Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
J Clin Periodontol
; 51(4): 499-509, 2024 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296249
2.
Clinical outcomes following atrophic alveolar ridge reconstruction using collagenated xenogeneic bone block or autogenous bone block: One-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical.
J Clin Periodontol
; 51(1): 14-23, 2024 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846853
3.
Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery.
Periodontol 2000
; 91(1): 89-112, 2023 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906928
4.
Soft-tissue dimensional change following guided bone regeneration on peri-implant defects using soft-type block or particulate bone substitutes: 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
J Clin Periodontol
; 50(2): 147-157, 2023 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36330670
5.
13-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study on zirconia and titanium abutments.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 34(9): 911-919, 2023 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37340530
6.
Radiographic outcomes of ridge reconstruction with autogenous bone block versus collagenated xenogeneic bone block: A randomized clinical trial.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 34(8): 863-871, 2023 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37309738
7.
Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 34(9): 999-1013, 2023 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37403575
8.
Tissue integration and biodegradation of soft tissue substitutes with and without compression: an experimental study in the rat.
Clin Oral Investig
; 27(1): 313-328, 2023 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36255492
9.
Randomized controlled pilot study assessing efficacy, efficiency, and patient-reported outcomes measures of chairside and labside single-tooth restorations.
J Esthet Restor Dent
; 35(1): 74-83, 2023 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35421283
10.
Strength of implant-supported lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations after thermomechanical aging.
Int J Comput Dent
; 26(3): 237-245, 2023 Sep 26.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36632986
11.
Management and prevention of soft tissue complications in implant dentistry.
Periodontol 2000
; 88(1): 116-129, 2022 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103320
12.
Anterior implant restorations with a convex emergence profile increase the frequency of recession: 12-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
J Clin Periodontol
; 49(11): 1145-1157, 2022 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817419
13.
Dimensional ridge changes in conjunction with four implant timing protocols and two types of soft tissue grafts: A pilot pre-clinical study.
J Clin Periodontol
; 49(4): 401-411, 2022 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35066942
14.
Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes.
J Clin Periodontol
; 49(5): 480-495, 2022 05.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35191065
15.
Autogenous bone block versus collagenated xenogeneic bone block in the reconstruction of the atrophic alveolar ridge: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
J Clin Periodontol
; 49(11): 1158-1168, 2022 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35833539
16.
Peri-implant tissue changes at sites treated with alveolar ridge preservation in the aesthetic zone: Twenty-two months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
J Clin Periodontol
; 49(1): 39-47, 2022 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34708422
17.
Informative title: Guided bone regeneration with and without rhBMP-2: 17-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 33(3): 302-312, 2022 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958487
18.
Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 33(7): 745-756, 2022 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570366
19.
Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 33(5): 537-547, 2022 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35224774
20.
Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Clin Oral Implants Res
; 33(4): 353-361, 2022 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35051314