Anatomy driven optimization strategy for total marrow irradiation with a volumetric modulated arc therapy technique.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of dose distribution optimization for total marrow irradiation (TMI) employing volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with RapidArc (RA) technology setting isocenter's positions and jaw's apertures according to patient's anatomical features. Plans for five patients were generated with the RA engine (PROIII): eight arcs were distributed along four isocenters and simultaneously optimized with collimator set to 90°. Two models were investigated for geometrical settings of arcs: (1) in the "symmetric" model, isocenters were equispaced and field apertures were set the same for all arcs to uniformly cover the entire target length; (2) in the "anatomy driven" model, both field sizes and isocenter positions were optimized in order to minimize the target volume near the field edges (i.e., to maximize the freedom of motion of MLC leaves inside the field aperture (for example, avoiding arcs with ribs and iliac wings in the same BEV)). All body bones from the cranium to mid of the femurs were defined as PTV; the maximum length achieved in this study was 130 cm. Twelve (12) Gy in 2 Gy/fractions were prescribed in order to obtain the covering of 85% of the PTV by 100% of the prescribed dose. For all organs at risk (including brain, optical structures, oral and neck structures, lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, bowels, bladder, rectum, genitals), planning strategy aimed to maximize sparing according to ALARA principles, looking to reach a mean dose lower than 6 Gy (i.e., 50% of the prescribed dose). Mean MU/fraction resulted 3184 ± 354 and 2939 ± 264 for the two strategies, corresponding to a reduction of 7% (range -2% to 13%) for (1) and (2). Target homogeneity, defined as D(2%)-D(98%) was 18% better for (2). Mean dose to the healthy tissue, defined as body minus PTV, had 10% better reduction with (2). The isocenter's position and the jaw's apertures are significant parameters in the optimization of the TMI with RA technique, giving the medical physicist a crucial role in driving the optimization and thus obtaining the best plan. A clinical protocol started in our department in October 2010.

Impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on seminal vesicles intrafraction motion during 1.5 T-MRI-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: MR-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy is improving the accuracy in the planning and delivery phases of the treatment. Rectal hydrogel-spacer may help in mitigating organ motion, but few data are currently available. METHODS: We aimed to assess any potential impact of the device on seminal vesicles motion by measuring translational and rotational shifts between the pre- and post-treatment MRI scans of a total of 50 fractions in the first 10 patients who underwent MR-guided prostate SBRT (35 Gy/5 fx). Of them, five patients received the hydrogel-spacer. The comparative analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Median rotational shifts were: in anteroposterior 0° (range, 0.097°/0.112°; SD = 0.05°) vs 0° (-0.162/0.04°; SD = 0.07°) in the no-spacer subgroup (p = 0.36); lateral shifts were 0° (-0.1°/0.54°; SD = 0.28°) vs -0.85° in the no-spacer cohort (-1.56°/0.124°; SD = 0.054°; p = 0.22). Cranio-caudal shifts were 0° (-0.121°/0.029°; SD = 0.06°) in the spacer-cohort vs 0° (-0.066°/0.087°; SD = 0.69°; p = 0.53). Median translational shifts were: in anteroposterior 0.9 mm (-0.014 mm/0.031 mm; SD = 0.036 mm) in the spacer-group vs 0.030 mm (-0.14 mm/0.03 mm; SD = 0.032 mm; p = 0.8); latero-lateral shifts were -0.042 mm (-0.047 mm/0.07 mm; SD = 0.054 mm), vs -0.023 mm (-0.027 mm/-0.01 mm; SD = 0.023 mm) in the no-spacer group (p = 0.94). In cranio-caudal, statistically significant shifts were reported: 0.082 mm (0.06 mm/0.15 mm; SD = 0.04 mm) vs 0.06 mm (-0.06/0.08 mm; SD = 0.09 mm) in the no-spacer cohort (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: A favorable impact of the hydrogel-spacer on seminal vesicles motion was observed only in cranio-caudal translational shifts, although being not clinically significant. Further studies are required to fully investigate the potential contribution of this device on vesicles motion. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy may represent a game changer for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy, given the possibility to better visualize soft-tissues anatomy and to daily recalculate the treatment plan based on real-time conditions. The use of devices like rectal ballon or rectal gel spacers has gained interest in the last years for the possibility to better spare the rectum during prostate radiotherapy. This is one of the first experiences exploring the role of rectal spacer on seminal vesicles intrafraction motion during MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer.

Volumetric-modulated arc stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric impact of an increased near-maximum target dose and of a rectal spacer.

OBJECTIVE: In volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) becomes challenging when the sparing of rectum, bladder and urethra is strictly pursued. Our current 35-Gy-in-five-fraction plans only assure 33.2 Gy to ≥95% PTV ([Formula: see text] ≥ 95%). Looking for an improved [Formula: see text], increased near-maximum target dose (D2%) and prostate-rectum spacer insertion were tested. METHODS: For 11 patients, two VMAT plans, with D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy (Hom) or D2% ≤ 40.2 Gy (Het), on each of two CT studies, before or after spacer insertion, were computed. All plans assured [Formula: see text] ≥95%, and <1 cm(3) of rectum, bladder and urethra receiving ≥35 Gy. By hypothesis testing, several dose-volume metrics for target coverage and rectal sparing were compared across the four groups of plans. The impact of spacer insertion on the fractions of rectum receiving more than 18, 28 and 32 Gy ([Formula: see text]) was further tested by linear correlation analysis. RESULTS: By hypothesis testing, the increased D2% was associated with improvements in target coverage, whereas spacer insertion was associated with improvements in both target coverage and rectal [Formula: see text]. By linear correlation analysis, spacer insertion was related to the reductions in rectal [Formula: see text] for X ≥ 28 Gy. CONCLUSION: A slightly increased D2% or the use of spacer insertion was each able to improve [Formula: see text]. Their combined use assured [Formula: see text] ≥ 98% to all our patients. Spacer insertion was further causative for improvements in rectal sparing. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: For VMAT plans in prostate SBRT, the distinct dosimetric usefulness of increased D2% and of the use of spacer insertion were validated in terms of target coverage and rectal sparing.