Surgical Glove Perforation and Percutaneous Injury during Intermaxillary Fixation with 0.5 Mm Stainless Steel Wire.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of exposure of either the patient or the surgeon to pathogens when the surgical glove is perforated is significant. This is particularly so in jaw fractures when intermaxillary fixation is done with the stainless-steel wire as many perforations also result in percutaneous injury. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study was carried out in two tertiary Hospitals in Abuja, Nigeria. Adult patients for intermaxillary fixation as a result of jaw fractures were consecutively recruited into the study. Similarly, surgeons and their trainees (assistants) were also recruited. Factors investigated included the method of gloving used by surgeons and trainees (single versus double gloving), glove perforations and percutaneous injury rates, years of operator's experience, among others. During surgical operations, percutaneous injuries were recorded and obviously perforated or torn gloves were labelled and changed. At the end of every surgical procedure, gloves used were investigated for perforation. RESULTS: A total of 564 gloves were investigated (Surgeons-337; Trainees-227) after use for wire intermaxillary fixation procedures. The frequency of glove perforations for the surgeons was 72 (21.4%). Forefinger perforations were most frequent; 40 (55.6%) cases. Assistants, had 35 (15.4%) cases of glove perforations. Percutaneous injury occurred in 9.7% (7/72) and 5.7% (2/35 cases) of cases for surgeons and assistants, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study revealed high risk for wire-based IMF procedures. Single gloving was more frequently associated with percutaneous injuries although double gloving was more associated with perforations with higher surgeon infection risk. Double gloving reduces the risk of percutaneous injuries and, therefore, the likelihood of exposure to blood-borne pathogens.

INTRODUCTION: Le risque d'exposition du patient ou du chirurgien à des agents pathogènes lorsque le gant chirurgical est perforé est important. Cela est particulièrement le cas dans les fractures de la mâchoire lorsque la fixation intermaxillaire est effectuée avec le fil en acier inoxydable, car de nombreuses perforations entraînent également des lésions percutanées. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODE: Cette étude a été réalisée dans deux hôpitaux tertiaires à Abuja, au Nigeria. Des patients adultes pour une fixation intermaxillaire à la suite de fractures de la mâchoire ont été recrutés consécutivement dans l'étude. De même, des chirurgiens et leurs stagiaires (assistants) ont également été recrutés. Les facteurs étudiés comprenaient la méthode de gloving utilisée par les chirurgiens et les stagiaires (simple versus double gloving), les perforations de gants et les taux de blessures percutanées, les années d'expérience de l'opérateur, entre autres. Au cours des opérations chirurgicales, des blessures percutanées ont été enregistrées et des gants manifestement perforés ou déchirés ont été étiquetés et changés. À la fin de chaque intervention chirurgicale, les gants utilisés ont été étudiés pour la perforation. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 895 gants ont fait l'objet d'une enquête (Surgeons-337; Stagiaires-227) après utilisation pour les procédures de fixation intermaxillaire du fil. La fréquence des perforations de gants chez les chirurgiens était de 72 (21,4 %). Les perforations de l'index étaient les plus fréquentes, 40 (55,6 %) cas. Assistant, avait 35 (15,4%) cas de perforations de gants. Des lésions percutanées sont survenues dans 9,7 % (7/72) et 5,7 % (2/35 cas) des cas chez les chirurgiens et les assistants respectivement. CONCLUSION: L'étude a révélé un risque élevé pour les procédures filaires du FMI. Le gloving simple était plus fréquemment associé à des blessures percutanées, bien que le double gloving soit plus associé à des perforations avec un risque d'infection plus élevé chez le chirurgien. Le double gloving réduit le risque de blessures percutanées et, par conséquent, la probabilité d'exposition à des agents pathogènes transmissibles par le sang. MOTS CLÉS: Fixation intermaxillaire, gants, Chirurgien, Lésion percutanée.

Evaluation of the scope and practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Oral and maxillofacial surgery is still evolving, with the scope of practice in Nigeria inadequately determined. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to ascertain the level of practice in various parts of the country vis-a-vis the global trend and factors influencing the scope in Nigeria. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Cross-sectional. SETTING: The study was carried out at the University of Ibadan. Participants included all the maxillofacial surgeons on the mailing list of the Nigerian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and Practicing in Nigeria as at December, 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Structured questionnaires were delivered to all on the mailing list of the Nigerian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Respondents were asked to provide information about their demographics, years of practice, areas of practice and factors influencing the choice of practice among others. Nonresponders were reminded a month after initial contact. Data were entered into a personal computer and variables analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two (56%) of the 57 questionnaires were returned. Most respondents were aged 41-45 years ( n = 11, 34.4%). Twenty-six (81.3%) were males, whereas 6 (18.8%) were females. Twenty respondents (62.5%) practiced in the teaching hospitals. Eighteen respondents (56.3%) practiced in the south-west geopolitical region. Twelve respondents (37.5%) were the only maxillofacial surgeons in their centers. 81.3% routinely practiced traumatology against 15.6% for implantology. Seventy-eight percent ( n = 25) had satisfactory facilities for traumatology, dentoalveolar surgery, and cleft repair surgery, while facilities were least satisfactory in implantology and orthognathic surgery (15.6% and 12.5%, respectively). The highest single factor influencing choice/area of practice was financial reward (100% of respondents). Fifty percent ( n = 16) claimed not to have had adequate training in their area of interest. Most respondents (93.8%) believe the greatest challenge facing oncological maxillofacial surgery in Nigeria was late presentation of patients. CONCLUSION: The scope of practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery is largely limited in the country relative to what obtains globally.

Acceptance and perception of Nigerian patients to medical photography.

The aim of the study was to determine the acceptance and perception of Nigerian patients to medical photography. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among Nigerian patients attending oral and maxillofacial surgery and plastic surgery clinics of 3 tertiary health institutions. Information requested included patients' opinion about consent process, capturing equipment, distribution and accessibility of medical photographs. The use of non-identifiable medical photographs was more acceptable than identifiable to respondents for all purposes (P = 0.003). Most respondents were favourably disposed to photographs being taken for inclusion in the case note, but opposed to identifiable photographs being used for other purposes most especially in medical websites and medical journals. Female respondents preferred non-identifiable medical photographs to identifiable ones (P = 0.001). Most respondents (78%) indicated that their consent be sought for each of the outline needs for medical photography. Half of the respondents indicated that identifiable photographs may have a negative effect on their persons; and the most commonly mentioned effects were social stigmatization, bad publicity and emotional/psychological effects. Most of the respondents preferred the use of hospital-owned camera to personal camera/personal camera-phone for their medical photographs. Most respondents (67.8%) indicated that they would like to be informed about the use of their photographs on every occasion, and 74% indicated that they would like to be informed of the specific journal in which their medical photographs are to be published. In conclusion, non-identifiable rather than identifiable medical photography is acceptable to most patients in the studied Nigerian environment. The use of personal camera/personal camera-phone should be discouraged as its acceptance by respondents is very low. Judicious use of medical photography is therefore advocated to avoid breach of principle of privacy and confidentiality in medical practice.

Maxillo-mandibular fixation: utility and current techniques in modern practice.

BACKGROUND: There appears to be a gradual relegation of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) from the frontline of oral and maxillofacial surgical techniques because of the evolution and increasing sophistication of rigid internal fixation techniques, efficiency. AIM: To highlight the residual relevance, utility, and current techniques of achieving MMF in modern practice. METHODS: A rigorous search of the maxillofacial literature was undertaken to identify recent articles that discuss the techniques, usefulness, limitations, merits, demerits and cost effectiveness of MMF. A narrative review of the selected literature was done to provide concise and current evidence on MMF in modern maxillofacial surgery. The cost effectiveness of MMF as a modality in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures is also compared with that of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). RESULTS: MMF is employed as temporary intraoperative adjunct to rigid fixation techniques or as a supplement for postoperative stabilization after semi-rigid fixation. It is a adequate and more cost effective method in some types of mandibular fractures. Other indications are patients' refusal of open surgery, refusal of hardware insertion and lack of medical fitness for extensive surgical operation. Many innovative techniques of achieving MMF are now available and are in this article, categorized into MMF with direct wiring techniques, MMF with inter-arch straight tie wires or elastics, and MMF with Special devices. CONCLUSION: In spite of the growing enthusiasm for ORIF, MMF remains a relevant technique in maxillofacial surgery and in some cases are more cost effective than rigid internal fixation.

