Speech Symptoms of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Incidence of Secondary Speech Surgery in 10-Year-Old Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison of 2 Randomized Surgical Methods for Primary Palatal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare speech symptoms of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and incidence of secondary speech surgery in 10-year-old Finnish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) following primary palatal surgery using 2 surgical methods. DESIGN: Single center analysis within the Scandcleft multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery for UCLP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients comprised 79 nonsyndromic 10-year-old children with UCLP. Two randomized surgical methods were used in the primary palatal surgery: soft palate closure at 4 months and hard palate closure at 12 months (Arm A) and closure of both the soft and hard palate at 12 months (Arm C). Speech symptoms of VPI were analyzed from standardized video recordings by 2 experienced speech pathologists. The incidences of surgery for correcting VPI, fistula closure, and speech therapy were evaluated retrospectively from patient records. RESULTS: No differences in speech symptoms of VPI, need for VPI surgery or speech therapy were found between the surgical methods. Of all 79 children, 33% had had VPI surgery and 61% had speech therapy. The number of fistulas was significantly higher in Arm A (25%) than in Arm C (2%). Moderate to severe speech symptoms of VPI (hypernasality, continuous nasal air leakage, weak pressure consonants, and/or compensatory articulation) were found in 11% of the children. CONCLUSION: No differences were present between groups in speech symptoms of VPI or need for VPI surgery or speech therapy between the 2 surgical methods. One third of the children had undergone VPI surgery. Most of the children (89%) had good or relatively good speech.

Le Fort I Osteotomy in Cleft Patients: Maxillary Advancement and Articulation.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients. AIMS: To examine whether the amount of maxillary advancement and preoperativecephalometric skeletal and dentoalveolar relationships are associated with articulation errors of the Finnish alveolar consonants /s/, /l/, and /r/ in cleft patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven nonsyndromic cleft patients who underwent Le Fort I or bimaxillary osteotomies were evaluated retrospectively. Pre- and post-operative lateral cephalometric radiographs and standardized speech video recordings were analyzed. The Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test, Student t test sign test, intraclass correlation and Kappa statistics were used in the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean advancement of the maxilla (point A) was 4.65 mm horizontally (range -2.80 to 11.30) and -3.82 mm vertically (range -14.20 to 3.90). The overall articulation (especially the sounds /s/ and /l/) improved significantly postoperatively, but the amount of maxillary advancement did not affect the articulation. The preoperative mean percentages of /s/, /l/, and /r/ errors were 32%, 33%, 46% and the postoperative percentages 23%, 19%, 40%, respectively. Preoperative articulation errors of /s/ were related to palatal inclination of the upper incisors. CONCLUSIONS: Orthognathic surgery may improve articulation errors. The amount of maxillary advancement is not related to the improvement.

Speech of Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison of Three Different Surgical Protocols for Primary Repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Between 1997 and 2014, 3 protocols have been used in out cleft unit for primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. During the Scandcleft randomized controlled trial closing the soft palate and lip at 4 months and the hard palate at 12 months (Protocol 1) was compared with closing the entire palate at 12 months (Protocol 2). Protocol 3 comprises closure of the lip and hard palate with a vomer flap at 4 months and the soft palate at 10 months. The purpose of this study was to compare subsequent velopharyngeal competence at age of 3 and 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 160 non-syndromatic patients with a unilateral cleft lip and palate. Protocol 3 was retrospectively compared with Protocols 1 and 2 within the previously published Scandcleft study. RESULTS: At 3 years of age, normal or borderline competent velopharyngeal function was found in 68% of patients in Protocol 1, 74% of patients in Protocol 2, and 72% of patients in Protocol 3. At 5 years of age, the corresponding figures were 84%, 82%, and 92%. 21% of patients in Protocol 1, 4% in Protocol 2, and 23% in Protocol 3 had palatal reoperations before the age of 5 years. CONCLUSION: No significant differences emerged in velopharyngeal competence at age 3 years between the 3 protocols. Palatal reoperations were performed earlier in patient groups 1 and 3, explaining the difference in the velopharyngeal competence rate at the 5-year time-point.

Speech Characteristics and Oromyofunctional Outcomes in Two Bimaxillary Face Transplantation Patients in Helsinki.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Facial functional restoration is one of the main goals in face transplantation. We report the oromyofacial function outcomes of two bimaxillary face transplantation (FT) patients in Helsinki. STUDY DESIGN: Outcome Study. METHODS: Two male patients, aged 34 and 59, had severe functional facial disabilities following self-inflicted gunshot injuries sustained to their mid and lower faces several years earlier. Both underwent tooth-bearing maxillomandibular face transplantation in 2016 and 2018. We collected data regarding speech, swallowing, sensory recovery, motor recovery, and olfaction prior to transplantation. Patient charts were reviewed from the follow-up period of 4 and 2 years, respectively. RESULTS: Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and articulation continued to improve during follow-up for both patients. Voice quality and resonance were mainly normal at last follow-up. Swallowing improved once lip occlusion was regained, with only minor aspiration evident on videofluorography. Both patients had significant improvement in facial mimic muscle function after FT. The first patient who only had buccal sensory nerves connected has only recovered protective facial sensation, whereas our second patient with buccal, infraorbital, and alveolar nerves connected has almost complete facial two-point discrimination. CONCLUSION: Both patients have regained satisfactory facial sensory and motor function. Sensory recovery seems to be faster and more precise if multiple sensory nerve coaptations are performed. Swallowing and speech have continued to improve over time although not reaching the level of the normal population. We demonstrate how speech-corrective surgery can safely be performed in a FT patient and can improve speech recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2643-E2649, 2021.

The effect of maxillary advancement on articulation of alveolar consonants in cleft patients.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of maxillary advancement on Finnish alveolar consonants /s/, /l/, and /r/ in cleft patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine Finnish-speaking nonsyndromic cleft patients, who had undergone Le Fort I or bimaxillary osteotomies, were evaluated retrospectively Production of the Finnish alveolar consonants /s/, /l/, and /r/ was assessed from pre- and postoperative standardized video recordings by two experienced speech pathologists. McNemar's test was used in the statistical analyses. Kappa statistics were calculated to assess reliability. RESULTS: The patients included 35 females and 24 males with CP (n = 12), UCLP (n = 31), and BCLP (n = 16). There was a significant improvement in /s/ and /l/ sounds after maxillary advancement (p = 0.039 and p = 0.002, respectively). The preoperative mean percentage of /s/ errors was 34%; postoperatively it was 20%. /L/ was misarticulated preoperatively by 34% of the patients and postoperatively by 19%. /R/ was misarticulated preoperatively by 47% of the patients and postoperatively by 42%. The level of mild articulation errors rose from 25% to 31%, while severe articulation errors decreased from 37% to 25%. The reliabilities were good. CONCLUSION: When planning orthognathic surgery in cleft patients with maxillary retrusion and articulation errors, advancement of the maxilla might be a means for improving articulation of /s/ and /l/.

Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft patients: Maxillary advancement and velopharyngeal function.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients. AIMS: To evaluate whether the amount of maxillary advancement in Le Fort I osteotomy affects velopharyngeal function (VPF) in cleft patients. METHODS: Ninety-three non-syndromic cleft patients (51 females, 42 males) were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had undergone a Le Fort I or bimaxillary (n = 24) osteotomy at Helsinki Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center. Preoperative and postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs were digitized to measure the amount of maxillary advancement. Pre- and postoperative speech was assessed perceptually and instrumentally by experienced speech therapists. Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test were used in the statistical analyses. Kappa statistics were calculated to assess reliability. RESULTS: The mean advancement of A point was 4.0 mm horizontally (range: -2.8-11.3) and 3.9 mm vertically (range -14.2-3.9). Although there was a negative change in VPF, the amount of maxillary horizontal or vertical movement did not significantly influence the VPF. There was no difference between the patients with maxillary and bimaxillary osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of maxillary advancement does not affect the velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.

The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy on velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative velopharyngeal (VP) function and cleft type can predict VP function after a Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive nonsyndromic cleft patients (54 females, 64 males) who underwent Le Fort I osteotomies were retrospectively evaluated. Pre- and postoperative VP function was assessed perceptually and instrumentally by a Nasometer. A five-point scale was used to rate velopharyngeal insufficiency symptoms (VPI 0-4). To assess reliability, 30 video recordings were re-evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 89% of patients had normal or insignificant VPI (0-1), and only 3% had moderate VPI (3). Postoperatively, 77% of patients had VPI values of 0-1 and 14% had moderate to severe VPI values (VPI 3-4). A positive correlation was found between pre- and postoperative VPI scores, whereas the cleft type did not affect speech results. Patients with a preoperatively normal VPI (0) were not at risk for postoperative velopharyngeal incompetence. CONCLUSIONS: There was an overall significant negative change in speech after a Le Fort I osteotomy. At-risk patients presented with borderline (1) or more severe VPI (2 and 3) preoperatively.