Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. METHODS: The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha. RESULTS: A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1; P<0.0001 for noninferiority for both tests). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Rationale and design of the PARTHENOPE trial: A two-by-two factorial comparison of polymer-free vs biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents and personalized vs standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in all-comers undergoing PCI.

BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone significant advancements as a result of the combination of device-based and drug-based therapies. These iterations have led to the development of polymer-free drug-eluting stents. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding their clinical performance. Furthermore, while various risk scores have been proposed to determine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), none of them have undergone prospective validation within the context of randomized trials. DESIGN: The PARTHENOPE trial is a phase IV, prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated, assessor-blind study being conducted at 14 centers in Italy (NCT04135989). It includes 2,107 all-comers patients with minimal exclusion criteria, randomly assigned in a 2-by-2 design to receive either the Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent or the SYNERGY everolimus-eluting stent, along with either a personalized or standard duration of DAPT. Personalized DAPT duration is determined by the DAPT score, which accounts for both bleeding and ischemic risks. Patients with a DAPT score <2 (indicating higher bleeding than ischemic risk) receive DAPT for 3 or 6 months for chronic or acute coronary syndrome, respectively, while patients with a DAPT score ≥2 (indicating higher ischemic than bleeding risk) receive DAPT for 24 months. Patients in the standard DAPT group receive DAPT for 12 months. The trial aims to establish the noninferiority between stents with respect to a device-oriented composite end point of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization at 12 months after PCI. Additionally, the trial aims to demonstrate the superiority of personalized DAPT compared to a standard approach with respect to a net clinical composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or type 2 to 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria at 24-months after PCI. SUMMARY: The PARTHENOPE trial is the largest randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of a polymer-free DES with a reservoir technology for drug-release and the first trial evaluating a personalized duration of DAPT based on the DAPT score. The study results will provide novel insights into the optimizing the use of drug-eluting stents and DAPT in patients undergoing PCI.

Temporal course of vascular healing and neoatherosclerosis after implantation of durable- or biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents.

Aims: Delayed healing and endothelial dysfunction may occur with drug-eluting stents (DES), promoting accelerated infiltration of lipids in the neointima and development of neoatherosclerosis (NA). Pathology data suggest durable polymer (DP) of DES to play a major role in this process. Whether biodegradable polymer (BP) may address these issues is uncertain. We compared in vivo vessel healing and NA of current generation BP- or DP-DES using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessments. Methods and results: Ninety patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized 1:1 to BP everolimus-eluting stents (EES, Synergy) or DP zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES, Resolute Integrity). Co-primary endpoints were the maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months (powered for non-inferiority) and the percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months (powered for superiority) as measured by OCT. The maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months was 10 ± 8 mm in the BP-EES group and 11 ± 7 mm in the DP-ZES group (mean difference -1 mm; upper 97.5% confidence interval +2 mm; P = 0.05 for non-inferiority; P = 0.45 for superiority). The percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months was low and similar between BP-EES and DP-ZES groups (11.6% vs. 15.9%; P = 0.56). There was no stent thrombosis in both groups at 24 months. Conclusion: BP-EES and DP-ZES showed a similar healing response at 3 months and a low incidence of NA at 18 months. Biocompatible polymers, regardless of whether they are durable or biodegradable, may favourably impact the long-term vascular response to current-generation DES.

Polymer-Free Biolimus-Eluting Stents or Polymer-Based Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

BACKGROUND: A polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (PF-BES) and a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) recently showed similar clinical profiles and appear to be competing options in specific clinical settings of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether they perform similarly also in complex procedural settings as coronary bifurcation lesions remains unaddressed. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI with PF-BES or the new iteration of the ZES from three large multicenter real-world registries were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST). Multiple analyses to adjust for baseline differences were carried out including propensity-score matching, propensity-score stratification and inverse-probability-weighting. Outcomes are reported according to Cox proportional hazard models censored at 400-day follow-up. RESULTS: 1169 patients treated with PF-BES (n = 440) or ZES (n = 729) on the main branch of a coronary bifurcation lesion were included (mean age 69 ± 11 years, 75.4% male, 53.8% acute coronary syndrome at presentation, 26.6% left main bifurcation, median dual antiplatelet therapy duration 12 [range 12-12] months). MACE, all-cause death, TLR and ST tended towards non-statistically higher rates with the PF-BES as compared to the ZES. Higher MI and target vessel revascularization occurrence was observed with PF-BES. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI, the occurrence of MACE was non-statistically different with the use of PF-BES and ZES devices. However, differences favoring the ZES device that may entail clinical relevance were observed. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore whether they remain valid when a short dual antiplatelet therapy is adopted.

Dual antiplatelet therapy strategies and clinical outcomes in patients treated with polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents.

AIMS: A large trial established the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) with a one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We aimed to evaluate the real-world patterns of indications, DAPT strategies and outcomes for the PF-BES following this evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: CHANCE is a multicentre registry including all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one PF-BES. The reasons for the PF-BES PCI and planned antithrombotic regimens were collected. Primary outcomes were the 390-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient-oriented and device-oriented composite endpoints (POCE: death, myocardial infarction [MI] or target vessel revascularisation [TVR]; DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR]). Between January 2016 and July 2018, 858 patients (age 74±10 years, 64.6% male, 58.7% acute coronary syndrome presentation) underwent PF-BES PCI. The main reasons for the physicians' choice of PF-BES reflected a perceived HBR in 77.7% of patients. One-month DAPT was planned in 40.3% of patients. At 390-day follow-up (median 340 days, interquartile range: 187-390 days), the estimated incidence of POCE was 13.1% (any MI 3.7%, any TVR 3.4%) and of DOCE was 7.1% (TV-MI 3.6%, ID-TLR 1.4%), while the 390-day estimate of any bleeding event was 11.1% (BARC 3-5 bleeding 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In a large all-comers registry, PF-BES was used mostly in HBR patients, frequently followed by a very short DAPT regimen. The reported outcomes suggest a favourable safety and efficacy profile for the PF-BES in a real-world clinical setting. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03622203.

Report of an ESC-EAPCI Task Force on the evaluation and use of bioresorbable scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary.

A previous Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) provided a report on recommendations for the non-clinical and clinical evaluation of coronary stents. Following dialogue with the European Commission, the Task Force was asked to prepare an additional report on the class of devices known as bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS). Five BRS have CE-mark approval for use in Europe. Only one device -the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold- has published randomized clinical trial data and this data show inferior outcomes to conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) at 2-3 years. For this reason, at present BRS should not be preferred to conventional DES in clinical practice. The Task Force recommends that new BRS devices should undergo systematic non-clinical testing according to standardized criteria prior to evaluation in clinical studies. A clinical evaluation plan should include data from a medium sized, randomized trial against DES powered for a surrogate end point of clinical efficacy. Manufacturers of successful devices receive CE- mark approval for use and must have an approved plan for a large-scale randomized clinical trial with planned long-term follow-up.

Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions: A Subanalysis of the International, Multicenter GHOST-EU Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate 1-year outcomes in patients treated with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BVS) for "long coronary lesions." BACKGROUND: The present substudy derived from the GHOST-EU registry included 1,722 lesions in 1,468 consecutive patients, enrolled between November 2011 and September 2014 at 11 European centers. METHODS: The lesions were divided into 3 groups according to continuous BVS length: 1) shorter than 30 mm; 2) between 30 and 60 mm; and 3) longer than 60 mm. Primary device-oriented endpoint (target lesion failure [TLF]) was defined as a combination of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Patients with lesions ≥60 mm had more comorbidities and more complex lesion characteristics, including chronic total occlusions (37%), bifurcation lesions (40.3%), higher Syntax score (16.4 ± 7.8), and higher number of scaffolds implanted per lesion (3.3 ± 0.9 mm). The main target vessel was the left anterior coronary artery in all groups. Median follow-up was 384 (interquartile range: 359 to 459) days. One-year follow-up was completed in 70.3% of patients. TLF at 1 year was significantly higher in group C (group A 4.8%, group B 4.5%, group C 14.3%; overall p = 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences between groups A and B. Finally, a numerically higher (but not statistically significant) number of scaffold thromboses were observed in group C when compared with shorter lesions (group A 2.1%, group B 1.1%, group C 3.8%; overall p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, treatment of long coronary lesions with BVS ≥60 mm was associated with a higher TLF rate, driven by myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

