Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 103(5): 295-302, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20416413

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Cementation of implant prostheses is a common practice. Excess cement in the gingival sulcus may harm the periodontal tissues. Identification of the excess cement may be possible with the use of radiographs if the cement has sufficient radiopacity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic density of different cements used for implant prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight different cements were compared: TempBond Original (TBO), TempBond NE (TBN), Fleck's (FL), Dycal (DY), RelyX Unicem (RXU), RelyX Luting (RXL), Improv (IM), and Premier Implant Cement (PIC). Specimen disks, 2 mm in thickness, were radiographed. Images were made using photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates with standardized exposure values. The average grey level of the central area of each specimen disk was selected and measured in pixels using a software analysis program, ImageTool, providing an average grey level value representative of radiodensity for each of the 8 cements. The radiodensity was determined using the grey level values of the test materials, which were recorded and compared to a standard aluminum step wedge. An equivalent thickness of aluminum in millimeters was calculated using best straight line fit estimates. To assess contrast effects by varying the exposure settings, a second experiment using 1-mm-thick cement specimens radiographed at both 60 kVp and 70 kVp was conducted. The PSP plates with specimens were measured for a grey level value comparison to the standard aluminum step wedge, using the same software program. RESULTS: The highest grey level values were recorded for the zinc cements (TBO, TBN, and FL), with the 1-mm specimen detectable at both 60- and 70-kVp settings. A lower grey level was recorded for DY, indicative of a lower radiodensity compared to the zinc cements, but higher than RXL and RXU. The implant-specific cements had the lowest grey level values. IM could only be detected in 2-mm-thick sections with a lower aluminum equivalence value than the previously mentioned cements. PIC could not be detected radiographically for either the 1-mm or 2-mm thicknesses at either of the kVp settings. CONCLUSIONS: Some types of cement commonly used for the cementation of implant-supported prostheses have poor radiodensity and may not be detectable following radiographic examination.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/química , Cimentos Dentários/química , Implantes Dentários , Absorciometria de Fóton , Hidróxido de Cálcio/química , Resinas Compostas/química , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/química , Humanos , Minerais/química , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia Dentária Digital , Cimentos de Resina/química , Software , Óxido de Zinco/química , Cimento de Óxido de Zinco e Eugenol/química , Cimento de Fosfato de Zinco/química
2.
Bone ; 35(2): 403-11, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15268890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis results in loss of bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration. Dental radiographs potentially offer a means of screening for osteoporosis as they are commonly made on adults. Spatial frequency analyses are well suited to detect subtle changes in image patterns. We hypothesize that individuals with osteoporosis exhibit an altered radiographic trabecular pattern that can be detected by spatial frequency and strut analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Maxillary and mandibular periapical radiographs of 26 women with osteoporosis and 23 controls were examined using one-dimensional discrete Fourier and wavelet analyses in both jaws to measure the spatial frequency distributions of trabecular structures. A strut analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Individuals with osteoporosis revealed an altered trabecular pattern compared to controls. Using Fourier and strut variables allows classification of subjects with 92% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and a 22% cross-validation error rate. Wavelet analysis was also useful but did not perform better than Fourier analysis for subject classification. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial frequency analysis of digitized dental radiographs, especially Fourier analysis, and strut analysis provide value for identifying individuals with osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Análise de Fourier , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Dentária , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA