Practical aspects of factor concentrate use in patients with von Willebrand disease undergoing invasive procedures: a European survey.

INTRODUCTION: The bleeding propensity in von Willebrand disease (VWD) is usually moderate or mild and patients with VWD do not need continuous treatment, but do require extra increased haemostatic cover when undergoing dental or surgical procedures. Desmopressin can be effective in certain patient groups and this has been considered in a previous publication. AIM: This paper now seeks to evaluate current knowledge and practice in the use of factor concentrate in the management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: A literature search was performed on the use of factor concentrates to cover invasive procedures and a survey of current practice in a number of specialist haematology centres across Europe represented by the European Haemophilia Strategy Board was conducted. RESULTS: Our review of the literature and the results of the survey showed considerable heterogeneity in treatment regimens, and a lack of consistency in reporting of the variables that determine factor concentrate dosing and monitoring. CONCLUSION: By analysing the literature, examining guidelines and using consensus deliberation, this survey allowed the group to develop recommendations for management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures.

Practical aspects of DDAVP use in patients with von Willebrand Disease undergoing invasive procedures: a European survey.

INTRODUCTION: Desamino D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP or desmopressin) is a useful and effective haemostatic treatment for patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD). However, there are still issues regarding in which subtypes of VWD DDAVP is appropriate and little consensus on its use in different surgical settings. We also lack information concerning the appropriate laboratory parameters that should be monitored. AIM: The European Haemophilia Therapy Strategy Board (EHTSB) wished to investigate published information and clinical use of DDAVP in VWD patients. METHODS: We conducted a literature survey on management of VWD during surgical interventions and undertook a survey of specialist haematologist centres across Europe to assess current management of VWD patients. RESULTS: DDAVP is ineffective in type 3 VWD and its use in type 2B remains controversial due to the possibility of thrombocytopenia. It can, however, be used effectively to cover minor surgery and dental procedures in most other VWD patients. For major surgery there is wider use of factor concentrate in preference to DDAVP depending on the subtype of VWD. We give consensus recommendations on the use of DDAVP for surgical interventions in VWD including laboratory parameters that denote an adequate response and contraindications to its use. CONCLUSIONS: DDAVP can be recommended to cover invasive procedure in selected patients with VWD, however, we need more information and systematic recording of adverse events associated with DDAVP use in VWD. A companion paper will be published covering the use of factor concentrates in VWD patients.

Replacement therapy for invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia: literature review, European survey and recommendations.

Although most surgical and invasive procedures can be performed safely in patients with haemophilia, the optimal level and duration of replacement therapy required to prevent bleeding complications have not been established conclusively. For providing more insight into optimal therapy during invasive procedures, a literature review of surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia was conducted. Concomitantly, current practice was surveyed in 26 European Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres, representing 15 different countries. The review identified 110 original papers published between 1965 and 2007. Of these, only two studies were randomized controlled trials. Target levels and the duration of replacement therapy in the published studies were as follows. For major orthopaedic surgery: preoperative targets were 80-90%; postoperative targets showed a high degree of variation, with trough levels ranging from 20% to 80%, duration 10-14 days; for liver biopsy, 70-100%, 1-7 days; tonsillectomy: 90-100%, 5-11 days; indwelling venous access device insertion: 100%, 3-10 days; circumcision: 50-60%, 2-4 days; dental surgery: 30-50%, single treatment. With the exception of dental surgery, current practice in Europe, as assessed by the survey, was largely in agreement with published data. In conclusion, this study provides both a comprehensive review and a large survey of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia undergoing invasive procedures; these data have informed the consensus practical treatment recommendations made in this paper. This study highlights the need for better-designed studies in order to better define minimal haemostatic levels of replacement therapy and optimal treatment duration.