The SYNERGY biodegradable polymer everolimus eluting coronary stent: Porcine vascular compatibility and polymer safety study.

AIMS: SYNERGY is a novel platinum chromium alloy stent that delivers abluminal everolimus from an ultrathin poly-lactide-co-glycide (PLGA) biodegradable polymer. This study evaluated the in vivo degradation of the polymer coating, everolimus release time course, and vascular compatibility of the SYNERGY stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: SYNERGY stents were implanted in arteries of domestic swine. Devices were explanted at predetermined time points (up to 120 days) and the extent of PLGA coating or everolimus remaining on the stents was quantified. Everolimus levels in the arterial tissue were also evaluated. A pathological analysis on coronary arteries of single and overlapping stents was performed at time points between 5 and 270 days. PLGA bioabsorption began immediately after implantation, and drug release was essentially complete by 90 days; PLGA absorption was substantially complete by 120 days (>90% of polymer was absorbed) leaving a bare metal SYNERGY stent. Vascular response was similar among SYNERGY and control stents (bare metal, polymer-only, and 3× polymer-only). Mild increases in para-strut fibrin were seen for SYNERGY at an early time point with no significant differences in all other morphological and morphometric parameters through 270 days or endothelial function (eNOS immunostaining) at 90 or 180 days. Inflammation was predominantly minimal to mild for all device types. CONCLUSION: In a swine model, everolimus was released by 90 days and PLGA bioabsorption was complete shortly thereafter. The SYNERGY stent and its biodegradable polymer, even at a 3× safety margin, demonstrated vascular compatibility similar to bare metal stent controls.

The EPIC nitinol stent system in the treatment of iliac artery lesions: one-year results from the ORION clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To report the 1-year results of a pivotal study for a new-generation nitinol stent for the treatment of iliac atherosclerotic lesions. METHODS: The ORION trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00896337) was a single-arm, non-randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial that enrolled 125 patients (81 men; mean age 61.1±9.3 years) implanted with the EPIC self-expanding nitinol stent system in 166 de novo or restenotic iliac artery lesions ≤13 cm long. The primary endpoint was the 9-month major adverse event rate [i.e., device- or procedure-related death within 30 days, myocardial infarction during the index hospitalization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), or index limb amputation]. Follow-up occurred at hospital discharge and at 1, 9, and 12 months. An independent core laboratory evaluated ultrasound results at 1, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: The primary endpoint met the prespecified performance goal, with only 3.4% (4/117) of patients experiencing a major adverse event by 9 months (p<0.0001). By 12 months, 6 (5.4%) of 111 patients had TVR; none had an index limb amputation. The ankle-brachial index, Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and Rutherford classifications all showed sustained improvements through 12 months. Primary patency was 94.4% with comparable results for lesions classified as complex (TASC II C/D 95.5%) or non-complex (TASC II A/B 95.0%). CONCLUSION: The EPIC stent system demonstrated safety and effectiveness through 12 months, including improvements for complex lesions. The EPIC stent is a viable alternative to surgery for patients with either complex or non-complex lesions.

Impact of bioresorbable versus permanent polymer on longterm vessel wall inflammation and healing: a comparative drug-eluting stent experimental study.

AIMS: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have evolved to using bioresorbable polymers as a method of drug delivery. The impact of bioresorbable polymer on long-term neointimal formation, inflammation, and healing has not been fully characterised. This study aimed to evaluate the biological effect of polymer resorption on vascular healing and inflammation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A comparative DES study was performed in the familial hypercholesterolaemic swine model of coronary stenosis. Permanent polymer DES (zotarolimus-eluting [ZES] or everolimus-eluting [EES]) were compared to bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BMS. Post implantation in 29 swine, stents were explanted and analysed up to 180 days. Area stenosis was reduced in all DES compared to BMS at 30 days. At 180 days, BP-EES had significantly lower area stenosis than EES or ZES. Severe inflammatory activity persisted in permanent polymer DES at 180 days compared to BP-EES or BMS. Qualitative para-strut inflammation areas (graded as none to severe) were elevated but similar in all groups at 30 days, peaked at 90 days in DES compared to BMS (p<0.05) and, at 180 days, were similar between BMS and BP-EES but were significantly greater in DES. CONCLUSIONS: BP-EES resulted in a lower net long-term reduction in neointimal formation and inflammation compared to permanent polymer DES in an animal model. Further study of the long-term neointima formation deserves study in human clinical trials.

