Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Curr Osteoporos Rep ; 19(2): 182-188, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528743

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the rational for bisphosphonate holidays, summaries key evidence to support the concept, and provides a roadmap to help clinicians initiate, monitor, and discontinue a bisphosphonate drug holiday. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized trials and data from large observational studies are available to determine the short and long-term bisphosphonate benefits (prevention of fracture) and harms (principally atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw). Mounting evidence points towards a causal relationship between bisphosphonate use and AFF and ONJ, particularly with > 5 years of use. Multiple studies now confirm the risk of AFF falls rapidly after BPs are discontinued. Osteoporosis patients without previous hip, vertebral, or multiple non-spine fractures who are successfully treated with oral bisphosphonates for 5 years (3 years if intravenous), should be offered a 3-5 year drug holiday, particularly if hip BMD T-score is > - 2.5. Bisphosphonates should only be continued beyond 10 years (6 years if parenteral) in patients at very high risk of fracture.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos
2.
JBMR Plus ; 5(8): e10524, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34368610

RESUMO

Large-scale studies have not addressed the knowledge level of US resident physicians regarding osteoporosis management. We gauged the knowledge level of family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians regarding osteoporosis management. In 2019, we sent an anonymous survey via e-mail to all program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs in family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology for distribution to resident physicians. Knowledge items assessed osteoporosis screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We received responses from 182 family medicine, 275 internal medicine, and 122 obstetrics and gynecology programs. Of 582 resident physician respondents, 31% were family medicine residents, 47% were internal medicine residents, and 21% were obstetrics and gynecology residents. Although 77% of respondents correctly selected the T-score threshold for the diagnosis of osteoporosis among persons aged 50 years and older (-2.5), only 20% of respondents correctly identified minimal-trauma hip fracture as being diagnostic of osteoporosis. One-third of respondents correctly identified which medications were demonstrated in clinical trials to decrease hip fracture risk. Fifteen percent of respondents correctly identified that denosumab and alendronate are associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw; and 40% of respondents correctly identified that decline in bone density is more rapid after discontinuation of denosumab than after discontinuation of bisphosphonates. Less than half of resident physicians knew that bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures are duration-dependent. One-quarter of respondents felt not at all prepared to manage osteoporosis. In this nationwide survey of resident physicians, knowledge regarding osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment was poor, with a striking lack of knowledge regarding the two most serious adverse effects of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fractures). The undertreatment of osteoporosis is unlikely to improve without increased education of resident physicians. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

3.
J Bone Miner Res ; 31(1): 16-35, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350171

RESUMO

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used medications for osteoporosis. This ASBMR report provides guidance on BP therapy duration with a risk-benefit perspective. Two trials provided evidence for long-term BP use. In the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX), postmenopausal women receiving alendronate for 10 years had fewer clinical vertebral fractures than those switched to placebo after 5 years. In the HORIZON extension, women who received 6 annual infusions of zoledronic acid had fewer morphometric vertebral fractures compared with those switched to placebo after 3 years. Low hip T-score, between -2 and -2.5 in FLEX and below -2.5 in HORIZON extension, predicted a beneficial response to continued therapy. Hence, the Task Force suggests that after 5 years of oral BP or 3 years of intravenous BP, reassessment of risk should be considered. In women at high risk, for example, older women, those with a low hip T-score or high fracture risk score, those with previous major osteoporotic fracture, or who fracture on therapy, continuation of treatment for up to 10 years (oral) or 6 years (intravenous), with periodic evaluation, should be considered. The risk of atypical femoral fracture, but not osteonecrosis of the jaw, clearly increases with BP therapy duration, but such rare events are outweighed by vertebral fracture risk reduction in high-risk patients. For women not at high fracture risk after 3 to 5 years of BP treatment, a drug holiday of 2 to 3 years can be considered. The suggested approach for long-term BP use is based on limited evidence, only for vertebral fracture reduction, in mostly white postmenopausal women, and does not replace the need for clinical judgment. It may be applicable to men and patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, with some adaptations. It is unlikely that future trials will provide data for formulating definitive recommendations. © 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Assuntos
Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas do Fêmur/prevenção & controle , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/prevenção & controle , Comitês Consultivos , Fatores Etários , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/metabolismo , Humanos , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/metabolismo , Ácido Zoledrônico
4.
Am J Med ; 126(1): 13-20, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23177553

RESUMO

The amino-bisphosphonates are first-line therapy for the treatment of most patients with osteoporosis, with proven efficacy to reduce fracture risk at the spine, hip, and other nonvertebral skeletal sites. Further, bisphosphonates have been associated with a significant decrease in morbidity and increase in survival. Following the use of bisphosphonates in millions of patients in clinical practice, some unexpected possible adverse effects have been reported, including osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femur fractures, atrial fibrillation, and esophageal cancer. Because bisphosphonates are incorporated into the skeleton and continue to exert an antiresorptive effect for a period of time after dosing is discontinued, the concept of a drug holiday has emerged, whereby the risk of adverse effects might be decreased while the patient still benefits from antifracture efficacy. Patients receiving bisphosphonates who are not at high risk for fracture are potential candidates for a drug holiday, while for those with bone mineral density in the osteoporosis range or previous history of fragility fracture, the benefits of continuing therapy probably far outweigh the risk of harm.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/induzido quimicamente , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/etiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacocinética , Difosfonatos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Fêmur/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Medição de Risco
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 61(7): 1111-8, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23772872

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify novel modifiable risk factors, focusing on oral hygiene, for pneumonia requiring hospitalization of community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Of 3,075 well-functioning community-dwelling adults aged 70 to 79 enrolled in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study from 1997 to 1998, 1,441 had complete data in the data set of all variables used, a dental examination within 6 months of baseline, and were eligible for this study. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was pneumonia requiring hospitalization through 2008. RESULTS: Of 1,441 participants, 193 were hospitalized for pneumonia. In a multivariable model, male sex (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.51-2.83), white race (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.03-2.01), history of pneumonia (HR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.86-5.14), pack-years of smoking (HR = 1.006, 95% CI = 1.001-1.011), and percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 minute (moderate vs mild lung disease or normal lung function, HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.28-2.48; severe lung disease vs mild lung disease or normal lung function, HR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.51-5.57) were nonmodifiable risk factors for pneumonia. Incident mobility limitation (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.32-2.38) and higher mean oral plaque score (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64) were modifiable risk factors for pneumonia. Average attributable fractions revealed that 11.5% of cases of pneumonia were attributed to incident mobility limitation and 10.3% to a mean oral plaque score of 1 or greater. CONCLUSION: Incident mobility limitation and higher mean oral plaque score were two modifiable risk factors that 22% of pneumonia requiring hospitalization could be attributed to. These data suggest innovative opportunities for pneumonia prevention among community-dwelling older adults.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Higiene Bucal , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Comorbidade , Índice de Placa Dentária , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tennessee/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA