Comparison of the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy with 5-Fluorouracil versus Ologen Implant in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus Ologen™ implant in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma who underwent trabeculectomy using either Ologen or 5-FU over 12 consecutive months. The patients had moderate-to-advanced primary open-angle glaucoma and uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) on maximally tolerated medical treatment. Fornix-based trabeculectomy was performed on all patients by the same surgeon. The outcomes that were recorded and analyzed included the IOP level and number of glaucoma medications before and after surgery as well as the complications. All patients were followed for at least 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 58 eyes (of 47 patients) were included in this study. The eyes were divided into 2 groups: the 5-FU group (n = 30, 51.7%) and the Ologen group (n = 28, 48.3%). The demographics and preoperative clinical features were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Repeated-measures analysis showed a significant decrease in IOP after trabeculectomy in both groups, with a marked decrease at day 1 after surgery. The amount of relative change at postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the Ologen group (62.1 vs. 45.2%; p = 0.025). After this, there were no significant changes over time in IOP measurements in either group. In all the eyes, there was a significant drop in the number of antiglaucoma medications used after the surgery (p < 0.005), i.e. from 4.0 to 1.4 and from 4.3 to 1.0 in the 5-FU and Ologen groups, respectively, with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.303). Complications were few and minor in both groups. Bleb revision was needed in 2 eyes in the 5-FU group and in 4 eyes in the Ologen group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy with 5-FU was similar to that with Ologen. Further studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Response of human peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages (PBMM) to demineralized and decellularized bovine bone graft substitutes.

The performance of apparently biocompatible implanted bovine bone grafts may be compromised by unresolved chronic inflammation, and poor graft incorporation leading to implant failure. Monitoring the intensity and duration of the inflammatory response caused by implanted bone grafts is crucial. In this study, the ability of demineralized (DMB) and decellularized (DCC) bovine bone substitutes in initiating inflammatory responses to peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages (PBMMs) was investigated. The response of PBMMs to bone substitutes was evaluated by using both direct and indirect cell culture, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, apoptosis, immunophenotyping, and cytokine production. Analysis of DMB and DCC substitutes using scanning electron microscope (SEM) showed a roughened surface with a size ranging between 500 and 750 µm. PBMMs treated with DMB demonstrated cell aggregation and clumping mimicking lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treated PBMMs and a higher proliferation ability (166.93%) compared to control (100%) and DCC treatments (115.64%; p<0.001) at 24h. This was associated with a significantly increased production of intracellular ROS in PBMMs exposed to DMB substitutes than control (3158.5 vs 1715.5; p<0.001) and DCC treatment (2117.5). The bone substitute exposure also caused an increase in percentage apoptosis which was significantly (p<0.0001) higher in both DMB (27.85) and DCC (29.2) treatment than control (19.383). A significant increase in proinflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α: 3.4 folds; p<0.05) was observed in DMB substitute-treated PBMMs compared to control. Notably, IL-1ß mRNA was significantly higher in DMB (21.75 folds; p<0.0001) than control and DCC (5.01 folds). In contrast, DCC substitutes exhibited immunoregulatory effects on PBMMs, as indicated by the expression for CD86, CD206, and HLDR surface markers mimicking IL-4 treatments. In conclusion, DMB excites a higher immunological response compared to DCC suggesting decellularization process of tissues dampen down inflammatory reactions when exposed to PBMM.