Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 21(5): 719-25, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17066632

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Cell proliferation and extracellular matrix formation are primary events in bone formation. At the dental implant-tissue interface, implant surface roughness modulates osteoblast functions. The aim of the present in vitro study was to investigate the effect of varying surface roughness of titanium implant material on cell proliferation and mRNA expression of specific markers of osteoblast phenotype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary cultures of osteoblasts derived from human mandibular bone were cultured on titanium surfaces. Three titanium surfaces were studied: machined titanium, microsandblasted titanium, and macro-sandblasted titanium (average surface roughnesses of 0.5 and 3 microm, respectively). Cell morphology was estimated by scanning electron microscope analysis and cell proliferation by measuring the amount of 3H-thymidine incorporation into DNA. mRNA expression of osteonectin, osteopontin, bone sialoprotein (BSP), and Runx2, which are markers of osteoblastic phenotype, were determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. RESULTS: Human osteoblasts cultured on machined titanium spread more and were flatter than cells cultured on rough titanium. All blasted surfaces showed significantly higher DNA synthesis than the machined surfaces. Osteonectin mRNA expression was similar on all surfaces. Other mRNA transcripts were increased in osteoblasts cultured on rough titanium surfaces, particularly the macrosandblasted surface. CONCLUSIONS: An average surface roughness of 3 microm (macro-sandblasted titanium) is more suitable than an average surface roughness of 0.5 microm (micro-sandblasted titanium) in favoring osteoblast differentiation in vitro.


Assuntos
Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Titânio , Análise de Variância , Diferenciação Celular , Proliferação de Células , Forma Celular , Células Cultivadas , Subunidade alfa 1 de Fator de Ligação ao Core/biossíntese , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Sialoproteína de Ligação à Integrina , Mandíbula/citologia , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Osteoblastos/citologia , Osteoblastos/ultraestrutura , Osteonectina/biossíntese , Osteopontina/biossíntese , RNA/biossíntese , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Sialoglicoproteínas/biossíntese , Propriedades de Superfície , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta2/biossíntese
2.
J Biomed Mater Res A ; 67(2): 504-9, 2003 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14566791

RESUMO

Crosslinking of collagen biomaterials increases their resistance to degradation in vivo. Glutaraldehyde (GA) is normally used to crosslink collagen biomaterial, but is often cytotoxic. Diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) has recently been proposed as reagent, but little is known about its effects on cell behavior. In this study, we determined which collagen membrane was the most biocompatible: Paroguide which is crosslinked with DPPA and contains chondroitin sulfate; Opocrin which is crosslinked with DPPA; Biomed Extend which is crosslinked with GA; and Bio-Gide which is left untreated. Cell proliferation and extracellular matrix macromolecule deposition were evaluated in human fibroblasts cultured on the membranes. The GA-crosslinked Biomed Extend membrane and the not-crosslinked Bio-Gide membrane reduced cell growth and collagen secretion compared with DPPA-crosslinked biomembranes. When Paroguide and Opocrin were compared, better results were obtained with Paroguide. The greatest amount of transforming growth factor beta1, a growth factor involved in extracellular matrix macromolecule accumulation and in tissue regeneration, was produced by cells cultured on Paroguide, with Opocrin second. Our data suggest that the DPPA method is more biocompatible than the GA for crosslinking collagen biomaterials and that membranes made of collagen plus chondroitin sulfate are better than membranes made of pure collagen.


Assuntos
Azidas/metabolismo , Materiais Biocompatíveis/metabolismo , Colágeno/metabolismo , Glutaral/metabolismo , Membranas Artificiais , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Glicosaminoglicanos/biossíntese , Humanos , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA