Presurgical Cleft Management of Infants: A Survey of ACPA Approved and International Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Teams.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) protocols across the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved and international cleft palate (CP) and craniofacial teams. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: ACPA approved and international CP and craniofacial teams. RESULTS: Respondents from 115 out of 215 ACPA approved and international CP and craniofacial teams permitted to contact (out of a total of 259 total teams) completed the survey (response rate = 53.5%). There were 89 (77.4%) ACPA approved teams and the remaining international teams were mainly located in Europe (13.0%). Seventy-eight CP and craniofacial teams (67.8%) provided PSIO and 65 (83.3%) of these teams used alveolar molding (AM). Twenty-two CP and craniofacial teams (19.1%) provided GPP. A mean of 9.5 ± 2.6 different specialists were on the cleft team with the most common being orthodontists (97.4%), speech therapists (96.5%), and plastic/craniofacial surgeons (90.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Most ACPA approved and ACPA registered international CP and craniofacial teams provided PSIO techniques by orthodontists using lip taping (LT) and AM, while few provide GPP.

Cephalometric outcomes of orthognathic surgery in hemifacial microsomia.

Hemifacial microsomia is a hypoplastic disorder of the first and second branchial arches that significantly impacts on the development of the jaws, leading to malocclusion and facial asymmetry. There is little in the literature regarding the application of orthodontic/orthognathic approaches to the correction of these deformities and the stability of the surgical results. To address this, a retrospective chart review of 10 patients with complete orthodontic records and greater than 1 year of follow-up was performed. Posteroanterior cephalograms were assessed by modified Grummons analysis to determine mandibular offset (deviation of the chin point from the skeletal midline) and occlusal cant. These measurements were performed at 3 time points (T1: preoperative, T2: immediate postoperative, T3: follow-up) to elucidate the surgical movement (T2-T1), the postoperative relapse (T3-T2), and the net gain movement (T3-T1). Maxillary movements were quantified, and the occlusal cant was expressed as a ratio between vertical heights of the maxilla at the first molar on each side. One sample t test demonstrated statistically significant surgical movement and net gain. Relapse was statistically insignificant. Repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated similar results for chin point position relative to the putative midline. Our results suggest that a combined orthodontic/orthognathic approach at skeletal maturity delivers improved occlusal outcomes in the long term as assessed by chin point deviation and occlusal cant, but secondary surgery rates are higher than those for orthognathic surgery in other patient groups. We advocate limiting surgery to skeletal maturity whenever possible to achieve stable long-term results while limiting morbidity and number of procedures.