Patients' attitude towards anterior teeth extraction an prosthetic replacement at the UPTH Dental Center, Port Harcourt.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the attitude of patients towards anterior teeth extraction and prosthetic replacement of same at the Dental center of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH). METHODS: A retrospective review of the data of patients who presented for anterior teeth extraction and prosthetic replacement or anterior teeth extraction only over a two-year period was done using the records of the oral surgery and prosthetic clinics of UPTH Dental centre. Demographic and clinical information were retrieved and analyzed using the SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients comprising 58 males(63%) and 34 females (37%), giving a male to female ratio of 1.7:1, were involved. The age range was 6 to 86 years with a median age of 34.5 years. Forty- three patients (46.7%) had both extraction and replacement within the study period while 49 patients (53.3%) had extraction without replacement. Trauma was the major cause of anterior tooth loss, especially among males and young individuals. Plastic removable partial denture was the main type of replacement offered. Fifty percent of the females (17/34) had replacement compared to 44.8% of the males (26/58). Among those who had both extraction and replacement, majority (74.4%, 32/43) requested for replacement within a month post extraction. Also, 86.2%t of the patients below 40 years either had immediate dentures or replacement within a month compared to 50% of those above 40 years. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients, surprisingly, tolerated anterior edentulousness. However, it appears that anterior edentulousness was more abhorent to female patients and younger individuals.

Incidence and risk factors for nerve injuries in mandibular third molar surgery.

BACKGROUND: The inferioralveolar (IAN), lingual (LN) and long buccal nerves (LBN)are the three terminal branches of the trigeminal nerve which are susceptible to injury during surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. While it is not always possible to accurately predict the patients that will be affected with these complications, understanding and identifying the risk factors may allow the adoption of appropriate technique and expertise for specific cases. We embarked on this study to document the incidence and duration of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), lingual nerve (LN) and long buccal nerve (LBN) following the operative removal of impacted mandibular third molars and to identify the associated radiographic and operative risk factors. METHOD: Pre- and postoperative neurosensory tests were performed for seventy nine patients who had surgical extraction of unilateral impacted mandibular third molars to determine the incidence and duration of complicating nerve injuries. The risk factors for nerve injury were determined among the radiographic variables and documented operative events. RESULTS: The incidence reported were 6.6% for IAN, 2.6% for LN and 4.0% for LBN; all but one of the nerve injuries resolved within 2 weeks. Depth of impaction (Pell & Gregory Level C) and linguo-version were the significant risk factors for IAN and LN injuries respectively while no risk factors was detected for LBN injury. Some significant operative events were associated with nerve injuries. CONCLUSION: Nerve injury in third molar surgery can be predicted based on some radiographic risk factors and some unforeseen intraoperative events. Most of the injuries are transitory in nature.

Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction.

AIM: This study was intended to assess the clinical reliability of the Pederson index as an instrument for preoperative determination of surgical difficulty in third molar surgery. METHODS: Pederson index was used to predict the difficulty of 79 cases of impacted mandibular third molar extractions. The predictions were compared with actual surgical difficulty determined by operation time. The reproducibility as well as the reliability of the index was determined. RESULTS: The index was found to be highly reproducible (P=0.00). The sensitivity and specificity were 94.9% and 45% respectively. The Positive predictive value (PPV) was 67.2% and the negative predictive value was 90% while the accuracy was 69.6%. CONCLUSION: The Pederson index though reproducible is not a reliable instrument for predicting surgical difficulty of third molar surgery when compared with actual surgical difficulty as determined by the operation time. There is a definite need to derive an index that could be used for preoperative prediction of difficulty; however it is much more important that any index so employed should provide accurate information as the consequence of wrong judgments could be quite deleterious to the patients and embarrassing to the surgeon. While it is not completely unimportant, the Pederson index should not be employed as a sole instrument for preoperative assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery.

Accidental displacement of mandibular third molar into soft tissue: a case report.

A case of accidental displacement of a mandibular molar tooth into adjacent submandibular space during routine extraction by a general practitioner is reported. The localization and surgical retrieval of the displaced tooth is described, post-operative period was uneventful and salient lessons for the practitioners highlighted.

An unusual case of total maxillary sequestration in a diabetic patient.

Osteomyelitis of the jaw is of relatively low incidence. Maxillary Osteomyelitis is however rare compared with mandibular osteomyelitis. The extensive blood supply and the strut-like bones of the maxilla make it less prone to chronic infections. Systemic conditions that alter the host's resistance such as diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disorders, agranulocytosis, anaemia, especially sickle cell anaemia are predisposing factors for the development of this condition. An unusual case of chronic maxillary osteomyelitis induced by trauma in a diabetic, with subsequent atypical necrotising ulceration of palatal mucosa resulting in total maxillary sequestration is presented.

Identification of risk factors for short-term morbidity in third molar surgery.

