Temporal course of vascular healing and neoatherosclerosis after implantation of durable- or biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents.

Aims: Delayed healing and endothelial dysfunction may occur with drug-eluting stents (DES), promoting accelerated infiltration of lipids in the neointima and development of neoatherosclerosis (NA). Pathology data suggest durable polymer (DP) of DES to play a major role in this process. Whether biodegradable polymer (BP) may address these issues is uncertain. We compared in vivo vessel healing and NA of current generation BP- or DP-DES using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessments. Methods and results: Ninety patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized 1:1 to BP everolimus-eluting stents (EES, Synergy) or DP zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES, Resolute Integrity). Co-primary endpoints were the maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months (powered for non-inferiority) and the percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months (powered for superiority) as measured by OCT. The maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months was 10 ± 8 mm in the BP-EES group and 11 ± 7 mm in the DP-ZES group (mean difference -1 mm; upper 97.5% confidence interval +2 mm; P = 0.05 for non-inferiority; P = 0.45 for superiority). The percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months was low and similar between BP-EES and DP-ZES groups (11.6% vs. 15.9%; P = 0.56). There was no stent thrombosis in both groups at 24 months. Conclusion: BP-EES and DP-ZES showed a similar healing response at 3 months and a low incidence of NA at 18 months. Biocompatible polymers, regardless of whether they are durable or biodegradable, may favourably impact the long-term vascular response to current-generation DES.

Mechanism of luminal patency of the self-expanding Sideguard sidebranch stent: evaluation by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: The Cappella Sideguard (CS) sidebranch stent is a self-expanding, thin-strut, nitinol device with anatomic flaring at the sidebranch ostium designed to treat bifurcation lesions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mechanism of long-term lumen patency of the novel, self-expanding CS sidebranch stent compared with a balloon-expandable stent in the main vessel. METHODS: We performed intravascular ultrasound postintervention and at follow-up in 24 CS stents and in 28 balloon-expandable drug-eluting stents deployed in the corresponding main vessel. Thirteen patients also had optical coherence tomography (OCT) at follow-up to evaluate neointimal hyperplasia and strut coverage. RESULTS: CS stent area at the sidebranch carina increased significantly from 3.8 ± 1.2 mm(2) postintervention to 4.6 ± 1.2 mm(2) at follow-up (P < 0.001), resulting in no change in lumen area (3.8 ± 1.2 mm(2) to 3.7 ± 1.2 mm(2) , P = 0.72) despite a neointimal area at follow-up of 0.9 ± 0.8 mm(2) . Volumetric changes were similar, and the distribution of neointimal hyperplasia peaked 1-2 mm distal to the carina. Change of lumen volume inversely correlated to the neointimal volume (R = -0.48, P < 0.001), but correlated positively to the change in stent volume (R = 0.52, P < 0.0001). By OCT, most CS struts were covered (100% [98.9, 100]) at the bifurcation site, whereas 61% of floating DES struts that crossed the sidebranch were covered by smooth tissue with a similar texture compared with neointima. CONCLUSION: Although neointimal hyperplasia accumulates within the CS stent mainly 1-2 mm distal to the carina, the self-expanding CS stent may be effective in maintaining an adequate patency in the sidebranch by continued stent expansion noted at follow-up.

Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary polymer-based stent delivery of paclitaxel has been shown to be effective in reducing restenosis in simple coronary lesions, but the evidence base for contemporary use in longer, more complex coronary stenoses is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS VI is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial assessing clinical and angiographic outcomes of the TAXUS Moderate Release paclitaxel-eluting stent in the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions. Four hundred forty-eight patients at 44 sites were randomized (1:1) between a drug-eluting TAXUS Express2 and an uncoated Express2 control stent. Per protocol, the 9-month follow-up included an angiographic reevaluation in all patients. The primary end point was the rate of target-vessel revascularization 9 months after the study procedure; secondary end points included the rate of target-lesion revascularization and binary restenosis at follow-up. Mean lesion length in the study was 20.6 mm, with a mean stent-covered length of 33.4 mm. Of all lesions, 55.6% were classified as complex lesions (type C of the AHA/ACC classification). At 9 months, target-vessel revascularization was 9.1% in the TAXUS group and 19.4% in the control group (P=0.0027; relative reduction, 53%). Target-lesion revascularization was reduced from 18.9% to 6.8%, respectively (P=0.0001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar in the 2 groups, 16.4% and 22.5% in TAXUS and control, respectively (P=0.12), including comparable rates for acute myocardial infarction. Binary restenosis in the stented area was reduced from 32.9% in the control group to 9.1% in the TAXUS patients (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The finding that the TAXUS Moderate Release stent system is safe and effective in the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions provides the evidence base for the more widespread use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice.

Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) for drug-eluting stents is unknown. We sought to prospectively investigate the incidence and extent of ISA after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with bare metal stents (BMS) and survey the clinical significance of ISA over a period of 12 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy included patients who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6 months (BMS, 240 patients; SR, 113; MR, 116). The qualitative and quantitative analyses of ISA were performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. More than half of the instances of ISA observed after the procedure resolved at 6 months in all groups. No difference in the incidence of late-acquired ISA was observed among the 3 groups (BMS, 5.4%; SR, 8.0%; MR, 9.5%; P=0.306), with a similar ISA volume (BMS, 11.4 mm3; SR, 21.7 mm3; MR, 8.5 mm3; P=0.18). Late-acquired ISA was the result of an increase of vessel area without change in plaque behind the stent. Predictive factors of late-acquired ISA were lesion length, unstable angina, and absence of diabetes. No stent thrombosis occurred in the patients diagnosed with ISA over a period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and extent of late-acquired ISA are comparable in paclitaxel-eluting stents and BMS. ISA is a pure IVUS finding without clinical repercussions.

Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial).

We determined the outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The prognosis after primary PCI in STEMI has been extensively studied and defined. Outcomes of patients who undergo primary PCI for NSTEMI are less well established. In total, 2,082 patients with ongoing chest pain for > 30 minutes consistent with acute MI were randomized to balloon angioplasty versus stenting, each with/without abciximab. Of 1,964 patients, STEMI was present in 1,725 (87.8%) and NSTEMI in 239 (12.2%). Compared with STEMI, those with NSTEMI were more likely to have delayed time-to-hospital arrival (2.4 vs 1.8 hours, p = 0.0002) and increased door-to-balloon time (3.2 vs 1.9 hours, p < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow at baseline (37.3% vs 19.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher ejection fraction (58.7% vs 55.8%, p = 0.001), but similar rates of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. At 1 year, patients with NTEMI had similar mortality (3.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.40) but higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (24.0% vs 16.6%, p = 0.007) that was driven by more frequent ischemic target vessel revascularization (21.8% vs 11.9%, p <0.0001). In conclusion, patients with acute MI without STE who are treated with primary PCI have marked delays to treatment, similar late mortality, and increased rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization compared with patients with STEMI, despite more favorable angiographic features at presentation and similar reperfusion success. The adverse prognosis of patients with NSTEMI should be recognized and efforts made to decrease reperfusion times.

Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical studies demonstrated the feasibility of local paclitaxel delivery in reducing restenosis after treatment of de novo coronary lesions in small patient populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of 536 patients at 38 medical centers evaluating slow-release (SR) and moderate-release (MR) formulations of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS) for revascularization of single, primary lesions in native coronary arteries. Cohort I compared TAXUS-SR with control stents, and Cohort II compared TAXUS-MR with a second control group. The primary end point was 6-month percent in-stent net volume obstruction measured by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary end points were 6-month angiographic restenosis and 6- and 12-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. At 6 months, percent net volume obstruction within the stent was significantly lower for TAXUS stents (7.9% SR and 7.8% MR) than for respective controls (23.2% and 20.5%; P<0.0001 for both). This corresponded with a reduction in angiographic restenosis from 17.9% to 2.3% in the SR cohort (P<0.0001) and from 20.2% to 4.7% in the MR cohort (P=0.0002). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months was significantly lower (P=0.0192) in the TAXUS-SR (10.9%) and TAXUS-MR (9.9%) groups than in controls (22.0% and 21.4%, respectively), predominantly because of a significant reduction in repeat revascularization of the target lesion in TAXUS-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a bare metal stent, paclitaxel-eluting stents reduced in-stent neointimal formation and restenosis and improved 12-month clinical outcome of patients with single de novo coronary lesions.

Chronic arterial responses to polymer-controlled paclitaxel-eluting stents: comparison with bare metal stents by serial intravascular ultrasound analyses: data from the randomized TAXUS-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Polymer-controlled paclitaxel-eluting stents have shown a pronounced reduction in neointimal hyperplasia compared with bare metal stents (BMS). The aim of this substudy was to evaluate local arterial responses through the use of serial quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses in the TAXUS II trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This IVUS substudy included patients treated with one study stent who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up (BMS, 152 patients; SR, 81; MR, 81). The analyzed stented segment (15 mm) was divided into 5 subsegments in which mean vessel area (VA), stent area (SA), lumen area (LA), intrastent neointimal hyperplasia area (NIHA), and peristent area (VA-SA) were measured. NIHA was significantly reduced in SR (0.7+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001) and MR (0.6+/-0.8 mm2, P<0.001) compared with BMS (1.9+/-1.5 mm2), with no differences between the two paclitaxel-eluting release formulations. Longitudinal distribution of neointimal hyperplasia throughout the paclitaxel-eluting stent was uniform. Neointimal growth was independent of peristent area at postprocedure examination in all groups. There were progressive increases in peristent area from BMS to SR to MR (0.5+/-1.7, 1.0+/-1.8, and 1.4+/-2.0 mm2, respectively; P<0.001). The increase in peristent area was directly correlated with increases in VA. CONCLUSIONS: Both SR and MR paclitaxel-eluting stents prevent neointimal formation to the same degree compared with BMS. However, the difference in peristent remodeling suggests a release-dependent effect between SR and MR.

High-dose 7-hexanoyltaxol-eluting stent with polymer sleeves for coronary revascularization: one-year results from the SCORE randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: The Study to COmpare REstenosis Rate between QueST and QuaDDS-QP2 (SCORE) trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety and performance of 13- and 17-mm QuaDDS stents (n = 126) (Quanam Medical Corp., Santa Clara, California/Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) versus uncoated control stents (n = 140) in focal, de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: The pioneering drug-delivery QuaDDS stent used four to six acrylate polymer sleeves, each loaded with 800 microg of the paclitaxel derivative 7-hexanoyltaxol. METHODS: Clinical end points were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months post procedure. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed post procedure and at six-month follow-up. RESULTS: In the QuaDDS group, early stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (MI) rates were significantly higher, leading to premature cessation of enrollment. For the QuaDDS group, the stent thrombosis rate increased from 3.2% to 10.3% between 1 and 12 months, associated with increased non-Q-wave MI and death rates. The angiographic restenosis rate at six months was reduced from 32.7% (control) to 7.4% (p < 0.0001). However, the primary end point was not met with six-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate as well as the composite major adverse cardiac event rates (cardiac death, MI, and TVR) comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite angiographic indications of potential anti-restenotic benefit, increased rates of stent thrombosis, MI, and cardiac death associated with the QuaDDS stent show an unacceptable safety profile.

Revascularization of diabetic patients: are drug-eluting stents the solution?

Restenosis and need of repeat revascularization as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are all significantly increased after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic patients. The potential clinical benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this cohort is currently under definition. Both Cypher and Taxus stents in randomized clinical trials and real world post-approval registries appear to be effective with a substantial reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization compared to control patients. However, despite stability of target lesion revascularization obtained with DES, diabetes continues to be associated with a significant increase in MACE at mid- and long-term follow-up. These data emphasize the role of a fully integrated medical, glycemic and device treatment for optimal outcome in diabetes. In order to develop new guidelines for diabetic treatment, prospective and randomized studies comparing DES with surgical revascularization in three-vessel and/or left main disease are ongoing. Despite significant amelioration obtained with DES the diabetic population remains an unmet need, requiring further basic and clinical research.

Drug-eluting stents: caution and concerns for long-term outcome.

Recent publications on drug-eluting stents (DES) report a significant reduction in restenosis rates as compared to bare metal stents in patients mostly with single vessel disease. We have recently observed however, late stent thrombosis following CYPHER DES implantation. The patient developed a hypersensitivity reaction around stent struts limited to the polymer with aneurysmal dilatation and extensive inflammation of the arterial wall in the absence of vascular healing. This incidence promotes a cautionary view and perhaps supports the use of DES only in high-risk patients.

Through the drug-eluting stent labyrinth.

For interventional cardiologists restenosis has represented the main limit for the successful long-term treatment of coronary artery disease. The past 2 years witnessed the extraordinary results of drug-eluting stents (DES), putting this technique at the center stage. The safety and efficacy of sirolimus and paclitaxel-eluting stents have been proved in large prospective, multicenter, randomized trials (RAVEL, SIRIUS, TAXUS II). It is possible that the introduction of DES will lead to substantial changes in the therapeutic and/or the economic strategies of the treatment of ischemic coronary artery disease (increase in the complexity of patients treated, reduction in surgical indications, growing costs). Realizing the potential value of this technology will require the successful management of more complex coronary situations (for lesions and patients characteristics). Many extreme situations are still unexplored, although for some of them studies are currently in progress or already being planned.

Drug-eluting versus bare metal coronary stents: long-term human pathology. Findings from different coronary arteries in the same patient.

A 71-year-old woman underwent right coronary artery (RCA) bare metal stenting during an acute myocardial infarction. Seven months later the patient received a sirolimus-eluting stent as treatment for an 80% left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis. She remained asymptomatic until she presented with unstable angina 16 months later. Angiography demonstrated subtotal occlusion of the left obtuse marginal branch. The LAD sirolimus-eluting stent showed 0% stenosis. The RCA stent showed 30% restenosis. The left obtuse marginal branch lesion was successfully stented, but the patient suffered a fatal stroke 24 hours after the coronary intervention. At autopsy the 16-month-old LAD sirolimus-eluting stent was widely patent with a minute thrombus near the ostium of a small side branch. The stent surface appeared free of any other irregularities. Scanning light microscopy showed mild neointimal thickening. Scanning electron microscopy showed > 80% endothelialization of the stent. The 24-month-old RCA bare metal stent showed mild to moderate neointimal growth with > 90% endothelialization.

Strut coverage and vessel wall response to a new-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin biodegradable abluminal polymer: Optical Coherence Tomography Drug-Eluting Stent Investigation (OCTDESI).

BACKGROUND: Polymer-coated drug-eluting stents are effective in preventing restenosis but have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. It is unknown whether paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) with minimal biodegradable abluminal coating enhances strut coverage while preventing neointimal hyperplasia. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a primary imaging modality, we assessed the proportion of uncovered struts at 6-month follow-up in PES coated with durable versus ultrathin (<1 microm) biodegradable abluminal polymers. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pilot trial, 60 patients with de novo lesions (< or =25 mm) in native coronary vessels were randomly assigned to receive either TAXUS Liberté PES or JACTAX PES, a Liberté stent with polymer deposited abluminally as microdots (JACTAX HD: 9.2 microg each of polymer and paclitaxel per 16-mm stent; JACTAX LD: 5 microg each). OCT follow-up occurred at 6 months with clinical follow-up through 1 year. The primary end point was percent uncovered struts by OCT. An independent core laboratory blinded to stent assignment analyzed images. The 6-month rate of uncovered struts per patient was 5.3+/-14.7% for TAXUS Liberté, 7.0+/-12.2% for JACTAX HD, and 4.6+/-7.3% for JACTAX LD (P=0.81); percent malapposed struts was 1.4+/-4.4%, 0.8+/-1.9%, and 1.1+/-2.8%, respectively (P=0.86). Strut-level intimal thickness was 0.20+/-0.10, 0.22+/-0.15, and 0.24+/-0.15 mm (P=0.64); percent volume obstruction by OCT was 22.2+/-12.8, 22.5+/-16.2, and 25.8+/-15.2 (P=0.69). There were no deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or stent thromboses through 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: JACTAX PES with an ultrathin microdot biodegradable abluminal polymer did not result in improved strut coverage at 6 months compared with TAXUS Liberté. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00776204.

