Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endod ; 40(8): 1063-70, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25069909

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective cohort study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of endodontic treatment performed in immature nonvital permanent teeth by apexification (calcium hydroxide or apical barrier with mineral trioxide aggregate) versus revascularization. METHODS: A comprehensive chart review was performed to obtain a cohort of previously completed cases with recalls. Clinical and radiographic data were collected for 31 treated teeth (19 revascularization and 12 apexification) with an average follow-up time of 17 months and a recall rate of 63%. Tooth survival, success rate, and adverse events were analyzed. Changes in radiographic root length, width, and area were quantified. RESULTS: The majority of treated teeth survived throughout the study period, with 30 of 31 (97%) teeth surviving (18/19 [95%] revascularization and 12/12 apexification). Most cases were also clinically successful, with 27 of 31 (87%) meeting criteria for success (15/19 [78%] revascularization and 12/12 apexification; nonsignificant difference). A greater incidence of adverse events was observed in the revascularization group (8/19 [42%] vs 1/12 [11%] in apexification) (risk ratio = 5.1; P = .04; 95% confidence interval, 0.719-35.48). Although more revascularization cases than apexification cases showed an increase in radiographic root area and width, the effect was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, revascularization was not superior to other apexification techniques in either clinical or radiographic outcomes. Studies with large subject cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to evaluate outcomes of revascularization and apexification while accounting for important covariants relevant to clinical success.


Assuntos
Apexificação/métodos , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos , Ápice Dentário/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente não Vital/terapia , Adolescente , Compostos de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Hidróxido de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Neovascularização Fisiológica/fisiologia , Óxidos/uso terapêutico , Dor/etiologia , Projetos Piloto , Radiografia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Silicatos/uso terapêutico , Clareamento Dental/métodos , Descoloração de Dente/etiologia , Fraturas dos Dentes/etiologia , Raiz Dentária/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente não Vital/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Endod ; 39(8): 1078-83, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23880282

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Revitalization procedures have been widely used for the treatment of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. The treatment procedures appear to be capable of encouraging continued root development and thickening of the canal walls. The nature of tissues formed in the canal space and at the root apex after revitalization has been shown histologically in several animal studies; similar studies in humans were recently reported. METHODS: A 9-year-old boy had a traumatic injury to his upper anterior teeth. Tooth #9 suffered a complicated crown fracture with a pulp exposure, which was restored with a composite resin. The tooth developed a chronic apical abscess. Revitalization procedures were performed on tooth #9 because it was an immature permanent tooth with an open apex and thin canal walls. Twenty-six months after revitalization, the tooth had a horizontal crown fracture at the cervical level and could not be restored. The tooth was extracted and processed for routine histological and immunohistochemical examination to identify the nature of tissues formed in the canal space. RESULTS: Clinically and radiographically, the revitalization of the present case was successful because of the absence of signs and symptoms and the resolution of periapical lesion as well as thickening of the canal walls and continued root development. The tissue formed in the canal was well-mineralized cementum- or bone-like tissue identified by routine histology and immunohistochemistry. No pulp-like tissue characterized by the presence of polarized odontoblast-like cells aligning dentin-like hard tissue was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The tissues formed in the canal of revitalized human tooth are similar to cementum- or bone-like tissue and fibrous connective tissue.


Assuntos
Apexificação/métodos , Abscesso Periapical/terapia , Raiz Dentária/patologia , Cementogênese/fisiologia , Criança , Doença Crônica , Fístula Dentária/terapia , Cavidade Pulpar/patologia , Necrose da Polpa Dentária/terapia , Dentina Secundária/patologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incisivo/lesões , Masculino , Odontogênese/fisiologia , Abscesso Periapical/diagnóstico por imagem , Abscesso Periapical/patologia , Radiografia , Ápice Dentário/diagnóstico por imagem , Ápice Dentário/patologia , Coroa do Dente/lesões , Fraturas dos Dentes/complicações , Raiz Dentária/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA