Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Semin Cutan Med Surg ; 26(1): 34-9, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17349561

RESUMO

Facial soft-tissue augmentation has become ubiquitous in cosmetic dermatology. In the appropriate patient and with appropriate training, fillers can temporarily eliminate rhytides, creases, and defects, thereby producing a rejuvenated appearance. Yet, even in the most experienced injectors, there can be complications. These adverse effects can be divided into early and late and range from bruising to necrosis. Understanding the anatomy, limitations of the filler and proper technique can reduce the risk of adverse effects. When a complication occurs, the practitioner should understand how to manage them from observation to surgical intervention.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Dermatologia/métodos , Injeções Intradérmicas/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Colágeno/efeitos adversos , Durapatita/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Láctico/efeitos adversos , Poliésteres , Polímeros/efeitos adversos
2.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 23(4): 298-301, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17667102

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) is a recently FDA-approved soft-tissue filler. Although approved only for treatment of HIV-associated lipoatrophy, there has been increased interest in its use for cosmetic purposes. Here we describe a case of a granulomatous reaction to injectable PLA in the inferior periorbital region resulting in visible papules and discuss treatment options. METHODS: We review literature pertaining to medical and surgical treatment options for our patient, and we discuss relevant techniques for both the injection of PLA and the management of this complication with surgical techniques. RESULTS: After failing several nonsurgical treatment options, our patient had excellent results with surgical excision of her persistent visible nodules. This technique is minimally invasive, provides definitive removal of the nodules, and can leave minimal residual scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high frequency of subcutaneous nodule formation reported in early trials of injectable PLA, it is important for physicians to be well informed regarding its potential side-effects and how to minimize risk of adverse reactions. Based on our experience, we suggest that surgical excision is an excellent treatment option for persistent papules and nodules that arise after injection of PLA in the periorbital area.


Assuntos
Celulose/efeitos adversos , Granuloma de Corpo Estranho/cirurgia , Ácido Láctico/efeitos adversos , Manitol/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Doenças Orbitárias/cirurgia , Polímeros/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/cirurgia , Adulto , Técnicas Cosméticas , Feminino , Granuloma de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Injeções , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Doenças Orbitárias/etiologia , Poliésteres , Ritidoplastia , Dermatopatias/etiologia
3.
Lasers Surg Med ; 38(3): 205-10, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16532442

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Several soft-tissue augmentation materials are now available for reduction of nasolabial fold creases and perioral rhytides. Nasolabial folds and perioral rhytides can also be improved by skin tightening delivered by non-ablative radiofrequency (RF) treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of RF treatment over skin areas recently injected with medium-term injectable soft-tissue augmentation materials. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five subjects were assigned to the experimental arm (augmentation materials plus RF) and one to the control arm (augmentation materials alone). Each subject received injections of 0.3 mL of hyaluronic acid derivative (Restylane) and calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) 3 cm apart on the upper inner arm. Two weeks later, two non-overlapping passes of RF (Thermage ThermaCool TC) were delivered at 63.5 setting with medium-fast 1.5 cm2 tip over injected sites in all of the experimental subjects. Punch skin biopsies were obtained 3 days later from each of the two injection sites on each subject. RESULTS: Light microscopy and digital photomicrographs obtained at low, medium, and high power showed no difference between filler materials in experimental and control subjects. In both cases filler was evident at the deep dermal-subcutaneous junction. Nodule formation, foreign body extravasation, or hemorrhage/clot was not observed grossly or histologically. Subjects and physicians did not report any difference in signs and symptoms between the experimental and control arms. Slightly increased transitory pain was noted when RF was delivered over filler versus over normal skin. CONCLUSION: Applying RF treatment over the same area 2 weeks after deep dermal injection with hyaluronic acid derivatives or calcium hydroxylapatite does not appear to cause gross morphological changes in the filler material or surrounding skin. Further studies with different parameters are necessary to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Durapatita/administração & dosagem , Ácido Hialurônico/análogos & derivados , Terapia por Radiofrequência , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Biópsia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Ondas de Rádio/efeitos adversos , Pele/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA