Retrospective cohort assessment of survival and complications of zygomatic implants in atrophic maxillae.

OBJECTIVES: To report on zygomatic implant (ZI) survival rate and associated complications through a longitudinal retrospective cohort assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 940 ZIs (rough: 781, machined: 159; immediate loading: 454, delayed loading: 486) and 451 standard implants (rough: 195, machined: 256; immediate loading: 58, delayed loading: 393) were placed in 302 adult patients with atrophic maxilla from December 1998 till September 2020. Following data collection reported complications were grouped based on their origin as infectious/ non-infectious biological and mechanical. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors and preceding complications leading to implant loss (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The survival rate of ZI was found to be 89.9% and the average time between implant placement and an eventual loss was 4.8 years. The mean ZI follow-up period was 7.9 ± 4.9 years. Amongst the infectious biological complications, sinusitis was the most reported (n = 138) occurring at a mean follow-up time-point of 4.5 years, whereas infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia occurred more frequently in the non-infectious biological category (n = 8, meantime: 0.3 years). The prosthetic screw fracture was the most reported complication of mechanical origin (n = 29, meantime: 4 years). Furthermore, sinusitis, standard implant loss, zygomatic/peri-zygomatic region infection, and oroantral communication were significantly associated with ZI loss. CONCLUSIONS: ZI placement offered a high survival rate for the rehabilitation of severely atrophied maxilla with most losses occurring within the first 5 years at follow-up. The most frequently observed complication was sinusitis which tends to develop several years following implant placement.

Local radiographic risk factors for MRONJ in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVE: To identify local radiographic risk factors for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients treated with antiresorptive drugs (ARD) and undergoing tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were included in this retrospective, longitudinal, case-control study, if having at least one administration of ARD, underwent tooth extraction(s), and had pre- and post-operative panoramic radiographs. Additionally, a matched control group was selected. Three calibrated, blinded, and independent observers assessed each tooth extraction site. Statistical analysis compared control against study group, and within the latter, sites MRONJ+ and MRONJ-. RESULTS: In total, 120 patients (99 females/21 males) with 354 tooth extractions were included, from which nine patients (7.5%) and eleven tooth extraction sites (3.1%) developed MRONJ. When comparing control with study group, the latter showed significantly more thickened lamina dura, persistence of the alveolar socket, heterogeneous bone patterns, and sequestrum formation. In the study group, MRONJ developed significantly more in males (19%, p = 0.049), smokers (25%, p = 0.008), in the mandible (82%, p = 0.027), when identifying a radiolucent or sclerotic trabecular pattern (p = 0.004) or when extracting teeth with furcation involvement (p < 0.001), root remnants (p = 0.017), or unrestored caries lesions (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth extraction sites showing radiographic signs of chronic dental infection are prone to MRONJ.

Peri-zygomatic infection associated with zygomatic implants: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study was to describe the occurrence of peri-zygomatic infection (PZI) as a complication associated with zygomatic implant (ZI) placement in a period of 22 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search was carried out in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Saint John's hospital in Genk, Belgium. Patients that had a severely atrophic fully or partially edentulous maxilla, and at least one ZI placed, were included. RESULTS: A total of 302 eligible patients, underwent ZI surgery between 1998 and 2020. From a total of 940 ZI, 45 were associated with the development of PZI. PZI was located in the upper portion of the cheek in relation to the external corner of the eye, one or two centimeters under the lower lid. The total number of affected patients was 25 (8.3%), who had a mean age of 58.1 years. In this subset, PZI occurred in 15 cases on the right side, in eight cases on the left side, and in two cases bilaterally. Ultimately, 16 ZI were lost in the PZI site. The mean time since the implant placement to the diagnosis of PZI was 1.9 years (SD ±2.4) and to the ZI removal of 3.8 years (SD ±3.7). After implant removal, the PZI symptomatology dissipated in all patients. CONCLUSION: Peri-zygomatic infection should be informed to the patients as a possible complication after ZI placement. Once identified, it should be acknowledged as a risk factor for ZI failure.

Osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, or medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws? Can CBCT enhance radiographic diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE: To attempt defining differential radiographic diagnostic characteristics for osteonecrotic lesions using 2D as opposed to 3D images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Subjects presenting mandibular osteonecrotic lesions (osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws) were selected and compared to a group of age- and gender-matched controls, all having both cone-beam computed tomographic images (CBCT) and panoramic radiographs (PANO). Both imaging modalities (predictor variables) were evaluated by two radiologists that scored lesion presence, eight additional radiological features, and a composite severity index (outcome variables). For each pathologic condition, characteristic features were assessed in PANO and CBCT by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Regression tree analysis revealed the predictive value of PANO and CBCT (α = 5%). RESULTS: Overall, the predictive value of PANO reached 74%, while for CBCT it became 90%. Regarding the composite severity index, CBCT enabled to detect more subtle lesions. Also, CBCT imaging allowed showing more distinct radiographic diagnostic features as compared to PANO imaging, more specifically when distinguishing osteomyelitis from both other lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam computed tomography enabled showing more differences in radiological features between distinct osteonecrosis disease entities. CBCT imaging might be a better contributor for the detection of early lesions and to monitor further pathological developments in the mandible.

Radiographic prediction of mandibular third molar eruption and mandibular canal involvement based on angulation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to identify and predict patients at risk of impeded mandibular third molar eruption and potential relation between the third molar roots and the mandibular canal, based on molar angulations in an early development stage. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 1011 adolescent orthodontic patients were included in this longitudinal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed pre-eruptive rotational changes and root development of mandibular third molars on 2022 panoramic radiographs (two time-points). Five variables were evaluated: third molar eruption level, development stage, risk of relation between the third molar and the mandibular canal, the molar angulations and orthodontic treatment. The relation between early third molar angulation and mean annual angulation change was assessed using a linear mixed model. Logistic regression was applied to investigate a potential correlation of the radiographic variables with the eruption potential and risk of developing a relation between the third molar and the mandibular canal. RESULTS: Mandibular third molar follicles with an initial angulation exceeding 27.0° relative to the second molar tend to progressively increase their angulation during further development. A significant correlation was found between the hemimandibular molar angulations and the probability of eruption (P < 0.0001). The second to first molar angulation was predictive for potential development of a relation with the mandibular canal (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: From the present data, it appears that severely angulated mandibular third molars (>27.0°) have a minimal chance of future eruption and a maximal risk of developing a relation with the mandibular canal.

Randomized controlled trial comparing immediate loading with conventional loading using cone-anchored implant-supported screw-retained removable prostheses: A 2-year follow-up clinical trial.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Implant-based prosthetic solutions can be time consuming. If implants can be loaded immediately, treatment time can be reduced. PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to monitor the survival rate of Ankylos implants, comparing conventional with immediate loading by using abutments with the SynCone concept for screw-retained removable prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 90 implants were placed in 15 study participants. The participants were randomly assigned to the immediate or conventional loading treatment group. Radiographic and clinical parameters were recorded at the time of permanent prosthesis installment and at 1- and 2-year follow-up examinations, and participants' satisfaction was measured by using questionnaires before and after prosthesis installation. A linear mixed model was used to measure differences. RESULTS: One implant in the conventional group was lost during abutment placement; hence, 89 implants could be followed for 2 years. Approximately 90% of these implants showed no bone loss or even bone gain at 1 and 2 years follow-up. Mean values for the immediate group were, respectively, 0.09 ±0.35 mm and 0.13 ±0.38 mm and 0.01 ±0.41 mm and -0.06 ±0.32 mm for the conventional method. No significant differences (P=.053) were found in bone level alterations between the groups. For all participants, the mean number of surfaces (4 per implant) with bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque were 0.76 ±0.81 and 0.16 ±0.42 at 1 year follow-up and 0.44 ±0.66 and 0.02 ±0.15, respectively, at the second-year follow-up. The mean pocket probing depths were 2.05 ±0.54 mm at 1 year and 2.18 ±0.64 mm at 2 years. For both groups, a significant rise in satisfaction and quality of life was observed (P≤.001) at 1 and 2 years compared with pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ankylos implants placed in the edentulous maxilla, immediately or conventionally loaded by a detachable prosthesis, showed favorable bone-level preservation after 2 years of follow-up. No significant differences could be found between the immediate and conventional groups. A significant increase in quality of life was observed for both loading modes.

A 5-year randomized clinical trial comparing minimally with moderately rough implants in patients with severe periodontitis.

AIM: To compare the clinical and microbiological performance of minimally and moderately rough implants in patients with a history of severe periodontitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight minimally (Turned surface [Tur]) and moderately (TiUnite surface [TiU]) rough implants were placed in eighteen patients according to a split-mouth protocol. Marginal bone loss, probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded, and microbial samples were analysed by means of quantitative PCR. RESULTS: The amount of bone loss over the 5-year period tended to be lower along Tur when compared with that of TiU surfaces (1.0 versus 1.7 mm, p = .06). Although the clinical outcomes tended to be better for Tur surfaces, there were no significant differences between both surfaces in mean PPD (Tur: 3.1 versus TiU: 4.2 mm, p = .09) or CAL (Tur: 0.5 versus TiU: 1.7 mm, p = .06). More bone loss and deeper pockets were recorded for partially than for fully edentulous patients. The cumulative survival rate at 5-year follow-up was 95.8% for Tur, and 100% for TiU surface implants. No significant differences were found between the surfaces in counts for key pathogens. CONCLUSION: In patients with a history of severe periodontitis minimally rough implants showed more favourable clinical parameters after 5 years of loading, when compared with moderately rough implants.

The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the literature on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in implant dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted to collect information about the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant systems. Meta-regression analysis was performed to summarise the accuracy studies. RESULTS: From a total of 372 articles. 20 studies, one randomised controlled trial (RCT), eight uncontrolled retrospective studies and 11 uncontrolled prospective studies were selected for inclusion for qualitative synthesis. A total of 2,238 implants in 471 patients that had been placed using static guides were available for review. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (20 clinical) revealed a total mean error of 1.2 mm (1.04 mm to 1.44 mm) at the entry point, 1.4 mm (1.28 mm to 1.58 mm) at the apical point and deviation of 3.5°(3.0° to 3.96°). There was a significant difference in accuracy in favour of partial edentulous comparing to full edentulous cases. CONCLUSION: Different levels of quantity and quality of evidence were available for static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS). Based on the present systematic review and its limitations, it can be concluded that the accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery is within the clinically acceptable range in the majority of clinical situations. However, a safety marge of at least 2 mm should be respected. A lack of homogeneity was found in techniques adopted between the different authors and the general study designs.

Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.

OBJECTIVES: Working Group 5 was assigned the task to review the current knowledge in the area of digital technologies. Focused questions on accuracy of linear measurements when using CBCT, digital vs. conventional implant planning, using digital vs. conventional impressions and assessing the accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and patient-related outcome measurements when using s-CAIS were addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was systematically searched, and in total, 232 articles were selected and critically reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. Four systematic reviews were produced in the four subject areas and amply discussed in the group. After emendation, they were presented to the plenary where after further modification, they were accepted. RESULTS: Static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), in terms of pain & discomfort, economics and intraoperative complications, is beneficial compared with conventional implant surgery. When using s-CAIS in partially edentulous cases, a higher level of accuracy can be achieved when compared to fully edentulous cases. When using an intraoral scanner in edentulous cases, the results are dependent on the protocol that has been followed. The accuracy of measurements on CBCT scans is software dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Because the precision intraoral scans and of measurements on CBCT scans and is not high enough to allow for the required accuracy, s-CAIS should be considered as an additional tool for comprehensive diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical procedures. Flapless s-CAIS can lead to implant placement outside of the zone of keratinized mucosa and thus must be executed with utmost care.

Associated parameters of canine impaction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate after secondary alveolar bone grafting: a retrospective study.

Objectives: To compare parameters related to impacted canines at the cleft versus the normal contralateral side and with non-impacted canines at the cleft side in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients. We also aim to search for possible associated parameters enabling prediction of canine impaction in these patients. Materials and methods: Ninety-five non-syndromic UCLP patients were included and divided into group A (n = 41 patients) with unilateral impacted canines at the cleft side (A1) and spontaneously erupted canines at the non-cleft side (A2) and group B with spontaneously erupted canines at the cleft side (n = 54 patients). Clinical information and radiographic parameters on panoramic radiographs were collected and compared between groups using a generalized linear mixed model, a Mann-Whitney U-test, a Fisher's exact test, and receiver operating characteristic tests. Results: Impaction of the maxillary canine at the cleft side in UCLP patients can be suspected in case of delayed canine root development, a higher vertical position and sector score (P < 0.05) and higher angles between the canine and the midline, as well as between canine and lateral incisor and between first premolar (P < 0.001). Results clearly indicate that the erupting canine position at the cleft side, even when not impacted, is different from the non-cleft side. Conclusion: There is a great risk for canine impaction at the cleft side in UCLP patients when the canine position is more apical than one-third of the root of the adjacent lateral incisor and when the angles between canine and midline and between canine and first premolar are higher than 23.82 and 16.1 degrees, respectively. These associated parameters should have to be studied in a prospective setting to confirm their predictive value.

The fate of buccal bone around dental implants. A 12-month postloading follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Buccal bone thickness is considered to be an important factor during implant surgery. Its resorption might have an effect on the soft tissue stability and eventually on implant survival. This study aimed to investigate the resorption of the buccal bone over the first 12 months after implant loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four subjects (47 implants) were included. The buccal bone thickness was measured during implant surgery at several distances from the implant shoulder using a specifically designed device which allows buccal bone thickness measurements without the elevation of a muco-periostal flap. These measurements were repeated after 12 months of loading. Sixteen implants were placed flapless and 31 with the elevation of a flap. Of the latter, 19 were placed following a one-stage protocol and 12 following a two-stage protocol. RESULTS: The mean reduction in buccal bone thickness, when all groups pooled, was 0.26, 0.36, 0.35 and 0.27 mm at the shoulder and 2, 4 and 6 mm apically. Implants with initial bone thickness <1mm (thin buccal plate) did not lose significantly more bone than those with an initial thickness ≥1mm (thick bone plate) except in the 'open-flap, one-stage' group (P = 0.009). A flapless procedure leads to less bone resorption compared to an open-flap procedure (P = 0.03). However, the number of surgeries (one stage vs. two stages) did not influence the rate of bone resorption (P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, one might question the necessity of having a thick bone plate at the vestibular site of the implant.

The outcome of oral implants placed in bone with limited bucco-oral dimensions: a 3-year follow-up study.

AIM: The dimension of the alveolar bone reduces significantly after tooth loss. Clinicians consider a 1-2 mm buccal and lingual bone width mandatory around the implant at placement. This prospective study analysed the outcome of implants inserted in jaws with narrow (≤4.5 mm) buccal bone dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (mean age 63, 89% female) with a narrow alveolar crest (≤4.5 mm in width on CBCT) received 100 implants (3.5 mm) via a two-stage procedure. Intra-oral radiographs were taken at placement, functional loading and after 1, 2 and 3-years of follow-up. Peri-implant bone level alterations were recorded by two calibrated, periodontologists. RESULTS: All implants integrated and the cumulative survival rate after 3 years was 100%. The implants were inserted 0.81 mm ± 0.83 subcrestal. At functional loading the bone was located 0.65 mm ± 0.6 apical of the implant shoulder. During 3 years of loading the amount of annual marginal bone loss was 0.17 ± 0.4, 0.05 ± 0.4 and - 0.06 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on these data and within the limitations of this study it became clear that implants, placed in sites with limited dimensions (≤4.5 mm width), showed minimal amounts of marginal bone loss during the first 3 years of functional loading.

The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible.

AIM: This study envisaged to explain early marginal bone loss (first years of function) around implants in the posterior area of the mandible by the local bone quality (ratio cortical vs. cancellous bone). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-three Brånemark MKIII implants inserted in the posterior region of the mandible were examined, retrospectively, on intra-oral radiographs taken at abutment connection, and 1 and 3-4 years after loading. The quality of the bone was assessed on cone beam or multi-slice CTs. The bone quality was determined by the relative proportions of cortical and trabecular bone at the insertion site. Cortical bone was defined as a clearly white structure without a trabecular pattern. Trabecular bone was defined as the structure between the two cortical plates. The width of both structures was measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm away from the crest of the alveolar bone and converted in to relative proportions. Other parameters (smoking, history of periodontitis, dehiscence, pre-tapping, submerged healing, etc.) were retrieved from the patients record. RESULTS: At abutment connection, the mesial and distal marginal bone level was located 0.7 (±0.7) and 0.8 (±0.7) mm apically to the implant-abutment junction. At 1 year and 3-4 years of loading implants placed in a mandible consisting of <30% of cancellous bone had lost 1.49 and 1.83 mm, respectively. Implants placed in jawbone consisting of more than 60% of cancellous bone lost 0.74 and 0.91 mm after 1 year and 3-4 years of loading. The bone-level changes (both first year as well as after 3-4 years) were significantly less when the implant was placed in sites with a higher proportion of cancellous bone. Other parameters were significantly less important. CONCLUSIONS: Very cortical bone could jeopardize the long-term stability of the marginal bone surrounding implants placed in the posterior region of the mandible. A correlation between marginal bone loss and the proportion of cortical bone was demonstrated around Brånemark implants. At present, no comparable studies are available, and therefore, it cannot be excluded that similar events take place around other implant systems.

The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study analyzed the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides, executed by inexperienced surgeons supervised by an experienced colleague. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the accuracy analysis, 75 OsseoSpeed implants™, placed in 17 fully edentulous jaws (16 patients) using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic guide (IMPLANT SAFE Guide, DENTSPLY Implants) and the Facilitate™ protocol, were included. DICOM images of the pre-surgical planning and the post-surgical CBCT were matched using the Mimics(®) software (Materialise Dental). These data were compared with the data (12 jaws, 52 implants) of an experienced surgeon (Vercruyssen et al. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2014; doi:10.1111/jcpe.12231). RESULTS: The global deviation at the coronal and apical point was 0.9 mm (SD 0.5) and 1.1 mm (SD 0.5), respectively. Depth deviations were 0.5 mm (SD 0.5) and 1.1 mm (SD 0.5), respectively, and the angular deviation was 2.8° (SD 1.5°). These deviations were statistically not inferior to the deviations of the experienced surgeon and also within the range of deviations reported by several systematic reviews. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study and for the above-mentioned surgical protocol, inexperience of the surgeon had no influence on the accuracy of implant placement in fully edentulous jaws, when all steps needed for the procedure are supervised by experienced dentists.

Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of linear measurements on three imaging modalities: lateral cephalograms from a cephalometric machine with a 3 m source-to-mid-sagittal-plane distance (SMD), from a machine with 1.5 m SMD and 3D models from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. METHODS: Twenty-one dry human skulls were used. Lateral cephalograms were taken, using two cephalometric devices: one with a 3 m SMD and one with a 1.5 m SMD. CBCT scans were taken by 3D Accuitomo® 170, and 3D surface models were created in Maxilim® software. Thirteen linear measurements were completed twice by two observers with a 4 week interval. Direct physical measurements by a digital calliper were defined as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Nasion-Point A was significantly different from the gold standard in all methods. More statistically significant differences were found on the measurements of the 3 m SMD cephalograms in comparison to the other methods. Intra- and inter-observer agreement based on 3D measurements was slightly better than others. LIMITATIONS: Dry human skulls without soft tissues were used. Therefore, the results have to be interpreted with caution, as they do not fully represent clinical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: 3D measurements resulted in a better observer agreement. The accuracy of the measurements based on CBCT and 1.5 m SMD cephalogram was better than a 3 m SMD cephalogram. These findings demonstrated the linear measurements accuracy and reliability of 3D measurements based on CBCT data when compared to 2D techniques. Future studies should focus on the implementation of 3D cephalometry in clinical practice.

One-stage full-mouth disinfection combined with a periodontal dressing: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

AIM: To compare the clinical benefit of a periodontal dressing applied after a one-stage full-mouth disinfection (OSFMD) in patients with chronic periodontitis up to 3 months after therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized, controlled split-mouth study included 24 patients. After OSFMD, a test and a control side were selected by means of a computer-generated randomization list. Test sides received a periodontal dressing (Coepak(®) ) for 7 days and the control sides received no periodontal dressing. After 7 days the periodontal dressing was removed and the pain experience was recorded. After 3 months, the clinical periodontal parameters were recorded. RESULTS: The periodontal dressing group showed a significant (p < 0.05) additional pocket depth reduction and additional clinical attachment gain for the moderate pockets of single- and multi-rooted teeth compared with the control group. A significant (p < 0.05) lower percentage of sites with probing pocket depth ≥5 mm were shown for the periodontal dressing group compared with the control group (2.7 ± 16.3% versus 4.8 ± 21.4%). The pain intensity was significantly reduced when using a periodontal dressing (5.13 ± 0.89 versus 3.42 ± 1.27). CONCLUSION: The use of a periodontal dressing for 7 days after a OSFMD offers an additional short-term clinical improvement and lowers the pain intensity.

An RCT comparing patient-centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement.

AIM: To assess in a randomized study the patient-centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (72 jaws) with edentulous maxillas and/ or mandibles, were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Outcome measures were the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ-DLV), the Health-related quality of life instrument (HRQOL), visual analogue scales (VAS), the duration of the procedure, and the analgesic doses taken each day. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen implants were placed successfully. No statistical differences could be shown between treatment groups on pain response (MPQ-DLV), treatment perception (VAS) or number or kind of pain killers. For the HRQOLI-instrument, a significant difference was found between the Materialise Mucosa and Materialise Bone group at day 1 (p = 0.02) and day 2 (p = 0.01). For the duration of the surgery, a statistical difference (p = 0.005) was found between the Materialise mucosa and the Mental group, in favour of the first. CONCLUSION: In this study little difference could be found in the patient outcome variables of the different treatment groups. However there was a tendency for patients treated with conventional flapped implant placement to experience the pain for a longer period of time.

A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.

AIM: To assess the accuracy of guided surgery (mucosa and bone-supported) compared to mental navigation or the use of a surgical template, in fully edentulous jaws, in a randomized controlled study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (72 jaws), requiring four to six implants (maxilla or mandible), were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups; guidance via Materialise Universal(®)/mucosa, Materialise Universal(®)/bone, Facilitate™/mucosa, Facilitate™/bone, or mental navigation or a pilot-drill template. The precision was assessed by matching the planning computed tomography (CT) with a post-operative cone beam CT. RESULTS: A significant lower mean deviation at the entry point (1.4 mm, range: 0.3-3.7), at the apex (1.6 mm, range: 0.2-3.7) and angular deviation (3.0°, range: 0.2-16°) was observed for the guiding systems when compared to mental navigation (2.7 mm, range: 0.3-8.3; 2.9 mm, range: 0.5-7.4 and 9.9°, range: 1.5-27.8) and to the surgical template group (3.0 mm, range: 0.6-6.6; 3.4 mm, range: 0.3-7.5 and 8.4°, range: 0.6-21.3°). Differences between bone and mucosa support or type of guidance were negligible. Jaw and implant location (posterior-anterior, left-right), however, had a significant influence on the accuracy when guided. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, guided implant placement appears to offer clear accuracy benefits.

