Monitoring of Home Respiratory Polygraphy During Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Succeeded by LeFort I Osteotomy in Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal ramus distraction (BIRD) is now part of select protocols for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Introducing a home monitoring protocol offers a valuable alternative to overnight laboratory polysomnography (PSG). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare OSA parameters obtained via home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) and hospital PSG in a cohort of patients undergoing mandibular distraction for OSA management. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: Hospital Universitario La Princesa (Madrid) researchers conducted a prospective cohort study with patients diagnosed with moderate (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) = 15 to 30) to severe (AHI>30) OSA undergoing BIRD followed by LeFort maxillary osteotomy. Exclusion criteria were as follows: severe systemic diseases, central apneas, smoking, poor dental hygiene, or prior OSA interventions. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was PSG and HRP techniques. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The main outcome variable comprises a collection of OSA parameters, including the AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and time spent below 90% oxygen saturation (T90). These data were measured both before and after distraction, as well as after 6 mm, 9 mm, and 12 mm of mandibular distraction. COVARIATES: The covariates were age, sex, cardiovascular risk parameters, and the Epworth sleepiness scale. ANALYSES: Pearson's correlation analyzed AHI, ODI, and T90 values from PSG and HRP. Wilcoxon Signed Rank-Sum Test compared 2 distraction stages, and the Friedman Test evaluated 3 stages (P < .05). Multiple regression analysis assessed if covariates were independent risk factors for postoperative persistent OSA. RESULTS: The study included 32 patients (25% with moderate and 75% with severe OSA). Final AHI was 10.9 ± 8.9 (events/hour) with HRP, compared to 15.2 ± 13.4 with PSG (r = 0.7, P < .05). ODI was 9.0 ± 8.1 (des/h) with HRP and 8.7 ± 9.5 with PSG (r = 0.85, P < .05). T90 was 1.6 ± 2.2 with HRP and 1.3 ± 3.0 with PSG (r = 0.6, P < .05). Based on HRP data, AHI improved from D1 (34.0 ± 19.5) to D2 (20.8 ± 14.1) and D3 (12.5 ± 10.4) (P < .05). ODI decreased from D1 (26.1 ± 19.0) to D2 (16.0 ± 12.6) and D3 (9.4 ± 8.8) (P < .05). T90 reduced from D1 (8.2 ± 12.6) to D2 (4.1 ± 5.2) and D3 (1.9 ± 2.8) (P < .05). Multiple regression analysis of comorbidities produced nonsignificant results. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Monitoring BIRD through HRP has demonstrated efficacy in yielding results that align with PSG.

Improved Quality of Life After Mandibular Advancement by Bilateral Internal Ramus Distraction.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a significant health issue due to noncompliance with continuous positive airway pressure treatment. Therefore, evaluating alternative treatments is crucial. PURPOSE: Analyze the impact of maxillomandibular advancement using bilateral internal ramus distraction (BIRD) on quality of life (QOL) in OSA patients. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of the University Hospital "La Princesa." The study included patients with moderate to severe OSA who were treated with the BIRD approach. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Changes in measured variables were analyzed at three time points: before surgery (T1), after mandibular advancement (T2), and after maxillary advancement (T3). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): QOL changes measured by Quebec Sleep Questionnaire and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Secondary outcomes included: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index, and percentage of time with saturation below 90%. COVARIATES: Age, sex, continuous positive airway pressure treatment, cephalometric variables and cardiovascular risk parameters were considered. ANALYSES: Statistical analysis employed the Friedman test and χ2 test, with a significance level of P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The study included 32 patients (22% with moderate OSA, 78% with severe OSA). Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores significantly decreased between T1 (13.4 ± 4.4) and T2 (5.8 ± 3.6) and T3 (1.9 ± 1.8) (P < .001). QOL improvements were observed in all domains: daytime sleepiness T1 (3.0 ± 1.3) T2 (5.4 ± 1.4) T3 (6.3 ± 1.0); diurnal symptoms T1 (2.5 ± 1.4) T2 (5.2 ± 1.3) T3 (6.2 ± 1.1); nocturnal symptoms T1 (2.5 ± 1.1) T2 (5.6 ± 1.1) T3 (6.5 ± 0.8); emotions T1 (2.6 ± 1.6) T2 (5.3 ± 1.4) T3 (6.5 ± 0.9); and social interaction T1 (2.5 ± 1.6) T2 (5.4 ± 1.6) T3 (6.3 ± 1.2) (P < .001). AHI decreased between T1 (47.9 ± 23.1) and T2 (14.4 ± 14.3) and T3 (4.7 ± 5.6) h-1 (P < .001), with a final cure rate of 81.2% (defined as final AHI<5 h-1). Oxygen desaturation index and percentage of time with saturation below 90% also showed significant reductions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BIRD approach for OSA demonstrated a high cure rate and significant QOL improvements. It shows promise as an effective surgical option. Further research and long-term follow-up are needed.

Zygomatic distraction osteogenesis for correction of midfacial support after hemimaxillectomy: experience and technical considerations.

PURPOSE: The maxilla is the functional and esthetic keystone of the midface, and large maxillary defects remain a challenge for reconstructive surgery. Different regional and microvascularized flaps have been used to restore the hemimaxilla. Distraction osteogenesis offers an alternative to complex flaps, with less donor-site morbidity. This method is also preferable as a secondary reconstruction in cases of serious bone defects where other flaps have failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with maxillary defects after oncologic ablation presented at a mean follow-up period of 36 months (standard deviation, 18 mo). In these patients, transport distraction osteogenesis of the zygoma was used to restore the bony support of the low maxilla. RESULTS: After a latency period of 15 days, distraction began at a rate of 0.5 mm/day. A 2-step distraction, by changing the direction of the zygomatic device, was carried out in 3 cases. After a consolidation period of 4 to 6 months for each distraction, the devices were removed and the bone edges were joined together with an autogenous bone graft (anterior iliac crest and calvaria). A good quality of bone was observed in the distracted gap, which allowed for postoperative dental implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: In patients with large maxillary defects in which the remaining bone is insufficient and in patients in whom other reconstructive methods have failed, zygomatic distraction is an excellent option to restore the low projection of the maxilla. Bone transport was found to be a stable reconstructive method that allowed for the restoration of function and esthetics in oncologic patients.

A 12-year retrospective analytic study of the implant survival rate in 177 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study sought to demonstrate the outcome of maxillary sinus elevation surgery in a series of 177 procedures performed over 12 years and to determine the existence of variables that could independently predict implant survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive and analytic study of a series of maxillary sinus elevation procedures performed between 1996 and 2007 was undertaken. The sample was composed of patients with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla who had been rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses. Several features of the patients (smoking habit, presence of comorbidities, and previous oral carcinoma) and of the surgical procedure (grafting material, associated procedures, associated materials, simultaneous/delayed implant placement, and complications) related to implant survival or failure were monitored during the follow-up period. Implant survival and the existence of variables that could predict implant survival independently were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven sinus augmentation procedures were performed in 119 consecutive patients (mean age 50.02 years; SD 11.5). Of the 272 implants placed in sinus-augmented regions, 19 were lost. The mean follow-up period was 60.7 months (SD 36.5). The overall cumulative implant survival rate was 93% after 5 years. The multivariate analysis showed that the presence of complications related to the sinus augmentation procedure (membrane perforation and sinusitis) and peri-implantitis were factors in predicting implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this retrospective analysis, it might be concluded that sinus augmentation is a very versatile procedure. Its efficacy and predictability in terms of implant survival rate is extremely high and independent of the graft material, surgical technique, associated comorbidities, smoking habits, and timing of implant placement. Complications such as membrane perforation, sinusitis, and peri-implantitis appeared to influence implant failure.

Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sinus lift, and inlay bone-grafting for reconstruction in the severely atrophic maxilla: a new vision of the sandwich technique, using bone scrapers and piezosurgery.

Severe atrophy of the edentulous maxilla and progressive pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus can compromise the insertion of dental implants. In this context, ideal implant positioning is limited by inadequate height, width, and quality of the bone. Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone graft is an excellent treatment concept for the dental rehabilitation of patients with atrophied maxilla and reversed intermaxillary relationship. In this report, we indicate the transcendent aspect of elevation and preservation of maxillary sinus and nasal mucosa, modifying the sandwich technique by the useful of bone scrapers and piezosurgery. The procedure is described including a 1-stage approach using cortico-cancellous bone blocks through which implants are placed. In the extremely atrophied alveolar process of the maxilla, this technique provides the desired gain of bone, allows for the ideal placement of dental implants, and improves any discrepancy between the upper and lower arches.

Giant aneurysmal bone cyst of the mandible with unusual presentation.

Aneurysmal bone cysts are rare benign lesions of bone tissue, infrequent in craneofacial skeleton with regard to other structures like long bones or the spine. They are composed of sinusoidal and vascular spaces blood-filled and surrounded by fibrous tissue septa. We present a case of a 29-year-old Caucasian male with a big swelling in the left mandible associated to pain and rapid growth. He referred previous extraction of the left inferior third molar. On the X-ray study, an expansive multilocular and high vascularized bony lesion within the mandibular angle was observed. It produced expansion and destruction of lingual and buccal cortex. An incisional biopsy was performed showing a fibrous tissue with blood-filled spaces lesion suggestive of an aneurysmal bone cyst. After selective embolization of the tumour, surgical resection was done with curettage and immediate reconstruction of the defect with an anterior iliac crest graft. Aneurysmal bone cysts are non-neoplastic but locally aggressive tumours with occasional rapid growth that may be differentiated from other multilocular process like ameloblastoma, ossifying fibroma, epithelial cyst, giant cell granuloma and sarcomas. Treatment of choice consists on conservative surgical excision of the mass with curettage or enucleation. When resection creates a big defect, primary surgical reconstruction is recommended.