Influence of the Milliamperage and Artifact Reduction Tool on the CBCT-Based Diagnosis of Buccal and Lingual Peri-implant Dehiscences: Comparison Between Two Types of Implants.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the milliamperage and artifact reduction (AR) tool on the diagnosis of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscences related to titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants using CBCT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ti-Zr and Zr implants were alternately inserted in 20 sites in the posterior region of three human mandibles that presented intact cortical (control) bones or simulated buccal and/or lingual peri-implant dehiscences. CBCT images were acquired with an OP300 Maxio unit, varied milliamperage (5 and 8 mA), and the use of AR tool. Three oral radiologists assessed the presence of dehiscences using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (Az), sensitivity, and specificity of each group (control and dehiscence) were obtained and compared using multiway ANOVA (α = .05). RESULTS: The milliamperage and the AR tool did not influence the diagnosis of dehiscences, and there were no differences between the buccal and lingual cortices (P > .05). However, Zr implants showed a higher sensitivity (0.67 to 0.89) and lower specificity (0.26 to 0.44) than Ti-Zr implants (0.19 to 0.44 and 0.93 to 1.00, respectively; P < .05). Az values did not differ between the implant types (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Dehiscences were more detectable when related to Zr implants, while the absence of dehiscences was more correctly visualized adjacent to Ti-Zr implants. The use of varied milliamperages and the AR tool did not affect the diagnosis of peri-implant dehiscences, regardless of the involved cortical (buccal or lingual) bones.

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05). Results: The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values (P>0.05). The material of the implant did not influence the ROC curve values (P>0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity were statistically significantly influenced by the implant material (P<0.05) with Zr implants showing higher sensitivity values and lower specificity values than Ti-Zr implants. Conclusion: The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.