The effect of a mandibular advancement splint in subjects with sleep-related breathing disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effectiveness of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) in subjects with sleep-related breathing disorders using both objective and subjective outcome measures. DESIGN: The study was carried out as a retrospective analysis. SETTING: The study was conducted within the Sleep Studies Unit at the Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, between May 1997 and March 2000. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and six with non-apnoeic snoring, diagnosed by overnight polysomnography, were fitted with a monobloc appliance between May 1997 and March 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The subjects were analysed for changes in the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores. In addition each subject completed an outcome questionnaire following fitting of the appliance. RESULTS: Variability in response measured by the change in the respiratory disturbance index was found with no correlation to the baseline recording. Although median RDI values improved in both groups, significantly so in the obstructive sleep apnoea group (p<0.05), seven subjects exhibited an increased RDI score following mandibular advancement splint therapy. The median Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores decreased in both the OSA group and the non-apnoeic snorers although not significantly. Twenty-one of the 26 subjects completed the outcome questionnaire revealing an 81% reduction in snoring. Side-effects were generally transient and minor. Eighty-six per cent of the subjects' partners reported better quality of sleep as a result of MAS therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The monobloc appliance significantly improved the Respiratory Disturbance Index in the obstructive sleep apnoea group. Some subjects had increased RDI scores following splint therapy. This supports the need for an objective assessment in the follow-up of patients treated with mandibular advancement splints.

Cephalometric evaluation of mandibular advancement at different horizontal jaw positions in obstructive sleep apnoea patients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of the mandibular advancement device (MAD) at 50% (P2) and 75% (P3) of maximum mandibular advancement, relative to maximum intercuspation (P1) subjectively and objectively. METHODS: Eighteen subjects previously diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) were selected for the study. ESS score, VAS score, soft palate angle, MP-H distance, S-H distance, a C4 -H distance, a Pu -p Pu distance and total pharyngeal area were calculated at P1, P2 and P3 positions with the help of an adjustable MAD. The results were statistically analysed. RESULTS: ESS score, VAS score, soft palate angle, MP-H distance, S-H distance and radius of curvature of airway at P2 and P3 were significantly lower compared to P1, but there was no significant difference between P2 and P3. CONCLUSIONS: The MAD produced significant improvement in objective signs and subjective symptoms at both 50% and 75% of the maximum mandibular protrusion positions at comparable comfort levels. Therefore, MAD may be given at 50% of maximum advancement in order to reduce dental or temporomandibular joint disturbances.