Meta-analysis of angiographic versus intravascular ultrasound parameters of drug-eluting stent efficacy (from TAXUS IV, V, and VI).

Both quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are currently used to assess in-stent restenosis. This study aimed to use standardized imaging and clinical follow-up to compare QCA parameters with several IVUS parameters to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses for detecting in-stent restenosis in a drug-eluting stent population. A subset of patients from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI studies was evaluated. The subset, which included 216 TAXUS-treated patients and 191 bare-metal stent-treated patients, had complete IVUS and QCA performed at baseline and follow-up. As expected, all QCA and IVUS parameters were consistent with less intimal hyperplasia in TAXUS patients than controls. The overall incidence of QCA binary restenosis was 14.0%, which was 9.3% in TAXUS-treated patients and 19% in bare-metal stent-treated patients (p = 0.0008). Regression analysis showed that QCA late lumen loss and percentage of diameter stenosis correlated only moderately with the various IVUS measures of neointimal hyperplasia for the combined group of patients (TAXUS + bare-metal stent), as well as for the TAXUS-treated and bare-metal stent-treated patients separately. However, in general, correlations within the control (bare-metal stent) group tended to be stronger than within the TAXUS group. The strongest correlation was between QCA percentage of diameter stenosis and IVUS percentage of intimal hyperplasia in the overall group and the control group. The strongest IVUS predictor of QCA binary restenosis at 9 months was maximum percentage of intimal hyperplasia, with an overall C = 0.91 and p <0.001. In conclusion, the QCA and IVUS parameters used to evaluate drug-eluting stent efficacy showed a moderate correlation with IVUS percentage of intimal hyperplasia, reliably predicting QCA binary in-stent restenosis.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Results From the PLATINUM Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the final 5-year safety and effectiveness of the platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) in the randomized trial, as well as in 2 single-arm substudies that evaluated PtCr-EES in small vessels (diameter <2.5 mm; n = 94) and long lesions (24 to 34 mm; n = 102). BACKGROUND: In the multicenter, randomized PLATINUM (PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions), the PtCr-EES was noninferior to the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) at 1 year in 1,530 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Patients with 1 or 2 de novo coronary artery lesions (reference vessel diameter 2.50 to 4.25 mm, length ≤24 mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES versus CoCr-EES. All patients in the substudies received PtCr-EES. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of target vessel-related cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: In the randomized trial, the 5-year TLF rate was 9.1% for PtCr-EES and 9.3% for CoCr-EES (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; p = 0.87). Landmark analysis demonstrated similar TLF rates from discharge to 1 year (HR: 1.12; p = 0.70) and from 1 to 5 years (HR: 0.90; p = 0.63). There were no significant differences in the rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion or vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis. PtCr-EES had 5-year TLF rates of 7.0% in small vessels and 13.6% in long lesions. CONCLUSIONS: PtCr-EES demonstrated comparable safety and effectiveness to CoCr-EES through 5 years of follow-up, with low rates of stent thrombosis and other adverse events. The 5-year event rates were also acceptable in patients with small vessels and long lesions treated with PtCr-EES. (The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions [PLATINUM]; NCT00823212; The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels [PLATINUM SV]; NCT01498692; The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions [PLATINUM LL]; NCT01500434).

A randomised comparison of biodegradable polymer- and permanent polymer-coated platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting coronary stents in China: the EVOLVE China study.

AIMS: The EVOLVE China randomised study sought to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease in China. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomised (1:1) to receive the SYNERGY or PROMUS Element Plus stent. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at nine months. Secondary endpoints included death, MI, revascularisation, and stent thrombosis up to 12 months. A total of 412 subjects were randomised (205 SYNERGY; 207 PROMUS Element Plus) at 14 sites in China from October 2013 to July 2014. SYNERGY was non-inferior to PROMUS Element Plus for the primary endpoint of nine-month in-stent late loss: SYNERGY 0.20±0.33 mm vs. PROMUS Element Plus 0.17±0.38 mm with an upper one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of the difference (0.10 mm), significantly less than the non-inferiority margin (0.15 mm; p<0.0008). Clinical adverse event rates were low and not significantly different between groups at nine and 12 months (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the EVOLVE China trial, the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated EES was noninferior to the PROMUS Element Plus permanent polymer-coated EES for the primary endpoint of late loss at nine months.

Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent in patients with diabetes: the EVOLVE II diabetes substudy.

AIMS: Bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) may reduce the inflammation and delayed healing associated with some permanent polymer-coated DES. Whether late clinical outcomes are improved, particularly among patients with medically treated diabetes, is unknown. Therefore, we analysed outcomes from a pre-specified substudy of the EVOLVE II trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS AND RESULTS: SYNERGY is a thin-strut, platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent with an ultra-thin bioabsorbable poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) abluminal polymer. The EVOLVE II randomised, controlled trial proved the non-inferiority of the SYNERGY versus the PROMUS Element Plus stent for one-year target lesion failure (TLF: ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR], target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or cardiac death). The pre-specified EVOLVE II diabetes substudy prospectively pooled randomised patients with diabetes (N=263) with a sequential single-arm diabetic cohort (n=203). The substudy primary endpoint was one-year TLF compared with a pre-specified performance goal (14.5%). The primary endpoint occurred in 7.5% of SYNERGY-treated patients with diabetes, significantly less than the performance goal (p<0.0001). The two-year rate of TLF was 11.2% (cardiac death 1.5%, TVMI 6.4%, ID-TLR 6.8%) and definite/probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The EVOLVE II diabetes substudy demonstrates the efficacy and safety of the SYNERGY stent in patients with medically treated diabetes.

Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary polymer-based stent delivery of paclitaxel has been shown to be effective in reducing restenosis in simple coronary lesions, but the evidence base for contemporary use in longer, more complex coronary stenoses is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS VI is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial assessing clinical and angiographic outcomes of the TAXUS Moderate Release paclitaxel-eluting stent in the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions. Four hundred forty-eight patients at 44 sites were randomized (1:1) between a drug-eluting TAXUS Express2 and an uncoated Express2 control stent. Per protocol, the 9-month follow-up included an angiographic reevaluation in all patients. The primary end point was the rate of target-vessel revascularization 9 months after the study procedure; secondary end points included the rate of target-lesion revascularization and binary restenosis at follow-up. Mean lesion length in the study was 20.6 mm, with a mean stent-covered length of 33.4 mm. Of all lesions, 55.6% were classified as complex lesions (type C of the AHA/ACC classification). At 9 months, target-vessel revascularization was 9.1% in the TAXUS group and 19.4% in the control group (P=0.0027; relative reduction, 53%). Target-lesion revascularization was reduced from 18.9% to 6.8%, respectively (P=0.0001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar in the 2 groups, 16.4% and 22.5% in TAXUS and control, respectively (P=0.12), including comparable rates for acute myocardial infarction. Binary restenosis in the stented area was reduced from 32.9% in the control group to 9.1% in the TAXUS patients (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The finding that the TAXUS Moderate Release stent system is safe and effective in the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions provides the evidence base for the more widespread use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice.

Fluorocopolymer-coated nitinol self-expanding paclitaxel-eluting stent: pharmacokinetics and vascular biology responses in a porcine iliofemoral model.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate arterial responses to paclitaxel and a novel fluorocopolymer-coated nitinol low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stent (FP-PES). METHODS AND RESULTS: Human smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration was assessed after exposure to paclitaxel in vitro. For pharmacokinetics and vascular response, FP-PES or bare metal stents (BMS) were implanted in porcine iliofemoral arteries. Paclitaxel significantly inhibited human coronary and femoral artery SMC migration at doses as low as 1 pM. Inhibition was significantly greater for femoral compared with coronary artery SMCs from 1 pM to 1 µM. Pharmacokinetics showed consistent paclitaxel release from FP-PES over the study duration. The peak arterial wall paclitaxel level was 3.7 ng/mg at 10 days, with levels decreasing to 50% of peak at 60 days and 10% at 180 days. Paclitaxel was not detected in blood or remote organs. Arteriogram and histomorphometry analyses showed FP-PES significantly inhibits neointimal proliferation versus BMS at 30 and 90 days. Re-endothelialisation scores were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel affected femoral artery SMC migration at lower concentrations and to a greater degree than it did coronary artery SMCs. The novel FP-PES used in this preclinical study demonstrated a vascular healing response similar to BMS, while significantly inhibiting neointimal formation up to 90 days.

Efficacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Drug eluting stents with durable polymers may be associated with hypersensitivity, delayed healing, and incomplete endothelialization, which may contribute to late/very late stent thrombosis and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Bioabsorbable polymers may facilitate stent healing, thus enhancing clinical safety. The SYNERGY stent is a thin-strut, platinum chromium metal alloy platform with an ultrathin bioabsorbable Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) abluminal everolimus-eluting polymer. We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial for regulatory approval to determine noninferiority of the SYNERGY stent to the durable polymer PROMUS Element Plus everolimus-eluting stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=1684) scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease were randomized to receive either the SYNERGY stent or the PROMUS Element Plus stent. The primary end point of 12-month target lesion failure was observed in 6.7% of SYNERGY and 6.5% PROMUS Element Plus treated subjects by intention-to-treat (P=0.83 for difference; P=0.0005 for noninferiority), and 6.4% in both the groups by per-protocol analysis (P=0.0003 for noninferiority). Clinically indicated revascularization of the target lesion or definite/probable stent thrombosis were observed in 2.6% versus 1.7% (P=0.21) and 0.4% versus 0.6% (P=0.50) of SYNERGY versus PROMUS Element Plus-treated subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to the PROMUS Element Plus everolimus-eluting stent with respect to 1-year target lesion failure. These data support the relative safety and efficacy of SYNERGY in a broad range of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01665053.

Three-year results comparing platinum-chromium PROMUS element and cobalt-chromium XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery narrowing (from the PLATINUM Trial).

In the randomized PLATINUM trial, the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) was noninferior to the XIENCE V cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES; Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) for the primary end point of 1-year target lesion failure. This study reports the 3-year outcomes. Patients (n=1,530) with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions (baseline vessel diameter≥2.50 mm to ≤4.25 mm and length≤24 mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES versus CoCr-EES. Three-year follow-up was available in 93.9% (703 of 749) of patients with CoCr-EES and 96.7% (733 of 758) of patients with PtCr-EES. Comparing CoCr-EES with PtCr-EES, 3-year rates of death (4.3% vs 3.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 1.48, p=0.62), cardiac death (1.9% vs 1.2%, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.45, p=0.27), myocardial infarction (2.5% vs 2.3%, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.79, p=0.81), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (4.9% vs 3.5%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.20, p=0.21), and Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.7%, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.33 to 4.57, p=0.76) were not significantly different. In conclusion, 3-year results of the PLATINUM randomized, controlled, clinical trial demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy outcomes of the PROMUS Element PtCr-EES and the XIENCE V CoCr-EES.

Experimental evaluation of efficacy and healing response of everolimus-eluting stents in the familial hypercholesterolemic swine model: a comparative study of bioabsorbable versus durable polymer stent platforms.

BACKGROUND: The utility of animal models for the prediction of drug-eluting stent (DES) efficacy in human clinical trials is still unclear. The familial hypercholesterolemic swine (FHS) model has been shown to induce a human-like neointimal response to bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. However, its utility to discriminate efficacy signals following DES implantation is unknown. In this study, we aimed to test the efficacy and healing response of several everolimus-eluting stent (EES) platforms in the coronary territory of the FHS. METHODS: A total of 19 EES platforms (SYNERGY=6, SYNERGY½-dose=7, and PROMUS Element=6) and an identical BMS control (Element=6) were implanted into the coronary arteries of nine FHS. All implants were performed under intravascular ultrasound guidance using a 1.2 : 1 overstretch ratio. At 30 days, the vascular response to the implant was evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography, and histology. RESULTS: At 28 days, all EES platforms showed a significant decrease in angiographic late lumen loss (between 27 and 37%) compared with the BMS control group. This finding was confirmed both by optical coherence tomography (mean neointimal thickness=28-42% reduction) and by histology (mean neointimal thickness=44-55% reduction). All EES platforms showed similar degrees of neointimal inhibition. The presence of moderate to severe para-strut inflammation was observed in 83% of the stent sections in the BMS group compared with 28.6% in the SYNERGY½-dose group and 0% in the SYNERGY and PROMUS groups (P=0.0002). There was a 68-95% reduction in MMP9 expression in the media in all EES platforms compared with the BMS controls. The presence of mild to moderate para-strut fibrin deposits ranged from 66.7 to 83.4% in all EES platforms compared with 16.7% in the EBMS group. CONCLUSION: The FHS coronary injury model showed the efficacy of several EES platforms compared with an identical BMS control. Everolimus eluted from different polymeric platforms showed lower levels of inflammation and slightly higher fibrin deposits compared with BMS controls.

