Raltegravir Pharmacokinetics in Patients on Asunaprevir-Daclatasvir.

Raltegravir pharmacokinetics was studied in 20 patients included in the ANRS HC30 QUADRIH Study before and after addition of anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) quadritherapy, including pegylated-interferon-ribavirin and asunaprevir plus daclatasvir. Raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters remained unchanged whether administered on or off anti-HCV therapy. In addition, concentrations of raltegravir, asunaprevir, and daclatasvir were not affected by liver cirrhosis. These data suggest that in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV-coinfected patients, whether cirrhotic or not, asunaprevir and daclatasvir could be administered safely with raltegravir.

Effects of hydroxychloroquine on symptomatic improvement in primary Sjögren syndrome: the JOQUER randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Primary Sjögren syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by mouth and eye dryness, pain, and fatigue. Hydroxychloroquine is the most frequently prescribed immunosuppressant for the syndrome. However, evidence regarding its efficacy is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for the main symptoms of primary Sjögren syndrome: dryness, pain, and fatigue. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From April 2008 to May 2011, 120 patients with primary Sjögren syndrome according to American-European Consensus Group Criteria from 15 university hospitals in France were randomized in a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were assessed at baseline, week 12, week 24 (primary outcome), and week 48. The last follow-up date for the last patient was May 15, 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/d) or placebo until week 24. All patients were prescribed hydroxychloroquine between weeks 24 and 48. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a 30% or greater reduction between weeks 0 and 24 in scores on 2 of 3 numeric analog scales (from 0 [best] to 10 [worst]) evaluating dryness, pain, and fatigue. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, the proportion of patients meeting the primary end point was 17.9% (10/56) in the hydroxychloroquine group and 17.2% (11/64) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.37-2.78; P = .98). Between weeks 0 and 24, the mean (SD) numeric analog scale score for dryness changed from 6.38 (2.14) to 5.85 (2.57) in the placebo group and 6.53 (1.97) to 6.22 (1.87) in the hydroxychloroquine group. The mean (SD) numeric analog scale score for pain changed from 4.92 (2.94) to 5.08 (2.48) in the placebo group and 5.09 (3.06) to 4.59 (2.90) in the hydroxychloroquine group. The mean (SD) numeric analog scale for fatigue changed from 6.26 (2.27) to 5.72 (2.38) in the placebo group and 6.00 (2.52) to 5.94 (2.40) in the hydroxychloroquine group. All but 1 patient in the hydroxychloroquine group had detectable blood levels of the drug. Hydroxychloroquine had no efficacy in patients with anti-SSA autoantibodies, high IgG levels, or systemic involvement. During the first 24 weeks, there were 2 serious adverse events in the hydroxychloroquine group and 3 in the placebo group; in the last 24 weeks, there were 3 serious adverse events in the hydroxychloroquine group and 4 in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with primary Sjögren syndrome, the use of hydroxychloroquine compared with placebo did not improve symptoms during 24 weeks of treatment. Further studies are needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00632866.

Practical management of boceprevir and immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is the most important complication in HCV liver transplant patients. Boceprevir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) enabled improvement in sustained virological response rates of patients with genotype 1 HCV. Boceprevir interacts with immunosuppressive therapy (IT) by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme. Our aim was to study interactions and assess the safety of boceprevir in the context of HCV recurrence. Boceprevir (800 mg three times a day) initiated after a 4-week lead-in phase was associated with cyclosporine (three patients), tacrolimus (two patients), and everolimus (one patient) in five liver transplant patients with genotype 1 HCV infection who experienced HCV recurrence. The mean follow-up period after HCV therapy was 14.8 ± 3.1 weeks. Estimated oral clearances of IT decreased on average by 50%, requiring reduced dosing regimens. Anemia occurred in all patients, with a mean fall in hemoglobin levels between baseline and week 12 of 3.12 ± 2.27 g/dl. All patients required administration of ß-erythropoietin (n = 5), three needed ribavirin dose reduction, and one needed a blood transfusion. A virological response was observed in all patients (mean HCV viral load [HVL] decrease at week 12, 6.64 ± 0.35 log(10) IU/ml). These preliminary results in liver transplant patients with HCV recurrence demonstrate the feasibility and safety of coadministration of boceprevir and IT.

Therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients to treat recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Severe hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence affects post-transplant survival in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. This article describes the results of triple anti-HCV therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir in seven HIV/HCV co-infected patients following liver transplantation. METHODS: All patients had severe HCV recurrence [fibrosis stage ≥F2 or acute hepatitis ≥A2 (n = 5) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 2)] associated with genotype 1a (n = 4) or 1b (n = 3). Patients were treated with Peg-interferon/ribavirin and boceprevir (n = 2) or telaprevir (n = 5) immediately (n = 3) or after a 4-week lead-in phase (n = 4). Immunosuppression included either cyclosporine (n = 5) or tacrolimus (n = 2). Prior to introducing telaprevir, combined antiretroviral therapy was switched in one patient to prevent drug-drug interactions. RESULTS: At 24 weeks after the end of treatment, sustained virological response was observed in 60% (3/5) of the patients treated with telaprevir; no responders were observed in the boceprevir group. Triple anti-HCV therapy was prematurely discontinued in six patients [treatment failure (n = 2), infection (n = 2), acute rejection (n = 1) and myocardial infarction (n = 1)]. Anaemia occurred in all patients, requiring erythropoietin, ribavirin dose reduction and red blood cell transfusions in five patients.Average cyclosporine doses were reduced by 50-84% after telaprevir initiation and by 33% after boceprevir initiation. Tacrolimus doses were reduced by 95% with telaprevir. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, triple anti-HCV therapy with telaprevir greatly improved efficacy despite poor tolerability. Significant decreases in cyclosporine or tacrolimus doses are necessary prior to introduction of boceprevir or telaprevir. Close monitoring is essential to prevent drug-drug interactions among antiretroviral therapy, immunosuppressive agents and anti-HCV therapy.

Successful anti-hepatitis C virus therapy with telaprevir in an HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patient with a severe recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection on the liver graft.

We report, for the first time, the outcome of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) triple therapy with telaprevir in an HIV/HCV co-infected transplanted patient. After liver transplantation, the patient experienced a severe HCV recurrence with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and anti-HCV therapy with pegylated interferon alpha 2a, ribavirin and telaprevir was initiated. A sustained virological response was achieved after 48 weeks of anti-HCV therapy. Drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral therapy, immunosuppressive agents and anti-HCV therapy could be managed.