Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 21(6): 757-60, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20062976

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We present a pure transvaginal approach to the removal of eroded mesh and a retained foreign body involving the bladder secondary to placement of transvaginal mesh for management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using a mesh kit. METHODS: Transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving the bladder after mesh placement using a prolapse kit was performed. A U-shaped incision was made in the anterior vaginal wall; mesh was identified, divided in the midline, and then dissected from the bladder. Additionally, a retained foreign body was removed from the bladder. The bladder was closed in three layers transvaginally. RESULTS: Removal of eroded mesh and foreign body within the bladder was completed with all operative steps performed transvaginally. Follow-up cystogram was normal. There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal removal of mesh erosion and retained foreign body involving the bladder is feasible and allows for rapid return to normal function.


Assuntos
Migração de Corpo Estranho/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Erros Médicos , Satisfação do Paciente , Polipropilenos/efeitos adversos , Tampões de Gaze Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirurgia
3.
Updates Surg ; 64(1): 53-7, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21894558

RESUMO

Uterine prolapse is one of the common reasons for hysterectomy throughout the world. However, recent data has shown that uterine-sparing techniques appear to be equivocal to that of hysterectomy. Older reports of intra-abdominal uterine suspension describe open approaches and more recent descriptions involve robotic and laparoscopic approaches utilizing mesh. We describe the first reported laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) sacral hysteropexy utilizing a strip of polypropylene mesh placed posteriorly on the uterus and attached to the sacral promontory. A 45-year-old female with grade 3 uterine prolapse, cystocele, and rectocele underwent the procedure. The procedure involved access utilizing a single-port system placed transumbilically, and dissection using articulating laparoscopic instruments. The hysteropexy was completed by placing a 3-cm wide strip of polypropylene mesh along the posterior vaginal wall and cervicouterine junction, and suturing the proximal end to the anterior longitudinal ligament overlying the sacral promontory. The patient was discharged home within 18 h of the procedure. At 6 month follow-up, the patient has excellent anatomic support, with no evidence for recurrence of prolapse. LESS hysteropexy appears to be a safe, effective procedure for uterine prolapse and provides patients with excellent outcome with no visible scar. Additional studies will determine whether the LESS approach provides any benefit when compared with robotic or traditional laparoscopic approaches with respect to blood loss, pain, and time of full recovery.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Telas Cirúrgicas , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polipropilenos , Técnicas de Sutura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA