Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 10(5)2023 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237673

RESUMO

Medical image segmentation, whether semi-automatically or manually, is labor-intensive, subjective, and needs specialized personnel. The fully automated segmentation process recently gained importance due to its better design and understanding of CNNs. Considering this, we decided to develop our in-house segmentation software and compare it to the systems of established companies, an inexperienced user, and an expert as ground truth. The companies included in the study have a cloud-based option that performs accurately in clinical routine (dice similarity coefficient of 0.912 to 0.949) with an average segmentation time ranging from 3'54″ to 85'54″. Our in-house model achieved an accuracy of 94.24% compared to the best-performing software and had the shortest mean segmentation time of 2'03″. During the study, developing in-house segmentation software gave us a glimpse into the strenuous work that companies face when offering clinically relevant solutions. All the problems encountered were discussed with the companies and solved, so both parties benefited from this experience. In doing so, we demonstrated that fully automated segmentation needs further research and collaboration between academics and the private sector to achieve full acceptance in clinical routines.

2.
Postgrad Med ; 134(5): 463-470, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Opioid/acetaminophen combinations may be overly prescribed in many post-surgical situations where a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with equal or greater efficacy, fewer central nervous system side effects, and no risk for opioid abuse could be substituted. We compared a single, non-prescription dose of naproxen sodium 440 mg (NapS) against hydrocodone plus acetaminophen 10/650 mg (HYD+APAP) in post-impaction surgery pain. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in moderate-severe pain after surgical removal of impacted third molars (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04307940). Patients (n = 212) received NapS, HYD+APAP, or placebo and were assessed over 12 hours. Primary endpoint: summed pain intensity difference from 0 to 12 hours (SPID0-12). Secondary endpoints: pain intensity, pain relief, time to rescue medication, duration of pain at least half gone. Others: onset of pain relief, global assessment of treatment, adverse events. RESULTS: All 221 randomized patients formed the safety population and were included in the intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis. Nine patients discontinued treatment or had protocol violations, and 212 patients were included in the per-protocol, primary efficacy population. Both active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo. NapS was significantly more effective than HYD+APAP regarding SPID0-12 (p = 0.01; primary endpoint), total pain relief (0-6 and 0-12 hours; p < 0.05), time to rescue medication (p < 0.001), and duration of pain at least half gone (p < 0.001). HYD+APAP was not statistically superior to NapS for any endpoint. More adverse events were reported with HYD+APAP (n = 63) than NapS (n = 2) and placebo (n = 20), including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. CONCLUSION: In moderate-to-severe postsurgical dental pain, a single dose of NapS was at least as effective as HYD+APAP in the early hours, significantly more effective at reducing pain intensity and providing greater pain relief over 12 hours, and was better tolerated. When not contraindicated, NapS should be considered a preferred alternative to opioid combinations for acute pain. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04307940; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04307940).


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos , Dente Impactado , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidrocodona/uso terapêutico , Naproxeno/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dente Impactado/cirurgia
3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 32(2): 331-42, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588111

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel formulation of extended-release/immediate-release (ER) naproxen sodium over 24 h in a dental pain model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in moderate to severe pain after extraction of one or two impacted third molars (at least one partial mandibular bony impaction). Treatment comprised oral ER naproxen sodium 660 mg (single dose), placebo (both studies) or immediate-release (IR) naproxen sodium 220 mg tid (study 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy endpoint: 24-h summed pain intensity difference (SPID). Secondary variables included total pain relief (TOTPAR), use of rescue medication. All treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00720057 (study 1), NCT01389284 (study 2). RESULTS: Primary efficacy analyses: pain intensity was significantly lower over 24 h with ER naproxen sodium vs. placebo (p < 0.001), with significant relief from 15 min (study 2). In study 2, ER naproxen sodium was non-inferior to IR naproxen sodium, reducing pain intensity to a comparable extent over 24 h. TOTPAR was significantly greater with ER and IR naproxen sodium vs. placebo at all time points, with generally comparable differences between active treatments. Significantly more placebo patients required rescue medication vs. ER and IR naproxen sodium from 2-24 h post-dose. Once daily ER naproxen sodium was generally safe and well tolerated, with a similar safety profile to IR naproxen sodium tid. LIMITATIONS: The studies were single dose, with limited ability to assess efficacy or safety of multiple doses over time. As the imputed pain score meant that estimated treatment differences may have been biased in favor of ER naproxen sodium, a post hoc analysis evaluated the robustness of the results for pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of ER naproxen sodium 660 mg significantly reduced moderate to severe dental pain vs. placebo and was comparable to IR naproxen sodium 220 mg tid. Significant pain relief was experienced from 15 min and sustained over 24 h, resulting in a reduced need for rescue medication. ER naproxen sodium 660 mg once daily is a convenient and effective therapy providing 24 h relief of pain.


Assuntos
Naproxeno/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA