Long-term follow-up after reimplantation of tumorous mandible bone treated with combination of decalcification and lyophilization.

Mandibular resection requires reconstruction, with often unsatisfactory morphofunctional results. Reimplantation of the resected mandible itself is one of ideal solutions to this problem. However, both devitalization of tumor cells involved in resected bone and preservation of osteoinductive activity are required for successful results. Lyophilization appears to enable devitalization of tumor cells, and decalcified bone implants are likely to have osteoinductive potential. Accordingly, we speculated that decalcification and lyophilization of resected bone would be an appropriate method for mandibular reconstruction. However, there is no study on the reimplantation of mandibles treated with these methods to date. The purpose of this study was to estimate the long-term follow-up of reimplanted mandibles treated with decalcification and lyophilization. Presented here are 2 patients of reimplanted mandibles treated by decalcification and lyophilization who were followed up for 8 and 9 years. We observed a good incorporation of the graft in 1 case, but severe absorption in the other. Our results suggest that treatment with decalcification and lyophilization is 1 strategy for reimplantation of the resected bone in mandibular reconstruction, but further study is needed to prevent absorption of the reimplanted bone over the long term.

Reconstruction of the mandible bone by treatment of resected bone with pasteurization.

The results of long-term follow-up for reimplantation of the mandibular bone treated with pasteurization are reported. Mandibulectomy was performed for mandibular malignancy in 3 cases. The resected bones were subsequently reimplanted after treatment with pasteurization in 3 cases to eradicate tumor cells involved in the resected bone. Although postoperative infection was observed in 2 of 3 cases, reimplantation of the resected mandibular bone treated by pasteurization was finally successful. Ten to 22 years of follow-up was carried out. Pasteurization was able to devitalize tumor cells involved in the resected bone and to preserve bone-inductive activity. Reimplantation of pasteurization could be a useful strategy for reconstruction of the mandible in patients with mandibular malignancy.

Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by using axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction for third molar surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-seven impacted third molars in 41 patients were found in close association with the mandibular canal during a panoramic radiographic assessment. The relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal was evaluated by using computed tomography and compared in terms of operative exposure of the inferior alveolar nerve and postoperative labial dysesthesia. RESULTS: Twenty-four (51%) mandibular canals were buccal relative to the third molar, 12 were lingual, 9 were inferior, and 2 were between roots. At the time of the surgical procedure, the inferior alveolar nerve was visible in 7 patients. Postoperative lower lip dysesthesia occurred in 1 patient whose mandibular canal was in the lingual position. CONCLUSIONS: Axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction provides useful information to surgeons regarding the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal.