Detection of Frank's sign in the dental setting: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In 1973, Saunders T. Frank described the diagonal earlobe crease (DELC) as a potential marker of cardiovascular disease. However, this anatomical finding is not routinely examined. The aim of this study was to assess the presence of this crease in the general population attending a dental setting and describe its anatomical variations to be able to categorize it as a physical sign. METHODOLOGY: A study group of 1050 white adults were selected, as participants in the framework of the "A Estrada Study of Glycation and Inflammation" (AEGIS), a cross-sectional, population-based descriptive study of a representative sample of the general adult population of the municipality of A Estrada (Pontevedra, Spain). Each participant's age, sex, and preferred head position when sleeping were recorded. Both earlobes were visually inspected and the anatomical variables of the crease were recorded (unilateral or bilateral, length, depth, and presence of secondary creases). The relationship between the study variables was analyzed using the chi-squared test, Student's t-test, the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the nonparametric tests of Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis. RESULTS: The DELC was observed in 65.2% of the participants. In 71.5% of the cases, the sign was complete (occupying the space from the tragus to the posterior edge of the earlobe); in 56.9% of the cases, the sign was bilateral; in 45.1% of the cases it was deep; and in the 43.6% of the cases, accessory creases were identified. Neither sex nor the habitual head position when sleeping were related to the prevalence or characteristics of the DELC. The prevalence, extent and depth of Frank's sign increased significantly with age (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the DELC increases significantly with age, and its morphological characteristics are accentuated. This finding, therefore, gains special relevance as a marker of potential cardiovascular disease when observed in young adults.

Influence of loading and drilling on marginal bone loss around implants with a Dynamic Bone Management design: A single-blind, randomised, 12-month clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate marginal bone loss 6 and 12 months after prosthetic loading of implants with Dynamic Bone Management (Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) through the implementation of different drilling protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A balanced, randomised, single-blind clinical trial was conducted with four parallel experimental arms: immediate loading and under-drilling, immediate loading and complete drilling, early loading and under-drilling, and early loading and complete drilling. Forty-four implants with a Dynamic Bone Management design and with a diameter of 3.75 mm and a length of 10.00 mm were placed in healed mature bone (more than 6 months post-extraction). RESULTS: The mean primary stability achieved was 60.6 ± 12.2 implant stability quotient, with a range from 21 to 75, and no differences were observed when considering the drilling protocol used, bone type or location. Early loading resulted in a loss of 0.728 mm (standard error 0.212; 95% confidence interval 1.134 to -0.325; t value -3.440), whereas immediate loading did not result in any bone loss. When the interaction between the loading and drilling protocols was studied, performing the complete drilling protocol in conjunction with early implant loading was found to result in lower marginal bone loss, with a marginal bone gain effect of 0.814 mm (standard error 0.283; 95% confidence interval -0.274 to 1.353; t value 2.880). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the complete drilling protocol in conjunction with early implant loading resulted in the lowest marginal bone loss at 12 months.

Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction.

The ability to predict the surgical difficulty of lower third molar extraction facilitates the design of treatment plans by minimizing complications and improving the preparation of patients and assistants in terms of the postoperative management of inflammation and pain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the value of panoramic radiographs in predicting lower third molar extraction difficulty and technique and to determine if the experience of the practitioner had any influence on this predictive ability. Fourteen dental practitioners with varying levels of experience evaluate the difficulty of lower third molar extraction in a group of patients using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a modified version of a surgical difficulty scale. The results were then compared to postoperative scores calculated using the same scale. A tendency to underestimate the difficulty of procedures that was more pronounced in observers with greater levels of experience was observed. A low level of agreement between preoperative and postoperative evaluations using the surgical difficulty scale as well as an association between difficulty assessed preoperatively using the VAS and difficulty assessed postoperatively using the surgical difficulty scale was also found. The use of panoramic radiographs does not allow practitioners to accurately predict lower third molar extraction difficulty and technique, regardless of their level of experience.

Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars.

We report a consecutive series of 105 extractions of impacted lower third molars, in each of which operative difficulty was predicted preoperatively using the Pederson scale (radiographic appearance of the anatomical position of the lower third molar), and postoperative difficulty was scored with a modified version of the Parant scale (operative manoeuvres that were needed for extraction of the third molar). Preoperative classification as "difficult" on the Pederson scale was not an accurate predictor of true difficulty (postoperative classification as "difficult" on the modified Parant scale). There was no significant association between the Pederson score and duration of operation, but high Parant scores were significantly associated with longer operations. We suggest that scales for the prediction of operative difficulty in the extraction of impacted lower third molars should take into account factors other than the anatomical position of the tooth.

Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of surgical difficulty on postoperative pain after extraction of mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed of 139 patients who underwent a total of 157 mandibular third molar extractions. For evaluation of surgical difficulty, a 4-class scale was completed after surgery: I, extraction with forceps only; II, extraction requiring osteotomy; III, extraction requiring osteotomy and coronal section; IV, complex extraction (root section). The duration of surgery was also recorded. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale that each patient completed daily until day 6 postsurgery, at which time the sutures were removed. RESULTS: A statistically significant relationship was observed between surgical difficulty (as rated on the scale) and postoperative pain. Longer interventions generally produced more pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pain after extraction of a mandibular third molar increases with increased surgical difficulty and duration of the intervention.