Japanese and non-Japanese patient outcomes in the PLATINUM randomized trial comparing the PROMUS Element and XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: The PLATINUM randomized trial enrolled 1530 patients treated with either the platinum chromium PROMUS Element everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) or the predicate cobalt chromium PROMUS/XIENCE V EES (CoCr-EES; manufactured as XIENCE V by Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA also distributed as PROMUS by Boston Scientific), including 124 patients from Japanese sites. This substudy examines 2-year outcomes in the Japanese and non-Japanese cohorts. METHODS: Patients with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions (baseline vessel diameter ≥2.50mm to ≤4.25mm and length ≤24mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES (N=63 patients in Japan) versus CoCr-EES (N=61 patients in Japan). RESULTS: Several significant differences were noted in baseline demographics, lesion characteristics, and procedural technique between Japanese and non-Japanese patients, including longer fluoroscopy time, less use of contrast, and greater post-dilatation usage and maximum pressure in Japan. Dual antiplatelet usage at 2 years was also higher in Japan. Despite these differences, the 2-year rates of target lesion failure were comparable in patients treated with PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES both in Japan (3.2% vs 5.0% respectively, p=0.68) and outside Japan (4.7% vs 5.9% respectively, p=0.33; p for interaction=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: This PLATINUM study subanalysis suggests that the PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES provide comparable safety and efficacy in both Japanese and non-Japanese patients.

Impact of stent surface on thrombogenicity and vascular healing: a comparative analysis of metallic and polymeric surfaces.

BACKGROUND: Emerging drug-eluting stent technologies are evolving toward the elimination of polymeric component used as the method for modulating drug delivery. Although this technological approach seems to be biologically appealing, the impact of durable polymers and metallic stent surfaces on vascular healing remains unclear. In the present study, we aimed to compare the independent effect of a durable polymer and a metallic stent surface on thrombogenicity and endothelial cell coverage using different in vitro and in vivo experimental models. METHODS AND RESULTS: Platinum chromium (PtCr) and polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene (PVDF-HFP)-coated surfaces were evaluated in this study. Thrombogenicity was assessed by exposing all surfaces to human blood under shear flow conditions. The inflammatory potential of the material was evaluated by measuring cytokine release from THP-1 cells exposed to all surfaces for 24 hours. Endothelial cell coverage was evaluated by detection of CD31 after the stents were exposed to human coronary artery endothelial cells for ≤ 14 days. Platelet adhesion (P<0.01) and activation (P=0.03) on PVDF-HFP were greater than on PtCr. In vivo, PVDF-HFP revealed more neointimal area (P<0.01) and residual parastrut fibrin (P=0.01) at 30 days compared with PtCr. PtCr displayed higher endothelialization rates and higher vascular endothelial-cadherin expression at 7 and 14 days (P=0.02) compared with PVDF-HFP. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombogenicity and vascular healing differ among metallic and polymeric stent surfaces. PVDF-HFP exhibits higher degrees of platelet activation-adhesion and thrombus accumulation in vivo compared with PtCr. PtCr displayed higher degrees of endothelial surface coverage compared with PVDF-HFP surfaces.

Six-month IVUS and two-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE FHU trial: a randomised evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent.

AIMS: The EVOLVE FHU trial demonstrated non-inferiority of six-month late loss with two dose formulations of SYNERGY, a novel bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the durable polymer PROMUS Element (PE) EES. The current analysis describes the six-month IVUS and clinical results through two years from the EVOLVE FHU trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: EVOLVE recruited 291 patients from 29 centres. At six months, IVUS-assessed in-stent net volume obstruction was 3.40 ± 5.06% for PROMUS Element (PE) vs. 2.68 ± 4.60% for SYNERGY (p=0.34) and 3.09 ± 4.29% for SYNERGY ½ dose (p=0.68 vs. PE). There were no significant differences between groups for any other measured IVUS parameter including resolved, persistent, and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA). At two years, target lesion failure (TLF) was 6.1% for PE vs. 5.5% for SYNERGY (p=0.87) and 5.2% for SYNERGY ½ dose (p=0.81). There were no significant differences between groups for cardiac death, repeat revascularisation, MI or stent thrombosis through two years. CONCLUSIONS: At six months, everolimus delivered from an ultrathin bioabsorbable abluminal polymer resulted in equivalent net volume obstruction and ISA compared with a permanent polymer EES. There were no significant differences between PE and either SYNERGY stent for any major cardiac endpoint through two years. Clinical trials number: NCT01135225.

