Randomized study of danoprevir/ritonavir-based therapy for HCV genotype 1 patients with prior partial or null responses to peginterferon/ribavirin.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C treatment for prior non-responders to peginterferon (PegIFN)/ribavirin remains suboptimal. The MATTERHORN study evaluated regimens containing ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (danoprevir/r) in prior PegIFN alfa/ribavirin non-responders. METHODS: Prior partial responders (N=152) were randomized to 24 weeks of twice-daily danoprevir/r 100/100mg, mericitabine 1000 mg and ribavirin 1000/1200 mg (IFN-free); danoprevir/r plus PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (triple); or danoprevir/r, mericitabine and PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (Quad). Prior null responders (N=229) were randomized to 24 weeks of IFN-free therapy, or quad alone (Quad 24) or quad plus 24-weeks of PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (Quad 48). The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (HCV RNA <25 IU/ml) 24 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR24). Due to high relapse rates, genotype (G) 1a patients in IFN-free arms were offered additional PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin. RESULTS: Among prior partial responders, SVR24 rates were 46.2%, 51.0%, and 86.0%, in the IFN-free, Triple and Quad arms, respectively; among prior null responders, SVR24 rates were 45.5%, 80.5%, and 83.8% respectively. Relapse rates were lower and SVR24 rates higher in G1b-infected than G1a-infected patients. SVR24 rates in G1a and G1b patients randomized to Quad were 75.0% and 96.2%, respectively, in the partial Quad arm, and 68.1% and 100%, respectively, in the null Quad 24 arm. Treatment failure was associated with resistance to danoprevir, but not to mericitabine, and was more common in G1a infected patients. Treatment was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Danoprevir/r, mericitabine plus PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin was well-tolerated and produced high overall SVR24 rates in prior partial and null responders to PegIFN alfa/ribavirin. In contrast, IFN-free regimens were associated with unacceptably high relapse rates.

Safety of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in a large multinational cohort of chronic hepatitis C patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Peginterferon plus ribavirin has been the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C for a decade and an essential component of combination regimens for this disease. This large multinational open-label study aimed to better define the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events of special interest in patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin. METHODS: Patients were assigned at the investigator's discretion to 24- or 48-week treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a 180 µg/week and ribavirin 800 mg/day or 1000/1200 mg/day. All AEs, defined as SAEs and non-SAEs of special interest, were recorded during treatment and for 12 weeks thereafter. Non-SAEs of special interest included those leading to dose reduction/discontinuation, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, ALT elevations leading to dose modification and unknown/unexpected AEs. RESULTS: Of 1675 and 7178 patients assigned to 24 and 48 weeks of treatment, respectively, 87.6 and 68.3% completed therapy, whereas 6.4 and 10.3% prematurely stopped peginterferon alfa-2a treatment because of AEs. Among patients assigned to 24 and 48 weeks, 37.4 and 46.9%, respectively, reported any AE (SAE or non-SAE of special interest); 4.2 and 6.6% reported SAEs and 35.2 and 44.0% reported non-SAEs of special interest. Female gender, increasing age and cirrhosis were significantly associated with dose reductions of either drug. Increasing age (and female gender in the case of ribavirin) was significantly associated with treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the safety and tolerability profile of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin and identified patient subgroups at higher risk of dose reductions and discontinuations, thus allowing optimum management of AEs.

[Comparison of early virologic response among patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype non 2/3 treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2B and ribavirin in dependence with hepatic fibrosis stages]. / Porównanie wczesnej odpowiedzi wirusologicznej w zaleznosci od zaawansowania wlóknienia u pacjentów z przewleklym wirusowym zapaleniem watroby typu c zakazonych genotypem innym niz 2 i 3 leczonych pegylowanym interferonem alfa-2B i rybawiryna.

Early virologic response (EVR) depending on various hepatic fibrosis was analyzed at 12 week of pegylated interferon alfa-2b (Pegintron, 12 KD) with ribavirin treatment among chronic hepatitis C patients (pts) infected with genotype non 2/3. The A group composed 29 pts. They were of staging 0 and grading 1. The group B composed 47 pts of staging 1, C 33 pts of staging 2, D 35 pts of staging 3 and 4. Liver biopsies were analyzed according to the Scheuer's and Knodell's scores. Early virologic response (ERV) was defined as decrease of VL >2 log or undetectable HCV RNA. Viral load (VL) was determined with HCV RNA Assay and CA HCV Monitor Test (Roche Diagn. Sys.). The EVR rates for the A, B, C, D groups were as follow: 86,2% (25/29), 80,9% (38/47), 75,8% (25/33) and 60% (15/25), respectively.

[Pegylated interferon-alfa 2a with ribavirin in chronic viral hepatitis C (final report)]. / Pegylowany interferon alpha-2a z rybawiryna w leczeniu przewleklego wirusowego zapalenia watroby typu C (raport koncowy z badan).

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a [40KD] (Peg-IFNalpha-2a) plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C in an open-label programme in a routine clinical setting in Poland. Patients received Peg-IFNalpha-2a 180mg/week plus ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d for 48 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (<50IU/mL) at the end of follow-up (week 72). 466 adults were enrolled. Most patients (87.3%) had genotype 1 infection. 440 subjects (94,4%) completed treatment. The overall SVR rate was 55.7%. A higher SVR rate was obtained in treatment-naïve patients (58.7%) than in relapsers (47.8%; p=0,048). SVR rates in genotype 1 and non-1 patients were 51.1% and 88.5%, respectively (p<0.001). There were significant higher SVR rates in patients with lower baseline fibrosis (p=0,01). There were no differences in SVRs by gender or viral load. Hemoglobin, leukocyte and neutrophil levels decreased significantly during treatment, but returned to baseline after the end of treatment. ALT levels decreased significantly during treatment in patients with and without an SVR. 38.4% of patients experienced adverse events like neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and other. There was one death (severe thrombocytopenia). CONCLUSIONS: The overall SVR achieved in this predominantly genotype 1 population was 55.7%. SVR rates were significantly higher in treatment-naïve patients, those with non-1 genotypes, and in patients with lower baseline fibrosis scores.

Effect of Peginterferon or Ribavirin Dosing on Efficacy of Therapy With Telaprevir in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Advanced Liver Fibrosis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

We investigated the safety, efficacy, and impact of ribavirin and peginterferon dose reduction on complete early virologic response and sustained virologic response (SVR) to triple therapy with telaprevir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced liver fibrosis.Treatment was initiated for 211 patients who failed treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, with bridging fibrosis (F3, n = 68) or cirrhosis (F4, n = 143), including 103 (49%) null-responders (NR), 30 (14%) partial responders (PR), and 78 (37%) relapsers (REL). Impaired liver function (ILF) platelets <100,000/mm or albumin <35 g/L were present in 40 patients. The distribution of hepatitis C virus subtypes was: 1a, 1b, or 1, with undetermined subtype for 10 (5%), 187 (89%), and 14 (6%) patients, respectively. Treatment was started with peginterferon alpha-2a or alpha-2b, ribavirin, and telaprevir at standard doses.The overall SVR24 rate was 56% and was lower in cirrhotic patients (NR: 35%, PR: 40%, and REL: 63%, respectively) than in patients with bridging fibrosis (NR: 50%, PR: 75%, and REL: 75%, respectively). The lowest probability of SVR24 was in NRs with ILF (26%). The SVR24 rate significantly decreased in NRs receiving <60% vs >60% of the total ribavirin dose (23% vs 44%, respectively) or <80% vs >80% of the total ribavirin dose (33% vs 48%, respectively). A significant SVR24 decrease was noted subsequent to a total peginterferon dose reduction, both when comparing patients who received <60% vs >60% of the total dose (NR: 0% vs 44%; REL: 33% vs 68%) and patients who received <80% vs >80% of the total dose (NR: 17% vs 50%; REL: 46% vs 71%).Serious adverse events were observed in 31 patients (15%). Deaths occurred in 4 patients. All of the deceased subjects were cirrhotic members of the ILF (baseline serum albumin level <35 g/L and/or platelet count <100,000/mm) group.Ribavirin dose reduction did not affect efficacy in REL but did in NR. Peginterferon dose reduction decreased the SVR24 rate for all groups, particularly in prior NR. ILF increased the risk of fatal complications with a low probability to achieve SVR24. One solution might be to provide wide and early access to novel, efficient, and safe interferon-free combinations to treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with liver cirrhosis.

Peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b combined with ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: results of a prospective single-centre study.

PURPOSE: This prospective, randomized, single-centre study compared peginterferons alfa-2a and alfa-2b, combined with ribavirin, in treating patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. MATERIAL/METHODS: Hundred-and-one patients received 48 weeks of open-label treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (180 µg/week) and 111 patients received peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 µg/kg/week). All patients received the same dose of ribavirin 1000/1200 mg/day, depending on weight. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA (<50 IU/mL) 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Early virologic response (EVR), defined as at least 2 log10 IU/mL reduction of viral load at 12 weeks, was more common in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (88% vs. 74.8%; p=0.04). However, the difference in SVR was not statistically significant (49.5% vs. 44.1%; p=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon alfa-2a treated patients were also more likely to be HCV RNA negative at the end of treatment (67.3% vs. 57.7%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that SVR was associated with low fibrosis stage (F1-2 by Scheuer; p=0.001) and low serum HCV RNA level (<400,000 IU/L; p=0.023). While both forms of peginterferon showed similar efficacy as measured by SVR, use of peginterferon alfa-2b could lower the number of patients receiving unnecessary treatment beyond 12 weeks.