Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Peristomal wound infection is a common complication in patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The main reason for peristomal infection might be the oral microbes coating the gastrostomy tube during implantation. Povidone-iodine solution can be applied for skin and oral decontamination. We designed a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a Betadine® (povidone-iodine) coated gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized to Betadine and control groups (25 patients in each group) from April 2014 to August 2021 at a tertiary medical center. All patients received the pull method for PEG implantation using a 24-french gastrostomy tube. The primary endpoint was peristomal wound infection rate 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Changes in Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) and C-Reative protein (Delta CRP) at 24 h after PEG were higher in the control group than in the Betadine group (N/L ratio, 3.1 vs. 1.2, p = 0.047; CRP, 2.68 vs.1.16, p = 0.009). The two groups did not differ in post-PEG fever, peristomal infection, pneumonia, or all-cause infection. Delta CRP could predict peristomal infection and all-cause infection within 2 weeks (AUROC 0.712 vs. 0.748; p = 0.039 vs. 0.008). The best cut-off-point of Delta CRP for the diagnosis of peristomal wound infection was 3 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The betadine coating gastrostomy tube method could not reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CRP elevation of less than 3 mg/dl may be used to exclude the potential peristomal wound infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04249570 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04249570 ).

Virological and immunological predictors of long term outcomes of peginterferon alfa-2a therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Predictors of long-term outcomes of peginterferon (PegIFN) therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of virological and immunological biomarkers and outcomes of PegIFN for CHB. METHODS: 57 HBeAg-negative CHB patients receiving 48 weeks of PegIFN therapy were prospectively followed for a median period of 5.3 years after the end of treatment (EOT). Serum CXCL9 and IP-10 levels were measured. Flow cytometry analysis for T cell subsets was performed in 23 patients. Factors associated with long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of virological relapse, clinical relapse and HBsAg loss at year 7 were 18.1%, 0%, 31.6%, respectively, in patients with sustained off-treatment virological response (SVR), and 100%, 67.4%, 6.7%, respectively, in patients without SVR. By multivariate analysis, baseline CXCL9 > 80 pg/mL (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.418, p = 0.018) and on-treatment HBsAg declines were associated with a lower risk of virological relapse. Non-SVR was the only predictor of clinical relapse. CXCL9 >200 pg/mL (HR = 8.154, p = 0.038) and HBsAg <750 IU/mL (HR = 10.507, p = 0.036) were baseline predictors of HBsAg loss, while HBsAg decline >1 log at EOT (HR = 23.296, p = 0.005) was the on-treatment predictor of HBsAg loss. In subgroup patients with available PBMC, populations of T cell subsets correlated with virological and clinical relapses in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Baseline serum CXCL9 and HBsAg levels could predict HBsAg loss after PegIFN therapy for HBeAg-negative CHB. Combining virological and immunological biomarkers could predict long-term outcomes of PegIFN therapy for HBeAg-negative CHB.

Incidence and Predictors of HBsAg Loss After Peginterferon Therapy in HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicenter, Long-term Follow-up Study.

Background: The long-term incidence and factors associated with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving peginterferon is rarely reported. Methods: From 2004 to 2016, 233 HBeAg-negative CHB patients who completed 48 weeks of peginterferon treatment from 3 medical centers in Taiwan were retrospectively enrolled. Results: During a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 27 cases achieved HBsAg loss. The cumulative incidences of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion at 3, 5, 10 years after peginterferon treatment were 4.7%, 9.4%, 14.2%, and 3.5%, 6.4%, 12.5%, respectively, in overall patients, and 15.9%, 29.1%, 37.3%, and 13.1%, 19%, 30.6%, respectively, in patients achieving sustained off-treatment virological response (SVR). By multivariate analysis, age (<35 years; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.742, P = .007), baseline HBsAg levels (<1250 IU/mL; HR = 4.849, P = .002), HBsAg decline at week 24 (≥1 log; HR = 5.660, P = .002), and achieving SVR (HR = 8.546, P = .006) were predictors of HBsAg loss. After achieving SVR, HBsAg loss rates were higher than 30% in 5 years among patients with either younger age or lower HBsAg at baseline. Conclusions: HBsAg loss rate continues to increase after peginterferon treatment in HBeAg-negative CHB patients with SVR. Age, baseline HBsAg levels, on-treatment HBsAg decline, and achieving SVR are factors associated with long-term HBsAg loss.

Nucleos(t)ide Analogs Do Not Independently Influence Hepatic Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension beyond Viral Suppression in CBDL-Induced Cirrhotic Rat.