Comparison of the SYNERGY with the PROMUS (XIENCE V) and bare metal and polymer-only Element control stents in porcine coronary arteries.

AIMS: This study evaluated vascular compatibility of the novel platinum chromium alloy Element stent platform delivering abluminal everolimus from a poly-lactide-co-glycolide bioabsorbable polymer (SYNERGY stent), currently undergoing clinical trial, compared with the PROMUS (XIENCE V) and bare metal and polymer-only Element stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: Stents (n=161) were implanted one per coronary artery in 72 swine at a stent-to-artery ratio of 1.1:1. Similar numbers of each device group were explanted at each of 30, 90, 180, and 360 days (except no PROMUS (XIENCE V) stent at 360 days) for pathological analysis. There was no stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or strut fractures in any group. Vascular response was similar between the SYNERGY and PROMUS (XIENCE V) stents, with no thrombi and complete endothelialisation on both scanning electron microscopy and histology at 30, 90 and 180 days. There were no significant differences for the morphologic parameters of luminal thrombus, endothelial cell coverage, strut tissue coverage, inflammation, internal elastic lamina (IEL) disruption, external elastic lamina (EEL) disruption and medial smooth muscle cell loss across device groups or between time points, but there was mild but greater (p<0.0001) para-strut fibrin at 30 days for both drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with the bare and polymer-only controls; this difference completely dissipated by 90 days. Inflammation was predominantly minimal to mild for all device types. No morphometric parameters, including intimal thickness, stent profile-based area stenosis, and EEL area were significantly different when comparing the SYNERGY stent with the bare metal Element and polymer-only Element control stents at 90, 180 and 360 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this non-injured porcine coronary artery model, the bioabsorbable polymer SYNERGY stent demonstrated vascular compatibility equivalent to the PROMUS (XIENCE V) stent and to the bare metal and polymer-only Element stents.

Vasomotor function and re-endothelialisation after implantation of biodegradable abluminal polymer coated paclitaxel-eluting stents in rabbit iliac arteries: a time-course study.

AIMS: To evaluate the time-course of vasomotor function and re-endothelialisation after implantation of a novel platinum-chromium (PtCr) abluminal biodegradable polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES, Labcoat Element) in rabbit iliac arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Either PES (n=18) or an identical platform of bare metal stents (BMS, Element, n=18) were implanted in rabbit iliac arteries (six animals per time-point). At 14, 30, and 90 days, acetylcholine- and nitroglycerine-induced vasomotor reactivity at 5-10 mm distal to the stent was measured. Subsequently, the animals were terminated. The stented artery was bisected longitudinally for either SEM or en face CD31 immunochemistry examination. All arteries were patent with normal angiographic flow. Decreased endothelial-dependent vasomotion was found at both 14 and 30 days for PES compared to BMS (p<0.01, respectively); however, these differences resolved by 90 days. Endothelial-independent vasorelaxation was similar at all three time-points. Both SEM and en face staining demonstrated equivalent endothelial coverage on the surface of the stented segments above and between struts at all time-points. CONCLUSIONS: This novel bioabsorbable polymer abluminal-coated PES demonstrated vasomotor function comparable to BMS within three months post-deployment in the rabbit iliac model. Despite indistinguishable endothelial cell coverage on the stent surface between groups, earlier differences in vasomotion were detected: this finding suggests that the timing of restoration vasomotor function lags morphologic endothelial recovery.

Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 dose formulations of SYNERGY, a novel bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) compared with the durable polymer PROMUS Element EES (Boston Scientific Corp.). BACKGROUND: Durable polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents have been associated with chronic inflammation and impaired healing. Bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-delivery systems may reduce the risk of late adverse events, including stent thrombosis, and thus the need for prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: A total of 291 patients with a de novo lesion ≤28 mm in length, in a coronary artery of ≥2.25 to ≤3.5 mm diameter, were enrolled in the EVOLVE study, a prospective, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, or SYNERGY half dose. The primary clinical endpoint was the 30-day rate of target lesion failure, defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization. The primary angiographic endpoint was 6-month in-stent late loss measured by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS: The 30-day primary clinical endpoint of target lesion failure occurred in 0%, 1.1%, and 3.1% of patients in the PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, and SYNERGY half dose groups, respectively. The 6-month in-stent late loss was 0.15 ± 0.34 mm for PROMUS Element, 0.10 ± 0.25 mm for SYNERGY, and 0.13 ± 0.26 mm for SYNERGY half dose (SYNERGY, difference -0.06, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.02, p for noninferiority <0.001; SYNERGY half dose, difference -0.03, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.05, p for noninferiority <0.001). Clinical event rates remained low and comparable between groups, with no stent thromboses in any group at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The EVOLVE trial confirms the effective delivery of everolimus by a unique directional bioabsorbable polymer system utilizing the SYNERGY stent. (A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Single-Blind Noninferiority Trial to Assess the Safety and Performance of the Evolution Everolimus-Eluting Monorail Coronary Stent System [Evolution Stent System] for the Treatment of a De Novo Atherosclerotic Lesion [EVOLVE]; NCT01135225).

A novel paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin abluminal biodegradable polymer 9-month outcomes with the JACTAX HD stent.

OBJECTIVES: The JACTAX HD trial ("JACTAX" Trial Drug Eluting Stent Trial) evaluated the safety and clinical performance of a novel JACTAX HD (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: The JACTAX HD (Boston Scientific) stent consists of a pre-crimped bare-metal Liberté (Boston Scientific) stent coated on its abluminal aspect with an ultrathin (<1 microm) 1/1 mixture of biodegradable polylactide polymer and paclitaxel applied as discrete microdots (nominal totals of 9.2 microg each of polymer and paclitaxel per 16-mm stent). METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm, multicenter, first-human-use study (n = 103), the primary end point of 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-related target vessel revascularization) was compared with an objective performance criterion (OPC) of 17% (11% MACE based on TAXUS ATLAS [TAXUS Liberté-SR Stent for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions] trial results plus a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 6%). RESULTS: The composite primary end point occurred in 7.8% of JACTAX HD patients with an upper 1-sided 95% confidence limit of 13.6%, thus meeting the pre-specified criteria for noninferiority. There was no death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis through 9 months. In-stent late loss was 0.33 +/- 0.45 mm, with an in-stent binary restenosis of 5.2% and net volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound of 11.4 +/- 11.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The JACTAX HD stent with an abluminal biodegradable polymer showed 9-month MACE, in-stent late loss, restenosis, and net volume obstruction comparable to that observed with the TAXUS Liberté (Boston Scientific) stent coated with a conformal durable polymer. Further studies are underway to better evaluate the potential of this new PES design, which might allow for more rapid endothelialization and improved vessel healing. ("JACTAX" Trial Drug Eluting Stent Trial; NCT00754728).

A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the TAXUS Element paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions: design and statistical methods of the PERSEUS clinical program.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-eluting stents decrease angiographic and clinical restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention compared to bare metal stents. TAXUS Element is a third-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent which incorporates a novel, thinner-strut, platinum-enriched metal alloy platform. The stent is intended to have enhanced radiopacity and improved deliverability compared to other paclitaxel-eluting stents. The safety and efficacy of the TAXUS Element stent are being evaluated in the pivotal PERSEUS clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN: The PERSEUS trials include two parallel studies of the TAXUS Element stent in single, de novo coronary atherosclerotic lesions. The PERSEUS Workhorse study is a prospective, randomized (3:1), single-blind, non-inferiority trial in subjects with lesion length < or = 28 mm and vessel diameter > or = 2.75 mm to < or = 4.0 mm which compares TAXUS Element to the TAXUS Express2 paclitaxel-eluting stent system. The Workhorse study employs a novel Bayesian statistical approach that uses prior information to limit the number of study subjects exposed to the investigational device and thus provide a safer and more efficient analysis of the TAXUS Element stent. PERSEUS Small Vessel is a prospective, single-arm, superiority trial in subjects with lesion length < or = 20 mm and vessel diameter > or = 2.25 mm to <2.75 mm that compares TAXUS Element with a matched historical bare metal Express stent control. DISCUSSION: The TAXUS PERSEUS clinical trial program uses a novel statistical approach to evaluate whether design and metal alloy iterations in the TAXUS Element stent platform provide comparable safety and improved procedural performance compared to the previous generation Express stent. PERSEUS trial enrollment is complete and primary endpoint data are expected in 2010. PERSEUS Workhorse and Small Vessel are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identification numbers NCT00484315 and NCT00489541.