Tolterodine extended release is well tolerated in older subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the tolerability of tolterodine extended release (ER) in older subjects with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of pooled data from five large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Subjects with OAB symptoms, including urinary frequency and urgency (and nocturia in two studies) with or without urgency urinary incontinence, received qd treatment with tolterodine ER (4 mg) or placebo for 8-12 weeks. Data were stratified post hoc by age group: < 65 (n = 2531), 65-74 (n = 1059) and > or = 75 years (n = 573). Tolerability was assessed by evaluating the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). AE occurrences from each study were mapped to the MedDRA coding dictionary of preferred terms. RESULTS: Discontinuation rates were slightly higher among subjects > or = 75 years of age vs. those < 65 years of age; however, this was observed in subjects treated with placebo as well as tolterodine ER. Overall, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of dry mouth, headache, constipation, nausea, urinary tract infection, blurred vision, dry eye, dizziness and micturition disorder in older (65-74 or > or = 75 years) vs. younger (< 65 years) subjects treated with tolterodine ER relative to placebo (treatment x age; all p > 0.1). Dry mouth was the only AE consistently associated with tolterodine ER treatment (< 65 years, 17%; 65-74 years, 16%; > or = 75 years, 15%). The occurrence of all other AEs was < or = 5% in most age and treatment cohorts. Most AEs were mild or moderate in all age and treatment cohorts. CONCLUSION: The nature and frequency of AEs associated with tolterodine ER treatment were similar across age groups in subjects with OAB, suggesting that tolterodine ER was not associated with an increased risk of AEs in older vs. younger subjects and, thus, is a suitable first-line pharmacotherapy treatment for OAB in this population.

Transurethral collagen injection for treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence in men.

OBJECTIVES: Transurethral injection of glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine collagen has recently been advocated as a potentially useful treatment modality for management of urinary incontinence. The reported clinical experience with urethral collagen injection in adult males has been limited. METHODS: This study summarizes the current literature and reviews the clinical results of collagen injection in a group of 25 men with incontinence after either transurethral or radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: The overall results in this series were disappointing. Only 2 patients (8%) achieved significant improvement with this treatment. Eight patients (32%) experienced minimal improvement in symptoms, and 15 (60%) remained incontinent with no improvement in symptoms after collagen injection. The number of injection procedures and volume of collagen material implanted did not correlate with clinical outcome. Five patients (20%) have subsequently required placement of an artificial urinary sphincter to control their incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that transurethral injection of glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine collagen has a limited role in the management of urinary incontinence in adult men after prostatectomy.