Chronic hepatitis is the major cause of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Several factors affect portal pressure, including liver fibrosis, splanchnic vasodilatation, and pathologic angiogenesis. Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs), the oral antiviral agents, effectively attenuate chronic hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension via viral suppression and alleviation of hepatitis. On the other hand, NUCs affect tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and nitric oxide, which participate in fibrogenesis, vasodilatation, and angiogenesis. However, whether NUCs independently influence liver fibrosis and portal hypertension beyond viral suppression is unknown. This study thus aimed to evaluate the influences of three frequently used NUCs in rats with nonviral cirrhosis. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received common bile duct ligation (CBDL) to induce cholestatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The rats were randomly allocated into four groups, treated by mouth with lamivudine (30 mg/kg per day), entecavir (0.09 mg/kg per day), tenofovir (50 mg/kg per day), or distilled water (vehicle control) from the 15th day after CBDL. On the 29th day, liver cirrhosis- and portal hypertension-related parameters were evaluated. The results showed that chronic NUCs treatment did not affect hemodynamic parameters, plasma TNF-α concentration, and hepatic fibrogenesis protein expressions in rats with nonviral cirrhosis. Though the mesenteric VEGF receptor 2 phosphorylation was downregulated in NUCs-treated groups, the splanchnic angiogenesis was not influenced. In conclusion, lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir had no additional effects on liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension in rats with nonviral cirrhosis.

Oral capnography is more effective than nasal capnography during sedative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

The role of capnography in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is controversial. Simultaneous supplemental oxygen, position of patient, open mouth breathing pattern, and anatomy of the oral and nasal cavity can influence capnography accuracy. This study first measured capnographic data via the nasal or oral cavity during sedated EGD. Secondly, we investigated the influence of supplementary oxygen through the oral cavity on the capnographic reading. Patients with ASA class I or II status admitted for routine EGD exams were enrolled. End-tidal carbon dioxide measurements were performed simultaneously via nasal catheter and oral catheter with standard oral bite and nasal cannula supplementary oxygen when the patient is awake, during sedation and during sedation with endoscopy. The influence of oral supplementary oxygen, oral capnography were recorded using a mandibular advancement bite block. One hundred and four patients were enrolled. Breathing in the conscious patient is conducted primarily via the nostrils (95%). When sedated with endoscope placement, the percentage of nasal breathing decreased significantly to 47% and oral capnography sufficiently captured data in 100% of patients. Supplementary oral oxygen decreased oral capnographic measurement significantly (38.89 ± 7.148 vs. 30.73 ± 7.84, p < 0.001). However, the measurements using the MA bite block did not differ from oral cavity catheter (28.86 ± 8.51 vs. 30.73 ± 7.839, p = 0.321). The conscious patient breathes mostly nasally while the sedated patient breathes mostly orally during EGD when an oral bite is in place. Capnography measurement via oral cannula increases the measurement accuracy and efficacy. Oral supplementary oxygen may decrease capnographic measurement but still provide sufficient reading for interpretation.

The safety and probable therapeutic effect of routine use of antibiotics and simultaneously treating bleeding gastric varices by using endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and concomitant esophageal varices with banding ligation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal varices are the most common type of gastric varices. Although endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is the current treatment of choice for acute gastric variceal bleeding, whether the concomitant esophageal varices should be ligated simultaneously with the first treatment session is currently not known. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and probable therapeutic effect of simultaneous cyanoacrylate injection for bleeding gastric varices obliteration (GVO) and endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for concomitant esophageal varices in combination with routine antibiotics (simultaneous group), and to compare our results with historical results in which the patients underwent GVO first and then EBL for concomitant esophageal varices (separate group). DESIGN: A single-center pilot study. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with liver cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices, who presented with acute gastric varices bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: Simultaneous treatment in the form of GVO and EBL for concomitant esophageal varices in combination with routine antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Rebleeding and mortality within the first year of index bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty patients in the simultaneous group and 67 patients in the separate group were included in the study. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The hemostasis of active bleeding was 100% in both groups (7/7 vs 20/20). The 1-year rebleeding rate was 10% (2/20) in the simultaneous group and 37.31% (25/67) in the separate group (P = .041). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher probability of remaining free of rebleeding in the simultaneous group (88.5% vs 61.1%; P = .044). Multivariate analysis indicated that treatment method (separate group) and high model for end-stage liver disease score (> or = 13) were independent risk factors of rebleeding in 1 year. The treatment failure, complications, 1-year mortality, and survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous endoscopic treatment for gastric varices bleeding and concomitant esophageal varices is a safe and effective procedure in combination with antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with cirrhosis. The 1-year mortality rate was similar between the 2 groups. The results need further validation.

