Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BJOG ; 130(6): 674-683, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660885

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane-Urolastic® (PDMS-U) compared with mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 1-year follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective, two-arm cohort study with 2-year follow-up. SETTING: International multicentre. POPULATION: Women with moderate to severe SUI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was subjective cure (Patient Global Impression of Improvement). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: objective cure (negative cough stress test), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), complications and re-interventions. Cost-effectiveness outcomes: total costs, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) using IIQ7-scores (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-5L, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and monetary benefit (adjusted for baseline confounders). RESULTS: In all, 131 PDMS-U and 153 MUS surgery patients were treated. Subjective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were, respectively: 101/112 (90%) versus 40/87 (46%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR; for age, body mass index [BMI], severity, type of urinary incontinence and previous SUI procedure) was 4.9. Objective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were respectively: 98/109 (90%) versus 58/92 (63%), aOR 5.4. Average total costs for PDMS-U and MUS surgery were €3567 and €6688. ICER for MUS surgery cost €15 598 per IIQ QALY and €37 408 per EQ-5D-5L QALY. With a willingness to pay (WTP) of €25 000, MUS has a 84% chance of being cost-effective using IIQ, whereas PDMS-U has a 99% chance of being cost-effective using EQ-5D-5L. CONCLUSION: MUS surgery is more cost-effective in realising improved disease-specific quality of life (QoL), while PDMS-U is more cost-effective in realising improved generic QoL.


Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Feminino , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Dimetilpolisiloxanos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Urol Int ; 99(1): 91-97, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28152525

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is often treated surgically. Urethral bulking agents are a minimally invasive alternative, especially in patients suffering from intrinsic sphincter deficiency, but often with limited long-term efficacy. Urolastic® is a non-deformable, non-resorbable silicone elastomer that is used as an injectable. Its properties might result in a more durable response after injection. If this durability factor can be combined with a low complication rate, this can become a useful treatment option. We therefore assessed the subjective improvement and safety after treatment with Urolastic®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2 Dutch hospitals, 65 patients were treated with Urolastic®. The subjective improvement was assessed and the medical charts were reviewed for complications that appeared during the follow-up period. The complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: We found that 76-88% of the patients showed subjective improvement at 12-25 months follow-up. The rate of improvement experienced was 50-70%. The rate of complications classified as Clavien-Dindo >II was 24-33%. The 12 patients with 75-100% subjective improvement after 2 months, showed 85% improvement after a median of 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: With careful patient selection, Urolastic® seems to be a safe, durable and effective treatment option for female SUI.


Assuntos
Dimetilpolisiloxanos/administração & dosagem , Titânio/administração & dosagem , Uretra/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Satisfação do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Titânio/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 24(6): 392-398, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953572

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stress urinary incontinence in women is a common problem that significantly impacts quality of life. Periurethral injection of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) is a simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective treatment. However, complications associated with UBA are often underappreciated. Objective of this review was to get a complete overview of all published complications of UBA. METHODS: An extensive search of the scientific literature was conducted to quantitatively summarize the complications and their treatments of 8 UBAs. A total of 117 articles (original articles and case reports) were included in the final analysis. Complication incidence, treatment incidence, and follow-up time were extracted when mentioned. Statistical analysis of complication incidence of each UBA was calculated if possible. RESULTS: A total of 2095 complications in 6462 treated patients were reported in 79 studies. Sixty-seven (3%) were considered serious implying operative correction (Clavien grade III); of these, 46 (69%) required incision and drainage, and 21 (31%) required a more invasive procedure. In 38 case reports and small case series, 49 patients were treated for 110 complications. Of these 110 complications, 41 (37%) can be classified as Clavien grade III. CONCLUSIONS: This extensive review shows that various UBAs have different complication rates, with certain UBAs being more prone to serious complications. Based on available publications, most UBAs have a good safety profile, with low complication rates. However, although the majority of UBA complications are transient and require no or noninvasive treatment, serious complications may require invasive intervention and treatment.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/terapia , Agentes Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Uretra
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA