Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 130(6): 674-683, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660885

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane-Urolastic® (PDMS-U) compared with mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 1-year follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective, two-arm cohort study with 2-year follow-up. SETTING: International multicentre. POPULATION: Women with moderate to severe SUI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was subjective cure (Patient Global Impression of Improvement). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: objective cure (negative cough stress test), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), complications and re-interventions. Cost-effectiveness outcomes: total costs, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) using IIQ7-scores (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-5L, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and monetary benefit (adjusted for baseline confounders). RESULTS: In all, 131 PDMS-U and 153 MUS surgery patients were treated. Subjective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were, respectively: 101/112 (90%) versus 40/87 (46%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR; for age, body mass index [BMI], severity, type of urinary incontinence and previous SUI procedure) was 4.9. Objective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were respectively: 98/109 (90%) versus 58/92 (63%), aOR 5.4. Average total costs for PDMS-U and MUS surgery were €3567 and €6688. ICER for MUS surgery cost €15 598 per IIQ QALY and €37 408 per EQ-5D-5L QALY. With a willingness to pay (WTP) of €25 000, MUS has a 84% chance of being cost-effective using IIQ, whereas PDMS-U has a 99% chance of being cost-effective using EQ-5D-5L. CONCLUSION: MUS surgery is more cost-effective in realising improved disease-specific quality of life (QoL), while PDMS-U is more cost-effective in realising improved generic QoL.


Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Feminino , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Dimetilpolisiloxanos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Urol Int ; 99(1): 91-97, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28152525

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is often treated surgically. Urethral bulking agents are a minimally invasive alternative, especially in patients suffering from intrinsic sphincter deficiency, but often with limited long-term efficacy. Urolastic® is a non-deformable, non-resorbable silicone elastomer that is used as an injectable. Its properties might result in a more durable response after injection. If this durability factor can be combined with a low complication rate, this can become a useful treatment option. We therefore assessed the subjective improvement and safety after treatment with Urolastic®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2 Dutch hospitals, 65 patients were treated with Urolastic®. The subjective improvement was assessed and the medical charts were reviewed for complications that appeared during the follow-up period. The complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: We found that 76-88% of the patients showed subjective improvement at 12-25 months follow-up. The rate of improvement experienced was 50-70%. The rate of complications classified as Clavien-Dindo >II was 24-33%. The 12 patients with 75-100% subjective improvement after 2 months, showed 85% improvement after a median of 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: With careful patient selection, Urolastic® seems to be a safe, durable and effective treatment option for female SUI.


Assuntos
Dimetilpolisiloxanos/administração & dosagem , Titânio/administração & dosagem , Uretra/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Satisfação do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Titânio/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 19(2): 145-157, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570362

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic multisystem disorder that causes a wide variety of motor and non-motor symptoms. Over time, the progressive nature of the disease increases the risk of complications such as falls and loss of independence, having a profound impact on quality of life. The complexity and heterogeneity of symptoms therefore warrant a holistic, multidisciplinary approach. Specific healthcare professionals, e.g. the movement disorders neurologist and the PD nurse specialist, are considered essential members of this multidisciplinary team. However, with our increasing knowledge about different aspects of the disease, other disciplines are also being recognized as important contributors to the healthcare team. Areas covered: The authors describe a selection of these relatively newly-recognized disciplines, including the specialist in vascular medicine, gastroenterologist, pulmonologist, neuro-ophthalmologist, urologist, geriatrician/elderly care physician, palliative care specialist and the dentist. Furthermore, they share the view of a person with PD on how patients and caregivers should be involved in the multidisciplinary team. Finally, they have included a perspective on the new role of the movement disorder neurologist, with care delivery via 'tele-neurology'. Expert commentary: Increased awareness about the potential role of these 'new' professionals will further improve disease management and quality of life of PD patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos
5.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 24(6): 392-398, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953572

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stress urinary incontinence in women is a common problem that significantly impacts quality of life. Periurethral injection of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) is a simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective treatment. However, complications associated with UBA are often underappreciated. Objective of this review was to get a complete overview of all published complications of UBA. METHODS: An extensive search of the scientific literature was conducted to quantitatively summarize the complications and their treatments of 8 UBAs. A total of 117 articles (original articles and case reports) were included in the final analysis. Complication incidence, treatment incidence, and follow-up time were extracted when mentioned. Statistical analysis of complication incidence of each UBA was calculated if possible. RESULTS: A total of 2095 complications in 6462 treated patients were reported in 79 studies. Sixty-seven (3%) were considered serious implying operative correction (Clavien grade III); of these, 46 (69%) required incision and drainage, and 21 (31%) required a more invasive procedure. In 38 case reports and small case series, 49 patients were treated for 110 complications. Of these 110 complications, 41 (37%) can be classified as Clavien grade III. CONCLUSIONS: This extensive review shows that various UBAs have different complication rates, with certain UBAs being more prone to serious complications. Based on available publications, most UBAs have a good safety profile, with low complication rates. However, although the majority of UBA complications are transient and require no or noninvasive treatment, serious complications may require invasive intervention and treatment.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/terapia , Agentes Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Uretra
6.
Eur Urol ; 72(3): 424-431, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28413126

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Surgical nonautologous meshes have been used for several decades to repair abdominal wall herniae. Implantable materials have been adopted for the treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). OBJECTIVE: A consensus review of existing data based on published meta-analyses and reviews. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This document summarises the deliberations of a consensus group meeting convened by the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the European Urogynecological Association, to explore the current evidence relating to the use of polypropylene (PP) materials used for the treatment of SUI and POP, with reference to the 2016 EAU guidelines (European Association of Urology 2016), the European Commission's SCENIHR report on the use of surgical meshes (SCENIHR 2015), other available high-quality evidence, guidelines, and national recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Current data suggest that the use of nonautologous durable materials in surgery has well-established benefits but significant risks, which are specific to the condition and location they are used for. Various graft-related complications have been described-such as infection, chronic pain including dyspareunia, exposure in the vagina, shrinkage, erosion into other organs of xenografts, synthetic PP tapes (used in SUI), and meshes (used in POP)-which differ from the complications seen with abdominal herniae. CONCLUSIONS: When considering surgery for SUI, it is essential to evaluate the available options, which may include synthetic midurethral slings (MUSs) using PP tapes, bulking agents, colposuspension, and autologous sling surgery. The use of synthetic MUSs for surgical treatment of SUI in both male and female patients has good efficacy and acceptable morbidity. Synthetic mesh for POP should be used only in complex cases with recurrent prolapse in the same compartment and restricted to those surgeons with appropriate training who are working in multidisciplinary referral centres. PATIENT SUMMARY: Synthetic slings can be safely used in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence in both male and female patients. Patients need to be aware of the alternative therapy and potential risks and complications of this therapy. Synthetic mesh for treating prolapse should be used only in complex cases with recurrent prolapse in specialist referral centres.


Assuntos
Ginecologia/normas , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Polipropilenos/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Slings Suburetrais/normas , Telas Cirúrgicas/normas , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Urologia/normas , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/diagnóstico , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/instrumentação
7.
Drugs Aging ; 29(2): 119-31, 2012 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22276958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine in older and younger subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. The effect of long-term fesoterodine treatment in different age groups has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the impact of age on the safety, tolerability and efficacy of long-term treatment with fesoterodine 8 mg in subjects with OAB syndrome. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of two identically designed open-label extensions of 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The setting was urology and general practice offices. Subjects who participated in the 12-week, double-blind studies and opted to continue long-term, open-label treatment with fesoterodine were included. Subjects were initiated on fesoterodine 8 mg/day at open-label baseline. After 1 month, subjects could elect dose reduction to 4 mg/day and subsequent re-escalation to 8 mg; each was permitted once annually. Maximal duration of open-label treatment ranged from 24 to 36 months. Discontinuations, subject-reported treatment tolerance, and efficacy (3-day diaries) were assessed at open-label baseline and months 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24. RESULTS: A total of 890 subjects were treated (age <45 years, n = 140; 45-64 years, n = 444; 65-74 years, n = 208; ≥75 years, n = 98); 49% continued treatment for ≥ 24 months (age <45 years, 43%; 45-64 years, 54%; 65-74 years, 50%; ≥75 years, 37%). Seventy-seven percent of subjects remained on fesoterodine 8 mg throughout treatment; this rate was highest among subjects aged ≥75 years (age <45 years, 72%; 45-64 years, 77%; 65-74 years, 73%; ≥75 years, 87%). Approximately 80% of continuing subjects were receiving fesoterodine 8 mg at each visit after open-label baseline up to 36 months. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed in any age group. Most subjects reported 'good' or 'excellent' treatment tolerance throughout the study (age <45 years, ≥90%; 45-64 years, ≥93%; 65-74 years, ≥85%; ≥75 years, ≥86%). Dry mouth, the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event, was lowest among subjects aged ≥75 years (age <45 years, 31%; 45-64 years, 30%; 65-74 years, 32%; ≥75 years, 26%). Rates of discontinuation due to dry mouth were low in all age groups. Significant improvements in all diary variables, including urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours, micturitions per 24 hours, urgency episodes per 24 hours, and mean voided volume per micturition, observed between double-blind baseline and open-label baseline were sustained or increased during open-label treatment in the overall population and all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term fesoterodine (administered primarily as 8 mg) was well tolerated and associated with sustained improvements in OAB symptoms, irrespective of age.


Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Segurança , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA