data were from the 2011/2012 National Survey of Children's Health (n=65,680). Unmet dental need was defined as lack of access to appropriate and timely preventive or therapeutic dental healthcare when needed within the past 12 months. The impact of unmet dental needs on school absenteeism was measured using a multivariate generalized linear model with Poisson probability distribution (p<0.05). RESULTS: Within the past 12 months, 21.8% (10.8 million) of all U.S. children and adolescents aged 6-17 years had "a toothache, decayed teeth, or unfilled cavities." Of all U.S. children and adolescents aged 6-17 years, 15.8% (7.8 million) reported any unmet dental need (i.e., preventive and/or therapeutic dental need) within the past 12 months. The mean number of days of school absence because of illness/injury was higher among students with an unmet therapeutic dental need in the presence of a dental condition compared to those reporting no unmet dental need (ß=0.25; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced and sustained efforts are needed to increase access to dental services among underserved U.S. children and adolescents.


Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/economia , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças , Doenças Dentárias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/estatística & dados numéricos , Cárie Dentária/economia , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Cárie Dentária/terapia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Odontologia Preventiva , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Doenças Dentárias/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Public Health ; 104(8): e67-75, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24922172

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We compared patient-reported receipt of smoking cessation counseling from US dentists and physicians. METHODS: We analyzed the 2010 to 2011 Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey to assess receipt of smoking cessation advice and assistance by a current smoker from a dentist or physician in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Current adult smokers were significantly less likely to be advised to quit smoking during a visit to a dentist (31.2%) than to a physician (64.8%). Among physician patients who were advised to quit, 52.7% received at least 1 form of assistance beyond the simple advice to quit; 24.5% of dental patients received such assistance (P < .05). Approximately 9.4 million smokers who visited a dentist in 2010 to 2011 did not receive any cessation counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a need for intensified efforts to increase dentist involvement in cessation counseling. System-level changes, coupled with regular training, may enhance self-efficacy of dentists in engaging patients in tobacco cessation counseling.


Assuntos
Odontólogos/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento Diretivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Aconselhamento Diretivo/métodos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int Dent J ; 72(5): 698-705, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292174

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Health professionals' own beliefs and practices, especially their smoking status, has been described to strongly influence their willingness to provide brief tobacco interventions (5 A's) to their patients. This study examines the association between the smoking status of faculty members in US dental programmes and (1) practice pattern; (2) perceived confidence; and (3) perceived educational preparedness of new graduates in providing the 5 A's to their patients. METHODS: This study presents data from the National Tobacco Survey of Personnel in Dental and Allied Academic Programs (TSPDAP) conducted in 2018. Faculty members in US dental/allied dental schools were invited to participate in this survey. Data were stratified based on the smoking status of the respondents as "never" and "ever" smokers (smoked <100 and ≥100 cigarettes during their lifetime, respectively). Multiple logistic regression models were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Data of 1896 participants were analysed, of whom 1032 (54.4%) were categorised as "ever" smokers. In the final regression model, low perceived barrier score was significantly associated with high practice pattern (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97), high perceived confidence (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95), and high perceived educational preparedness (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) in delivering the 5 A's to patients. Similarly, high perceived effectiveness was significantly associated with high practice pattern (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11), high perceived confidence (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.13), and high perceived educational preparedness (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09) in delivering the 5 A's to their patients. The smoking status of the dental personnel did not show any significant association with practice pattern, perceived confidence, or perceived educational preparedness in delivering the 5 A's to their patients. CONCLUSIONS: The smoking status of oral health care personnel was not significantly associated with their participation in tobacco cessation interventions.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Aconselhamento , Docentes , Humanos , Fumar
4.
J Periodontol ; 91(8): 1039-1048, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31919844

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cocaine is the second most abused illicit drug in the United States. To date, no study has examined the association between cocaine use and oral health with a nationally representative sample. Our study examined the association between cocaine use-singly and with other substances-and oral health outcomes, including periodontitis and untreated caries, among US adults. METHODS: Data for 11,753 individuals, aged ≥30 years, who completed a periodontal examination, in the 2009 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed. Descriptive analyses and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted on weighted data. RESULTS: Overall, 17% (20.5 million) of US adults aged ≥30 years had ever used cocaine, with higher likelihood seen among males, non-Hispanic whites, and those living in poverty. Current cocaine use prevalence was 2.6% (3.2 million). By number of co-used substances, the odds of having any periodontitis were higher among cocaine users who consumed ≥3 other substances (adjusted OR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.15 to 5.30) when compared with solely cocaine users. By type of substance co-used, odds of having untreated caries were greater among those reporting cigarettes (adjusted OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.21 to 3.11) or methamphetamine (adjusted OR = 5.40; 95% CI = 1.92 to 15.14) usage. Odds of any periodontitis were higher among those reported ancillary cigarette use (adjusted OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.60 to 5.04) compared with cocaine-only users. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a positive association between periodontal disease, dental caries, and cocaine use, select co-usage elevated the risk of oral disease. Patients should be screened for and counseled regarding substance abuse to facilitate a successful quit.

