The impact of timing and modalities of dental prophylaxis on the risk of 5-fluorouracil-related oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of dental prophylaxis on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related oral mucositis (OM) according to the head and neck cancer (HNC) locations and treatment times. METHODS: A total of 13,969 HNC participants, including 482 5-FU-related OM subjects and 13,487 comparisons were enrolled from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan between 2000 and 2008. All subjects were stratified into subgroups based on the times to perform chlorhexidine use, scaling, and fluoride application before 5-FU administration. The dental prophylaxis related to 5-FU-related OM was estimated by multiple logistic regression and represented with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Fluoride gel application and scaling significantly impacted on OM development (p < 0.001), and the joint effect of fluoride gel and scaling induced 5-FU-related OM (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 2.39-5.01). The risk of OM was raised 2.25-fold as scaling within 3 weeks before 5-FU-related chemotherapy (95% CI = 1.81-2.81), and a 3.22-fold increased risk of OM while fluoride gel was applied during 5-FU-related treatment (95% CI = 1.46-7.13). CONCLUSION: Dental prophylaxis significantly affected 5-FU-related OM in the HNC population. A short interval between dental scaling or fluoride application and 5-FU administration may be associated with higher prevalence of OM. Scaling simultaneously combined with chlorohexidine promoted 5-FU-related OM in specific HNC patients excluding the oral cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer population. Proper timing of the prophylactic dental treatments prior to 5-FU therapy could reduce the risk to develop 5-FU-related OM.

The impact of dental therapy timelines and irradiation dosages on osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer patients: A population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate how different timelines of various dental therapies were related to osteoradionecrosis development under consideration of radiotherapy dosage in patients with oral cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7,107 oral cancer patients were enrolled, including 88 osteoradionecrosis patients treated with low radiotherapy dosages (<60 Gy) or high radiotherapy dosages (≥60 Gy), from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare the osteoradionecrosis risk of various dental treatment timelines under different irradiation dosages. RESULTS: In the oral cancer population with low irradiation dosages (<60 Gy), performing periodontal therapy combined with irradiation significantly raised the risk of osteoradionecrosis by 2.21-fold. Starting radiotherapy within three months after dental surgery greatly increased the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis by 1.87-fold. The oral cancer patients treated with high radiation doses (≥60 Gy) receiving dental surgery within one month prior to radiotherapy had a significantly raised osteoradionecrosis occurrence by 1.60-fold. While the dental surgery was performed during the radiotherapy course, the risk of osteoradionecrosis was greatly increased by 2.21-fold. CONCLUSION: For oral cancer patients, performing dental surgery within three months before radiotherapy might significantly induce osteoradionecrosis. Patients that were treated with high irradiation dosages (≥60 Gy) had a higher tendency to develop osteoradionecrosis if they received dental surgery during radiotherapy. Those who were treated with low radiation dosages (<60 Gy) and received periodontal therapy during radiotherapy might have an increased risk in developing osteoradionecrosis.

Managing sternal osteomyelitis with antibiotic bead implantation.

Early, aggressive debridement followed by closure with muscle flaps is thought to improve the resolution of deep sternal wound infection that occurs after sternotomy. However, persistently discharging sternal osteomyelitis remains difficult to resolve. We successfully treated 2 patients who developed deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery by combining one-stage debridement with implantation of gentamicin beads to fill up the evacuated bone marrow space. This approach provides a simple and effective solution for sternal osteomyelitis.