RESUMO
BufferGel (ReProtect, LLC) is a vaginal gel with an acidic buffering action that was designed to prevent vaginal neutralization by semen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BufferGel (ReProtect, Limited Liability Company) applied vaginally either once or twice daily by 27 women who were at low risk for acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Participants initially used the product once daily for 14 days and then twice daily for 14 days; they underwent colposcopy before and after product exposure. BufferGel was well tolerated, although two-thirds of the participants reported at least 1 mild or moderate adverse experience. The most common adverse events were irritative genitourinary symptoms. Product use was discontinued after 3 adverse events. BufferGel was well tolerated in women at low risk for acquisition of HIV; toxicity was limited and occurred at frequencies similar to those in women who did not use any vaginal product and at levels lower than in women who used detergent-based microbicides.
Assuntos
Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Espermicidas/efeitos adversos , Vagina/efeitos dos fármacos , Resinas Acrílicas , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Colposcopia , Feminino , Géis , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Segurança , Sêmen/efeitos dos fármacos , Espermicidas/administração & dosagem , Sistema Urogenital/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the safety of BufferGel (ReProtect LLC, Baltimore, MD), a spermicidal microbicide that acidifies semen and maintains the protective acidity of the vagina, in a high-dose tolerance trial. METHODS: HIV/STD negative, sexually abstinent, and sexually active women in India, Thailand, Malawi, and Zimbabwe were asked to insert one applicator ( approximately 5 ml) of BufferGel vaginally twice per day for 14 days. Sexually active women agreed to have sex (while using BufferGel and nonlubricated condoms) at least twice per week. RESULTS: In total, 98 women (30 sexually abstinent and 68 sexually active) were enrolled. Overall compliance with product use was 93%. Epithelial abnormalities detected by pelvic examination or colposcopy were uncommon (8 cases in 271 examinations). Irritation was reported by approximately one quarter of the women (0.58 events per woman-week) but was generally mild and of short duration. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) fell significantly, from 30% at enrollment to 6% at one week, and 7% at two weeks of BufferGel use. Thirty-two women acquired microscopically detectable yeast during BufferGel exposure, but only 3 developed symptomatic vaginitis. CONCLUSION: BufferGel appears to be safe and well tolerated by the cervicovaginal epithelium. Its effect on BV and yeasts merits further study.