Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 136(12): 1102-1113, 2017 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28729250

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are a predominant revascularization therapy for symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease. Because of the differences in excipients, paclitaxel dose, and coating morphologies, varying clinical outcomes have been observed with different DCBs. We report the results of 2 studies investigating the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes of a new DCB to treat femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: In the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Study (Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, U.S. Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery or Popliteal Lesions With A Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon), 300 symptomatic patients (Rutherford class 2-4) were randomly assigned to DCB (n=200) or standard angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]) (n=100). The primary safety end point was freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days, and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months. The primary effectiveness end point was primary patency through 12 months. In the ILLUMENATE PK study (Pharmacokinetic Study of the Stellarex Drug-Coated Angioplasty Balloon), paclitaxel plasma concentrations were measured after last DCB deployment and at prespecified times (at 1, 4, 24 hours and at 7 and 14 days postprocedure) until no longer detectable. RESULTS: In the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Study, baseline characteristics were similar between groups: 50% had diabetes mellitus, 41% were women, mean lesion length was 8.3 cm, and 44% were severely calcified. The primary safety end point was met (92.1% for DCB versus 83.2% for PTA, P=0.025 for superiority) and the primary patency rate was significantly higher with DCB (76.3% for DCB versus 57.6% for PTA, P=0.003). Primary patency per Kaplan-Meier estimates at day 365 was 82.3% for DCB versus 70.9% for PTA (P=0.002). The rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the DCB cohort (7.9% versus 16.8%, P=0.023). Improvements in ankle-brachial index, Rutherford class, and quality of life were comparable, but the PTA cohort required twice as many revascularizations. Pharmacokinetic outcomes showed that all patients had detectable paclitaxel levels after DCB deployment that declined within the first hour (54.4±116.9 ng/mL to 1.4±1.0 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate superior safety and effectiveness of the Stellarex DCB in comparison with PTA, and plasma levels of paclitaxel fall to low levels within 1 hour. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01858428 and NCT01912937.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/química , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/sangue , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/farmacocinética , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/farmacologia , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/patologia , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/sangue , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Paclitaxel/farmacologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(3): 497-504, 2018 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086462

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and performance of Stellarex Drug-coated balloon (DCB). BACKGROUND: DCB coatings differ in excipients, paclitaxel dose, and coating morphologies. Due to these differences, a class effect with DCBs has not been demonstrated. Consequently, each DCB needs to be evaluated independently based on its own clinical study results. METHODS: The ILLUMENATE Global Study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Patients with intermittent claudication or ischemic rest pain due to superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) were treated with the Stellarex DCB. The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency, defined as freedom from restenosis with peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.5 or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days postprocedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and CD-TLR through 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 417 lesions were treated in 371 patients. The mean lesion length was 7.5 ± 5.3 cm, 40.8% of lesions were severely calcified per core laboratory fluoroscopy criteria and 31.3% were total occlusions. Primary patency by independent duplex core lab evaluation was 81.4% and the freedom from CD-TLR was 94.8% day 365 per Kaplan-Meier estimate. The majority of patients experienced improvements in their Rutherford classification (90.3%) and walking impairment questionnaire score (83.6%) at 12 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated previous positive findings and confirms the strong safety profile and effectiveness outcomes.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Artéria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Artéria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 27(2): 194-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26830936

RESUMO

The successful transcatheter treatment of a type IA endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm sealing with the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system (Endologix Inc, Irvine, California) using proximal covered stent extension and transarterial N-butyl cyanoacrylate sac embolization is described. Three patients were treated using the same technique with a mean interval between the index procedure and reintervention of 9.3 months (range, 3-15 mo). No complications or endoleaks were seen on follow-up imaging. The mean follow-up time after reintervention was 10.3 months (range, 7-13 mo).


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Embucrilato/uso terapêutico , Endoleak/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia Digital , Endoleak/classificação , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA