Impacts of seasonality and operating conditions on algal-dual osmosis membrane system for potable water reuse: Part 2.

This study investigated the impact of seasonal variation and operating conditions on recovery of potable quality water from municipal wastewater effluent using an integrated algal treatment process with a dual forward osmosis (FO)-reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system. Pilot study of the algal process treating primary effluent validated the technical viability and seasonal performance during warm weather (May to October, 25-55 °C) using an extremophilic algal strain Galdieria sulphuraria, and during cold weather (November to April, 4-17 °C) using polyculture strains of algae and bacteria. Algal effluents from both seasons were used as the feed solution for the laboratory FO-RO study. In addition, pilot-scale FO-RO experiments were conducted to compare the system performance during treatment of algal effluent and secondary effluent from the conventional treatment facility. At 90% water recovery, the FO-RO achieved over 90% overall rejection of major ions and organic matter using the bench-scale system and over 99% rejection of all contaminants in pilot-scale studies. Detailed water quality analysis indicated that the product water from the integrated system met both the primary and secondary drinking water standards. This study demonstrated that the FO-RO system can be engineered as a viable alternative to treat algal effluent and secondary effluent for potable water reuse independent of seasonal variations and operating conditions.

Clinical crown length of the maxillary anterior teeth preorthodontics and postorthodontics.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence information on excessive gingival display in postorthodontic patients is limited. By studying the size relationship of the clinical crowns of teeth, in an orthodontic population, we can begin to quantify their need for periodontal plastic surgery. METHODS: Preorthodontic and postorthodontic crown dimensions were measured on 200 plaster models, and after 5 years, 31 of the subjects were recalled to repeat the measurements in a clinical examination. The measurements included clinical crown lengths and widths of the six anterior teeth, and these values were compared to known ideals. RESULTS: This study revealed a significant increase in the length of the maxillary anterior crowns over the three examinations, yet these values were still approximately 1.5 mm shorter than ideal. The mean crown width-to-length ratio was 87% to 88% for maxillary central incisors, clearly above the accepted "ideal." In addition, 61% to 71% of maxillary central incisors exceeded allowable crown width-to-length ratios, and 61% of subjects displayed asymmetry in gingival architecture. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study only examined one aspect of excessive gingival display, to our knowledge it is the first study to show that in a predominantly young, postorthodontic population, the prevalence of non-ideal width-to-length ratios is >65% and the presence of asymmetry is >60%. Therefore, close interaction between the periodontist and the orthodontist is necessary to diagnose these conditions to provide patients with all options for improving their smile.