AIM: The study was designed to identify preoperative variables that may constitute important risk factors for greater degree of facial swelling, pain and trismus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 79 patients who presented for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Parameters such as age, sex, weight, body mass index, body surface area, and radiographic parameters such as depth of impaction, root morphology, ramus relationship, angulation of impaction, and proximity to inferior alveolar nerve {P-IAN} were measured and recorded. Swelling, trismus and pain were assessed by measuring facial dimension, inter incisal distance and using visual analogue scales respectively. The association between the preoperative parameters and extent of morbidity were determined by both a spearman correlation and multiple regression tests RESULTS: Sex, weight, and body surface area (BSA) correlated significantly with facial swelling. On the other hand, weight and body surface area were significant positive correlates of postoperative trismus. None of the preoperative variables studied correlated significantly with postoperative pain. In the regression analysis, sex, weight and BSA were also found to be significant determinants of facial swelling while postoperative pain severity was determined by sex, surface area and proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve. No statistically significant determinant of trismus was observed. CONCLUSION: Some non-operative parameters such as sex, weight and body surface area of patients are perhaps more important risk factors and determinants of individual variation of extent of morbidity than many radiographic variables to which more attention have been given in this regard. This requires further research.

Indications for the removal of impacted mandible third molars at Ibadan--any compliance with established guidelines?

The removal of impacted lower third molars has been a subject of controversy among dental practitioners since the turn of the twentieth century. A yet unresolved aspect of the controversy is the definition of appropriate indications for surgical extraction. Clinical guidelines have long been established but the effectiveness of adoption of the guidelines is still to be proved in our environment. A retrospective observational study of the indications for extractions in oral surgery clinic of the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan was conducted with the aim of identifying the common indications and to verify the level of compliance with established guidelines. There were 294 extractions out of which the indications for 268 cases were recorded. We found that pericoronitis constituted the most frequent indication 190 (33.6%) recurrent, 36 (13.4%) acute cases] while apical periodontitis 70, (26.1%) was next most frequent. Prophylactic extractions were performed in 34 (12.7%) cases. Other indications such as pulpitis 19, (7.1%), dental caries 13, (4.9%), dentoalveolar abscess (4, 1.5%), orthodontic reason (1, 0.3%) and tooth fracture (1, 0.37%) were also recorded. Compliance rate with NIH criteria and NICE guidelines were 87.3% and 73.9% respectively. We recommend that prophylactic extractions be discouraged while guidelines should be adequately emphasized for effective clinical practice.

Multiple malignant lesions involving the orofacial region: a case report.

We describe a rare finding in a 38 year old patient with previously undiagnosed prostate cancer who presented with multiple facial swellings, mental nerve neuropathy and paraplegia. While the co-existence of paraplegia and mental nerve neuropathy is a possible feature of metastatic prostate cancer involving the spine and mandible, the concomitant occurrence of multiple facial swellings involving the anterior mandible with its related gingival and lip mucosa, frontal bone and parotid glands is a rare finding. This raised a suspicion of two histologically different malignancies co-existing in this patient. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the parotid lesion and incisional biopsy of the gingival lesion were reported as Lymphoblastic lymphoma and Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma respectively. A Transrectal biopsy of the prostate gland confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. The patient however died due to a number of intercurrent illnesses and rapid deterioration consequent on his disease condition. Unfortunately, all efforts to carry out an autopsy were unsuccessful due to strong objection of the relatives on religious grounds. Problem associated with the diagnosis and management of such a rare case in a developing economy was highlighted.

A systematic review of the diagnostic role of ultrasonography in maxillofacial fractures.

This systematic review assessed the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in maxillofacial fractures. A computerized literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed and GoogleMed databases was conducted for publications on diagnostic ultrasound and maxillofacial fractures in English. Search phrases were 'maxillofacial fractures' or 'midfacial fractures' or 'zygomatic complex fractures' or 'nasal bone fractures' or 'orbital fractures' or 'mandibular fractures' combined with 'ultrasound' or 'ultrasonography'. The Boolean operator 'AND' was used to narrow the searches. 17 articles published between 1992 and 2009 were reviewed: two on midfacial fractures, nine on orbital fractures, three on nasal fractures, and two on mandibular fractures. One article described case series of ultrasonographic diagnosis of mandibular and midfacial fractures. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting orbital fractures were 56-100% and 85-100%, respectively, whilst that of nasal fractures were 90-100% and 98-100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in detecting zygomatic fractures were >90%. For mandibular fractures, the sensitivity and specificity was 66-100% and 52-100%, respectively. Much evidence justifies the use of diagnostic ultrasonography in maxillofacial fractures, especially fractures involving the nasal bone, orbital walls, anterior maxillary wall and zygomatic complex. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography is generally comparable with CT.