RESUMO
The varicella zoster virus as an aetiological agent for endodontic disease is not a well-recognised entity despite several published case reports. While advances in DNA molecular analysis techniques (PCR) have contributed to the current understanding of the potential role of the varicella zoster virus in the initiation and progression of endodontic disease, a review indicates a need for ongoing research. Case reports are presented of two female patients with a history of herpes zoster who developed pulp necrosis, with one patient progressing to apical periodontitis. Both patients received non-surgical endodontic therapy, followed by intra-coronal bleaching in one of the patients due to tooth discolouration which developed during the prodromal and acute phases of the herpes zoster infection. Clinical and radiographic examinations at 23 and 22 years, respectively, showed the affected teeth to be retained in an asymptomatic and aesthetically satisfactory state with no radiographic evidence of apical pathosis.
Assuntos
Doenças da Polpa Dentária , Herpes Zoster , Periodontite Periapical , Humanos , Feminino , Necrose da Polpa Dentária/diagnóstico por imagem , Necrose da Polpa Dentária/terapia , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Periodontite Periapical/diagnóstico por imagem , Periodontite Periapical/terapia , Herpes Zoster/complicações , Doenças da Polpa Dentária/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The literature assessing quality of life for subjects who have undergone root canal treatment (RCT) is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of RCT with other dental services (exodontia, restorative, prosthodontics, periodontics, and negative controls [preventative and scale and clean]) on oral health-related quality of life. METHODS: A random sample of 3000 adults aged 30-61 years was obtained from the Australian electoral roll in 2009. Data were collected through questionnaires, dental service logbooks, and treatment receipts. The impact their dentition had at baseline and the 2-year follow-up for the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and the self-rated dental health score followed by "global transition statement of change" (GTSC) was assessed. Binary regression models were used to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 1096 respondents (response rate = 36.5%). After adjustment (for age, sex, household income, and reason for visit), the RCT group had significant differences (P ≤ .05) to other dental services at the 2-year follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.96) and GTSC (odds ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.88) but not with individual treatment groups. Using the self-rated dental health score/GTSC, only the prosthodontic treatment group had a significant difference to the RCT group at baseline, whereas the negative controls (P ≤ .01) had significant differences to the RCT group with the odds for improved health 5 times higher, at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The RCT group presented with similar oral health-related quality of life when compared with the other individual treatment groups; however, they consistently reported poorer oral health outcomes when the negative controls were included.