TAXUS VI final 5-year results: a multicentre, randomised trial comparing polymer-based moderate-release paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent for treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions.

AIMS: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS moderate-release (MR) investigation-only stent for the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS VI was a prospective, double-blind, multicentre trial wherein 446 patients were randomised between a TAXUS Express MR stent and an uncoated Express Control stent. At 5-years, the overall rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was similar in the two groups at 27.8% in control and 31.3% in TAXUS (P = 0.61), including similar rates for stent thrombosis. The target vessel revascularisation (TVR) rate was 23.7% in control and 22.2% in TAXUS (P = 0.45) with a non-target lesion revascularisation (non-TLR) rate of 5.1% in control and 10.9% in TAXUS (P = 0.0274) and a TLR rate of 21.4% in control and 14.6% in TAXUS (relative reduction, 32%; P = 0.0325). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that the TLR benefit of TAXUS was preserved among study groups including small vessels, long lesions and patients receiving multiple overlapping stents. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of complex coronary lesions with the TAXUS MR stent demonstrated similar MACE, similar TVR, and reduced TLR rates compared with control through five years. Based on these positive results, the aetiology of increased non-TLR TVR rate in TAXUS remains unclear.

TAXUS VI 2-year follow-up: randomized comparison of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting with bare metal stents for treatment of long, complex lesions.

AIMS: Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have shown to be effective in reducing in-stent restenosis, although data relating to long-term experience in treating more complex lesion subsets are limited. In order to assess the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of the polymer-based moderate release (MR) paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS MR stent in treatment of complex lesion subsets, we evaluated the 2-year follow-up of TAXUS VI. METHOD AND RESULTS: TAXUS VI was a randomized multi-centre study enrolling 446 patients with complex lesions, including small vessels in 28% of patients and a mean lesion length of 20.6 mm. At 9-month follow-up, the use of the TAXUS MR stent was highly effective, resulting in a significant 53% reduction of the target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate (primary endpoint) from 19.4% in the control group to 9.1% in the TAXUS group (P = 0.0027). Clinical follow-up at 2 years post-stenting was available in 98.6% of the TAXUS group and 95.6% of the control group. The incidence of major adverse cardiac event at 1- and 2-year follow-up was 16.4% and 21.3% in the TAXUS group when compared with 22.5 and 25.1% in the control group, respectively. A significant difference in TVR was maintained at 2-year follow-up (TAXUS 13.9%; control 21.9%; P = 0.0335). The cumulative 1- and 2-year survival rates free from TVR were, respectively, 91.7 and 90.3% in the TAXUS group vs. 80.0 and 79.0% in the control group (log-rank P < 0.001). The number of patients required to be treated with a TAXUS stent to prevent one re-percutaneous coronary intervention at 2 years was 12.5. CONCLUSION: Treatment of complex coronary lesions with the polymer-based MR paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS MR stent is associated with a sustained clinical benefit and low rates of TVR up to 2 years after device implantation.

Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.

The NUGGET study: NIR ultra gold-gilded equivalency trial.

This study should clarify whether the gold-coated NIROYAL stent is equivalent to the stainless steel NIR stent. Patients were randomized to either NIR stent (n = 298) or a NIROYAL stent (n = 305). The primary endpoint was the minimum lumen diameter of the target lesion at 6 months postprocedure. Secondary endpoints focused on clinical events. At 30 days, adverse events were similar in both groups. At 6 months, the minimal lumen diameter was 1.83/1.64 mm (P < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.08-0.30) and the angiographic restenosis rate was 20.6%/37.7% (P < 0.001; 95% CI = -24.7 to -9.3) for NIR/NIROYAL. The 6-month MACE rates were NIR 7.4% and NIROYAL 10.5% (95% CI = -7.7 to 1.4). Compared to stainless steel stent, the NIROYAL stent demonstrated a smaller minimal lumen diameter, a higher late loss (i.e., higher neointimal hyperplasia in spite of a significantly better initial gain), with higher restenosis and similar MACE rates at 6 months.