A randomized trial of endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for acute gastric variceal bleeding: 0.5 mL versus 1.0 mL.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is the preferred method to treat acute gastric variceal bleeding (GVB). However, its rebleeding rate remains high. OBJECTIVE: To compare an injection containing 0.5 mL of cyanoacrylate (group A) with an injection containing 1.0 mL of cyanoacrylate (group B). DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Occurrence of rebleeding. PATIENTS: Patients with acute gastric variceal bleeding. RESULTS: Forty-four patients in group A and 47 patients in group B were studied; their clinical characteristics were similar. The treatment stopped active bleeding in approximately 90% of cases in both groups. The rebleeding rate was 29.8% (14/47) in group B compared with 38.6% (17/44) in group A (P = .504; 95% CI, -10.592 to 28.280). On multivariate analysis, concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma, infection, and the size of the gastric varices were independent determinants of rebleeding. More patients in group B than in group A had postinjection fever (>37.5 degrees C) (23/47 vs 12/44, P = .059). Treatment failure, complications, 30-day mortality, and survival did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small number of study patients, a double dose of cyanoacrylate injection for GVB cannot be proven to have better hemostatic efficacy than a single dose. Multicenter studies with larger patient numbers are necessary to determine whether a double dose is in fact more efficacious.

A 12-week rescue therapy by PrOD-based regimen for advanced fibrotic genotype-1 CHC patients who failed to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) evolved rapidly due to the invention of interferon-free direct antiviral agents. Previous clinical trials showed combination therapy with paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir (PrOD) with or without ribavirin (RBV) can cure over 95% of genotype 1 CHC patients, regardless with cirrhosis or not. However, real-world data regarding the efficacy and safety of PrOD-based therapy in Asian HCV genotype 1 CHC patients are limited, especially for advanced-fibrotic patients who failed previous therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus RBV. METHODS: Between January and October 2017, 60 advanced fibrotic (≥F3) genotype 1 CHC patients who failed previous therapy with PEG-IFN and received PrOD-based therapy for 12 weeks were retrospectively enrolled. Weight-based RBV 800 to 1200 mg/d was added for genotype 1b patients with cirrhosis and all genotype 1a patients. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined by undetectable HCV RNA at the end and 12 weeks after the completion of therapy. RESULTS: The mean age was 63.2 ± 9.3 years, 26 (43.3%) of them were males and 20 (33.3%) were diagnosed to have liver cirrhosis. The mean baseline HCV RNA level was 6.19 ± 0.88 log10 IU/mL and 86.7% (52/60) of patients were infected by HCV genotype 1b. After PrOD-based therapy, the rates undetectable HCV RNA (<15 IU/mL) at week 2, 4, and 12 were 61.7%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively; 69.6% (16/23) of patients with detectable HCV RNA at week 2 were < 100 IU/mL. Pruritus, fatigue, headache, insomnia, and dizziness were the most common patient-reported adverse events. Grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia were found in 21.6% (13/60) of patients during study period and all belonged to unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. After posttherapy follow up, all 60 patients (100%) achieved SVR. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data in Taiwan revealed that PrOD-based rescue therapy is well-tolerated and highly effective for genotype 1 CHC patients with advanced fibrosis failing previous therapy with PEG-IFN plus RBV.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Mandibular Advancement Bite Block Decrease Hypoxic Events during Sedative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

During sedated endoscopic examinations, upper airway obstruction occurs. Nasal breathing often shifts to oral breathing during open mouth esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) which delivers humidified 100% oxygen at 30 L min-1 may prevent hypoxemia. A mandibular advancement (MA) bite block with oxygen inlet directed to both mouth and nose may prevent airway obstruction during sedated EGD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these airway devices versus standard management. One hundred and eighty-nine patients were assessed for eligibility. One hundred and fifty-three were enrolled. This study randomly assigned eligible patients to three arms: the standard bite block and standard nasal cannula, HFNC, and MA bite block groups. EGD was performed after anaesthetic induction. The primary endpoint was the oxygen desaturation area under curve at 90% (AUCDesat). The secondary endpoints were percentage of patients with hypoxic, upper airway obstruction, and apnoeic and rescue events. One hundred and fifty-three patients were enrolled. AUCdesat was significantly lower for HFNC and MA bite blocks versus the standard management (p= 0.019). The HFNC reduced hypoxic events by 18% despite similar airway obstruction and apnoeic events as standard group. The MA bite block reduced hypoxic events by 12% and airway obstructions by 32%. The HFNC and MA groups both showed a 16% and 14% reduction in the number of patients who received rescue intervention, respectively, compared to the standard group. The HFNC and MA bite block may both reduce degree and duration of hypoxemia. HFNC may decrease hypoxemic events while maintaining nasal patency is crucial during sedative EGD. The MA bite block may prevent airway obstruction and decrease the need for rescue intervention.

Pyogenic portal vein thrombosis as a reservoir of persistent septicemia after cyanoacrylate injection for bleeding gastric varices.

Gastric variceal bleeding is a serious complication of liver cirrhosis. A recent consensus suggested that endoscopic injection of tissue glue for gastric variceal obliteration (GVO) should be the first choice for treatment of acute gastric variceal bleeding. Following the widespread use of GVO, more severe complications such as needle cementation, fistula formation, embolic sequels, recurrent septicemia, etc., have been reported. We present the first case of GVO-complicated pyogenic portosplenic vein thrombosis which led to persistent Klebsiella pneumoniae septicemia. The foreign body of a glue plug offers an ideal surface for bacterial colonization which becomes a reservoir for continuous bacterial dissemination. The mechanism was proven by ribotyping of the microorganism and postmortem pathology.

Esophageal food impaction: a homemade suction tube attached to esophagogastroduodenoscopy for food bolus removal.

The most common esophageal foreign body in adults is impacted food bolus. Polypectomy snares, Dormia baskets, retrieval nets, rat-tooth forceps, alligator forceps or polyp graspers are usually used to remove it. Here, we report the case of a 78-year-old woman whose esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed a firm goose liver impacted tightly in the lower esophagus; all of the above-mentioned retrieval instruments could not remove it. We used a homemade device by attaching a modified nasogastric tube to an EGD and successfully removed the goose liver by suction under endoscopic visualization. The method is very effective to remove firm and tightly impacted materials in a narrow lumen. When the usual retrieval instruments fail, a homemade suction tube attached to an EGD is an alternative.

Citrus reticulata peel improves patient tolerance of low-volume polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate adjuncts help to reduce the volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) needed, to ameliorate patient discomfort, and to improve colonic visibility during colonoscopy. This study aimed to assess the effect of Citrus reticulata peel (CRP) as an adjunct to low-volume PEG for colonic preparation. METHODS: A total of 1092 health examination examinees received colonoscopy during the study period. After excluding those who refused to participate and those who did not meet our criteria, 212 examinees were enrolled into this study. They were divided into the PEG group and the PEG + CRP group according to their date of examination. All examinees received 2 L of PEG-ELS one day before colonoscopy. The PEG + CRP group also received additional CRP in the form of a "buccal tablet" between drinks. Tolerance and adverse events were assessed by questionnaire, while the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy was scored by an endoscopist. RESULTS: There were 107 examinees in the PEG group and 105 examinees in the PEG + CRP group. The demographic characteristics of the examinees were comparable between these two groups. Examinees in the PEG + CRP group had a trend of better colonic visibility than those in the PEG group (p = 0.056). Moreover, examinees in the PEG + CRP group had higher rate of acceptable taste (p = 0.015) and lower rate of difficulty swallowing (p = 0.001). The incidences of adverse events including vomiting (p = 0.045), bloating (p = 0.035), and difficulty sleeping (p < 0.001) were also significantly lower in the PEG + CRP group. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional colonic preparation, the application of CRP as an adjunct could improve examinees' tolerance, decrease the incidence of adverse events, and maintain the quality of colonic cleansing.

A randomized trial of endoscopic treatment of acute gastric variceal hemorrhage: N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection versus band ligation.

Progression of gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH) is poorer than esophageal variceal bleeding. However, data on its optimal treatment are limited. We designed a prospective study to compare the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (GVL) and endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection (GVO). Liver patients with cirrhosis with or without concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and patients presenting with acute GVH were randomized into two treatment groups. Forty-eight patients received GVL, and another 49 patients received GVO. Both treatments were equally successful in controlling active bleeding (14/15 vs. 14/15, P = 1.000). More of the patients who underwent GVL had GV rebleeding (GVL vs. GVO, 21/48 vs. 11/49; P = .044). The 2-year and 3-year cumulative rate of GV rebleeding were 63.1% and 72.3% for GVL, and 26.8% for both periods with GVO; P = .0143, log-rank test. The rebleeding risk of GVL was sustained throughout the entire follow-up period. Multivariate Cox regression indicated that concomitance with HCC (relative hazard: 2.453, 95% CI: 1.036-5.806, P = .041) and the treatment method (GVL vs. GVO, relative hazard: 2.660, 95% CI: 1.167-6.061, P = .020) were independent factors predictive of GV rebleeding. There was no difference in survival between the two groups. Severe complications attributable to these two treatments were rare. In conclusion, the efficacy of GVL to control active GVH appears not different to GVO, but GVO is associated with a lower GV rebleeding rate.