The Effects of Abutment Materials on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Integration: A Study in Minipigs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in a minipig model, the soft tissue integration of four different transmucosal materials, as well as the peri-implant bone remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 implants were placed in five minipigs in a single stage surgery, and two of each of the following abutment materials were used in each animal: (1) titanium (Ti; control), (2) polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), (3) zirconia (Zi), and (4) veneering ceramic (VC). After a healing period of 3 months, the samples were collected and subjected to nondecalcified histology. The soft tissue dimensions (sulcus, junctional epithelium, and connective tissue attachment) were assessed on each abutment and the distance from the implant margin to first bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was measured. RESULTS: The mean biological width-characterized by the sum of junctional epithelium and connective tissue measurements-was 3.8 (0.6) mm and no statistically significant difference was found between the four groups (p = 0.41). However, a long junctional epithelium (3.3-3.8 mm) and a very short connective tissue attachment (0.1-0.2 mm) were observed with all abutments. The measured peri-implant bone remodeling was similar in all four groups (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Within its limitations, this study showed that all tested materials allowed soft tissue integration, consisting of a long junctional epithelium, extending close to the bone level, and a rather short portion of connective tissue.

The Effects of Direct Polymethyl Methacrylate and Zirconia-on-Ti-Base Abutments on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Integration: A Study in Minipigs.

PURPOSE: To assess two types of abutment materials routinely used in daily practice-direct polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and a zirconia-on-Ti-base abutment-and their effects on peri-implant soft tissues and bone remodeling in a minipig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 implants were placed in five minipigs in a single-stage surgery. Four different types of abutment materials (n = 10 per group) were used: (1) titanium (control); (2) zirconia (control); (3) PMMA (test 1); and (4) Ti-base (zirconia bonded to a titanium framework; test 2). After 3 months of healing, the samples were collected and subjected to nondecalcified histology. The soft tissue dimensions (sulcus, junctional epithelium, and connective tissue attachment) were assessed on each abutment mesially and distally, and the distance from the implant margin to the first bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was measured. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found among the four groups regarding soft tissue dimensions (P = .21), and a long junctional epithelium (mean: 4.1 mm) and a short connective tissue attachment (mean: 0.3 mm) were found in the majority of abutments. In some samples, the junctional epithelium extended all the way to the bone level. The measured peri-implant bone remodeling was similar in all four groups (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that both direct PMMA and zirconia-on-Ti-base abutments seem to allow soft tissue integration similar to that of titanium and zirconia abutments. However, clinical studies are warranted to either confirm or refute the observed findings and to further investigate the influence of different materials on mucointegration.