RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported that some types of orofacial pain are more common in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) than the general population. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-reported orofacial pain in a larger group of patients with PD than has been previously studied. METHODS: We analysed data from 1916 participants with PD in a cross-sectional study recruited to the UK Parkinson's Pain Study who had detailed assessments of pain, motor, and nonmotor symptoms. The King's Parkinson's Pain scale was used to quantify different subtypes of pain. RESULTS: A total of 139 (7.3%) patients reported the presence of some form of orofacial pain. Burning mouth syndrome was reported in 32 (1.7%), whereas chewing pain was found in 38 (2.0%) and grinding pain in 78 (4.0%). Orofacial pain was significantly more common in females (10.4%) than males (5.9%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between orofacial pain and pain severity, neuropathic pain, and oral motor and nonmotor dysfunction. CONCLUSION: In our study, population cohort of early patients with PD found prevalence of orofacial pain conditions similar to that in the general population.
RESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: La permeabilidad dentinaria es conocida como el paso de fluidos, iones, partículas, moléculas y bacterias a través de la dentina bajo ciertas condiciones. Objetivo: Determinar la influencia de la aplicación activa con un aplicador mejorado de un adhesivo dentinario sobre la conductancia hidráulica dentinaria humana, in vitro. Métodos: Estudio experimental in vitro en 40 terceros molares libres de caries, con indicación de exodoncia, provenientes de pacientes sanos entre 15 y 30 años, previo consentimiento informado. Posteriormente se limpiaron, desinfectaron y conservaron para ser incluidos en bloques de resina epóxica. Luego se realizaron cortes transversales y se obtuvieron discos dentinarios de 1,5 mm de espesor y 25 mm de diámetro. Se dividieron en dos grupos de 20 unidades cada uno, se sometieron a grabado con ácido ortofosfórico al 37 por ciento, y se lavaron y secaron. Sobre una balanza de precisión se les aplicó adhesivo dentinario fotopolimerizable, registrando la fuerza ejercida. En el grupo 1 se usó un microbrush en la aplicación y en el grupo 2 un aplicador mejorado diseñado especialmente. Posteriormente cada muestra fue sometida a una cámara de difusión para obtener la tasa de flujo y luego calcular la conductancia hidráulica, la cual otorga información acerca de la permeabilidad de la dentina. Resultados: los resultados obtenidos fueron levemente menores en el grupo 2, sin embargo, experimentaron una distribución normal. Conclusiones: no existen diferencias significativas, al ser analizados estadísticamente bajo diversas pruebas, en los valores de conductancia hidráulica. Tampoco se pudo establecer una relación inversa entre la fuerza de aplicación de un adhesivo en forma activa con un aplicador mejorado y la conductancia hidráulica, por lo cual no se aconseja el uso de dicho instrumento(AU)
ABSTRACT Introduction: Dentin permeability is defined as the passage of fluids, ions, particles, molecules and bacteria through the dentin under certain conditions. Objective: Determine the effect of the active application of a dentin adhesive with an improved applicator on human dentin hydraulic conductance in vitro. Methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted of 40 caries-free third molars with an indication of exodontia from healthy patients aged 15-30 years, prior informed consent. The molars were cleaned, disinfected and preserved to be included in epoxy resin blocks. Cross-sectional cuts were then made to obtain dentin discs 1.5 mm thick and 25 mm in diameter. These were divided into two 20-unit groups, were subjected to etching with 37 percent orthophosphoric acid, and were washed and dried. On a precision scale photopolymerizable dentin adhesive was applied, recording the force exerted. Application was performed with a Microbrush applicator in Group 1 and with an improved dedicated applicator in Group 2. The samples were then placed in a diffusion chamber to determine flow rate and subsequently estimate hydraulic conductance, thus obtaining information about dentin permeability. Results: Results were slightly lower in Group 2, but they displayed normal distribution. Conclusions: Statistical analysis with various tests did not find any significant differences in hydraulic conductance values, nor could an inverse relation be established between the force of active application of an adhesive with an improved applicator and hydraulic conductance. Therefore, use of that instrument is not advised(AU)