Resident memory T cells: Possible players in periodontal disease recurrence.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) represent a new subset of long-lived memory T cells that remain in barrier tissues after previous bacterial or viral infection to support early/immediate defense mechanisms, providing site-specific protection from pathogen challenge. As data on Trm cells in human gingiva are just emerging, the aim of the present study was to explore their presence and distribution in epithelial and connective periodontal tissues in relation to microbial exposure and periodontal damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periodontitis tissue specimens were collected from 20 generalized chronic periodontitis patients at the time of osseous resective surgery. As a control, 18 healthy tissue specimens were harvested each from both the primary flap and the palatal graft in 18 periodontally healthy patients during mucogingival surgeries. As CD69 and CD103 are phenotypic markers associated with tissue residence, intraepithelial and stromal CD103+ and CD69+ cells per high-power field were counted in areas with highest expression. Double immunohistochemistry for CD3 and CD69 was performed to identify T cells. RESULTS: CD69 +and CD103+ cells showed a lymphocytic morphology, and double CD69 and CD3 staining confirmed the T cell phenotype of these cells. CD103 and CD69 expression was significantly enhanced in epithelial and connective tissues from patients with periodontitis compared with healthy controls (P < .001). Significant positive correlation between PD and both CD103 and CD69 epithelial expression was observed in tissue specimens from periodontitis patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the present study, these results indicate that Trm cells are higher in periodontitis lesions. They could orchestrate the host response to microbial challenge, leading to a faster reactivation of periodontal disease.

Reliability assessment of the 2018 classification case definitions of peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy in the assignment of the case definitions of peri-implant health and diseases according to the 2018 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions. METHODS: Ten undergraduate students, 10 general dentists, and 10 experts in implant dentistry participated in this study. All examiners were provided with clinical and radiographic documentation of 25 dental implants. Eleven out the 25 cases were also accompanied by baseline readings. Examiners were asked to define all cases using the 2018 classification case definitions. Reliability among examiners was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa statistic. Accuracy was estimated using percentage of complete agreement and quadratic weighted kappa for pairwise comparisons between each rater and a gold standard diagnosis. RESULTS: The Fleiss kappa was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.51) and the mean quadratic weighted kappa value was 0.544. Complete agreement with the gold standard diagnosis was achieved in 59.8% of the cases. Expertise in implantology affected accuracy positively (p < 0.001) while the absence of baseline readings affected it negatively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both reliability and accuracy in assigning case definitions to dental implants according to the 2018 classification were mostly moderate. Some difficulties arose in the presence of specific challenging scenarios.