Dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis for rapid orthodontic canine retraction.

PURPOSE: We present a technique to reduce the overall orthodontic treatment time by means of dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients who were planned to undergo orthodontic treatment with bilateral first premolar extractions and subsequent bilateral canine tooth distalization underwent osteotomy around the canine tooth. The first premolar was extracted, and the buccal bone was carefully removed. After wound closure, a special orthopedic device was mounted and cemented to the first molar and canine teeth. Distraction was started the same day at the rate of 0.4 mm twice a day and continued until adequate movement of the canine teeth was achieved. The device was then removed, and orthodontic therapy was continued with fixed appliances. RESULTS: The distraction rate and the device were well tolerated by all of patients. No anchorage loss in the second premolar and first molar teeth, root resorption, dental ankylosis, discoloration, or loss of vitality was detected. CONCLUSION: The concept of distraction osteogenesis for rapid orthodontic tooth movement is promising and feasible for clinical practice.

Cephalometric analysis of the consolidation phase following bilateral pediatric mandibular distraction.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the consolidation phase of mandible distraction is to maintain the improvement in maxillomandibular form and relationship while the generated tissue ossifies. During this period, external deforming forces can act on the healing generated bone. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential cephalometric changes that occur following pediatric bilateral mandibular distraction using external devices. DESIGN: Retrospective lateral superimposition cephalometric analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five cases of pediatric mandible distraction were reviewed. Seven of these cases were included in the study after exclusion criteria were applied. These cases represented a group with severe congenital dysmorphology and a mean device activation of 26.5 mm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in pogonion position, symphyseal plane rotation, mandible length, and mandible length relative to maxillary length during the 18 to 36 days of activation, the eight weeks of consolidation, and the 1-year period following removal of the distraction device were measured. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated variable changes in position of the mandible during the consolidation phase. The most common were retrusion of pogonion, a decrease in mandible length, and a clockwise rotation of the symphyseal plane. In some cases the changes that occurred during consolidation were greater than those that occurred on 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis is a dynamic phase and should not be assumed to be static. Multicenter use of this cephalometric technique would help to identify potential risk factors associated with postactivation changes.