Prediction of wound healing status following dental extraction using Adapted-University of Connecticut osteonecrosis numerical scale: A retrospective study.

Background and Aims: There is a scarcity of evidence concerning the use of a prognostic instrument for predicting normal healing, delayed healing, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) occurrence following tooth extraction in medically compromised patients. The present study aimed to predict healing outcomes following tooth extraction in medically compromised patients using an Adapted-University of Connecticut osteonecrosis numerical scale (A-UCONNS). Methods: The digital medical records of medically compromised patients were reviewed, who underwent tooth extraction. The A-UCONNS parameters included the initial pathological condition, dental procedures, comorbidities (smoking habits, type and duration of medication, and type of intervention), and administered antiresorptive (AR) medications. Each parameter was assigned a different weight, and the scores were then accumulated and classified into three categories: minimal risk (less than 10), moderate risk (10-15), and significant risk (16 or more). The patient's healing status was categorized as normal healing, delayed healing, or MRONJ. Results: A total of 353 male patients (mean age: 67.4 years) were recruited from a pool of 3977 patients, where 12.46% of patients had delayed wound healing, and 18.69% developed MRONJ. The median A-UCONNS scores for MRONJ were higher based on initial pathology, comorbidity, and AR drugs compared to normal or delayed healing. In addition, a significant relationship existed between A-UCONNS and healing outcomes (p < 0.05), with a unit increase in A-UCONNS associated with 1.347 times higher odds of experiencing MRONJ compared to normal healing. In contrast, a low score was linked to an increased likelihood of normal wound healing. Conclusion: The A-UCONNS could act as a promising tool for predicting wound healing outcomes. It can provide clinicians the ability to pinpoint patients at high risk and allow tailoring of patient-specific strategies for improving healing outcomes following tooth extraction.

Risk of healing impairment following tooth extraction in patients administered with antiresorptive and non-antiresorptive polypharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of evidence existed related to the essential role by which anticancer medications alone or in combination with other polypharmacy would be accountable for wound healing impairment post-dental extraction. The following study was conducted to assess the influence of antiresorptive (AR) and non-antiresorptive (non-AR) drugs and other patient-related risk factors on wound healing status following tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 353 patients (age range: 40-90 years, average age: 67.4 years, clinical and radiological follow-up) were recruited. All the patients were divided into three groups, which included, patients used polypharmacy with non-AR drugs, polypharmacy with a combination of AR + non-AR drugs, and the control group. Based on time of healing, the outcome was defined as, normal healing, delayed healing, and Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The polypharmacy score was categorized depending on the sum of the number of administered medications. RESULTS: The odds of delayed healing were significantly higher in 80+ years old patients (OR=6.98, 95 %CI:2.45-19.88, p = < 0.001) administered with AR+ non-AR drugs (OR=14.68, 95 %CI:4.67-46.14, p = < 0.001), having a major polypharmacy score (OR= 15.37, 95 %CI:4.83-48.91, p = < 0.001). On the contrary, patient administered with non-AR drugs (OR=11.52, 95 %CI: 4.45-29.83, p = < 0.001) with hyper polypharmacy (OR=58.86, 95 %CI:25.03-138.40, p = < 0.001) were significantly more likely to develop MRONJ. Smoking and extraction sites showed no significant impact on wound healing impairment. DISCUSSION: Wound healing status in patients administered with both non-AR and AR+ non-AR polypharmacy was significantly impaired following tooth extraction. Other risk factors, such as increased age and high polypharmacy scoring, also significantly contributed towards the occurrence of delayed healing and MRONJ.