Biocompatibility of a bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PD fluid tested with a double-chamber cell culture system.

OBJECTIVE: In peritoneal dialysis (PD), neutrally buffered PD fluids with lower concentrations of glucose degradation products (GDP) have tested superior to conventional fluids in terms of biocompatibility. However, conventional in vitro studies provoke debate because, due to the lack of subsequent equilibration with the blood, they do not resemble the true intraperitoneal situation of PD. METHODS: We established a double-chamber cell culture system with peritoneal mesothelial cells seeded on top of a permeable membrane, with a physiological buffer below. Thus adequately reflecting the in vivo equilibration pattern, we compared a conventional fluid with a neutral bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PD solution. Using an exchange pattern adapted from an 8-hour continuous ambulatory PD regimen, cell viability was assessed with an MTT assay, and cell function via constitutive and stimulated interleukin (IL)-6 release. As an indicator of potential induction of fibrosis and as a parameter of mesothelial cell integrity, respectively, transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta1) generation and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) release were measured. RESULTS: The conventional solution significantly compromised mesothelial cell viability and function in terms of mitochondrial activity (p < 0.05) and stimulated IL-6 release (p < 0.05). The bicarbonate/lactate fluid had no effect on cell viability or IL-6 release and turned out to be equivalent to the properties of the growth medium. Whereas lactate-incubated cells did not respond to IL-1beta stimulation, bicarbonate/lactate-treated cells adequately increased IL-6 release after stimulation (p < 0.0005). Release of TGF-beta1 and CA125 did not differ between the different fluids and the control. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the sustained equilibration process, the double-chamber cell culture model allows a more realistic insight into mesothelial cell viability and function in terms of PD. As in classic in vitro studies, an adverse effect of conventional PD solutions on mesothelial cells was overt in the present cell culture system. The neutral bicarbonate/lactate-buffered fluid with low GDP content, however, did not interfere with mesothelial cell vitality or function, indicating superior biocompatibility.

Biocompatibility pattern of a bicarbonate/lactate-buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid in APD: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: In chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, bicarbonate-buffered fluids, with their neutral pH and less advanced glycosylation end-products (AGE) and glucose degradation products (GDP), have better biocompatibility than conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions. That difference may be more beneficial in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), due to its more frequent exchanges and longer contact times with fresh dialysate. We performed a prospective, randomized study in APD patients to compare the biocompatibility of conventional and bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PD fluids. METHODS: We randomized 14 APD patients to have APD with either conventional or bicarbonate/lactate-based fluids. After 6 months, both groups changed to the other solution. The overall observation period was 12 months. After 1 and 5 months and again after 7 and 11 months, phagocytotic and respiratory burst capacities of effluent peritoneal macrophages were determined. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as effluent IL-6, CRP, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 1, AGE and CA125 concentrations were measured. Inflow pain was quantified using a patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Respiratory burst capacity remained unchanged and phagocytotic activity increased significantly during APD (P<0.001) with the bicarbonate/lactate fluid. Effluent IL-6 release was significantly lower than with the lactate fluid (P<0.05). While in the effluent TGF-beta 1 was unaffected, AGE concentration was lower after bicarbonate/lactate treatment (P<0.05). Effluent CA125 concentration, an indicator of mesothelial cell integrity, was higher (P<0.05) in neutral effluents. Finally, patients' inflow pain diminished (P = 0.05) when using the neutral fluid. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a neutral PD fluid in APD improved patients' inflow pain as well as biocompatibility parameters reflecting enhanced phagocytotic activity of peritoneal macrophages, reduced constitutive inflammatory stimulation (IL-6), reduced AGE accumulation in the peritoneal cavity and better preservation of the mesothelial cell integrity. From the biocompatibility point of view, a neutral fluid with low GDP content can be recommended as the primary choice for APD.