Clinical, Angiographic, Functional, and Imaging Outcomes 12 Months After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the multimodal outcome 12 months after implantation of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Functional and imaging data on the use of BVS are limited to simple, stable lesions; in the setting of ACS, only short-term clinical follow-up data are available, and no information from intracoronary imaging and vasomotion tests has been reported. METHODS: A total of 133 patients (age 62 ± 12 years, 74% males, 15% diabetic) underwent BVS (n = 166) implantation for the treatment of thrombotic lesions in the setting of ACS (43% non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 38% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 20% unstable angina). Clinical, angiographic, intracoronary imaging, and vasomotor endpoints were evaluated at 12 months. RESULTS: During the 374 days (interquartile range: 359 to 411 days) of follow-up, there were 4 deaths; 3 definite and 1 probable in-BVS thromboses (all in the first 6 months). At 12-month angiography (75 patients, 83 BVS), in-segment late lumen loss was 0.19 ± 0.45 mm, and 3 (4%) patients showed binary restenosis. Optical coherence tomography (80 BVS, n = 70) showed a mean lumen area of 6.3 ± 2.3 mm(2). Malapposition was evidenced in 21 (26%) BVS. Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation were observed in 48% and 49% of the BVS. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after BVS implantation, clinical, intracoronary imaging, and vasomotion data appear to provide a rationale for the use of BVS in the setting of ACS and the basis for a randomized study.

Safety and effectiveness of the Catania Polyzene-F coated stent in real world clinical practice: 12-month results from the ATLANTA 2 registry.

AIMS: The pivotal ATLANTA first-in-man study showed the promising safety and efficacy profile of the novel Catania™ stent in a population with ~20% American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) type C coronary lesions. The ATLANTA 2 registry was designed to evaluate the 12-month safety and efficacy of the Catania stent in a broader real world scenario. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ATLANTA 2 registry was a prospective, non-randomised, single-arm study of patients with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease and de novo lesions of native coronary arteries. A total of 300 patients (396 lesions) were recruited and 482 Catania stents were implanted. At 12 months, major adverse cardiac events were 8.8%, mainly driven by target lesion revascularisation (6.5%). Cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction occurred in 2.5% and 0.7% of patients, respectively. Subacute definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.7%. No late stent thrombosis was recorded. Compared with patients treated with drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents in the study period, those treated with Catania stents experienced similar outcomes at one year. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month results of the ATLANTA 2 registry confirmed the positive results of the ATLANTA first-in-man trial in a more complex population. A randomised trial is needed to assess the comparative value of the Catania stent over currently-used drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents.

Novel drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions.

Due to safety concerns in recent years, much effort has been devoted to improving the outcomes associated with drug-eluting stents (DESs). This review summarizes the current status of methodological and technical achievements reported in second-generation DES. Novel stents are described based on the component (the platform, the polymer, and the drug) that has undergone the most significant changes compared to earlier generation DES. An overview of the currently available evidence on the use of novel coronary devices in patients undergoing coronary revascularization is also reviewed.

Head-to-head comparison of early vessel healing by optical coherence tomography after implantation of different stents in the same patient.

OBJECTIVES: Strut coverage represents the most powerful morphometric predictor of stent thrombosis and the best surrogate indicator of endothelization. The aim of this study was to get new insights on temporal patterns of vessel healing after stenting with different types of stent. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to investigate the early strut coverage of lesions treated with CATANIA (CAT) stent, drug-eluting stent (DES) or cobalt-chromium bare metal stent (BMS). Two cohorts of 10 and 24 patients underwent OCT follow-up at 7-10 and 28-32 days after stenting, respectively. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive a CAT stent in one lesion and a BMS or a DES in a separate lesion. RESULTS: A total of 7975 and 8406 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 7-10 days, respectively. A total of 21 123 and 25 069 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 28-32 days, respectively. At 7-10 days, the CAT stent showed higher coverage rates compared with DES (90.0 vs. 85.9%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (90.2 vs. 83.6%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, at 28-32 days, the coverage rate was higher with CAT stent compared with DES (97.7 vs. 90.5%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (97.2 vs. 96.5%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The CAT stent yields quicker and more complete strut coverage than DES and BMS in the early phases of vessel healing following stent implantation.

Properties and clinical development of a novel coating technology: the poly[bis(trifluoroethoxy)phosphazene].

Ultrapure poly[bis(trifluoroethoxy)phosphazene] is a novel biocompatible, anti-inflammatory, antithrombogenic polymer which has the potential to cover stent devices without elution of a cell cycle inhibiting drug. The properties of polyphosphazene are likely to extend its use to a broad array of promising applications. This article reviews the features of the polymer and some recent patents related to use of poly[bis(trifluoroethoxy)phosphazene] in coating, its relevance as compared to other polymers, current evidence on pre-clinical and clinical performance, and future perspectives.

Rapid Evaluation of Vessel HEaling After AngiopLasty (REVEAL) trial: rationale, objectives and design.

BACKGROUND: Novel approaches to modify stents have been developed to address the limitations of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES), aiming for ideal features, such as decreased restenosis rates with decreased thrombogenicity and without the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. RATIONALE: The Assessment of The LAtest Non-Thrombogenic Angioplasty Stent (ATLANTA) trial was the first-in-man study to show the safety and efficacy of the Polyzene-F coated CATANIA stent (CeloNova BioSciences, Newnan, Georgia, USA) as an alternative to both BMS and DES. The stent was found to be associated with a good clinical outcome with no vessel thrombosis and a modest growth of late neointima. A subgroup undergoing optical coherence tomography late assessment showed almost complete stent strut coverage at 6 months. However, whether the CATANIA stent is superior in promoting a greater stent strut coverage rate both at 7 and 30 days with respect to DES and BMS is unknown. METHODS: The Rapid Evaluation of Vessel HEaling After AngiopLasty (REVEAL) trial will be a prospective, randomized study providing new evidence on early vessel healing and thrombus development after stenting with different stent types. Optical coherence tomography examination at 7-10 days or 28-32 days after implantation will evaluate strut coverage and vessel healing. The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the percentage of 'healed stent struts' at 28-32 days, identified by the presence of an evenly apposed rim of tissue on stent struts, and without apposition of thrombotic material, on the total amount of analyzed struts for the stent groups.

Optical coherence tomographic results at six-month follow-up evaluation of the CATANIA coronary stent system with nanothin Polyzene-F surface modification (from the Assessment of The LAtest Non-Thrombogenic Angioplasty Stent [ATLANTA] trial).

Drug-eluting stents were devised as an answer to restenosis, but research has shown that the eluting drug can interfere with the blood vessel's healing process, thus increasing the risk of stent thrombosis. A stent coated with the new proprietary polymer Polyzene-F, is a novel technical solution that promises to decrease in-stent restenosis and tackle the risk of thrombosis. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the first clinical human study (ATLANTA registry), addressing the short-term follow-up results of the CATANIA stent with Polyzene-F. As a part of the study protocol, 15 patients were randomly assigned to optical coherence tomographic (OCT) examination at 6-month follow-up. Optical coherence tomograms were obtained using a Lightlab M2 system with a motorized pull-back at 2.0 mm/s. OCT images were acquired at 15.6 frames/s. A total of 1,904 cross-sectional images with 19,028 struts were analyzed. The rate of covered struts was 99.5%, whereas malapposed struts accounted for 0.15%. Area measurements were performed in 476 cross sections. Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) area and percent NIH area were 3.2 +/- 1.4 mm2 and 38 +/- 17%, respectively. Percent NIH area was comparable between diabetics and nondiabetics. Qualitative assessment of OCT images demonstrated neither occurrence of stent fractures nor thrombus. In conclusion, OCT assessment of the Polyzene-F-covered stent at follow-up showed a small percentage of neointima. Also, almost complete stent strut coverage was revealed by optical coherence tomography. These figures indicate that the CATANIA stent with Polyzene-F is a promising solution for decreasing late stent restenosis and preventing thrombosis.

Early and mid-term clinical outcomes with the CATANIA coronary stent system vs. bare metal stents in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The potential for the CATANIA (CAT) stent to be an alternative to both bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) has been recently demonstrated in the Assessment of The LAtest Non-Thrombogenic Angioplasty stent (ATLANTA) first-in-human study. The aim of the present study was to compare short-term outcomes of patients treated with the CAT stent with those treated with BMS. METHODS: Based on an internal registry, the 30-day and 6-month risk-adjusted outcomes for patients who received the CAT stent (n=254) were compared against outcomes of a historical cohort of patients who received BMS (n=552) between January 2001 and December 2001. RESULTS: At 30 days, use of BMS vs. the CAT stent resulted in borderline significant differences with respect to major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction. At 6 months, BMS showed a statistically significant higher adjusted risk of MACCE (HR 2.79, 95% CIs 1.20-6.48, P=.017) and no differences with respect to the subcomponent end points. The cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium defined) at 6 months was 0.39% for the CAT stent and 2.35% for the BMS. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the favorable early and mid-term safety profile and the high-level efficacy of the CAT stent in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions seen in the ATLANTA trial. The use of stents with a nanothin Polyzene-F surface treatment provided improved results with respect to BMS and lower risk of acute and subacute stent thrombosis.