5.
J Periodontol ; 87(4): 385-94, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26537367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking and tooth loss are seldom considered concurrently as determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines the multiplicative effect of self-reported tooth loss and cigarette smoking on COPD among United States adults aged ≥18 years. METHODS: Data were taken from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 439,637). Log-linear regression-estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) are reported for the interaction of combinations of tooth loss (0, 1 to 5, 6 to 31, or all) and cigarettes smoking status (never, former, or current) with COPD after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment, employment, health insurance coverage, dental care utilization, and diabetes. RESULTS: Overall, 45.7% respondents reported having ≥1 teeth removed from tooth decay or gum disease, 18.9% reported being current cigarette smokers, and 6.3% reported having COPD. Smoking and tooth loss from tooth decay or gum disease were associated with an increased likelihood of COPD. Compared with never smokers with no teeth removed, all combinations of smoking status categories and tooth loss had a higher likelihood of COPD, with adjusted PRs ranging from 1.5 (never smoker with 1 to 5 teeth removed) to 6.5 (current smoker with all teeth removed) (all P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth loss status significantly modifies the association between cigarette smoking and COPD. An increased understanding of causal mechanisms linking cigarette smoking, oral health, and COPD, particularly the role of tooth loss, infection, and subsequent inflammation, is essential to reduce the burden of COPD. Health providers should counsel their patients about cigarette smoking, preventive dental care, and COPD risk.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Fumar , Perda de Dente , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Perda de Dente/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
6.
Quintessence Int ; 45(4): 355-9, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24570998

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Nativity status is a major determinant of health and healthcare access in the United States. This study compared oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) survival between US-born and foreign-born patients. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Data were obtained from the 1988-2008 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. A Cox proportional hazards multivariate model was used to assess the eff ect of birthplace on OSCC survival, adjusting for other sociodemographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: US-born patients had a higher median survival time (19.3 years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.6-19.7) compared to foreign-born patients (10.7 years; 95% CI: 10.1-11.3). After adjusting for other factors, being born in the US conferred a modest protective eff ect from OSCC mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87- 0.99). Other factors that conferred better survival included involvement of paired structures (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58- 0.74), lip involvement rather than tongue lesions (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71-0.82), and receipt of either surgery (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.94) or radiation therapy (HR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87-0.97). CONCLUSION: US-born patients had significantly better OSCC survival compared to their foreign-born counterparts. This underscores the need for enhanced and sustained efforts to improve access to healthcare among immigrant populations. In addition, oral health professionals such as general dentists, oral pathologists, and oral surgeons providing care to immigrant patients should ensure that reasonable efforts are made to communicate effectively with patients with language barriers, especially in high-stake conditions such as cancer. This may help increase such patients' awareness of treatment provided and the critical issues regarding cancer care, resulting in enhanced treatment outcome.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Bucal/organização & administração , Neoplasias Bucais/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
7.
J Dent Educ ; 78(1): 75-84, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24385527

RESUMO

This study assessed differences among health professions students in exposure to didactic tobacco cessation training in asking about patients' tobacco use status ("ask") and assisting smoking patients to quit by providing educational materials ("assist"). Data from the 2005-08 Global Health Professions Student Survey were analyzed for 28,420 medical, dental, nursing, and pharmacy students in eight low- and middle-income countries. Country-specific prevalence of exposure to training in tobacco cessation was calculated for each profession category; differences were assessed using logistic regression analysis (p<0.05). The proportion of dental students taught to implement the "ask" intervention ranged from 45.4 percent (Armenia) to 95.2 percent (Chile). Only about one-third of these dental students reported being taught to implement the "assist" intervention in most countries. After adjusting for survey year, country, gender, and tobacco use, the odds of dental students' being taught to implement the "ask" intervention were lower than for medical students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.96). Similarly, the odds of being taught to implement the "assist" intervention were significantly higher for medical (aOR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.26-2.17), nursing (aOR=2.84; 95% CI: 2.37-3.40), and pharmacy students (aOR=1.36; 95CI:1.05-1.76) than for dental students. These findings underscore the need for enhanced measures to incorporate tobacco cessation training as a formal component of dental education globally.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Educação em Odontologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Adulto , Currículo , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudantes de Odontologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA