Severity of Mandibular Dysmorphology in Treacher Collins Syndrome for Stratification of Perioperative Airway Risk.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) and attendant airway dysmorphology may be predisposed to airway complications in the perioperative period. However, limited data correlates severity of mandibular hypoplasia and airway status. This study aims to improve risk stratification for perioperative airway insufficiency in TCS by using a previously proposed mandibular severity index. METHODS: Patient demographics, perioperative airway status, difficulty of intubation, and Cormack Lehane grade were collected and compared using a TCS mandibular hypoplasia severity grading scale in patients with TCS treated between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent 222 procedures with institutional mandibular severity gradings as follows: 23% Grade I, 31% Grade II, 39% Grade III, 8% Grade IV. Our severity index was associated with intubation difficulty ( P <0.001) and difficult airway status ( P <0.001), with 72% of difficult airways found in grade III and grade IV patients. Mandibular retrusion and ramal hypoplasia subscores were positively correlated with measures of airway severity ( P <0.001), whereas the gonial angle was negatively correlated ( P <0.001). Age was negatively correlated with difficult visualization for endotracheal intubation ( P =0.02) but had no association with difficult airway status ( P =0.2). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a positive correlation between severity of maxillomandibular dysmorphology and perioperative airway difficulty in TCS patients. Our findings suggest that severely affected patients require heightened vigilance throughout life, as difficult airways may not completely resolve with aging. Given the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with airway complications, proper identification and preparation for challenging airways is critical for TCS patients.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Internationally Adopted Children with Cleft Lip and Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in internationally adopted patients with cleft lip and palate to those in non-adopted peers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft team at tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥ 8 with cleft lip and palate attending routine cleft team evaluations September 2021 - September 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CLEFT-Q PRO scores. RESULTS: Sixty-four internationally adopted patients and 113 non-adopted patients with a mean age of 13 years were included. Compared to non-adopted peers, adopted patients demonstrated worse satisfaction with face appearance (mean 59 vs. 66, p = .044), speech function (mean 69 vs. 78, p = .005), and speech distress (mean 80 vs. 84, p = .032). No significant differences were observed on the nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, lip scar, jaws, psychological function, or social function scales (p > .05). Objective clinical evaluation corroborated these findings, with adopted patients demonstrating worse Pittsburgh Weighted Speech scores (mean 3.0 vs 1.9, p = .027) and greater incidence of articulation errors (64% vs 46%, p = .021). No significant differences were observed in rates of mood, anxiety, or behavior concerns identified on psychosocial assessment (p = .764). Among adopted patients, undergoing palatoplasty prior to adoption was associated with worse satisfaction with speech, appearance, school, and social function (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes among internationally adopted adolescents and young adults with cleft lip and palate show slightly lower satisfaction with facial appearance and speech but otherwise demonstrate similar results to non-adopted peers on most appearance and psychosocial measures. PRO data correlated well with objective speech assessment and did not portend worse psychosocial function.

Orthognathic Considerations of Maxillary and Mandibular Asymmetry at Skeletal Maturity in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Improving occlusion and aesthetics is the primary objective of orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). However, these patients often suffer from horizontal, vertical, and rotational asymmetry in addition to maxillary retrusion. This study aims to describe maxillary and mandibular asymmetry in patients with CLP undergoing orthognathic surgery and analyze its anatomic basis. METHODS: Patients with isolated CLP undergoing CT imaging prior to orthognathic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Maxillary and mandibular positioning and dimensional symmetry were evaluated. Incidence of clinically significant asymmetry, correlations between areas of asymmetry, and associations with clinical history were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients, with mean age 17 years were analyzed, including 32 patients with unilateral CLP and 26 with bilateral CLP. Twenty (34%) patients demonstrated chin deviation ≥4mm and 21 (36%) had a ≥5% discrepancy in mandibular ramus lengths. Horizontal occlusal plane cant of ≥2° was seen in 20 (34%) maxillae and 28 (48%) mandibles, with dental arch yaw ≥2° noted in 32 (55%) of both maxillae and mandibles. Chin deviation correlated with maxillary cant, discrepancy in ramus length, discrepancy in mandibular body length, and discrepancy in condylar volume (p<0.05). Bilateral and unilateral CLP did not show significantly different asymmetry on any measure (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both maxillary and mandibular asymmetry is common in skeletally mature patients with CLP and frequently results in notable chin deviation. Preoperative three-dimensional imaging and virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery aid in recognition of facial asymmetries and reveal opportunities to optimize results in this population.

Long-Term Outcomes and Growth Analysis of Costochondral Grafts for Hemifacial Microsomia: 24-Year Experience of a Single Surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Costochondral grafts (CCGs) can be used in mandibular reconstruction of Kaban-Pruzansky IIB/III hemifacial microsomia (HFM). Their growth is variable, occasionally necessitating secondary surgery. This study examined one surgeon's 24-year experience to better quantify long-term outcomes and surgical care required in CCG reconstruction of HFM mandibles. METHODS: Serial three-dimensional computed tomography scans, from preoperative to most recent, were analyzed in patients with minimum four years of clinical follow-up following CCG reconstruction. Graft/ramus height, length, volume, bilateral mandibular body length, and chin deviation were measured. Changes in measurements were analyzed at preoperative, immediate postoperative, most recent imaging prior to secondary surgery, and most recent imaging overall. Growth rates per measure were calculated utilizing scans after CCG, but before secondary surgery. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were analyzed. Median clinical follow-up was 10.0 (5.1) years. One patient developed temporomandibular joint ankylosis secondary to stacked-graft malposition, which was repaired without further complications. CCG reconstruction led to immediate improvement in graft/ramus height (p=0.03), length (p=0.002), and volumetric symmetry (p=0.02). No difference was found between graft and native ramus height (p=0.4) and length measures (p=0.5), while graft volume and affected mandibular body grew significantly more slowly. By latest imaging, 63% of patients required secondary surgery, including distraction osteogenesis and/or orthognathic surgery due to differential graft/hemimandible growth behavior. By most recent clinical follow-up, this proportion increased to 93%. CONCLUSION: CCGs provide significant short-term mandibular and facial symmetry improvement in HFM IIB/III. Long-term analysis reveals frequent undergrowth requiring secondary intervention to promote and maintain symmetry.

Associations between the timing of tongue reduction surgery, (Epi)genotype, and dentoskeletal development in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

Tongue reduction surgery is often pursued to manage the adverse effects of macroglossia in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). This study characterized dental outcomes in patients with BWS based on surgical timing and molecular diagnosis. A retrospective study was designed to include patients with BWS over the age of two who had clinical or radiographic documentation of dental development. Patients were grouped by history of tongue reduction surgery and surgical timing (early: <12 months). One hundred three patients were included (55 no tongue reduction, 18 early, 30 late). Patients who underwent late surgery had lower odds of class I occlusion (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.58, p = 0.009) and higher odds of anterior open bite (OR 7.5, 95% CI 1.14-49.4, p = 0.036). Patients with clinical diagnoses and negative molecular testing had anterior open bite less frequently than patients with imprinting center 2 loss of methylation and paternal uniparental isodisomy of 11p15.5 (p = 0.009). Compared to reference values, patients who had tongue reductions had an increased mandibular plane angle (32.0 ± 4.5° versus 36.9 ± 5.0°, p = 0.001), indicative of hyperdivergent growth. The results of this study help to understand the complex nature of dentoskeletal growth in BWS and shed insight on how surgical timing and molecular diagnosis influence prognosis.

Radiographic Evidence of Dental Complications Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Inverted-L versus Oblique Osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with micrognathia undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for functional and aesthetic improvement are at significant risk for dental complications. This study investigates association of two osteotomy patterns-oblique and inverted-L-with risk to developing dentition. METHODS: Our senior orthodontist performed a retrospective review of dental radiographs of patients undergoing MDO with confirmed oblique or inverted-L osteotomies between 2012 and 2022. Images were assessed for evidence of missing, damaged, or displaced teeth, and proportion of affected hemimandibles by injury type and median number of affected teeth per hemimandible were compared between groups using appropriate statistical methodology. RESULTS: Analysis included 44 patients (23 oblique, 21 inverted-L) and 85 hemimandibles (45 and 40). Mean age at surgery was 3.1±4.6 years, and mean time to imaging was 4.9±4.1 years; there was no difference between groups (p=0.23, p=0.34, respectively). Oblique osteotomy was associated with greater odds of missing teeth (OR 13.3, p<0.001), damaged teeth (OR 3.2, p=0.02), and any dental injury (OR 39.9, p<0.001) compared to inverted-L, as well as greater number of missing teeth (ß=0.6, p<0.01), damaged teeth (ß=0.3, p=0.02), and total number of affected teeth (ß=0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in incidence (p=0.5) or number (p=0.4) of displaced teeth between groups. CONCLUSION: Inverted-L osteotomies were associated with fewer dental complications as compared to oblique osteotomy at all ages studied. While longer-term follow up and prospective data are needed prior to making definitive recommendations, this data is helpful to surgeons as they plan MDO.