Dentogingival complex: dimension based on biotypes.

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the DGC dimensions and determine whether the DGC dimension varies by gingival biotype. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in the Undergraduate and Prosthodontic Graduate Program clinics of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Puerto Rico from August 2011 to April 2012. A total of 53 participants who needed restorative crowns in their teeth were recruited. Prior to crown preparation, the gingiva was classified as having a thin, mixed or thick biotype, according to transparency, using a standardized 15 UNC Hu-Friedy periodontal probe. The DGC dimension was measured by transulcus probing. Descriptive statistics were calculated in mesial, medial, and distal sites by phenotypes. Differences between and within the sites' DGC dimension mean were determined using a Friedman test. The level of significance was 0.05. RESULTS: Mean DGC dimensions, in millimeters, for all sites measured were: 3.09 (95% CI: 2.91-3.27), 3.40 (95% CI: 3.18-3.62), 2.70 (95% CI: 2.51-2.89), and 3.17 (95% CI: 2.94-3.41) in mesial, medial, and distal sites, respectively. In thick, mixed, and thin biotypes the mesial sites showed greater DGC dimension means than the medial and distal (p<0.05) sites. Mean DGC dimension was greater for the thin compared to mixed and thick biotypes at mesial, medial and distal sites (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the thick biotype presented the smallest DGC mean dimensions compared to mixed and thin biotypes at the same sites. CONCLUSION: The DGC dimensions in all sites were similar to those reported in the literature. DGC dimensions are different for thin, mixed and thick gingival biotypes.

Socio-Demographic and Medical Characteristics of Patients With Odontogenic Infection Admitted to the Adult University Hospital in Puerto Rico: A Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the overall distribution of odontogenic infection by socio-demographic and medical characteristics in patients admitted to the Adult University Hospital (AUH) in Puerto Rico (PR). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken with the medical charts of 129 patients (≥21 years) with odontogenic infection who had been admitted (2011-2015) to the AUH and treated by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Post - graduate Program of the University of PR. The patients were selected from the hospital's billing database after having been identified using the International Classification of Diseases (9th and 10th revisions). The study variables included age, gender, municipality of residence, medical insurance, infection etiology, surgical and antibiotic treatments, length of stay (LOS), and the presence of diabetes. Descriptive and frequency statistics were calculated for all the variables; chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis, Kendall tau, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 40.36 (SD: 14.74) years, and they ranged in age from 21 to 81 years; the majority were enrolled in the public health insurance plan of PR. The leading cause of infection was dental caries. Diabetes was associated with longer LOSs; P < .01. CONCLUSION: In our study, the relative frequency of admitted patients with an odontogenic infection, most of them with low income, increased over time with dental caries being the principal cause of infection.

Prevalence of Short Root Anomaly in a Group of Puerto Ricans.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of short root anomaly (SRA) in a group of Puerto Ricans at the Advanced Education Program in Orthodontics of the University of Puerto Rico. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with digital panoramic x-rays of 203 patients (112 females and 91 males; mean age: 17 years) in Puerto Rico. Utilizing the modified Lind's method, 406 maxillary right and left central incisors (1) were measured and evaluated for SRA. Root and crown length and R/C ratio were compared by sex and side. Linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between the R/C ratio and age, sex, and side (right/left). All the statistical analyses were evaluated using significance level of .05 (2). RESULTS: The prevalence of SRA was 0.49%. The average root and crown lengths for the maxillary right and left central incisors were 19.47 and 10.28 mm, respectively. Sex was associated with root and crown length, not with the R/C ratio. No differences were observed in the R/C ratio by the side. There were no significant associations between age, sex, and side and R/C ratio in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SRA in our population is lower than any reported in the literature. The R/C ratio in our Hispanic population was the highest compared with those of other ethnicities. Neither the sex nor the side of the incisor was associated with the R/C ratio. These findings are contrary to those of prior reports stating that males have higher R/C ratios than females.

Comparison of Chu's Proportion Gauge with a T-bar Tip and a Two-Tip Compass in the Determination of Anterior Dentition Tooth Size in a Group of Puerto Ricans.

OBJECTIVE: Compare maxillary anterior dentition measurements, using Chu's proportion gauge with a T-bar tip (PG-TT) and a Two-Tip Compass (T-TC), in a group of Puerto Ricans, to determine the reliability of the PG-TT. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Puerto Rico, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Sciences Campus. The participants (18-35 years old) were dental students or employees of the university. Previously, the examiner had been trained and calibrated in instrument usage. Calibration participants (n = 16) received an oral exam, prophylaxis, and a chlorhexidine mouthwash for home use. After 3 days, the upper-anterior teeth were measured using the 2 instruments. The agreement was determined using weighted kappa statistics (Kw), and 0.80 was the minimum acceptable level. The examiner achieved almost perfect agreement (inter-examiner KwT-TC = 0.95 [0.96-0.93]; KwPG-TT = 0.82 [0.81-0.87]) with a reference examiner. RESULTS: Fifty participants (25 women and 25 men) were evaluated. Length: The teeth of the men presented an unacceptable level of agreement, except for in the right central incisors. For the women, a strong level of agreement was observed only in the lateral incisors and left canines. When the teeth of both sexes were considered, a strong level of agreement was detected, except for in the right canines and left central incisors. Width: The level of agreement was unacceptable, except for in the right canines (distal). CONCLUSION: T-TC is a more reliable instrument to measure tooth dimensions as compared to the PG-TT.