The role of sealants for achieving anastomotic hemostasis in vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: During vascular interventions, connections that link arteries, veins, or synthetic grafts, which are known as an 'anastomosis', may be necessary. Vascular anastomoses can bleed from the needle holes that result from the creation of the anastomoses. Various surgical options are available for achieving hemostasis, or the stopping of bleeding, including the application of sealants directly onto the bleeding vessels or tissues. Sealants are designed for use in vascular surgery as adjuncts when conventional interventions are ineffective and are applied directly by the surgeon to seal bleeding anastomoses. Despite the availability of several different types of sealants, the evidence for the clinical efficacy of these hemostatic adjuncts has not been definitively established in vascular surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of sealants as adjuncts for achieving anastomotic site hemostasis in patients undergoing vascular surgery. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist conducted systematic searches of the following databases: the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register via the Cochrane Register of Studies; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE via Ovid; Embase via Ovid ; and CINAHL via EBSCO. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for clinical trials. Reference lists of included trials and relevant reviews were also searched. The latest search date was 6 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that compared fibrin or synthetic sealant use with alternative interventions (e.g. manual compression, reversal of anticoagulation) for achieving anastomotic-site hemostasis in vascular surgery procedures. We included participants who underwent the creation of an anastomosis during vascular surgery. We excluded non-vascular surgery patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We have used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were time to hemostasis, failure of hemostatic intervention, and intraoperative blood loss. Our secondary outcomes were operating time, death from bleeding complications up to 30 days, postoperative bleeding up to 30 days, unplanned return to the operating room for bleeding complications management up to 30 days, quality of life, and adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We found 24 randomized controlled trials that included a total of 2376 participants who met the inclusion criteria. All trials compared sealant use with standard care controls, including oxidized cellulose, gelatin sponge, and manual compression. All trials were at high risk of performance bias, detection bias, and other sources of bias. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for risk of bias concerns, inconsistency, imprecision and possible publication bias. Combining data on time to hemostasis showed that sealant use may reduce the mean time to hemostasis compared to control (mean difference (MD) -230.09 seconds, 95% confidence interval (CI) -329.24 to -130.94; P < 0.00001; 7 studies, 498 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combining data on failure of hemostatic intervention showed that sealant use may reduce the rate of failure compared to control, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; P < 0.00001; 17 studies, 2120 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We did not detect any clear differences between the sealant and control groups for intraoperative blood loss (MD -32.69 mL, 95% CI -96.21 to 30.83; P = 0.31; 3 studies, 266 participants; low-certainty evidence); operating time (MD -18.72 minutes, 95% CI -40.18 to 2.73; P = 0.09; 4 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence); postoperative bleeding (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; P = 0.09; 9 studies, 1216 participants; low-certainty evidence), or unplanned return to the operating room (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.69; P = 0.16; 8 studies, 721 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported death from bleeding or quality of life outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis of 24 trials with 2376 participants, our review demonstrated that sealant use for achieving anastomotic hemostasis in vascular surgery patients may result in reduced time to hemostasis, and may reduce rates of hemostatic intervention failure, although the evidence is very uncertain, when compared to standard controls. Our analysis showed there may be no differences in intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative bleeding up to 30 days, and unplanned return to the operating room for bleeding complications up to 30 days. Deaths and quality of life could not be analyzed. Limitations include the risk of bias in all studies. Our review has demonstrated that using sealants may reduce the time required to achieve hemostasis and the rate of hemostatic failure. However, a significant risk of bias was identified in the included studies, and future trials are needed to provide unbiased data and address other considerations such as cost-effectiveness and adverse events with sealant use.

Final results from a postmarket registry of an iliac leg graft with a continuous, spiral nitinol stent.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes from a postmarket registry of the Zenith Spiral-Z abdominal aortic aneurysm iliac leg graft with a continuous, spiral nitinol stent that was designed for improved conformability, kink, and migration resistance. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter registry was designed to evaluate physician-reported outcomes of the Spiral-Z leg graft in up to 600 patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic or aortoiliac aneurysms at up to 30 investigative sites in the United States and Canada. Study outcomes were focused on iliac limb occlusion, limb-related reintervention, limb-related endoleak, component separation, and device integrity. Short-term data were collected during an interval of 1 to 6 months, with longer term data collected at 12 months. RESULTS: Between March 2012 and March 2015, 599 patients (mean age 74 ± 8 years; 87% male; 26% with aortoiliac aneurysm) were treated, with Spiral-Z iliac leg grafts placed in 564 left iliac arteries and 559 right iliac arteries. The mean iliac inner diameters (both left and right) were 9 ± 3 mm; moderate/severe occlusive disease, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were present in 14%, 25%, and 36% and 15%, 25%, and 34% of the left and right iliac arteries, respectively. Iliac artery adjunctive procedures (iliac artery angioplasty and/or stent placement) were performed intraoperatively in 112 patients (19%; bilateral in 52 patients). Mortality within 30 days was 1.7% (10/599); cumulative mortality at 1 year was 6.2% (37/599). There were no aortic ruptures and only one open conversion (0.2%). Limb occlusions occurred in 11 of 599 patients (2%; 3 within 30 days and 8 after 30 days, all unilateral, none had received procedural iliac artery adjuncts at implantation); of these, 7 patients underwent reinterventions. Other limb-related reinterventions were performed on eight patients for nonocclusive kink, compression, or thrombus (six within 30 days and three after 30 days). In total, 13 patients (2%) underwent 15 limb-related reinterventions (7 for occlusions and 8 for nonocclusive causes). In one patient, a distal type I endoleak and device migration (>10 mm) involving a right iliac leg was noted at the 12-month follow-up visit. No other limb-related endoleak, migration, component separation, or stent fracture was reported during a mean follow-up of 11 ± 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Spiral-Z leg graft demonstrated excellent patency and required infrequent limb-related reinterventions in routine clinical care in a postmarket registry.

Results of the combined U.S. multicenter postapproval study of the Nit-Occlud PDA device for percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus.

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of the Nit-Occlud PDA prospective postapproval study (PAS) along with a comparison to the results of the pivotal and continued access trials. BACKGROUND: The Nit-Occlud PDA (PFM Medical, Cologne, Germany), a nitinol coil patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) occluder, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2013. METHODS: The PAS enrolled a total of 184 subjects greater than 6 months of age, weighing at least 5 kg, with PDAs less than 4 mm by angiography at 11 centers. Patients were followed prospectively at 2 months, 12 months, and 24 months postprocedure. These outcomes were compared to the 357 subjects enrolled in the pivotal and continued access protocols. Efficacy and safety data were reported. RESULTS: Among 184 subjects enrolled for the PAS between 2014 and 2017, 180 (97.8%) had successful device implantation. After 12 months, 98.7% (150/152) had trivial or no residual shunt by echocardiography and two subjects had only small residual shunts. There were three device embolizations that were all retrieved by snare without clinical consequence. Together with the pivotal and continued access study, 97.4% (449/461) had complete echocardiographic closure at 12 months in 541 enrolled subjects. The composite success was 94.4%. There were no mortalities and no serious device-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The Nit-Occlud PDA is a safe and effective device for closure of a small to moderate sized PDA. There were no serious device-related adverse events in a large cohort of three clinical trials.